Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 4/2021

Open Access 01-04-2021 | Artificial Intelligence | Imaging Informatics and Artificial Intelligence

Practical applications of deep learning: classifying the most common categories of plain radiographs in a PACS using a neural network

Authors: Thomas Dratsch, Michael Korenkov, David Zopfs, Sebastian Brodehl, Bettina Baessler, Daniel Giese, Sebastian Brinkmann, David Maintz, Daniel Pinto dos Santos

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 4/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

The goal of the present study was to classify the most common types of plain radiographs using a neural network and to validate the network’s performance on internal and external data. Such a network could help improve various radiological workflows.

Methods

All radiographs from the year 2017 (n = 71,274) acquired at our institution were retrieved from the PACS. The 30 largest categories (n = 58,219, 81.7% of all radiographs performed in 2017) were used to develop and validate a neural network (MobileNet v1.0) using transfer learning. Image categories were extracted from DICOM metadata (study and image description) and mapped to the WHO manual of diagnostic imaging. As an independent, external validation set, we used images from other institutions that had been stored in our PACS (n = 5324).

Results

In the internal validation, the overall accuracy of the model was 90.3% (95%CI: 89.2–91.3%), whereas, for the external validation set, the overall accuracy was 94.0% (95%CI: 93.3–94.6%).

Conclusions

Using data from one single institution, we were able to classify the most common categories of radiographs with a neural network. The network showed good generalizability on the external validation set and could be used to automatically organize a PACS, preselect radiographs so that they can be routed to more specialized networks for abnormality detection or help with other parts of the radiological workflow (e.g., automated hanging protocols; check if ordered image and performed image are the same). The final AI algorithm is publicly available for evaluation and extension.

Key Points

• Data from one single institution can be used to train a neural network for the correct detection of the 30 most common categories of plain radiographs.
• The trained model achieved a high accuracy for the majority of categories and showed good generalizability to images from other institutions.
• The neural network is made publicly available and can be used to automatically organize a PACS or to preselect radiographs so that they can be routed to more specialized neural networks for abnormality detection.
Literature
6.
go back to reference Gueld MO, Kohnen M, Keysers D et al (2002) Quality of DICOM header information for image categorization. In: Siegel EL, Huang HK (eds) Medical imaging 2002: PACS and integrated medical information systems: design and evaluation, pp 280–287CrossRef Gueld MO, Kohnen M, Keysers D et al (2002) Quality of DICOM header information for image categorization. In: Siegel EL, Huang HK (eds) Medical imaging 2002: PACS and integrated medical information systems: design and evaluation, pp 280–287CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Sandström S, Ostensen H, Pettersson H, Akerman K (2003) The WHO manual of diagnostic imaging. World Health Organisation Sandström S, Ostensen H, Pettersson H, Akerman K (2003) The WHO manual of diagnostic imaging. World Health Organisation
8.
go back to reference IBM Corp. (2019) IBM SPSS statistics for Macintosh IBM Corp. (2019) IBM SPSS statistics for Macintosh
9.
go back to reference Rajpurkar P, Irvin J, Zhu K et al (2017) CheXNet: radiologist-level pneumonia detection on chest X-rays with deep learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.05225 Rajpurkar P, Irvin J, Zhu K et al (2017) CheXNet: radiologist-level pneumonia detection on chest X-rays with deep learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.05225
Metadata
Title
Practical applications of deep learning: classifying the most common categories of plain radiographs in a PACS using a neural network
Authors
Thomas Dratsch
Michael Korenkov
David Zopfs
Sebastian Brodehl
Bettina Baessler
Daniel Giese
Sebastian Brinkmann
David Maintz
Daniel Pinto dos Santos
Publication date
01-04-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 4/2021
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07241-6

Other articles of this Issue 4/2021

European Radiology 4/2021 Go to the issue