Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 11/2015

01-11-2015 | Urogenital

Volume-based quantitative FDG PET/CT metrics and their association with optimal debulking and progression-free survival in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer undergoing secondary cytoreductive surgery

Authors: H. A. Vargas, I. A. Burger, D. A. Goldman, M. Miccò, R. E. Sosa, W. Weber, D. S. Chi, H. Hricak, E. Sala

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 11/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

Our aim was to evaluate the associations between quantitative 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography (FDG-PET) uptake metrics, optimal debulking (OD) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer undergoing secondary cytoreductive surgery.

Methods

Fifty-five patients with recurrent ovarian cancer underwent FDG-PET/CT within 90 days prior to surgery. Standardized uptake values (SUVmax), metabolically active tumour volumes (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were measured on PET. Exact logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test were used to assess associations between imaging metrics, OD and PFS.

Results

MTV (p = 0.0025) and TLG (p = 0.0043) were associated with OD; however, there was no significant association between SUVmax and debulking status (p = 0.83). Patients with an MTV above 7.52 mL and/or a TLG above 35.94 g had significantly shorter PFS (p = 0.0191 for MTV and p = 0.0069 for TLG). SUVmax was not significantly related to PFS (p = 0.10). PFS estimates at 3.5 years after surgery were 0.42 for patients with an MTV ≤ 7.52 mL and 0.19 for patients with an MTV > 7.52 mL; 0.46 for patients with a TLG ≤ 35.94 g and 0.15 for patients with a TLG > 35.94 g.

Conclusion

FDG-PET metrics that reflect metabolic tumour burden are associated with optimal secondary cytoreductive surgery and progression-free survival in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer.

Key Points

• Both TLG and MTV were associated with optimal tumour debulking.
• There was no significant association between SUVmax and tumour debulking status.
• Patients with higher MTV and/or TLG had significantly shorter PFS.
SUVmax was not significantly related to PFS.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Piccart MJ, Bertelsen K, Stuart G et al (2003) Long-term follow-up confirms a survival advantage of the paclitaxel-cisplatin regimen over the cyclophosphamide-cisplatin combination in advanced ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 13(Suppl 2):144–148CrossRefPubMed Piccart MJ, Bertelsen K, Stuart G et al (2003) Long-term follow-up confirms a survival advantage of the paclitaxel-cisplatin regimen over the cyclophosphamide-cisplatin combination in advanced ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 13(Suppl 2):144–148CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Rochon J, du Bois A (2011) Clinical research in epithelial ovarian cancer and patients' outcome. Ann Oncol 22(Suppl 7):vii16–vii19CrossRefPubMed Rochon J, du Bois A (2011) Clinical research in epithelial ovarian cancer and patients' outcome. Ann Oncol 22(Suppl 7):vii16–vii19CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Baumann KH, Wagner U, du Bois A (2012) The changing landscape of therapeutic strategies for recurrent ovarian cancer. Future Oncol 8:1135–1147CrossRefPubMed Baumann KH, Wagner U, du Bois A (2012) The changing landscape of therapeutic strategies for recurrent ovarian cancer. Future Oncol 8:1135–1147CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Harter P, Sehouli J, Reuss A et al (2011) Prospective validation study of a predictive score for operability of recurrent ovarian cancer: the Multicenter Intergroup Study DESKTOP II. A project of the AGO Kommission OVAR, AGO Study Group, NOGGO, AGO-Austria, and MITO. Int J Gynecol Cancer 21:289–295CrossRefPubMed Harter P, Sehouli J, Reuss A et al (2011) Prospective validation study of a predictive score for operability of recurrent ovarian cancer: the Multicenter Intergroup Study DESKTOP II. A project of the AGO Kommission OVAR, AGO Study Group, NOGGO, AGO-Austria, and MITO. Int J Gynecol Cancer 21:289–295CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Bristow RE, Puri I, Chi DS (2009) Cytoreductive surgery for recurrent ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis. Gynecol Oncol 112:265–274CrossRefPubMed Bristow RE, Puri I, Chi DS (2009) Cytoreductive surgery for recurrent ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis. Gynecol Oncol 112:265–274CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Friedlander M, Trimble E, Tinker A et al (2011) Clinical trials in recurrent ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 21:771–775CrossRefPubMed Friedlander M, Trimble E, Tinker A et al (2011) Clinical trials in recurrent ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 21:771–775CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Forstner R, Sala E, Kinkel K, Spencer JA (2010) ESUR guidelines: ovarian cancer staging and follow-up. Eur Radiol 20:2773–2780CrossRefPubMed Forstner R, Sala E, Kinkel K, Spencer JA (2010) ESUR guidelines: ovarian cancer staging and follow-up. Eur Radiol 20:2773–2780CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Gu P, Pan LL, Wu SQ, Sun L, Huang G (2009) CA 125, PET alone, PET-CT, CT and MRI in diagnosing recurrent ovarian carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Radiol 71:164–174CrossRefPubMed Gu P, Pan LL, Wu SQ, Sun L, Huang G (2009) CA 125, PET alone, PET-CT, CT and MRI in diagnosing recurrent ovarian carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Radiol 71:164–174CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Chung HH, Kwon HW, Kang KW et al (2012) Prognostic value of preoperative metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 19:1966–1972CrossRefPubMed Chung HH, Kwon HW, Kang KW et al (2012) Prognostic value of preoperative metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 19:1966–1972CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Yoo J, Choi JY, Moon SH et al (2012) Prognostic significance of volume-based metabolic parameters in uterine cervical cancer determined using 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. Int J Gynecol Cancer 22:1226–1233CrossRefPubMed Yoo J, Choi JY, Moon SH et al (2012) Prognostic significance of volume-based metabolic parameters in uterine cervical cancer determined using 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. Int J Gynecol Cancer 22:1226–1233CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Burger IA, Vargas HA, Donati OF et al (2013) The value of 18 F-FDG PET/CT in recurrent gynecologic malignancies prior to pelvic exenteration. Gynecol Oncol 129:586–592PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Burger IA, Vargas HA, Donati OF et al (2013) The value of 18 F-FDG PET/CT in recurrent gynecologic malignancies prior to pelvic exenteration. Gynecol Oncol 129:586–592PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Sala E, Kataoka M, Pandit-Taskar N et al (2010) Recurrent ovarian cancer: contrast-enhanced CT and PET/CT can accurately localize tumor recurrence and to predict patients’ survival. Radiology 257(1):125–134 Sala E, Kataoka M, Pandit-Taskar N et al (2010) Recurrent ovarian cancer: contrast-enhanced CT and PET/CT can accurately localize tumor recurrence and to predict patients’ survival. Radiology 257(1):125–134
14.
go back to reference Erdi YE, Mawlawi O, Larson SM et al (1997) Segmentation of lung lesion volume by adaptive positron emission tomography image thresholding. Cancer 80:2505–2509CrossRefPubMed Erdi YE, Mawlawi O, Larson SM et al (1997) Segmentation of lung lesion volume by adaptive positron emission tomography image thresholding. Cancer 80:2505–2509CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Kitajima K, Murakami K, Yamasaki E et al (2008) Performance of integrated FDG-PET/contrast-enhanced CT in the diagnosis of recurrent ovarian cancer: comparison with integrated FDG-PET/non-contrast-enhanced CT and enhanced CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 35:1439–1448CrossRefPubMed Kitajima K, Murakami K, Yamasaki E et al (2008) Performance of integrated FDG-PET/contrast-enhanced CT in the diagnosis of recurrent ovarian cancer: comparison with integrated FDG-PET/non-contrast-enhanced CT and enhanced CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 35:1439–1448CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Nanni C, Rubello D, Farsad M et al (2005) (18)F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of recurrent ovarian cancer: a prospective study on forty-one patients. Eur J Surg Oncol 31:792–797CrossRefPubMed Nanni C, Rubello D, Farsad M et al (2005) (18)F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of recurrent ovarian cancer: a prospective study on forty-one patients. Eur J Surg Oncol 31:792–797CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Sironi S, Messa C, Mangili G et al (2004) Integrated FDG PET/CT in patients with persistent ovarian cancer: correlation with histologic findings. Radiology 233:433–440CrossRefPubMed Sironi S, Messa C, Mangili G et al (2004) Integrated FDG PET/CT in patients with persistent ovarian cancer: correlation with histologic findings. Radiology 233:433–440CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Thrall MM, DeLoia JA, Gallion H, Avril N (2007) Clinical use of combined positron emission tomography and computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) in recurrent ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 105:17–22CrossRefPubMed Thrall MM, DeLoia JA, Gallion H, Avril N (2007) Clinical use of combined positron emission tomography and computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) in recurrent ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 105:17–22CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Fulham MJ, Carter J, Baldey A, Hicks RJ, Ramshaw JE, Gibson M (2009) The impact of PET-CT in suspected recurrent ovarian cancer: A prospective multi-centre study as part of the Australian PET Data Collection Project. Gynecol Oncol 112:462–468CrossRefPubMed Fulham MJ, Carter J, Baldey A, Hicks RJ, Ramshaw JE, Gibson M (2009) The impact of PET-CT in suspected recurrent ovarian cancer: A prospective multi-centre study as part of the Australian PET Data Collection Project. Gynecol Oncol 112:462–468CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Simcock B, Neesham D, Quinn M, Drummond E, Milner A, Hicks RJ (2006) The impact of PET/CT in the management of recurrent ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 103:271–276CrossRefPubMed Simcock B, Neesham D, Quinn M, Drummond E, Milner A, Hicks RJ (2006) The impact of PET/CT in the management of recurrent ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 103:271–276CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Soussan M, Wartski M, Cherel P et al (2008) Impact of FDG PET-CT imaging on the decision making in the biologic suspicion of ovarian carcinoma recurrence. Gynecol Oncol 108:160–165CrossRefPubMed Soussan M, Wartski M, Cherel P et al (2008) Impact of FDG PET-CT imaging on the decision making in the biologic suspicion of ovarian carcinoma recurrence. Gynecol Oncol 108:160–165CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Chi DS, McCaughty K, Diaz JP et al (2006) Guidelines and selection criteria for secondary cytoreductive surgery in patients with recurrent, platinum-sensitive epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Cancer 106:1933–1939CrossRefPubMed Chi DS, McCaughty K, Diaz JP et al (2006) Guidelines and selection criteria for secondary cytoreductive surgery in patients with recurrent, platinum-sensitive epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Cancer 106:1933–1939CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Burger IA, Vargas HA, Apte A et al (2014) PET quantification with a histogram derived total activity metric: superior quantitative consistency compared to total lesion glycolysis with absolute or relative SUV thresholds in phantoms and lung cancer patients. Nucl Med Biol 41:410–418PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Burger IA, Vargas HA, Apte A et al (2014) PET quantification with a histogram derived total activity metric: superior quantitative consistency compared to total lesion glycolysis with absolute or relative SUV thresholds in phantoms and lung cancer patients. Nucl Med Biol 41:410–418PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Burger IA, Vargas HA, Beattie BJ et al (2014) How to assess background activity: introducing a histogram-based analysis as a first step for accurate one-step PET quantification. Nucl Med Commun 35:316–324CrossRefPubMed Burger IA, Vargas HA, Beattie BJ et al (2014) How to assess background activity: introducing a histogram-based analysis as a first step for accurate one-step PET quantification. Nucl Med Commun 35:316–324CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Volume-based quantitative FDG PET/CT metrics and their association with optimal debulking and progression-free survival in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer undergoing secondary cytoreductive surgery
Authors
H. A. Vargas
I. A. Burger
D. A. Goldman
M. Miccò
R. E. Sosa
W. Weber
D. S. Chi
H. Hricak
E. Sala
Publication date
01-11-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 11/2015
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-3729-9

Other articles of this Issue 11/2015

European Radiology 11/2015 Go to the issue