Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Urology 6/2013

01-12-2013 | Original Article

Unfavorable outcomes of laparoscopic pyeloplasty using barbed sutures: a multi-center experience

Authors: Evangelos Liatsikos, Thomas Knoll, Iason Kyriazis, Ioannis Georgiopoulos, Panagiotis Kallidonis, Patrick Honeck, Jens Uwe Stolzenburg

Published in: World Journal of Urology | Issue 6/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Barbed self-retaining sutures (SRS) have been introduced as an advance in suture technology, facilitating reconstructive laparoscopic surgery. We present the experience of three centers performing laparoscopic pyeloplasty with the use of SRS.

Methods

Preoperative, intraoperative and follow-up data were collected for 6 patients undergoing pyeloplasty using the Quill SRS (Angiotech, Vancouver, CAN) in three centers. Standard laparoscopic pyeloplasty technique was used and a knot-less continuous anastomosis between the spatulated ureter and the renal pelvis was created.

Results

Knot-less uretero-pelvic anastomosis creation was feasible in all six cases. Peri-operative data were similar to standard pyeloplasty using conventional suture materials. A very high stricture recurrence rate (5/6 patients) was noted during follow-up. Further endourologic and open interventions were needed to address the recurrence of the strictures.

Conclusions

Knotless intracorporeal laparoscopic suturing using SRS for the reconstruction of UPJ during laparoscopic pyeloplasty is associated with high rates of stricture recurrence at least in the initial cases of each surgeon. Until further investigations elucidate the cause of treatment failure, SRS should not be recommended for upper urinary tract reconstruction.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Weld KJ, Ames CD, Hruby G et al (2006) Evaluation of a novel knotless self-anchoring suture material for urinary tract reconstruction. Urology 67(6):1133–1137PubMedCrossRef Weld KJ, Ames CD, Hruby G et al (2006) Evaluation of a novel knotless self-anchoring suture material for urinary tract reconstruction. Urology 67(6):1133–1137PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Shikanov S, Wille M, Large M et al (2009) Knotless closure of the collecting system and renal parenchyma with a novel barbed suture during laparoscopic porcine partial nephrectomy. J Endour 23(7):1157–1160CrossRef Shikanov S, Wille M, Large M et al (2009) Knotless closure of the collecting system and renal parenchyma with a novel barbed suture during laparoscopic porcine partial nephrectomy. J Endour 23(7):1157–1160CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Zorn KC, Trinh QD, Jeldres C et al (2012) Prospective randomized trial of barbed polyglyconate suture to facilitate vesico-urethral anastomosis during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: time reduction and cost benefit. BJU Int 109(10):1526–1532PubMedCrossRef Zorn KC, Trinh QD, Jeldres C et al (2012) Prospective randomized trial of barbed polyglyconate suture to facilitate vesico-urethral anastomosis during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: time reduction and cost benefit. BJU Int 109(10):1526–1532PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Williams SB, Alemozaffar M, Lei Y et al (2010) Randomized controlled trial of barbed polyglyconate versus polyglactin suture for robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy anastomosis: technique and outcomes. Eur Urol 58(6):875–881PubMedCrossRef Williams SB, Alemozaffar M, Lei Y et al (2010) Randomized controlled trial of barbed polyglyconate versus polyglactin suture for robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy anastomosis: technique and outcomes. Eur Urol 58(6):875–881PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Sammon J, Kim TK, Trinh QD et al (2011) Anastomosis during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: randomized controlled trial comparing barbed and standard monofilament suture. Urology 78(3):572–579PubMedCrossRef Sammon J, Kim TK, Trinh QD et al (2011) Anastomosis during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: randomized controlled trial comparing barbed and standard monofilament suture. Urology 78(3):572–579PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Tewari AK, Srivastava A, Sooriakumaran P et al (2010) Use of a novel absorbable barbed plastic surgical suture enables a “self-cinching” technique of vesicourethral anastomosis during robot-assisted prostatectomy and improves anastomotic times. J Endourol 24(10):1645–1650PubMedCrossRef Tewari AK, Srivastava A, Sooriakumaran P et al (2010) Use of a novel absorbable barbed plastic surgical suture enables a “self-cinching” technique of vesicourethral anastomosis during robot-assisted prostatectomy and improves anastomotic times. J Endourol 24(10):1645–1650PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kaul S, Sammon J, Bhandari A et al (2010) A novel method of urethrovesical anastomosis during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy using a unidirectional barbed wound closure device: feasibility study and early outcomes in 51 patients. J Endourol 24(11):1789–1793PubMedCrossRef Kaul S, Sammon J, Bhandari A et al (2010) A novel method of urethrovesical anastomosis during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy using a unidirectional barbed wound closure device: feasibility study and early outcomes in 51 patients. J Endourol 24(11):1789–1793PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Manganiello M, Kenney P, Canes D et al (2012) Unidirectional barbed suture versus standard monofilament for urethrovesical anastomosis during robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Int Braz J Urol 38(1):89–96PubMedCrossRef Manganiello M, Kenney P, Canes D et al (2012) Unidirectional barbed suture versus standard monofilament for urethrovesical anastomosis during robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Int Braz J Urol 38(1):89–96PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Greenberg J (2008) Quill™ self-retaining system. Rev. Obstet Gynecol 1(4):201–202 Greenberg J (2008) Quill™ self-retaining system. Rev. Obstet Gynecol 1(4):201–202
10.
go back to reference Herrmann TR, Liatsikos EN, Nagele U et al (2012) EAU guidelines on laser technologies. Eur Urol 61(4):783–795PubMedCrossRef Herrmann TR, Liatsikos EN, Nagele U et al (2012) EAU guidelines on laser technologies. Eur Urol 61(4):783–795PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Unfavorable outcomes of laparoscopic pyeloplasty using barbed sutures: a multi-center experience
Authors
Evangelos Liatsikos
Thomas Knoll
Iason Kyriazis
Ioannis Georgiopoulos
Panagiotis Kallidonis
Patrick Honeck
Jens Uwe Stolzenburg
Publication date
01-12-2013
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
World Journal of Urology / Issue 6/2013
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Electronic ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-012-1019-6

Other articles of this Issue 6/2013

World Journal of Urology 6/2013 Go to the issue