Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 1/2016

01-01-2016 | Oncology

mTOR-inhibitor treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: contribution of Choi and modified Choi criteria assessed in 2D or 3D to evaluate tumor response

Authors: M. Lamuraglia, S. Raslan, R. Elaidi, S. Oudard, B. Escudier, K. Slimane, R. Renard Penna, M. Wagner, O. Lucidarme

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To determine whether 2D or 3D Choi and modified Choi (mChoi) criteria could assess the efficacy of everolimus against metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

Methods

RECIST-1.1, Choi, and mChoi criteria were applied retrospectively to analyse baseline and 2-month contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) images in 48 patients with mRCC enrolled in the everolimus arm of the French randomized double-blind multicentre phase III trial comparing everolimus versus placebo (RECORD-1). The primary endpoint was centrally reviewed progression-free survival (PFS) calculated from the initial RECORD-1 analysis. Mean attenuation was determined for 2D target lesion regions of interest drawn on CECT sections whose largest diameters had been measured, and for the 3D whole target lesion.

Results

The median PFS was 5.5 months. The median PFS for everolimus responders defined using 3D mChoi criteria was significantly longer than for non-responders (7.6 versus 5.4 months, respectively), corresponding to a hazard ratio for progression of 0.45 (95 % CI: 0.22–0.92), with respective 1-year survival rates of 31 % and 9 %. No other 2D or 3D imaging criteria at 2 months identified patients who would benefit from everolimus.

Conclusions

At 2 months, only 3D mChoi criteria were able to identify mRCC patients with a PFS benefit from everolimus.

Key points

Choi criteria could not identify everolimus-treated patients with significantly prolonged PFS.
mCHOI enabled identification of everolimus-treated mRCC patients with a PFS benefit.
3D attenuation measurement criteria appeared to perform better than single-slice measurement.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA et al (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205–216CrossRefPubMed Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA et al (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205–216CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Choi H, Charnsangavej C, Faria SC et al (2007) Correlation of computed tomography and positron emission tomography in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor treated at a single institution with imatinib mesylate: proposal of new computed tomography response criteria. J Clin Oncol 25:1753–1759CrossRefPubMed Choi H, Charnsangavej C, Faria SC et al (2007) Correlation of computed tomography and positron emission tomography in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor treated at a single institution with imatinib mesylate: proposal of new computed tomography response criteria. J Clin Oncol 25:1753–1759CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Smith AD, Shah SN, Rini BI et al (2010) Morphology, attenuation, size, and structure (MASS) criteria: assessing response and predicting clinical outcome in metastatic renal cell carcinoma on antiangiogenic targeted therapy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:1470–1478CrossRefPubMed Smith AD, Shah SN, Rini BI et al (2010) Morphology, attenuation, size, and structure (MASS) criteria: assessing response and predicting clinical outcome in metastatic renal cell carcinoma on antiangiogenic targeted therapy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:1470–1478CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Schmidt N, Hess V, Zumbrunn T et al (2013) Choi response criteria for prediction of survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with anti-angiogenic therapies. Eur Radiol 23:632–639PubMed Schmidt N, Hess V, Zumbrunn T et al (2013) Choi response criteria for prediction of survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with anti-angiogenic therapies. Eur Radiol 23:632–639PubMed
5.
go back to reference Van der Veldt M, Meijerink MR, van den Eertwegh JM et al (2010) Choi response criteria for early prediction of clinical outcome in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer treated with sunitinib. Br J Cancer 102:803–809PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Van der Veldt M, Meijerink MR, van den Eertwegh JM et al (2010) Choi response criteria for early prediction of clinical outcome in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer treated with sunitinib. Br J Cancer 102:803–809PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Krajewski KM, Guo M, Van den Abbeele AD et al (2011) Comparison of four early posttherapy imaging changes (EPTIC; RECIST 1.0, tumor shrinkage, computed tomography tumor density, Choi criteria) in assessing outcome to vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted therapy in patients with advanced renal cell cancer. Eur Urol 59:856–862CrossRefPubMed Krajewski KM, Guo M, Van den Abbeele AD et al (2011) Comparison of four early posttherapy imaging changes (EPTIC; RECIST 1.0, tumor shrinkage, computed tomography tumor density, Choi criteria) in assessing outcome to vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted therapy in patients with advanced renal cell cancer. Eur Urol 59:856–862CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Nathan PD, Vinayan A, Stott D et al (2010) CT response assessment combining reduction in both size and arterial phase density correlates with time to progression in metastatic renal cancer patients treated with targeted therapies. Cancer Biol Ther 9:15–19CrossRefPubMed Nathan PD, Vinayan A, Stott D et al (2010) CT response assessment combining reduction in both size and arterial phase density correlates with time to progression in metastatic renal cancer patients treated with targeted therapies. Cancer Biol Ther 9:15–19CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Krajewski KM, Franchetti Y, Nishino M et al (2014) 10 % Tumor diameter shrinkage on the first follow-up computed tomography predicts clinical outcome in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma treated with angiogenesis inhibitors: a follow-up validation study. Oncologist 19:507–514PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Krajewski KM, Franchetti Y, Nishino M et al (2014) 10 % Tumor diameter shrinkage on the first follow-up computed tomography predicts clinical outcome in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma treated with angiogenesis inhibitors: a follow-up validation study. Oncologist 19:507–514PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Motzer RJ, Escudier B, Oudard S et al (2008) Efficacy of everolimus in advanced renal cell carcinoma: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase III trial. Lancet 372:449–456CrossRefPubMed Motzer RJ, Escudier B, Oudard S et al (2008) Efficacy of everolimus in advanced renal cell carcinoma: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase III trial. Lancet 372:449–456CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Motzer RJ, Escudier B, Oudard S et al (2010) Phase 3 trial of everolimus for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: final results and analysis of prognostic factors. Cancer 116:4256–4265CrossRefPubMed Motzer RJ, Escudier B, Oudard S et al (2010) Phase 3 trial of everolimus for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: final results and analysis of prognostic factors. Cancer 116:4256–4265CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Oudard S, Thiam R, Fournier LS et al (2012) Optimisation of the tumour response threshold in patients treated with everolimus for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: analysis of response and progression-free survival in the RECORD-1 study. Eur J Cancer 48:1512–1518CrossRefPubMed Oudard S, Thiam R, Fournier LS et al (2012) Optimisation of the tumour response threshold in patients treated with everolimus for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: analysis of response and progression-free survival in the RECORD-1 study. Eur J Cancer 48:1512–1518CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Eisenhauer E, Therasse P, Bogaerts J et al (2009) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45:228–247CrossRefPubMed Eisenhauer E, Therasse P, Bogaerts J et al (2009) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45:228–247CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Stacchiotti S, Verderio P, Messina A et al (2012) Tumor response assessment by modified Choi criteria in localized high-risk soft tissue sarcoma treated with chemotherapy. Cancer 118:5857–5866CrossRefPubMed Stacchiotti S, Verderio P, Messina A et al (2012) Tumor response assessment by modified Choi criteria in localized high-risk soft tissue sarcoma treated with chemotherapy. Cancer 118:5857–5866CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Liu K, Li G, Fan C et al (2012) Adapted Choi response criteria for prediction of clinical outcome in locally advanced gastric cancer patients following preoperative chemotherapy. Acta Radiol 53:127–134CrossRefPubMed Liu K, Li G, Fan C et al (2012) Adapted Choi response criteria for prediction of clinical outcome in locally advanced gastric cancer patients following preoperative chemotherapy. Acta Radiol 53:127–134CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Smith AD, Lieber ML, Shah SN (2010) Assessing tumor response and detecting recurrence in metastatic renal cell carcinoma on targeted therapy: importance of size and attenuation on contrast-enhanced CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:157–165CrossRefPubMed Smith AD, Lieber ML, Shah SN (2010) Assessing tumor response and detecting recurrence in metastatic renal cell carcinoma on targeted therapy: importance of size and attenuation on contrast-enhanced CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:157–165CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
mTOR-inhibitor treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: contribution of Choi and modified Choi criteria assessed in 2D or 3D to evaluate tumor response
Authors
M. Lamuraglia
S. Raslan
R. Elaidi
S. Oudard
B. Escudier
K. Slimane
R. Renard Penna
M. Wagner
O. Lucidarme
Publication date
01-01-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 1/2016
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-3828-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

European Radiology 1/2016 Go to the issue