Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 2/2020

01-02-2020 | Glioma | Neuro

Radiogenomics of lower-grade gliomas: machine learning–based MRI texture analysis for predicting 1p/19q codeletion status

Authors: Burak Kocak, Emine Sebnem Durmaz, Ece Ates, Ipek Sel, Saime Turgut Gunes, Ozlem Korkmaz Kaya, Amalya Zeynalova, Ozgur Kilickesmez

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 2/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the potential value of the machine learning (ML)–based MRI texture analysis for predicting 1p/19q codeletion status of lower-grade gliomas (LGG), using various state-of-the-art ML algorithms.

Materials and methods

For this retrospective study, 107 patients with LGG were included from a public database. Texture features were extracted from conventional T2-weighted and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI images, using LIFEx software. Training and unseen validation splits were created using stratified 10-fold cross-validation technique along with minority over-sampling. Dimension reduction was done using collinearity analysis and feature selection (ReliefF). Classifications were done using adaptive boosting, k-nearest neighbours, naive Bayes, neural network, random forest, stochastic gradient descent, and support vector machine. Friedman test and pairwise post hoc analyses were used for comparison of classification performances based on the area under the curve (AUC).

Results

Overall, the predictive performance of the ML algorithms were statistically significantly different, χ2(6) = 26.7, p < 0.001. There was no statistically significant difference among the performance of the neural network, naive Bayes, support vector machine, random forest, and stochastic gradient descent, adjusted p > 0.05. The mean AUC and accuracy values of these five algorithms ranged from 0.769 to 0.869 and from 80.1 to 84%, respectively. The neural network had the highest mean rank with mean AUC and accuracy values of 0.869 and 83.8%, respectively.

Conclusions

The ML-based MRI texture analysis might be a promising non-invasive technique for predicting the 1p/19q codeletion status of LGGs. Using this technique along with various ML algorithms, more than four-fifths of the LGGs can be correctly classified.

Key Points

• More than four-fifths of the lower-grade gliomas can be correctly classified with machine learning–based MRI texture analysis. Satisfying classification outcomes are not limited to a single algorithm.
• A few-slice-based volumetric segmentation technique would be a valid approach, providing satisfactory predictive textural information and avoiding excessive segmentation duration in clinical practice.
• Feature selection is sensitive to different patient data set samples so that each sampling leads to the selection of different feature subsets, which needs to be considered in future works.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
9.
go back to reference Ino Y, Betensky RA, Zlatescu MC et al (2001) Molecular subtypes of anaplastic oligodendroglioma: implications for patient management at diagnosis. Clin Cancer Res 7:839–845 Ino Y, Betensky RA, Zlatescu MC et al (2001) Molecular subtypes of anaplastic oligodendroglioma: implications for patient management at diagnosis. Clin Cancer Res 7:839–845
11.
go back to reference Reifenberger J, Reifenberger G, Liu L, James CD, Wechsler W, Collins VP (1994) Molecular genetic analysis of oligodendroglial tumors shows preferential allelic deletions on 19q and 1p. Am J Pathol 145:1175–1190 Reifenberger J, Reifenberger G, Liu L, James CD, Wechsler W, Collins VP (1994) Molecular genetic analysis of oligodendroglial tumors shows preferential allelic deletions on 19q and 1p. Am J Pathol 145:1175–1190
27.
go back to reference Demšar J, Curk T, Erjavec A et al (2013) Orange: data mining toolbox in Python. J Mach Learn Res 14:2349–2353 Demšar J, Curk T, Erjavec A et al (2013) Orange: data mining toolbox in Python. J Mach Learn Res 14:2349–2353
28.
go back to reference Demšar J (2006) Statistical comparisons of classifiers over multiple data sets. J Mach Learn Res 7:1–30 Demšar J (2006) Statistical comparisons of classifiers over multiple data sets. J Mach Learn Res 7:1–30
34.
go back to reference Zwanenburg A, Leger S, Vallières M, Löck S (2016) Image biomarker standardisation initiative - feature definitions. arXiv:1612.07003 Zwanenburg A, Leger S, Vallières M, Löck S (2016) Image biomarker standardisation initiative - feature definitions. arXiv:1612.07003
Metadata
Title
Radiogenomics of lower-grade gliomas: machine learning–based MRI texture analysis for predicting 1p/19q codeletion status
Authors
Burak Kocak
Emine Sebnem Durmaz
Ece Ates
Ipek Sel
Saime Turgut Gunes
Ozlem Korkmaz Kaya
Amalya Zeynalova
Ozgur Kilickesmez
Publication date
01-02-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 2/2020
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06492-2

Other articles of this Issue 2/2020

European Radiology 2/2020 Go to the issue