Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Urology 4/2013

Open Access 01-08-2013 | Original Article

Impact of ureteral stenting prior to ureterorenoscopy on stone-free rates and complications

Authors: P. P. Lumma, P. Schneider, A. Strauss, K. D. Plothe, P. Thelen, R. H. Ringert, H. Loertzer

Published in: World Journal of Urology | Issue 4/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To date, only few studies have evaluated the impact of ureteral stenting prior to ureterorenoscopy. This study is to clarify the role of preoperative ureteral stenting in the treatment for ureteral stones.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 550 ureterorenoscopies from 1998 to 2008. Patients were classified into two groups depending on whether they had a stent placed before URS. Baseline characteristics of patients and stone properties, stone-free rates, complications, and operation times were compared between both groups. Subanalysis was performed regarding stone localization. We retrospectively reviewed data from patient documentation, X-ray imagery, intravenous urography, and operation reports.

Results

Baseline characteristics of patients were similar in both groups. The majority of patients underwent stent placement before the ureteroscopic stone treatment (88.4%). The mean operation time in the prestented group was longer (43.3 vs. 38.4 min). Stone-free rate of patients with stent was 72.2%, compared to 59.4% without preoperative stenting. The rate of minor complications was 4.7% with stent versus 9.4% without stent, major complications 0.6% versus 1.6%, respectively. Patients with distal ureter stones had similar stone-free rates regardless of a stent placement (90.1% with stent vs. 87.6% without), and no difference in complication rates was observed (3.5% with stent vs. 3.1% without), respectively.

Conclusions

Stent placement prior to ureteroscopic stone treatment in distal ureter is not reasonable and does not considerably improve stone-free rates.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Chander J, Dangi AD, Gupta N et al (2010) Evaluation of the role of preoperative double-j ureteral stenting in retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy. Surg Endosc 24(7):1722–1726PubMedCrossRef Chander J, Dangi AD, Gupta N et al (2010) Evaluation of the role of preoperative double-j ureteral stenting in retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy. Surg Endosc 24(7):1722–1726PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Corcoran AT, Smaldone MC, Mally D et al (2008) When is prior ureteral stent placement necessary to access the upper urinary tract in prepubertal children? J Urol 180(4 Suppl):1861–1863 (discussion 1863–1864) Corcoran AT, Smaldone MC, Mally D et al (2008) When is prior ureteral stent placement necessary to access the upper urinary tract in prepubertal children? J Urol 180(4 Suppl):1861–1863 (discussion 1863–1864)
3.
go back to reference Gerber GS, Stockton BR (2006) Use of stents after ureteroscopic stone removal. J Endourol 20(6):383–385PubMedCrossRef Gerber GS, Stockton BR (2006) Use of stents after ureteroscopic stone removal. J Endourol 20(6):383–385PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Hubert KC, Palmer JS (2005) Passive dilation by ureteral stenting before ureteroscopy: eliminating the need for active dilation. J Urol 174(3):1079–1080 (discussion 1080) Hubert KC, Palmer JS (2005) Passive dilation by ureteral stenting before ureteroscopy: eliminating the need for active dilation. J Urol 174(3):1079–1080 (discussion 1080)
5.
go back to reference Knoll T (2009) Arbeitskreis Harnsteine der Akademie der Deutschen Urologen, Arbeitskreis Endourologie und Steinerkrankung der Osterreichischen Gesellschaft fuer Urologie. S2 guidelines on diagnostic, therapy and metaphylaxis of urolithiasis : part 1: diagnostic and therapy. Urologe A 48(8):917–924PubMedCrossRef Knoll T (2009) Arbeitskreis Harnsteine der Akademie der Deutschen Urologen, Arbeitskreis Endourologie und Steinerkrankung der Osterreichischen Gesellschaft fuer Urologie. S2 guidelines on diagnostic, therapy and metaphylaxis of urolithiasis : part 1: diagnostic and therapy. Urologe A 48(8):917–924PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Musa AAK (2008) Use of double-j stents prior to extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is not beneficial: results of a prospective randomized study. Int Urol Nephrol 40(1):19–22PubMedCrossRef Musa AAK (2008) Use of double-j stents prior to extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is not beneficial: results of a prospective randomized study. Int Urol Nephrol 40(1):19–22PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Preminger GM, Tiselius HG, Assimos DG et al (2007) Guideline for the management of ureteral calculi. J Urol 178(6):2418–2434PubMedCrossRef Preminger GM, Tiselius HG, Assimos DG et al (2007) Guideline for the management of ureteral calculi. J Urol 178(6):2418–2434PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Rubenstein RA, Zhao LC, Loeb S et al (2007) Prestenting improves ureteroscopic stone-free rates. J Endourol 21(11):1277–1280PubMedCrossRef Rubenstein RA, Zhao LC, Loeb S et al (2007) Prestenting improves ureteroscopic stone-free rates. J Endourol 21(11):1277–1280PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Shields JM, Bird VG, Graves R et al (2009) Impact of preoperative ureteral stenting on outcome of ureteroscopic treatment for urinary lithiasis. J Urol 182(6):2768–2774PubMedCrossRef Shields JM, Bird VG, Graves R et al (2009) Impact of preoperative ureteral stenting on outcome of ureteroscopic treatment for urinary lithiasis. J Urol 182(6):2768–2774PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Unsal A, Cimentepe E, Balbay MD (2004) Routine ureteral dilatation is not necessary for ureteroscopy. Int Urol Nephrol 36(4):503–506PubMedCrossRef Unsal A, Cimentepe E, Balbay MD (2004) Routine ureteral dilatation is not necessary for ureteroscopy. Int Urol Nephrol 36(4):503–506PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Impact of ureteral stenting prior to ureterorenoscopy on stone-free rates and complications
Authors
P. P. Lumma
P. Schneider
A. Strauss
K. D. Plothe
P. Thelen
R. H. Ringert
H. Loertzer
Publication date
01-08-2013
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
World Journal of Urology / Issue 4/2013
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Electronic ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-011-0789-6

Other articles of this Issue 4/2013

World Journal of Urology 4/2013 Go to the issue