Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 12/2012

01-12-2012 | Breast

Characteristics and screening outcome of women referred twice at screening mammography

Authors: Wikke Setz-Pels, Lucien E. M. Duijm, Marieke W. J. Louwman, Rudi M. H. Roumen, Frits H. Jansen, Adri C. Voogd

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 12/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To determine the characteristics and screening outcome of women referred twice at screening mammography.

Methods

We included 424,703 consecutive screening mammograms and collected imaging, biopsy and surgery reports of women with screen-detected breast cancer. Review of screening mammograms was performed to determine whether or not an initial and second referral comprised the same lesion.

Results

The overall positive predictive value of referral for cancer was 38.6% (95% CI 37.3-39.8%). Of 147 (2.6%) women referred twice, 86 had been referred for a different lesion at second referral and 32 of these proved malignant (37.2%, 95% CI 27.0-47.4%). Sixty-one women had been referred twice for the same lesion, of which 22 proved malignant (36.1%, 95% CI 24.1-48.0%). Characteristics of these women were comparable to women with cancer diagnosed after first referral. Compared with women without cancer at second referral for the same lesion, women with cancer more frequently showed suspicious densities at screening mammography (86.4% vs 53.8%, P = 0.02) and work-up at first referral had less frequently included biopsy (22.7% vs 61.5%, P = 0.004).

Conclusions

Cancer risk in women referred twice for the same lesion is similar to that observed in women referred once, or referred for a second time but for a different lesion.

Key Points

Cancer risk was 36% for lesions referred twice at screening mammography
The cancer risk was similar for lesions referred only once at screening
Densities at first referral were associated with increased cancer risk at second referral
No biopsy at first referral was associated with increased cancer risk at second referral
Patient and tumour characteristics were similar for women with and without diagnostic delay
Literature
1.
go back to reference Dowling E, Klabunde C, Patnick J, Ballard-Barbash R (2010) International Cancer Screening Network (ICSN) Breast and cervical cancer screening programme implementation in 16 countries. J Med Screen 17:139–146PubMedCrossRef Dowling E, Klabunde C, Patnick J, Ballard-Barbash R (2010) International Cancer Screening Network (ICSN) Breast and cervical cancer screening programme implementation in 16 countries. J Med Screen 17:139–146PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Smith-Bindman R, Chu PW, Miglioretti DL et al (2003) Comparison of screening mammography in the United States and the United Kingdom. JAMA 290:2129–2137PubMedCrossRef Smith-Bindman R, Chu PW, Miglioretti DL et al (2003) Comparison of screening mammography in the United States and the United Kingdom. JAMA 290:2129–2137PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Duijm LE, Groenewoud JH, de Koning HJ et al (2009) Delayed diagnosis of breast cancer in women recalled for suspicious screening mammography. Eur J Cancer 45:774–781PubMedCrossRef Duijm LE, Groenewoud JH, de Koning HJ et al (2009) Delayed diagnosis of breast cancer in women recalled for suspicious screening mammography. Eur J Cancer 45:774–781PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Seigneurin A, Exbrayat C, Labarère J, Delafosse P, Poncet F, Colonna M (2011) Association of diagnostic work-up with subsequent attendance in a breast cancer screening program for false-positive cases. Breast Cancer Res 127:221–228CrossRef Seigneurin A, Exbrayat C, Labarère J, Delafosse P, Poncet F, Colonna M (2011) Association of diagnostic work-up with subsequent attendance in a breast cancer screening program for false-positive cases. Breast Cancer Res 127:221–228CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Lampic C, Thurfjell E, Bergh J, Sjödérn PO (2001) Short- and long-term anxiety and depression in women recalled after breast cancer screening. Eur J Cancer 37:436–469CrossRef Lampic C, Thurfjell E, Bergh J, Sjödérn PO (2001) Short- and long-term anxiety and depression in women recalled after breast cancer screening. Eur J Cancer 37:436–469CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Hofvind S, Thorensen S, Tretli S (2004) The cumulative risk of a false-positive recall in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program. Cancer 101:1501–1507PubMedCrossRef Hofvind S, Thorensen S, Tretli S (2004) The cumulative risk of a false-positive recall in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program. Cancer 101:1501–1507PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference van der Steeg AF, Keyzer-Dekker CM, de Vries J, Roukema JA (2011) Effect of abnormal screening mammogram on quality of life. Br J Surg 98:537–542PubMedCrossRef van der Steeg AF, Keyzer-Dekker CM, de Vries J, Roukema JA (2011) Effect of abnormal screening mammogram on quality of life. Br J Surg 98:537–542PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Duijm LE, Groenewoud JH, Fracheboud J et al (2008) Utilization and cost of diagnostic imaging and biopsies following positive screening mammography in the southern breast cancer screening region of the Netherlands, 2000-2005. Eur Radiol 18:1390–1397CrossRef Duijm LE, Groenewoud JH, Fracheboud J et al (2008) Utilization and cost of diagnostic imaging and biopsies following positive screening mammography in the southern breast cancer screening region of the Netherlands, 2000-2005. Eur Radiol 18:1390–1397CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Brewer NT, Salz T, Lillie SE (2007) Systematic review: the long term effects of false-positive mammograms. Ann Intern Med 146:502–510PubMed Brewer NT, Salz T, Lillie SE (2007) Systematic review: the long term effects of false-positive mammograms. Ann Intern Med 146:502–510PubMed
11.
go back to reference Fracheboud J, de Koning HJ, Beemsterboer PM et al (1998) Nation-wide breast cancer screening in the Netherlands: results of initial and subsequent screening 1990-1995. National Evaluation Team for Breast Cancer Screening. Int J Cancer 75:694–698PubMedCrossRef Fracheboud J, de Koning HJ, Beemsterboer PM et al (1998) Nation-wide breast cancer screening in the Netherlands: results of initial and subsequent screening 1990-1995. National Evaluation Team for Breast Cancer Screening. Int J Cancer 75:694–698PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Maes RM, Dronkers DJ, Hendriks JH, Thijssen MA, Nab HW (1997) Do non-specific minimal signs in a biennial mammographic breast cancer screening programme need further diagnostic assessment? Br J Radiol 70:34–38PubMed Maes RM, Dronkers DJ, Hendriks JH, Thijssen MA, Nab HW (1997) Do non-specific minimal signs in a biennial mammographic breast cancer screening programme need further diagnostic assessment? Br J Radiol 70:34–38PubMed
13.
go back to reference UICC (International Union Against Cancer) (1997) In: Sobin LH, Wittekind C (eds) TNM classification of malignant tumours, 5th edn. Wiley-Liss, New-York UICC (International Union Against Cancer) (1997) In: Sobin LH, Wittekind C (eds) TNM classification of malignant tumours, 5th edn. Wiley-Liss, New-York
14.
go back to reference American College of Radiology (2003) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS), 4th edn. American College of Radiology, Reston American College of Radiology (2003) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS), 4th edn. American College of Radiology, Reston
15.
go back to reference Setz-Pels W, Duijm LE, Groenewoud JH et al (2011) Detection of bilateral breast cancer at biennial screening mammography in the Netherlands: a population based study. Radiology 260:357–363PubMedCrossRef Setz-Pels W, Duijm LE, Groenewoud JH et al (2011) Detection of bilateral breast cancer at biennial screening mammography in the Netherlands: a population based study. Radiology 260:357–363PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Richards MA, Westcombe AM, Love SB, Littlejohns P, Ramirez AJ (1999) Influence of delay on survival in patients with breast cancer: a systematic review. Lancet 353:1119–1126PubMedCrossRef Richards MA, Westcombe AM, Love SB, Littlejohns P, Ramirez AJ (1999) Influence of delay on survival in patients with breast cancer: a systematic review. Lancet 353:1119–1126PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Physician Insurers Association of America (2003) Breast cancer report. Physician Insurers Association of America, Rockville Physician Insurers Association of America (2003) Breast cancer report. Physician Insurers Association of America, Rockville
18.
go back to reference Vizcaíno I, Gadea L, Andreo L; Screening Program Working Group et al (2001) Short-term follow-up results in 795 non-palpable probably benign lesions detected at screening mammography. Radiology 219:475–483PubMed Vizcaíno I, Gadea L, Andreo L; Screening Program Working Group et al (2001) Short-term follow-up results in 795 non-palpable probably benign lesions detected at screening mammography. Radiology 219:475–483PubMed
19.
go back to reference Yasmeen S, Romano PS, Pettinger M et al (2003) Frequency and predictive value of a mammographic recommendation for short-interval follow-up. J Natl Cancer Inst 95:429–436PubMedCrossRef Yasmeen S, Romano PS, Pettinger M et al (2003) Frequency and predictive value of a mammographic recommendation for short-interval follow-up. J Natl Cancer Inst 95:429–436PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Rosen EL, Baker JA, Soo MS (2002) Malignant lesions initially subjected to short-term mammographic follow-up. Radiology 223:221–228PubMedCrossRef Rosen EL, Baker JA, Soo MS (2002) Malignant lesions initially subjected to short-term mammographic follow-up. Radiology 223:221–228PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Duijm LE, Groeneveld JH, Jansen FH, Fracheboud J, van Beek M, de Koning HJ (2004) Mammography screening in the Netherlands: delay in the diagnosis of breast cancer after breast cancer screening. Br J Cancer 91:1795–1799PubMedCrossRef Duijm LE, Groeneveld JH, Jansen FH, Fracheboud J, van Beek M, de Koning HJ (2004) Mammography screening in the Netherlands: delay in the diagnosis of breast cancer after breast cancer screening. Br J Cancer 91:1795–1799PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Ciatto S, Houssami N, Ambrogetti D et al (2007) Minority report-false negative breast assessment in women recalled for suspicious screening mammography: imaging and pathological features, and associated delay in diagnosis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 105:37–43PubMedCrossRef Ciatto S, Houssami N, Ambrogetti D et al (2007) Minority report-false negative breast assessment in women recalled for suspicious screening mammography: imaging and pathological features, and associated delay in diagnosis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 105:37–43PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Rakha EA, Lee AH, Reed J et al (2010) Screen-detected malignant breast lesions diagnosed following benign (B2) or normal (B1) needle core biopsy diagnoses. Eur J Cancer 46:1835–1840PubMedCrossRef Rakha EA, Lee AH, Reed J et al (2010) Screen-detected malignant breast lesions diagnosed following benign (B2) or normal (B1) needle core biopsy diagnoses. Eur J Cancer 46:1835–1840PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Youk JH, Kim EK, Kim MJ, Lee JY, Oh KK (2007) Missed breast cancers at US-guided core needle biopsy: how to reduce them. Radiographics 27:79–94PubMedCrossRef Youk JH, Kim EK, Kim MJ, Lee JY, Oh KK (2007) Missed breast cancers at US-guided core needle biopsy: how to reduce them. Radiographics 27:79–94PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Otten JD, Karssemeijer N, Hendriks JH et al (2005) Effect of recall rate on earlier screen detection of breast cancers based on the Dutch performance indicators. J Nat Cancer Inst 97:748–754PubMedCrossRef Otten JD, Karssemeijer N, Hendriks JH et al (2005) Effect of recall rate on earlier screen detection of breast cancers based on the Dutch performance indicators. J Nat Cancer Inst 97:748–754PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Yankaskas BC, Cleveland RJ, Schell MJ, Kozar R (2001) Association of recall rates with sensitivity and positive predictive values of screening mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 177:543–549PubMed Yankaskas BC, Cleveland RJ, Schell MJ, Kozar R (2001) Association of recall rates with sensitivity and positive predictive values of screening mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 177:543–549PubMed
27.
go back to reference Lampic C, Thurfjell E, Bergh J, Sjödérn PO (2003) The influence of false-positive mammogram on women’s subsequent behaviour for detecting breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 39:1730–1737PubMedCrossRef Lampic C, Thurfjell E, Bergh J, Sjödérn PO (2003) The influence of false-positive mammogram on women’s subsequent behaviour for detecting breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 39:1730–1737PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Andersen SB, Vejborg I, von Euler-Chelpin M (2008) Particiaption behaviour following a false positive test in the Copenhagen mammography screening programme. Acta Oncologica 47:550–555PubMedCrossRef Andersen SB, Vejborg I, von Euler-Chelpin M (2008) Particiaption behaviour following a false positive test in the Copenhagen mammography screening programme. Acta Oncologica 47:550–555PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference McCann J, Stockton D, Godward S (2002) Impact of false-positive mammography on subsequent screening attendance and risk of cancer. Breast Cancer Res 4:R11PubMedCrossRef McCann J, Stockton D, Godward S (2002) Impact of false-positive mammography on subsequent screening attendance and risk of cancer. Breast Cancer Res 4:R11PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Pinckney RG, Geller BM, Burman M, Littenberg B (2003) Effect of false-positive mammograms on return for subsequent screening mammography. Am J Med 114:120–125PubMedCrossRef Pinckney RG, Geller BM, Burman M, Littenberg B (2003) Effect of false-positive mammograms on return for subsequent screening mammography. Am J Med 114:120–125PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Duijm LE, Groenewoud JH, Roumen RM, de Koning HJ, Plaisir M, Fracheboud J (2007) A decade of breast cancer screening in the Netherlands: trends in preoperative diagnosis of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 106:113–119PubMedCrossRef Duijm LE, Groenewoud JH, Roumen RM, de Koning HJ, Plaisir M, Fracheboud J (2007) A decade of breast cancer screening in the Netherlands: trends in preoperative diagnosis of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 106:113–119PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Ciatto S, Rosselli del Turco M, Ambrogetti D et al (1997) Solid nonpalpable breast lesions. Success and failure of guided fine-needle aspiration cytology in a consecutive series of 2444 cases. Acta Radiol 38:815–820PubMed Ciatto S, Rosselli del Turco M, Ambrogetti D et al (1997) Solid nonpalpable breast lesions. Success and failure of guided fine-needle aspiration cytology in a consecutive series of 2444 cases. Acta Radiol 38:815–820PubMed
33.
go back to reference Arisio R, Cuccorese C, Accinelli G, Mano MP, Bordon R, Fessia L (1998) Role of fine-needle aspiration biopsy in breast lesions: analysis of a series of 4,110 cases. Diagn Cytopathol 18:462–467PubMedCrossRef Arisio R, Cuccorese C, Accinelli G, Mano MP, Bordon R, Fessia L (1998) Role of fine-needle aspiration biopsy in breast lesions: analysis of a series of 4,110 cases. Diagn Cytopathol 18:462–467PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Pisano ED, Fajardo LL, Sneige N et al (2001) Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions in a multicenter clinical trial: results from the radiologic diagnostic oncology group. Radiology 219:785–792PubMed Pisano ED, Fajardo LL, Sneige N et al (2001) Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions in a multicenter clinical trial: results from the radiologic diagnostic oncology group. Radiology 219:785–792PubMed
Metadata
Title
Characteristics and screening outcome of women referred twice at screening mammography
Authors
Wikke Setz-Pels
Lucien E. M. Duijm
Marieke W. J. Louwman
Rudi M. H. Roumen
Frits H. Jansen
Adri C. Voogd
Publication date
01-12-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 12/2012
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2523-1

Other articles of this Issue 12/2012

European Radiology 12/2012 Go to the issue