Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 8/2017

01-08-2017 | Emergency Radiology

A new technique for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: abdominal CT with compression to the right lower quadrant

Authors: Abidin Kılınçer, Erhan Akpınar, Bülent Erbil, Emre Ünal, Ali Devrim Karaosmanoğlu, Volkan Kaynaroğlu, Deniz Akata, Mustafa Özmen

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 8/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To determine the diagnostic accuracy of abdominal CT with compression to the right lower quadrant (RLQ) in adults with acute appendicitis.

Methods

168 patients (age range, 18–78 years) were included who underwent contrast-enhanced CT for suspected appendicitis performed either using compression to the RLQ (n = 71) or a standard protocol (n = 97). Outer diameter of the appendix, appendiceal wall thickening, luminal content and associated findings were evaluated in each patient. Kruskal-Wallis, Fisher’s and Pearson's chi-squared tests were used for statistical analysis.

Results

There was no significant difference in the mean outer diameter (MOD) between compression CT scans (10.6 ± 1.9 mm) and standard protocol (11.2 ± 2.3 mm) in patients with acute appendicitis (P = 1). MOD was significantly lower in the compression group (5.2 ± 0.8 mm) compared to the standard protocol (6.5 ± 1.1 mm) (P < 0.01) in patients without appendicitis. A cut-off value of 6.75 mm for the outer diameter of the appendix was found to be 100% sensitive in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis for both groups. The specificity was higher for compression CT technique (67.7 vs. 94.9%).

Conclusion

Normal appendix diameter was significantly smaller in the compression-CT group compared to standard-CT group, increasing diagnostic accuracy of abdominal compression CT.

Key points

Normal appendix diameter is significantly smaller in compression CT.
Compression could force contrast material to flow through the appendiceal lumen.
Compression CT may be a CT counterpart of graded compression US.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Jeffrey RB Jr, Laing FC, Townsend RR (1988) Acute appendicitis: sonographic criteria based on 250 cases. Radiology 167:327–329CrossRefPubMed Jeffrey RB Jr, Laing FC, Townsend RR (1988) Acute appendicitis: sonographic criteria based on 250 cases. Radiology 167:327–329CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Lane MJ, Liu DM, Huynh MD, Jeffrey RB Jr, Mindelzun RE, Katz DS (1999) Suspected acute appendicitis: nonenhanced helical CT in 300 consecutive patients. Radiology 213:341–346CrossRefPubMed Lane MJ, Liu DM, Huynh MD, Jeffrey RB Jr, Mindelzun RE, Katz DS (1999) Suspected acute appendicitis: nonenhanced helical CT in 300 consecutive patients. Radiology 213:341–346CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Miki T, Ogata S, Uto M et al (2005) Enhanced multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis and its severity. Radiat Med 23:242–255PubMed Miki T, Ogata S, Uto M et al (2005) Enhanced multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis and its severity. Radiat Med 23:242–255PubMed
4.
go back to reference Pickuth D, Spielmann RP (2001) Unenhanced spiral CT for evaluating acute appendicitis in daily routine. A prospective study. Hepatogastroenterology 48:140–142PubMed Pickuth D, Spielmann RP (2001) Unenhanced spiral CT for evaluating acute appendicitis in daily routine. A prospective study. Hepatogastroenterology 48:140–142PubMed
5.
go back to reference Daly CP, Cohan RH, Francis IR, Caoili EM, Ellis JH, Nan B (2005) Incidence of acute appendicitis in patients with equivocal CT findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:1813–1820CrossRefPubMed Daly CP, Cohan RH, Francis IR, Caoili EM, Ellis JH, Nan B (2005) Incidence of acute appendicitis in patients with equivocal CT findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:1813–1820CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Karabulut N, Boyaci N, Yagci B, Herek D, Kiroglu Y (2007) Computed tomography evaluation of the normal appendix: comparison of low-dose and standard-dose unenhanced helical computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 31:732–740CrossRefPubMed Karabulut N, Boyaci N, Yagci B, Herek D, Kiroglu Y (2007) Computed tomography evaluation of the normal appendix: comparison of low-dose and standard-dose unenhanced helical computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 31:732–740CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Lai V, Chan WC, Lau HY, Yeung TW, Wong YC, Yuen MK (2012) Diagnostic power of various computed tomography signs in diagnosing acute appendicitis. Clin Imaging 36:29–34CrossRefPubMed Lai V, Chan WC, Lau HY, Yeung TW, Wong YC, Yuen MK (2012) Diagnostic power of various computed tomography signs in diagnosing acute appendicitis. Clin Imaging 36:29–34CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Ives EP, Sung S, McCue P, Durrani H, Halpern EJ (2008) Independent predictors of acute appendicitis on CT with pathologic correlation. Acad Radiol 15:996–1003CrossRefPubMed Ives EP, Sung S, McCue P, Durrani H, Halpern EJ (2008) Independent predictors of acute appendicitis on CT with pathologic correlation. Acad Radiol 15:996–1003CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Rettenbacher T, Hollerweger A, Macheiner P et al (2003) Ovoid shape of the vermiform appendix: a criterion to exclude acute appendicitis--evaluation with US. Radiology 226:95–100CrossRefPubMed Rettenbacher T, Hollerweger A, Macheiner P et al (2003) Ovoid shape of the vermiform appendix: a criterion to exclude acute appendicitis--evaluation with US. Radiology 226:95–100CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Atema JJ, Gans SL, Van Randen A et al (2015) Comparison of ımaging strategies with conditional versus ımmediate contrast-enhanced computed tomography in patients with clinical suspicion of acute appendicitis. Eur Radiol 25:2445–2452CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Atema JJ, Gans SL, Van Randen A et al (2015) Comparison of ımaging strategies with conditional versus ımmediate contrast-enhanced computed tomography in patients with clinical suspicion of acute appendicitis. Eur Radiol 25:2445–2452CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference O'Malley ME, Alharbi F, Chawla TP, Moshonov H (2016) CT following US for possible appendicitis: anatomic coverage. Eur Radiol 26:532–538CrossRefPubMed O'Malley ME, Alharbi F, Chawla TP, Moshonov H (2016) CT following US for possible appendicitis: anatomic coverage. Eur Radiol 26:532–538CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Kammerer S, Hoink AJ, Wessling J et al (2015) Abdominal and pelvic CT: is positive enteric contrast still necessary? Results of a retrospective observational study. Eur Radiol 25:669–678CrossRefPubMed Kammerer S, Hoink AJ, Wessling J et al (2015) Abdominal and pelvic CT: is positive enteric contrast still necessary? Results of a retrospective observational study. Eur Radiol 25:669–678CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Puylaert JB (1986) Acute appendicitis: US evaluation using graded compression. Radiology 158:355–360CrossRefPubMed Puylaert JB (1986) Acute appendicitis: US evaluation using graded compression. Radiology 158:355–360CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Stewart JK, Olcott EW, Jeffrey RB (2012) Sonography for appendicitis: nonvisualization of the appendix is an indication for active clinical observation rather than direct referral for computed tomography. J Clin Ultrasound 40:455–461CrossRefPubMed Stewart JK, Olcott EW, Jeffrey RB (2012) Sonography for appendicitis: nonvisualization of the appendix is an indication for active clinical observation rather than direct referral for computed tomography. J Clin Ultrasound 40:455–461CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Webb EM, Wang ZJ, Coakley FV, Poder L, Westphalen AC, Yeh BM (2010) The equivocal appendix at CT: prevalence in a control population. Emerg Radiol 17:57–61CrossRefPubMed Webb EM, Wang ZJ, Coakley FV, Poder L, Westphalen AC, Yeh BM (2010) The equivocal appendix at CT: prevalence in a control population. Emerg Radiol 17:57–61CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Tamburrini S, Brunetti A, Brown M, Sirlin CB, Casola G (2005) CT appearance of the normal appendix in adults. Eur Radiol 15:2096–2103CrossRefPubMed Tamburrini S, Brunetti A, Brown M, Sirlin CB, Casola G (2005) CT appearance of the normal appendix in adults. Eur Radiol 15:2096–2103CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Benjaminov O, Atri M, Hamilton P, Rappaport D (2002) Frequency of visualization and thickness of normal appendix at nonenhanced helical CT. Radiology 225:400–406CrossRefPubMed Benjaminov O, Atri M, Hamilton P, Rappaport D (2002) Frequency of visualization and thickness of normal appendix at nonenhanced helical CT. Radiology 225:400–406CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Bursali A, Arac M, Oner AY, Celik H, Eksioglu S, Gumus T (2005) Evaluation of the normal appendix at low-dose non-enhanced spiral CT. Diagn Interv Radiol 11:45–50PubMed Bursali A, Arac M, Oner AY, Celik H, Eksioglu S, Gumus T (2005) Evaluation of the normal appendix at low-dose non-enhanced spiral CT. Diagn Interv Radiol 11:45–50PubMed
19.
go back to reference Johnson PT, Eng J, Moore CJ, Horton KM, Fishman EK (2006) Multidetector-row CT of the appendix in healthy adults. Emerg Radiol 12:248–253CrossRefPubMed Johnson PT, Eng J, Moore CJ, Horton KM, Fishman EK (2006) Multidetector-row CT of the appendix in healthy adults. Emerg Radiol 12:248–253CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Charoensak A, Pongpornsup S, Suthikeeree W (2010) Wall thickness and outer diameter of the normal appendix in adults using 64 slices multidetector CT. J Med Assoc Thai 93:1437–1442PubMed Charoensak A, Pongpornsup S, Suthikeeree W (2010) Wall thickness and outer diameter of the normal appendix in adults using 64 slices multidetector CT. J Med Assoc Thai 93:1437–1442PubMed
21.
go back to reference Cabarrus M, Sun YL, Courtier JL, Stengel JW, Coakley FV, Webb EM (2013) The prevalence and patterns of intraluminal air in acute appendicitis at CT. Emerg Radiol 20:51–56CrossRefPubMed Cabarrus M, Sun YL, Courtier JL, Stengel JW, Coakley FV, Webb EM (2013) The prevalence and patterns of intraluminal air in acute appendicitis at CT. Emerg Radiol 20:51–56CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
A new technique for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: abdominal CT with compression to the right lower quadrant
Authors
Abidin Kılınçer
Erhan Akpınar
Bülent Erbil
Emre Ünal
Ali Devrim Karaosmanoğlu
Volkan Kaynaroğlu
Deniz Akata
Mustafa Özmen
Publication date
01-08-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 8/2017
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4728-1

Other articles of this Issue 8/2017

European Radiology 8/2017 Go to the issue