Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 12/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Metastasis | Nuclear Medicine

Temporal validation of metabolic nodal response of esophageal cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy as an independent predictor of unresectable disease, survival, and recurrence

Authors: John M. Findlay, Edward Dickson, Cristina Fiorani, Kevin M. Bradley, Somnath Mukherjee, Richard S. Gillies, Nicholas D. Maynard, Mark R. Middleton

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 12/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

We recently described metabolic nodal stage (mN) and response (mNR) of cancer of the esophagus and gastro-esophageal junction (GEJ) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) using 18F-FDG PET-CT as new markers of disease progression, recurrence, and death. We aimed to validate our findings.

Methods

Our validation cohort comprised all patients consecutive to our discovery cohort, staged before and after NAC using PET-CT from 2014 to 2017. Multivariate binary logistic and Cox regression were performed.

Results

Fifty-one of the 200 patients had FDG-avid nodes after NAC (25.5%; i.e., lack of complete mNR), and were more likely to progress during NAC to incurable disease on PET-CT or at surgery: odds ratio 3.84 (1.46–10.1; p = 0.006). In 176 patients undergoing successful resection, patients without complete mNR had a worse prognosis: disease-free survival hazard ratio 2.46 (1.34–4.50); p = 0.004. These associations were independent of primary tumor metabolic, pathological response, and stage. In a hybrid pathological/metabolic nodal stage, avid nodal metastases conferred a worse prognosis than non-avid metastases. Lack of complete mNR predicted recurrence or death at 1 and 2 years: positive predictive values 44.4% (31.7–57.8) and 74.1% (56.6–86.3) respectively.

Conclusions

This study provides temporal validation for mNR as a new and independent predictive and prognostic marker of esophageal and GEJ cancer treated with NAC and surgery, although external validation is required to assess generalizability. mNR may provide surrogate information regarding the phenotype of metastatic cancer clones beyond the mere presence of nodal metastases, and might be used to better inform patients, risk stratify, and personalize management, including adjuvant therapy.

Key Points

• We previously described metabolic nodal response (mNR) of esophageal cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy using 18 F-FDG PET-CT as a predictor of unresectable disease, early recurrence, and death.
• We report the first validation of these findings. In an immediately consecutive cohort, we found consistent proportions of patients with and without mNR, and associations with abandoned resection, early recurrence, and death.
• This supports mNR as a new and actionable biomarker in esophageal cancer. Although external validation is required, mNR may provide surrogate information about the chemosensitivity of metastatic subclones, and the means to predict treatment success, guide personalized therapy, and follow-up.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Findlay JM, Gillies RS, Franklin JM et al (2016) Restaging oesophageal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy with (18)F-FDG PET-CT: identifying interval metastases and predicting incurable disease at surgery. Eur Radiol 26:3519–3533CrossRef Findlay JM, Gillies RS, Franklin JM et al (2016) Restaging oesophageal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy with (18)F-FDG PET-CT: identifying interval metastases and predicting incurable disease at surgery. Eur Radiol 26:3519–3533CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Findlay JM, Bradley KM, Wang LM et al (2017) Metabolic nodal response as a prognostic marker after neoadjuvant therapy for oesophageal cancer. Br J Surg 104:947CrossRef Findlay JM, Bradley KM, Wang LM et al (2017) Metabolic nodal response as a prognostic marker after neoadjuvant therapy for oesophageal cancer. Br J Surg 104:947CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Shapiro J, van Lanschot JJB, Hulshof Hulshof MCCM et al (2015) Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for oesophageal or junctional cancer (CROSS): long-term results of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 16:1090–1098 Shapiro J, van Lanschot JJB, Hulshof Hulshof MCCM et al (2015) Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for oesophageal or junctional cancer (CROSS): long-term results of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 16:1090–1098
4.
go back to reference Davies AR, Gossage JA, Zylstra J et al (2014) Tumor stage after neoadjuvant chemotherapy determines survival after surgery for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction. J Clin Oncol 32:2983–2990CrossRef Davies AR, Gossage JA, Zylstra J et al (2014) Tumor stage after neoadjuvant chemotherapy determines survival after surgery for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction. J Clin Oncol 32:2983–2990CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Davies AR, Pillai A, Sinha P et al (2014) Factors associated with early recurrence and death after esophagectomy for cancer. J Surg Oncol 109:459–464CrossRef Davies AR, Pillai A, Sinha P et al (2014) Factors associated with early recurrence and death after esophagectomy for cancer. J Surg Oncol 109:459–464CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Findlay JM, Middleton MR, Tomlinson I (2015) A systematic review and meta-analysis of somatic and germline DNA sequence biomarkers of esophageal cancer survival, therapy response and stage. Ann Oncol 26:624–644CrossRef Findlay JM, Middleton MR, Tomlinson I (2015) A systematic review and meta-analysis of somatic and germline DNA sequence biomarkers of esophageal cancer survival, therapy response and stage. Ann Oncol 26:624–644CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Edge SB, Compton CC (2010) The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM. Ann Surg Oncol 17:1471–1474CrossRef Edge SB, Compton CC (2010) The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM. Ann Surg Oncol 17:1471–1474CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Wahl RL, Jacene H, Kasamon Y, Lodge MA (2009) From RECIST to PERCIST: evolving considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors. J Nucl Med 50(Suppl 1):122S–150SCrossRef Wahl RL, Jacene H, Kasamon Y, Lodge MA (2009) From RECIST to PERCIST: evolving considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors. J Nucl Med 50(Suppl 1):122S–150SCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Mandard AM, Dalibard F, Mandard JC et al (1994) Pathologic assessment of tumor regression after preoperative chemoradiotherapy of esophageal carcinoma. Clinicopathologic correlations. Cancer 73:2680–2686CrossRef Mandard AM, Dalibard F, Mandard JC et al (1994) Pathologic assessment of tumor regression after preoperative chemoradiotherapy of esophageal carcinoma. Clinicopathologic correlations. Cancer 73:2680–2686CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Medical Research Council Oesophageal Cancer Working Group (2002) Surgical resection with or without preoperative chemotherapy in oesophageal cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 359:1727–1733CrossRef Medical Research Council Oesophageal Cancer Working Group (2002) Surgical resection with or without preoperative chemotherapy in oesophageal cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 359:1727–1733CrossRef
13.
14.
go back to reference Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP et al (2006) Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med 355:11–20CrossRef Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP et al (2006) Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med 355:11–20CrossRef
15.
go back to reference R Core Team (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna R Core Team (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna
16.
go back to reference Allum WH, Blazeby JM, Griffin SM et al (2011) Guidelines for the management of oesophageal and gastric cancer. Gut 60:1449–1472CrossRef Allum WH, Blazeby JM, Griffin SM et al (2011) Guidelines for the management of oesophageal and gastric cancer. Gut 60:1449–1472CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Findlay JM, Bradley KM, Wang LM et al (2017) Predicting pathologic response of esophageal cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: the implications of metabolic nodal response for personalized therapy. J Nucl Med 58:266–275CrossRef Findlay JM, Bradley KM, Wang LM et al (2017) Predicting pathologic response of esophageal cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: the implications of metabolic nodal response for personalized therapy. J Nucl Med 58:266–275CrossRef
18.
go back to reference van Rossum PS, Fried DV, Zhang L et al (2016) The incremental value of subjective and quantitative assessment of 18F-FDG PET for the prediction of pathologic complete response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy in esophageal cancer. J Nucl Med 57:691–700CrossRef van Rossum PS, Fried DV, Zhang L et al (2016) The incremental value of subjective and quantitative assessment of 18F-FDG PET for the prediction of pathologic complete response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy in esophageal cancer. J Nucl Med 57:691–700CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Lordick F, Ott K, Krause BJ et al (2007) PET to assess early metabolic response and to guide treatment of adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction: the MUNICON phase II trial. Lancet Oncol 8:797–805CrossRef Lordick F, Ott K, Krause BJ et al (2007) PET to assess early metabolic response and to guide treatment of adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction: the MUNICON phase II trial. Lancet Oncol 8:797–805CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Xing X, Jia S, Wu J et al (2017) Clonality analysis of synchronous gastro-oesophageal junction carcinoma and distal gastric cancer by whole-exome sequencing. J Pathol 243:165–175CrossRef Xing X, Jia S, Wu J et al (2017) Clonality analysis of synchronous gastro-oesophageal junction carcinoma and distal gastric cancer by whole-exome sequencing. J Pathol 243:165–175CrossRef
21.
go back to reference van Nistelrooij AM, van Marion R, Koppert LB et al (2017) Molecular clonality analysis of esophageal adenocarcinoma by multiregion sequencing of tumor samples. BMC Res Notes 10:144CrossRef van Nistelrooij AM, van Marion R, Koppert LB et al (2017) Molecular clonality analysis of esophageal adenocarcinoma by multiregion sequencing of tumor samples. BMC Res Notes 10:144CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Yuan W, Liu Z, Lei W et al (2017) Mutation landscape and intra-tumor heterogeneity of two MANECs of the esophagus revealed by multi-region sequencing. Oncotarget 8:69610–69621PubMedPubMedCentral Yuan W, Liu Z, Lei W et al (2017) Mutation landscape and intra-tumor heterogeneity of two MANECs of the esophagus revealed by multi-region sequencing. Oncotarget 8:69610–69621PubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Findlay JM, Castro-Giner F, Makino S et al (2016) Differential clonal evolution in oesophageal cancers in response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Nat Commun 7:11111CrossRef Findlay JM, Castro-Giner F, Makino S et al (2016) Differential clonal evolution in oesophageal cancers in response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Nat Commun 7:11111CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Murugaesu N, Wilson GA, Birkbak NJ et al (2015) Tracking the genomic evolution of esophageal adenocarcinoma through neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Cancer Discov 5:821–831CrossRef Murugaesu N, Wilson GA, Birkbak NJ et al (2015) Tracking the genomic evolution of esophageal adenocarcinoma through neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Cancer Discov 5:821–831CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Noble F, Lloyd MA, Turkington R et al (2017) Multicentre cohort study to define and validate pathological assessment of response to neoadjuvant therapy in oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg 104:1816–1828CrossRef Noble F, Lloyd MA, Turkington R et al (2017) Multicentre cohort study to define and validate pathological assessment of response to neoadjuvant therapy in oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg 104:1816–1828CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Davies AR, Myoteri D, Zylstra et al (2018) Lymph node regression and survival following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg 105(12):1639–1649CrossRef Davies AR, Myoteri D, Zylstra et al (2018) Lymph node regression and survival following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg 105(12):1639–1649CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Miyata H, Yamasaki M, Makino T et al (2016) Impact of number of [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose-PET-positive lymph nodes on survival of patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery for oesophageal cancer. Br J Surg 103:97–104CrossRef Miyata H, Yamasaki M, Makino T et al (2016) Impact of number of [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose-PET-positive lymph nodes on survival of patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery for oesophageal cancer. Br J Surg 103:97–104CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Temporal validation of metabolic nodal response of esophageal cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy as an independent predictor of unresectable disease, survival, and recurrence
Authors
John M. Findlay
Edward Dickson
Cristina Fiorani
Kevin M. Bradley
Somnath Mukherjee
Richard S. Gillies
Nicholas D. Maynard
Mark R. Middleton
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 12/2019
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06310-9

Other articles of this Issue 12/2019

European Radiology 12/2019 Go to the issue