Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 1/2016

Open Access 01-01-2016 | Breast

Performance of one-view breast tomosynthesis as a stand-alone breast cancer screening modality: results from the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial, a population-based study

Authors: Kristina Lång, Ingvar Andersson, Aldana Rosso, Anders Tingberg, Pontus Timberg, Sophia Zackrisson

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To assess the performance of one-view digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) in breast cancer screening.

Methods

The Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial is a prospective population-based one-arm study with a planned inclusion of 15000 participants; a random sample of women aged 40–74 years eligible for the screening programme. This is an explorative analysis of the first half of the study population (n = 7500). Participants underwent one-view DBT and two-view digital mammography (DM), with independent double reading and scoring. Primary outcome measures were detection rate, recall rate and positive predictive value (PPV). McNemar's test with 95 % confidence intervals was used.

Results

Breast cancer was found in sixty-eight women. Of these, 46 cases were detected by both modalities, 21 by DBT alone and one by DM alone. The detection rate for one-view DBT was 8.9/1000 screens (95 % CI 6.9 to 11.3) and 6.3/1000 screens (4.6 to 8.3) for two-view DM (p < 0.0001). The recall rate after arbitration was 3.8 % (3.3 to 4.2) for DBT and 2.6 % (2.3 to 3.0) for DM (p < 0.0001). The PPV was 24 % for both DBT and DM.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that one-view DBT might be feasible as a stand-alone screening modality.

Key Points

One-view DBT as a stand-alone breast cancer screening modality has not been investigated.
One-view DBT increased the cancer detection rate significantly.
The recall rate increased significantly but was still low.
Breast cancer screening with one-view DBT as a stand-alone modality seems feasible.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Independent UK Panel on Breast Cancer Screening (2012) The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review. Lancet 380:1778–1786CrossRef Independent UK Panel on Breast Cancer Screening (2012) The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review. Lancet 380:1778–1786CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Laming D, Warren R (2000) Improving the detection of cancer in the screening of mammograms. J Med Screen 7:24–30CrossRefPubMed Laming D, Warren R (2000) Improving the detection of cancer in the screening of mammograms. J Med Screen 7:24–30CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Bochud FO, Valley JF, Verdun FR et al (1999) Estimation of the noisy component of anatomical backgrounds. Med Phys 26:1365–1370CrossRefPubMed Bochud FO, Valley JF, Verdun FR et al (1999) Estimation of the noisy component of anatomical backgrounds. Med Phys 26:1365–1370CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Carney PA, Miglioretti DL, Yankaskas BC et al (2003) Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography. Ann Intern Med 138:168–175CrossRefPubMed Carney PA, Miglioretti DL, Yankaskas BC et al (2003) Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography. Ann Intern Med 138:168–175CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Baker JA, Lo JY (2011) Breast tomosynthesis: state-of-the-art and review of the literature. Acad Radiol 18:1298–310CrossRefPubMed Baker JA, Lo JY (2011) Breast tomosynthesis: state-of-the-art and review of the literature. Acad Radiol 18:1298–310CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Niklason LT, Christian BT, Niklason LE et al (1997) Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging. Radiology 205:399–406CrossRefPubMed Niklason LT, Christian BT, Niklason LE et al (1997) Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging. Radiology 205:399–406CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Houssami N, Skaane P (2013) Overview of the evidence on digital breast tomosynthesis in breast cancer detection. Breast 22:101–108CrossRefPubMed Houssami N, Skaane P (2013) Overview of the evidence on digital breast tomosynthesis in breast cancer detection. Breast 22:101–108CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Lei J, Yang P, Zhang L et al (2013) Diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography for benign and malignant lesions in breasts: a meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 24:595–602CrossRef Lei J, Yang P, Zhang L et al (2013) Diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography for benign and malignant lesions in breasts: a meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 24:595–602CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Andersson I, Ikeda DM, Zackrisson S et al (2008) Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of breast cancer visibility and BIRADS classification in a population of cancers with subtle mammographic findings. Eur Radiol 18:2817–2825CrossRefPubMed Andersson I, Ikeda DM, Zackrisson S et al (2008) Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of breast cancer visibility and BIRADS classification in a population of cancers with subtle mammographic findings. Eur Radiol 18:2817–2825CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Svahn TM, Chakraborty DP, Ikeda D et al (2012) Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of diagnostic accuracy. Br J Radiol 85:e1074–82PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Svahn TM, Chakraborty DP, Ikeda D et al (2012) Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of diagnostic accuracy. Br J Radiol 85:e1074–82PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Ciatto S, Houssami N, Bernardi D et al (2013) Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study. Lancet Oncol 14:583–589CrossRefPubMed Ciatto S, Houssami N, Bernardi D et al (2013) Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study. Lancet Oncol 14:583–589CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Skaane P, Bandos AI, Gullien R et al (2013) Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program. Radiology 267:47–56CrossRefPubMed Skaane P, Bandos AI, Gullien R et al (2013) Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program. Radiology 267:47–56CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Haas BM, Kalra V, Geisel J et al (2013) Comparison of tomosynthesis plus digital mammography and digital mammography alone for breast cancer screening. Radiology 269:694–700CrossRefPubMed Haas BM, Kalra V, Geisel J et al (2013) Comparison of tomosynthesis plus digital mammography and digital mammography alone for breast cancer screening. Radiology 269:694–700CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Friedewald SM, Rafferty EA, Rose SL et al (2014) Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography. JAMA 311:2499–507CrossRefPubMed Friedewald SM, Rafferty EA, Rose SL et al (2014) Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography. JAMA 311:2499–507CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Van Engen R, Bouwman R, Dance D, Heid P, Lazzari B, Marshall N, Schopphoven S, Strudley C, Thjissen M, Young K BH (2013) Protocol for the quality control of the physical and technical aspects of digital breast tomosynthesis system. EUREF, European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis Van Engen R, Bouwman R, Dance D, Heid P, Lazzari B, Marshall N, Schopphoven S, Strudley C, Thjissen M, Young K BH (2013) Protocol for the quality control of the physical and technical aspects of digital breast tomosynthesis system. EUREF, European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis
17.
go back to reference Hemdal B (2011) Forward-scattered radiation from the compression paddle should be considered in glandular dose estimations. Radiat Prot Dosim 147:196–201CrossRef Hemdal B (2011) Forward-scattered radiation from the compression paddle should be considered in glandular dose estimations. Radiat Prot Dosim 147:196–201CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Mertelmeier T (2006) Optimizing filtered backprojection reconstruction for a breast tomosynthesis prototype device. Proc SPIE. doi:10.1117/12.651380 Mertelmeier T (2006) Optimizing filtered backprojection reconstruction for a breast tomosynthesis prototype device. Proc SPIE. doi:10.​1117/​12.​651380
19.
go back to reference Förnvik D, Andersson I, Svahn T, et al. The effect of reduced breast compression in breast tomosynthesis: human observer study using clinical cases. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 139:118–23 Förnvik D, Andersson I, Svahn T, et al. The effect of reduced breast compression in breast tomosynthesis: human observer study using clinical cases. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 139:118–23
20.
go back to reference D’Orsi CJ, Mendelson EB, Morris EASEA (2013) ACR BI-RADS® Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. American College of Radiology, Reston, VA D’Orsi CJ, Mendelson EB, Morris EASEA (2013) ACR BI-RADS® Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. American College of Radiology, Reston, VA
21.
go back to reference Sullivan M (2003) The statistical evaluation of medical tests for classification and prediction, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press Inc, New York, pp 230–233 Sullivan M (2003) The statistical evaluation of medical tests for classification and prediction, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press Inc, New York, pp 230–233
22.
go back to reference Tabar L, Fagerberg CJ, Gad A et al (1985) Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography. Randomised trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare. Lancet 1:829–832CrossRefPubMed Tabar L, Fagerberg CJ, Gad A et al (1985) Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography. Randomised trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare. Lancet 1:829–832CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Förnvik D, Zackrisson S, Ljungberg O et al (2010) Breast tomosynthesis: Accuracy of tumor measurement compared with digital mammography and ultrasonography. Acta Radiol 51:240–247CrossRefPubMed Förnvik D, Zackrisson S, Ljungberg O et al (2010) Breast tomosynthesis: Accuracy of tumor measurement compared with digital mammography and ultrasonography. Acta Radiol 51:240–247CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Evans AJ, Pinder SE, James JJ et al (2006) Is mammographic spiculation an independent, good prognostic factor in screening-detected invasive breast cancer? AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:1377–1380CrossRefPubMed Evans AJ, Pinder SE, James JJ et al (2006) Is mammographic spiculation an independent, good prognostic factor in screening-detected invasive breast cancer? AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:1377–1380CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Perry N, Broeders M, de Wolf C et al (2008) European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Fourth edition—summary document. Ann Oncol 19:614–622CrossRefPubMed Perry N, Broeders M, de Wolf C et al (2008) European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Fourth edition—summary document. Ann Oncol 19:614–622CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Lundgren B, Helleberg A (1982) Single oblique-view mammography for periodic screening for breast cancer in women. J Natl Cancer Inst 68:351–355PubMed Lundgren B, Helleberg A (1982) Single oblique-view mammography for periodic screening for breast cancer in women. J Natl Cancer Inst 68:351–355PubMed
27.
go back to reference Dustler M, Förnvik D, Timberg P, Tingberg A (2013) A Study of the Feasibility of using slabbing to reduce Tomosynthesis Review Time. Proc SPIE. doi:10.1117/12.2006987 Dustler M, Förnvik D, Timberg P, Tingberg A (2013) A Study of the Feasibility of using slabbing to reduce Tomosynthesis Review Time. Proc SPIE. doi:10.​1117/​12.​2006987
28.
go back to reference Stout NK, Rosenberg MA, Trentham-Dietz A et al (2006) Retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis of screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst 98:774–82CrossRefPubMed Stout NK, Rosenberg MA, Trentham-Dietz A et al (2006) Retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis of screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst 98:774–82CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Performance of one-view breast tomosynthesis as a stand-alone breast cancer screening modality: results from the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial, a population-based study
Authors
Kristina Lång
Ingvar Andersson
Aldana Rosso
Anders Tingberg
Pontus Timberg
Sophia Zackrisson
Publication date
01-01-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 1/2016
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-3803-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

European Radiology 1/2016 Go to the issue