Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Urology 2/2007

01-04-2007 | Topic Paper

Urologic imaging for localized prostate cancer in 2007

Author: Tillmann Loch

Published in: World Journal of Urology | Issue 2/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Increasing numbers of systematic random biopsies have virtually replaced urologic imaging as a detection and staging tool in prostate cancer. TRUS as the most commonly utilized urologic imaging is now mainly utilized to guide the biopsy needle into the correct anatomical or topographic region of the prostate. But even multiple systematic random biopsies have been shown to overlook a large number of clinically significant carcinoma. This fact has led to a dramatic increase in the number of biopsies taken in the detection of localized prostate cancer. There are some centers where 6, 10, 12, even up to 143 biopsies are taken in one sitting. This increasingly invasive and heterogeneous strategy underlines the need for an improvement in diagnostic imaging. New modalities and innovative techniques are currently being investigated in order to identify prostate cancer more accurately. The purpose of this paper is to review innovative urologic imaging techniques to identify emerging modalities that may be beneficial in the management of prostate cancer. Enhanced transrectal ultrasonography modalities, including ultrasound contrast agents, color and power doppler, elastography and computerized (C)-TRUS with artificial neural network analysis (ANNA) promise benefits in comparison to standard gray-scale ultrasonography to accurately target and diagnose prostate cancer.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bertermann H, Frentzel-Beyme B (1983) Prostatasonographie. B&K Verlag Nearum Bertermann H, Frentzel-Beyme B (1983) Prostatasonographie. B&K Verlag Nearum
2.
go back to reference Lee F, Gray JM, McLeary RD, Meadows TK, Kumasaka GH, Borlasa GS, Straub WH, Lee FJR, Solomon MH, McHugh T (1985) Transrectal ultrasound in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: location, echogenicity, histopathology and staging. Prostate 7:117–129PubMedCrossRef Lee F, Gray JM, McLeary RD, Meadows TK, Kumasaka GH, Borlasa GS, Straub WH, Lee FJR, Solomon MH, McHugh T (1985) Transrectal ultrasound in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: location, echogenicity, histopathology and staging. Prostate 7:117–129PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hodge KK, McNeal JE, Terris MK, Stamey TA (1989) Random systematic versus directed ultrasound-guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. J Urol 142:71–74PubMed Hodge KK, McNeal JE, Terris MK, Stamey TA (1989) Random systematic versus directed ultrasound-guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. J Urol 142:71–74PubMed
4.
go back to reference Flanigan RC, Catalona WJ, Richie JP, Ahmann FR, Hudson MA, Scardino PT, DeKernion JB, Ratliff TL, Kavoussi LR, Dalkin BL, Waters WB, MacFarlane MT, Southwick PC (1994) Accuracy of digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography in localizing prostate cancer: results of a multicenter clinical trial of 6,630 men. J Urol 152:1506–1509PubMed Flanigan RC, Catalona WJ, Richie JP, Ahmann FR, Hudson MA, Scardino PT, DeKernion JB, Ratliff TL, Kavoussi LR, Dalkin BL, Waters WB, MacFarlane MT, Southwick PC (1994) Accuracy of digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography in localizing prostate cancer: results of a multicenter clinical trial of 6,630 men. J Urol 152:1506–1509PubMed
5.
go back to reference Norberg M, Egevad L, Holmberg L, Sparen P, Norlen BJ, Busch C (1997) The sextant protocol for ultrasound-guided core biopsies of the prostate underestimates the presence of cancer. Urology 50(4):562–566PubMedCrossRef Norberg M, Egevad L, Holmberg L, Sparen P, Norlen BJ, Busch C (1997) The sextant protocol for ultrasound-guided core biopsies of the prostate underestimates the presence of cancer. Urology 50(4):562–566PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Loch T (2004) Computerized supported transrectal ultrasound (C-TRUS) in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Urologe A 43(11):1377–1384PubMedCrossRef Loch T (2004) Computerized supported transrectal ultrasound (C-TRUS) in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Urologe A 43(11):1377–1384PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Nava L, Montorsi F, Consonni P, Scattoni V, Guazzoni G, Rigatti PJ (1997) Results of a prospective randomized study comparing 6, 12 and 18 transrectal ultrasound guided sextant biopsies in patients with elevated PSA, normal DRE, and normal prostatic ultrasound. Urol 157:59, abstract 226 Nava L, Montorsi F, Consonni P, Scattoni V, Guazzoni G, Rigatti PJ (1997) Results of a prospective randomized study comparing 6, 12 and 18 transrectal ultrasound guided sextant biopsies in patients with elevated PSA, normal DRE, and normal prostatic ultrasound. Urol 157:59, abstract 226
8.
go back to reference Chon CH, Lai FC, McNeal JE, Presti JC Jr (2002) Extended systematic sampling. J Urol 167(6):2457–2460PubMedCrossRef Chon CH, Lai FC, McNeal JE, Presti JC Jr (2002) Extended systematic sampling. J Urol 167(6):2457–2460PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Patel AR, Jones JS, Rabets J, DeOreo G, Zippe CD (2004) Parasagittal biopsies in repeat saturation biopsy. Urology 63(1):87–89PubMedCrossRef Patel AR, Jones JS, Rabets J, DeOreo G, Zippe CD (2004) Parasagittal biopsies in repeat saturation biopsy. Urology 63(1):87–89PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Chrouser KL, Lieber MM (2004) Extended and saturation needle biopsy. Curr Urol Rep 5(3):226–230PubMed Chrouser KL, Lieber MM (2004) Extended and saturation needle biopsy. Curr Urol Rep 5(3):226–230PubMed
11.
go back to reference Loch T, Bertermann H, Stöckle M (2000) Technische und anatomische Grundlagen des transrektalen Ultraschalls (TRUS) der Prostata. Urologe B 40:475–483CrossRef Loch T, Bertermann H, Stöckle M (2000) Technische und anatomische Grundlagen des transrektalen Ultraschalls (TRUS) der Prostata. Urologe B 40:475–483CrossRef
12.
13.
go back to reference McNeal JE, Redwine E, Freiha FS, Stamey TA (1989) Zonal distribution of prostatic adenocarcinoma. Correlation with histopathologic pattern and direction of spread. Am J Surg Pathol 12: 897–901CrossRef McNeal JE, Redwine E, Freiha FS, Stamey TA (1989) Zonal distribution of prostatic adenocarcinoma. Correlation with histopathologic pattern and direction of spread. Am J Surg Pathol 12: 897–901CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Loch T, Eppelmann U, Lehmann J, Wullich B, Loch A, Stockle M (2004) Transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy of the prostate: random sextant versus biopsies of sono-morphologically suspicious lesions. World J Urol 22(5):357–360. (Epub 2004 Dec 1) Loch T, Eppelmann U, Lehmann J, Wullich B, Loch A, Stockle M (2004) Transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy of the prostate: random sextant versus biopsies of sono-morphologically suspicious lesions. World J Urol 22(5):357–360. (Epub 2004 Dec 1)
15.
go back to reference Balaji KC, Fair WR, Feleppa EJ, Porter CR, Tsai H, Liu T, Kalisz A, Urban S, Gillespie J (2002) Role of advanced 2 and 3 dimensional ultrasound for detecting prostate cancer. J Urol 168:2422–2425PubMedCrossRef Balaji KC, Fair WR, Feleppa EJ, Porter CR, Tsai H, Liu T, Kalisz A, Urban S, Gillespie J (2002) Role of advanced 2 and 3 dimensional ultrasound for detecting prostate cancer. J Urol 168:2422–2425PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Halpern EJ, Ramey JR, Strup SE, Frauscher F, McCue P, Gomella LG (2005) Detection of prostate carcinoma with contrast-enhanced sonography using intermittent harmonic imaging. Cancer 104(11):2373–2383PubMedCrossRef Halpern EJ, Ramey JR, Strup SE, Frauscher F, McCue P, Gomella LG (2005) Detection of prostate carcinoma with contrast-enhanced sonography using intermittent harmonic imaging. Cancer 104(11):2373–2383PubMedCrossRef
17.
18.
go back to reference Loch T, Lehmann J, Wilhelm A, et al. Pulse Inversion Harmonic Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS) Imaging of the Prostate. J Urol 167:361–362 (A 1435) Loch T, Lehmann J, Wilhelm A, et al. Pulse Inversion Harmonic Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS) Imaging of the Prostate. J Urol 167:361–362 (A 1435)
19.
go back to reference De Jong N, Bouakaz A, Frinking P (2002) Basic acoustic properties of microbubbles. Echocardiography 19:229–240PubMedCrossRef De Jong N, Bouakaz A, Frinking P (2002) Basic acoustic properties of microbubbles. Echocardiography 19:229–240PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Frauscher F, Gradl J, Pallwein L (2005) Prostate ultrasound—for urologists only? Cancer Imaging 5, Spec No A:S76–82. Review Frauscher F, Gradl J, Pallwein L (2005) Prostate ultrasound—for urologists only? Cancer Imaging 5, Spec No A:S76–82. Review
21.
go back to reference Wijkstra H, Wink MH, de la Rosette JJ (2004) Contrast specific imaging in the detection and localization of prostate cancer. World J Urol 22(5):346–350 (Epub 2004 Oct 5). Review Wijkstra H, Wink MH, de la Rosette JJ (2004) Contrast specific imaging in the detection and localization of prostate cancer. World J Urol 22(5):346–350 (Epub 2004 Oct 5). Review
22.
go back to reference Halpern EJ, Frauscher F, Rosenberg M, Gomella LG (2002) Directed biopsy during contrast-enhanced sonography of the prostate. Am J Roentgenol 178(4):915–919 Halpern EJ, Frauscher F, Rosenberg M, Gomella LG (2002) Directed biopsy during contrast-enhanced sonography of the prostate. Am J Roentgenol 178(4):915–919
23.
go back to reference Strohmeyer D, Frauscher F, Klauser A, Recheis W, Eibl G, Horninger W, Steiner H, Volgger H, Bartsch G (2001) Contrast-enhanced transrectal color doppler ultrasonography (TRCDUS) for assessment of angiogenesis in prostate cancer. Anticancer Res 21(4B):2907–2913PubMed Strohmeyer D, Frauscher F, Klauser A, Recheis W, Eibl G, Horninger W, Steiner H, Volgger H, Bartsch G (2001) Contrast-enhanced transrectal color doppler ultrasonography (TRCDUS) for assessment of angiogenesis in prostate cancer. Anticancer Res 21(4B):2907–2913PubMed
24.
go back to reference Konig K, Scheipers U, Pesavento A, Lorenz A, Ermert H, Senge T (2005) Initial experiences with real-time elastography guided biopsies of the prostate. J Urol 174:115–117PubMedCrossRef Konig K, Scheipers U, Pesavento A, Lorenz A, Ermert H, Senge T (2005) Initial experiences with real-time elastography guided biopsies of the prostate. J Urol 174:115–117PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Loch T, Leuschner I, Genberg C, Weichert-Jacobsen K, Küppers F, Yfantis Y, Evans M, Tsarev V, Stöckle M (1999) Artificial neural network analysis (ANNA) of prostatic transrectal ultrasound. Prostate 39:198–204PubMedCrossRef Loch T, Leuschner I, Genberg C, Weichert-Jacobsen K, Küppers F, Yfantis Y, Evans M, Tsarev V, Stöckle M (1999) Artificial neural network analysis (ANNA) of prostatic transrectal ultrasound. Prostate 39:198–204PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Urologic imaging for localized prostate cancer in 2007
Author
Tillmann Loch
Publication date
01-04-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
World Journal of Urology / Issue 2/2007
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Electronic ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-007-0155-x

Other articles of this Issue 2/2007

World Journal of Urology 2/2007 Go to the issue