Published in:
Open Access
01-08-2013 | Original Article
Impact of ureteral stenting prior to ureterorenoscopy on stone-free rates and complications
Authors:
P. P. Lumma, P. Schneider, A. Strauss, K. D. Plothe, P. Thelen, R. H. Ringert, H. Loertzer
Published in:
World Journal of Urology
|
Issue 4/2013
Login to get access
Abstract
Objective
To date, only few studies have evaluated the impact of ureteral stenting prior to ureterorenoscopy. This study is to clarify the role of preoperative ureteral stenting in the treatment for ureteral stones.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed 550 ureterorenoscopies from 1998 to 2008. Patients were classified into two groups depending on whether they had a stent placed before URS. Baseline characteristics of patients and stone properties, stone-free rates, complications, and operation times were compared between both groups. Subanalysis was performed regarding stone localization. We retrospectively reviewed data from patient documentation, X-ray imagery, intravenous urography, and operation reports.
Results
Baseline characteristics of patients were similar in both groups. The majority of patients underwent stent placement before the ureteroscopic stone treatment (88.4%). The mean operation time in the prestented group was longer (43.3 vs. 38.4 min). Stone-free rate of patients with stent was 72.2%, compared to 59.4% without preoperative stenting. The rate of minor complications was 4.7% with stent versus 9.4% without stent, major complications 0.6% versus 1.6%, respectively. Patients with distal ureter stones had similar stone-free rates regardless of a stent placement (90.1% with stent vs. 87.6% without), and no difference in complication rates was observed (3.5% with stent vs. 3.1% without), respectively.
Conclusions
Stent placement prior to ureteroscopic stone treatment in distal ureter is not reasonable and does not considerably improve stone-free rates.