Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Urology 5/2011

01-10-2011 | Topic paper

Computerized transrectal ultrasound of the prostate in a multicenter setup (C-TRUS-MS): detection of cancer after multiple negative systematic random and in primary biopsies

Authors: Bjoern Grabski, Leif Baeurle, Annemie Loch, Bjoern Wefer, Udo Paul, Tillmann Loch

Published in: World Journal of Urology | Issue 5/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To improve prostate cancer diagnostic imaging, a computer-based analysis of the transrectal ultrasound signal (C-TRUS) was developed. Until recently, the C-TRUS existed only as a stand-alone device. Now, C-TRUS was developed into a network-compatible module (C-TRUS-MS). This new technology allows users to transmit C-TRUS images from any internet platform to C-TRUS-MS investigation. After analysis, the cancer-suspicious marked images are then retransmitted via internet. Targeted biopsies can then be taken at the urologists’ office remotely.

Materials and methods

This prospective study investigates whether the rates of prostate cancer detection with C-TRUS-MS “multicenter online” are comparable with those achieved by the stand-alone unit. In addition to patients with a history of multiple systematic random biopsies, a group of patients who had not undergone systematic random biopsies were analyzed.

Results

A total of 1,545 digital images (2–23 per patient, median 6) from 57 urologists were transmitted to the analysis center. After analysis, the color-coded images were sent back electronically and utilized for a maximum of six targeted biopsies. C-TRUS-MS was able to detect prostate cancer in 91 patients.
In addition, we evaluated 75 patients without any previous random biopsies. In this group, C-TRUS-MS was able to detect prostate cancer in 31 out of 75 patients (41%).

Conclusion

The results indicate that C-TRUS-MS “online” achieves similar results as the stand-alone system, independent of the user even with little experience in the method. Furthermore, C-TRUS-MS for the first time is able to detect carcinomas in patients without prior biopsies in a high number by taking only six targeted biopsies.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Potosky AL, Miller BA, Albertson PC, Kramer BS (1995) The role of increasing detection in the rising incidence of prostate cancer. JAMA 273:548–552PubMedCrossRef Potosky AL, Miller BA, Albertson PC, Kramer BS (1995) The role of increasing detection in the rising incidence of prostate cancer. JAMA 273:548–552PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Cooner WH, Mosley BR, Rutherford C, Beard JH, Pond HS, Terry WJ, Igel TC, Kidd DD (1990) Prostate cancer detection in a clinical urological practice by ultrasonography, digital rectal examination and prostate speciWc antigen. J Urol 143:1146–1154PubMed Cooner WH, Mosley BR, Rutherford C, Beard JH, Pond HS, Terry WJ, Igel TC, Kidd DD (1990) Prostate cancer detection in a clinical urological practice by ultrasonography, digital rectal examination and prostate speciWc antigen. J Urol 143:1146–1154PubMed
3.
go back to reference Oesterling JE (1991) Prostate speciWc antigen: a critical assessment of the most useful tumormarker for adenocarcinoma of the prostate. J Urol 145:907–923PubMed Oesterling JE (1991) Prostate speciWc antigen: a critical assessment of the most useful tumormarker for adenocarcinoma of the prostate. J Urol 145:907–923PubMed
4.
go back to reference Stamey TA, Yang N, Hay AR, McNeal JE, Freiha FS, Redwine E (1987) Prostate-speciWc antigen as a serum marker for adenocarcinoma of the prostate. New Engl J Med 317:909–916PubMedCrossRef Stamey TA, Yang N, Hay AR, McNeal JE, Freiha FS, Redwine E (1987) Prostate-speciWc antigen as a serum marker for adenocarcinoma of the prostate. New Engl J Med 317:909–916PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Jones JS, Oder M, Zippe CD (2002) Saturation biopsy with periprostatic block can be performed in oYce. J Urol 168:2108–2110PubMedCrossRef Jones JS, Oder M, Zippe CD (2002) Saturation biopsy with periprostatic block can be performed in oYce. J Urol 168:2108–2110PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Fleshner N, Klotz L (2002) Role of “saturation biopsy” in the detection of prostate cancer among diYcult diagnostic cases. Urology 60:93–97PubMedCrossRef Fleshner N, Klotz L (2002) Role of “saturation biopsy” in the detection of prostate cancer among diYcult diagnostic cases. Urology 60:93–97PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Chrouser KL, Lieber MM (2004) Extended and saturation needle biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Curr Urol Rep 5:226–230PubMedCrossRef Chrouser KL, Lieber MM (2004) Extended and saturation needle biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Curr Urol Rep 5:226–230PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ashley RA, Inman BA, Routh JC, Mynderse LA, Gettman MT, Blute ML (2008) Reassessing the diagnostic yield of saturation biopsy of the prostate. Eur Urol 53(5):976–983PubMedCrossRef Ashley RA, Inman BA, Routh JC, Mynderse LA, Gettman MT, Blute ML (2008) Reassessing the diagnostic yield of saturation biopsy of the prostate. Eur Urol 53(5):976–983PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Simon J, Kuefer R, Bartsch G Jr, Volkmer BG, Hautmann RE, Gottfried HW (2008) Intensifying the saturation biopsy technique for detecting prostate cancer after previous negative biopsies: a step in the wrong direction. BJU Int 103(5):701 Simon J, Kuefer R, Bartsch G Jr, Volkmer BG, Hautmann RE, Gottfried HW (2008) Intensifying the saturation biopsy technique for detecting prostate cancer after previous negative biopsies: a step in the wrong direction. BJU Int 103(5):701
10.
go back to reference Lane BR, Zippe CD, Abouassaly R, Schoenfield L, Magi-Galluzzi C, Jones JS (2008) Saturation technique does not decrease cancer detection during followup after initial prostate biopsy. J Urol 179(5):1746–1750PubMedCrossRef Lane BR, Zippe CD, Abouassaly R, Schoenfield L, Magi-Galluzzi C, Jones JS (2008) Saturation technique does not decrease cancer detection during followup after initial prostate biopsy. J Urol 179(5):1746–1750PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Loch T et al (2007) Computerized transrectal ultrasound (C-TRUS) of the prostate: detection of cancer in patients with multiple negative systematic random biopsies. World J Urol 25:375–380PubMedCrossRef Loch T et al (2007) Computerized transrectal ultrasound (C-TRUS) of the prostate: detection of cancer in patients with multiple negative systematic random biopsies. World J Urol 25:375–380PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Loch T, Leuschner I, Genberg C, Weichert-Jacobsen K, Küppers F, Yfantis Y, Evans M, Tsarev V, Stöckle M (1999) ArtiWcial neural network analysis (ANNA) of prostatic transrectal ultrasound. Prostate 39:198–204PubMedCrossRef Loch T, Leuschner I, Genberg C, Weichert-Jacobsen K, Küppers F, Yfantis Y, Evans M, Tsarev V, Stöckle M (1999) ArtiWcial neural network analysis (ANNA) of prostatic transrectal ultrasound. Prostate 39:198–204PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Loch T, Leuschner I, Genberg C, Weichert-Jacobsen K, Küppers F, Retz M, Lehmann J, Yfantis Y, Evans M, Tsarev V, Stöckle M (2000) Weiterentwicklung des transrektalen ultraschalls: artifzielle neuronale netzwerk-analyse (ANNA) in der erkennung und stadieneinteilung des prostatakarzinoms. Urologe A 39:341–347PubMedCrossRef Loch T, Leuschner I, Genberg C, Weichert-Jacobsen K, Küppers F, Retz M, Lehmann J, Yfantis Y, Evans M, Tsarev V, Stöckle M (2000) Weiterentwicklung des transrektalen ultraschalls: artifzielle neuronale netzwerk-analyse (ANNA) in der erkennung und stadieneinteilung des prostatakarzinoms. Urologe A 39:341–347PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Loch T, Lehmann J, Wullich B, Loch AC, Klein L, Scheliga A, Thomas M, Stöckle M (2004) Computerized transrectal ultrasound (C-TRUS) of the prostate: detection of cancer in patients with multiple negative systematic random biopsies. J Urol 171(4):477A Loch T, Lehmann J, Wullich B, Loch AC, Klein L, Scheliga A, Thomas M, Stöckle M (2004) Computerized transrectal ultrasound (C-TRUS) of the prostate: detection of cancer in patients with multiple negative systematic random biopsies. J Urol 171(4):477A
15.
go back to reference Gleason DF (1977) Histologic grading and staging of prostate carcinoma. In: Tannenbaum M (ed) Urologic pathology: the prostate. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, pp 171–187 Gleason DF (1977) Histologic grading and staging of prostate carcinoma. In: Tannenbaum M (ed) Urologic pathology: the prostate. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, pp 171–187
16.
go back to reference Flanigan RC, Catalona WJ, Richie JP, Ahmann FR, Hudson MA, Scardino PT, DeKernion JB, RatliV TL, Kavoussi LR, Dalkin BL, Waters WB, MacFarlane MT, Southwick PC (1994) Accuracy of digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography in localizing prostate cancer: results of a multicenter clinical trial of 6, 630 men. J Urol 152:1506–1509PubMed Flanigan RC, Catalona WJ, Richie JP, Ahmann FR, Hudson MA, Scardino PT, DeKernion JB, RatliV TL, Kavoussi LR, Dalkin BL, Waters WB, MacFarlane MT, Southwick PC (1994) Accuracy of digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography in localizing prostate cancer: results of a multicenter clinical trial of 6, 630 men. J Urol 152:1506–1509PubMed
17.
go back to reference Loch T, Bertermann H, Stöckle M (2000) Technische und anatomische Grundlagen des transrektalen Ultraschalls (TRUS) der Prostata. Urologe B 40:475–483CrossRef Loch T, Bertermann H, Stöckle M (2000) Technische und anatomische Grundlagen des transrektalen Ultraschalls (TRUS) der Prostata. Urologe B 40:475–483CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Beemsterboer PM, Kranse R, de Koning HJ, Habbema JD, Schröder FH (1999) Changing role of 3 screening modalities in the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer (Rotterdam). Int J Cancer 84:437–441PubMedCrossRef Beemsterboer PM, Kranse R, de Koning HJ, Habbema JD, Schröder FH (1999) Changing role of 3 screening modalities in the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer (Rotterdam). Int J Cancer 84:437–441PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Hodge KK, McNeal JE, Terris MK, Stamey TA (1989) Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. J Urol 142:71–74PubMed Hodge KK, McNeal JE, Terris MK, Stamey TA (1989) Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. J Urol 142:71–74PubMed
20.
go back to reference Rome I (2004) The technique of ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. World J Urol 22:353–356CrossRef Rome I (2004) The technique of ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. World J Urol 22:353–356CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Shariat SF, Roehrborn Claus G (2008) Using biopsy to detect prostate cancer. Rev Urol Fall 10(4):262–280 Shariat SF, Roehrborn Claus G (2008) Using biopsy to detect prostate cancer. Rev Urol Fall 10(4):262–280
23.
go back to reference Cooner WH, Mosley BR, Rutherford C, Beard JH, Pond HS, Terry WJ, Igel TC, Kidd DD (1990) Prostate cancer detection in a clinical urological practice by ultrasonography, digital rectal examination and prostate specific antigen. J Urol 143:1146–1154PubMed Cooner WH, Mosley BR, Rutherford C, Beard JH, Pond HS, Terry WJ, Igel TC, Kidd DD (1990) Prostate cancer detection in a clinical urological practice by ultrasonography, digital rectal examination and prostate specific antigen. J Urol 143:1146–1154PubMed
24.
go back to reference Levine MA, Ittman M, Melamed J, Lepor H (1998) Two consecutive sets of transrectal ultrasound guided sextant biopsies of the prostate for the detection of prostate cancer. J Urol 159:471–475PubMedCrossRef Levine MA, Ittman M, Melamed J, Lepor H (1998) Two consecutive sets of transrectal ultrasound guided sextant biopsies of the prostate for the detection of prostate cancer. J Urol 159:471–475PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Naughton CK, Miller DC, Mager TDE, Ornstein DK, Catalona WJ, Lerner SP, Atkinson N (2000) A prospective randomized trial comparing 6 versus 12 prostate biopsy cores: impact on cancer detection. J Urol 164:388–392PubMedCrossRef Naughton CK, Miller DC, Mager TDE, Ornstein DK, Catalona WJ, Lerner SP, Atkinson N (2000) A prospective randomized trial comparing 6 versus 12 prostate biopsy cores: impact on cancer detection. J Urol 164:388–392PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Gore JL, Shariat SF, Miles BJ et al (2001) Optimal combinations of systematic sextant and laterally directed biopsies for the detection of prostate cancer. J Urol 165:1554–1559PubMedCrossRef Gore JL, Shariat SF, Miles BJ et al (2001) Optimal combinations of systematic sextant and laterally directed biopsies for the detection of prostate cancer. J Urol 165:1554–1559PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Ravery V, Goldblatt L, Royer B et al (2000) Extensive biopsy protocol improves the detection rate of prostate cancer. J Urol 164:393–396PubMedCrossRef Ravery V, Goldblatt L, Royer B et al (2000) Extensive biopsy protocol improves the detection rate of prostate cancer. J Urol 164:393–396PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Presti JCJ, Chang JJ, Bhargava V et al (2000) The optimal systematic prostate biopsy scheme should include 8 rather than 6 biopsies: results of a prospective clinical trial. J Urol 163:163–166PubMedCrossRef Presti JCJ, Chang JJ, Bhargava V et al (2000) The optimal systematic prostate biopsy scheme should include 8 rather than 6 biopsies: results of a prospective clinical trial. J Urol 163:163–166PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference de la Taille A, Antiphon P, Salomon L et al (2003) Prospective evaluation of a 21-sample needle biopsy procedure designed to improve the prostate cancer detection rate. Urology 61:1181–1186CrossRef de la Taille A, Antiphon P, Salomon L et al (2003) Prospective evaluation of a 21-sample needle biopsy procedure designed to improve the prostate cancer detection rate. Urology 61:1181–1186CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Computerized transrectal ultrasound of the prostate in a multicenter setup (C-TRUS-MS): detection of cancer after multiple negative systematic random and in primary biopsies
Authors
Bjoern Grabski
Leif Baeurle
Annemie Loch
Bjoern Wefer
Udo Paul
Tillmann Loch
Publication date
01-10-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
World Journal of Urology / Issue 5/2011
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Electronic ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-011-0713-0

Other articles of this Issue 5/2011

World Journal of Urology 5/2011 Go to the issue