Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 1/2023

Open Access 12-08-2022 | Prostate Cancer | Imaging Informatics and Artificial Intelligence

AI-assisted biparametric MRI surveillance of prostate cancer: feasibility study

Authors: C. Roest, T.C. Kwee, A. Saha, J.J. Fütterer, D. Yakar, H. Huisman

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the feasibility of automatic longitudinal analysis of consecutive biparametric MRI (bpMRI) scans to detect clinically significant (cs) prostate cancer (PCa).

Methods

This retrospective study included a multi-center dataset of 1513 patients who underwent bpMRI (T2 + DWI) between 2014 and 2020, of whom 73 patients underwent at least two consecutive bpMRI scans and repeat biopsies. A deep learning PCa detection model was developed to produce a heatmap of all PIRADS ≥ 2 lesions across prior and current studies. The heatmaps for each patient’s prior and current examination were used to extract differential volumetric and likelihood features reflecting explainable changes between examinations. A machine learning classifier was trained to predict from these features csPCa (ISUP > 1) at the current examination according to biopsy. A classifier trained on the current study only was developed for comparison. An extended classifier was developed to incorporate clinical parameters (PSA, PSA density, and age). The cross-validated diagnostic accuracies were compared using ROC analysis. The diagnostic performance of the best model was compared to the radiologist scores.

Results

The model including prior and current study (AUC 0.81, CI: 0.69, 0.91) resulted in a higher (p = 0.04) diagnostic accuracy than the current only model (AUC 0.73, CI: 0.61, 0.84). Adding clinical variables further improved diagnostic performance (AUC 0.86, CI: 0.77, 0.93). The diagnostic performance of the surveillance AI model was significantly better (p = 0.02) than of radiologists (AUC 0.69, CI: 0.54, 0.81).

Conclusions

Our proposed AI-assisted surveillance of prostate MRI can pick up explainable, diagnostically relevant changes with promising diagnostic accuracy.

Key Points

• Sequential prostate MRI scans can be automatically evaluated using a hybrid deep learning and machine learning approach.
• The diagnostic accuracy of our csPCa detection AI model improved by including clinical parameters.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A (2016) Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin 66:7–30CrossRef Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A (2016) Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin 66:7–30CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Wilt TJ, Jones KM, Barry MJ et al (2017) Follow-up of prostatectomy versus observation for early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 377:132–142CrossRef Wilt TJ, Jones KM, Barry MJ et al (2017) Follow-up of prostatectomy versus observation for early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 377:132–142CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Lardas M, Liew M, van den Bergh RC et al (2017) Quality of life outcomes after primary treatment for clinically localised prostate cancer: a systematic review. Eur Urol 72:869–885CrossRef Lardas M, Liew M, van den Bergh RC et al (2017) Quality of life outcomes after primary treatment for clinically localised prostate cancer: a systematic review. Eur Urol 72:869–885CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Cooperberg MR, Carroll PR (2015) Trends in management for patients with localized prostate cancer, 1990-2013. JAMA 314:80–82 Cooperberg MR, Carroll PR (2015) Trends in management for patients with localized prostate cancer, 1990-2013. JAMA 314:80–82
5.
go back to reference Sklinda K, Mruk B, Walecki J (2020) Active surveillance of prostate cancer using multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: a review of the current role and future perspectives. Med Sci Monit 26:e920252–e920251 Sklinda K, Mruk B, Walecki J (2020) Active surveillance of prostate cancer using multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: a review of the current role and future perspectives. Med Sci Monit 26:e920252–e920251
6.
go back to reference Moore CM, Giganti F, Albertsen P et al (2017) Reporting magnetic resonance imaging in men on active surveillance for prostate cancer: the PRECISE recommendations—a report of a European School of Oncology Task Force. Eur Urol 71:648–655CrossRef Moore CM, Giganti F, Albertsen P et al (2017) Reporting magnetic resonance imaging in men on active surveillance for prostate cancer: the PRECISE recommendations—a report of a European School of Oncology Task Force. Eur Urol 71:648–655CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Felker ER, Wu J, Natarajan S et al (2016) Serial magnetic resonance imaging in active surveillance of prostate cancer: incremental value. J Urol 195:1421–1427CrossRef Felker ER, Wu J, Natarajan S et al (2016) Serial magnetic resonance imaging in active surveillance of prostate cancer: incremental value. J Urol 195:1421–1427CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Caglic I, Sushentsev N, Gnanapragasam VJ et al (2021) MRI-derived PRECISE scores for predicting pathologically-confirmed radiological progression in prostate cancer patients on active surveillance. Eur Radiol 31:2696–2705CrossRef Caglic I, Sushentsev N, Gnanapragasam VJ et al (2021) MRI-derived PRECISE scores for predicting pathologically-confirmed radiological progression in prostate cancer patients on active surveillance. Eur Radiol 31:2696–2705CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Rajwa P, Pradere B, Quhal F et al (2021) Reliability of serial prostate magnetic resonance imaging to detect prostate cancer progression during active surveillance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 80:549–563CrossRef Rajwa P, Pradere B, Quhal F et al (2021) Reliability of serial prostate magnetic resonance imaging to detect prostate cancer progression during active surveillance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 80:549–563CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Schelb P, Kohl S, Radtke JP et al (2019) Classification of cancer at prostate MRI: deep learning versus clinical PI-RADS assessment. Radiology 293:607–617CrossRef Schelb P, Kohl S, Radtke JP et al (2019) Classification of cancer at prostate MRI: deep learning versus clinical PI-RADS assessment. Radiology 293:607–617CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Saha A, Hosseinzadeh M, Huisman H (2021) End-to-end prostate cancer detection in bpMRI via 3D CNNs: effects of attention mechanisms, clinical priori and decoupled false positive reduction. Med Image Anal 73:102155CrossRef Saha A, Hosseinzadeh M, Huisman H (2021) End-to-end prostate cancer detection in bpMRI via 3D CNNs: effects of attention mechanisms, clinical priori and decoupled false positive reduction. Med Image Anal 73:102155CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Weinreb JC, Barentsz JO, Choyke PL et al (2016) PI-RADS prostate imaging--reporting and data system: 2015, version 2. Eur Urol 69:16–40CrossRef Weinreb JC, Barentsz JO, Choyke PL et al (2016) PI-RADS prostate imaging--reporting and data system: 2015, version 2. Eur Urol 69:16–40CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Isensee F, Jaeger PF, Kohl SAA et al (2021) nnU-Net: a self-configuring method for deep learning-based biomedical image segmentation. Nat Methods 18:203–211CrossRef Isensee F, Jaeger PF, Kohl SAA et al (2021) nnU-Net: a self-configuring method for deep learning-based biomedical image segmentation. Nat Methods 18:203–211CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Israël B, Van der Leest M, Sedelaar M et al (2020) Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: what urologists need to know. Part 2: Interpretation. Eur Urol 77:469–480CrossRef Israël B, Van der Leest M, Sedelaar M et al (2020) Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: what urologists need to know. Part 2: Interpretation. Eur Urol 77:469–480CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T (2015) U-Net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. Springer, pp 234–241 Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T (2015) U-Net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. Springer, pp 234–241
16.
go back to reference Hu J, Shen L, Sun G. (2018) Squeeze-and-excitation networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2018:7132-7141. Hu J, Shen L, Sun G. (2018) Squeeze-and-excitation networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2018:7132-7141.
17.
go back to reference Lin TY, Goyal P, Girshick R, et al (2017) Focal loss for dense object detection. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. IEEE, pp. 2980-2988. Lin TY, Goyal P, Girshick R, et al (2017) Focal loss for dense object detection. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. IEEE, pp. 2980-2988.
18.
go back to reference Cao R, Mohammadian Bajgiran A, Afshari Mirak S et al (2019) Joint prostate cancer detection and Gleason score prediction in mp-MRI via FocalNet. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 38:2496–2506CrossRef Cao R, Mohammadian Bajgiran A, Afshari Mirak S et al (2019) Joint prostate cancer detection and Gleason score prediction in mp-MRI via FocalNet. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 38:2496–2506CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Mukhoti J, Kulharia V, Sanyal A, Golodetz S, Torr P, Dokania P (2020) Calibrating deep neural networks using focal loss. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 33:15288–15299 Mukhoti J, Kulharia V, Sanyal A, Golodetz S, Torr P, Dokania P (2020) Calibrating deep neural networks using focal loss. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 33:15288–15299
20.
go back to reference Saha A, Bosma JS, Linmans J, Hosseinzadeh M, Huisman H (2021) Anatomical and diagnostic Bayesian segmentation in prostate MRI −should different clinical objectives mandate different loss functions? Medical Imaging Meets NeurIPS Workshop – 35th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2110.12889 Saha A, Bosma JS, Linmans J, Hosseinzadeh M, Huisman H (2021) Anatomical and diagnostic Bayesian segmentation in prostate MRI −should different clinical objectives mandate different loss functions? Medical Imaging Meets NeurIPS Workshop – 35th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. https://​doi.​org/​10.​48550/​arxiv.​2110.​12889
21.
go back to reference Rundo L, Han C, Nagano Y et al (2019) USE-Net: incorporating squeeze-and-excitation blocks into U-Net for prostate zonal segmentation of multi-institutional MRI datasets. Neurocomputing 365:31–43CrossRef Rundo L, Han C, Nagano Y et al (2019) USE-Net: incorporating squeeze-and-excitation blocks into U-Net for prostate zonal segmentation of multi-institutional MRI datasets. Neurocomputing 365:31–43CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Castro E, Cardoso JS, Pereira JC (2018) Elastic deformations for data augmentation in breast cancer mass detection. IEEE EMBS International Conference on Biomedical & Health Informatics. IEEE, pp. 230-234. Castro E, Cardoso JS, Pereira JC (2018) Elastic deformations for data augmentation in breast cancer mass detection. IEEE EMBS International Conference on Biomedical & Health Informatics. IEEE, pp. 230-234.
23.
go back to reference Zhang B, He X, Ouyang F et al (2017) Radiomic machine-learning classifiers for prognostic biomarkers of advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer Lett 403:21–27CrossRef Zhang B, He X, Ouyang F et al (2017) Radiomic machine-learning classifiers for prognostic biomarkers of advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer Lett 403:21–27CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Sushentsev N, Rundo L, Blyuss O et al (2022) Comparative performance of MRI-derived PRECISE scores and delta-radiomics models for the prediction of prostate cancer progression in patients on active surveillance. Eur Radiol 32:680–689CrossRef Sushentsev N, Rundo L, Blyuss O et al (2022) Comparative performance of MRI-derived PRECISE scores and delta-radiomics models for the prediction of prostate cancer progression in patients on active surveillance. Eur Radiol 32:680–689CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Rosenkrantz AB, Rice SL, Wehrli NE et al (2015) Association between changes in suspicious prostate lesions on serial MRI examinations and follow-up biopsy results. Clin Imaging 39:264–269CrossRef Rosenkrantz AB, Rice SL, Wehrli NE et al (2015) Association between changes in suspicious prostate lesions on serial MRI examinations and follow-up biopsy results. Clin Imaging 39:264–269CrossRef
Metadata
Title
AI-assisted biparametric MRI surveillance of prostate cancer: feasibility study
Authors
C. Roest
T.C. Kwee
A. Saha
J.J. Fütterer
D. Yakar
H. Huisman
Publication date
12-08-2022
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 1/2023
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-09032-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

European Radiology 1/2023 Go to the issue