Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 5/2012

Open Access 01-05-2012 | Breast

Shear wave elastography for breast masses is highly reproducible

Authors: David O. Cosgrove, Wendie A. Berg, Caroline J Doré, Danny M. Skyba, Jean-Pierre Henry, Joel Gay, Claude Cohen-Bacrie, the BE1 Study Group

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 5/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate intra- and interobserver reproducibility of shear wave elastography (SWE) for breast masses.

Methods

For intraobserver reproducibility, each observer obtained three consecutive SWE images of 758 masses that were visible on ultrasound. 144 (19%) were malignant. Weighted kappa was used to assess the agreement of qualitative elastographic features; the reliability of quantitative measurements was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). For the interobserver reproducibility, a blinded observer reviewed images and agreement on features was determined.

Results

Mean age was 50 years; mean mass size was 13 mm. Qualitatively, SWE images were at least reasonably similar for 666/758 (87.9%). Intraclass correlation for SWE diameter, area and perimeter was almost perfect (ICC ≥ 0.94). Intraobserver reliability for maximum and mean elasticity was almost perfect (ICC = 0.84 and 0.87) and was substantial for the ratio of mass-to-fat elasticity (ICC = 0.77). Interobserver agreement was moderate for SWE homogeneity (κ = 0.57), substantial for qualitative colour assessment of maximum elasticity (κ = 0.66), fair for SWE shape (κ = 0.40), fair for B-mode mass margins (κ = 0.38), and moderate for B-mode mass shape (κ = 0.58), orientation (κ = 0.53) and BI-RADS assessment (κ = 0.59).

Conclusions

SWE is highly reproducible for assessing elastographic features of breast masses within and across observers. SWE interpretation is at least as consistent as that of BI-RADS ultrasound B-mode features.

Key Points

Shear wave ultrasound elastography can measure the stiffness of breast tissue
It provides a qualitatively and quantitatively interpretable colour-coded map of tissue stiffness
Intraobserver reproducibility of SWE is almost perfect while intraobserver reproducibility of SWE proved to be moderate to substantial
The most reproducible SWE features between observers were SWE image homogeneity and maximum elasticity
Literature
1.
go back to reference Berg WA (2004) Supplemental screening sonography in dense breasts. Radiol Clin North Am 42:845–851PubMedCrossRef Berg WA (2004) Supplemental screening sonography in dense breasts. Radiol Clin North Am 42:845–851PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Corsetti V, Ferrari A, Ghirardi M et al (2006) Role of ultrasonography in detecting mammographically occult breast carcinoma in women with dense breasts. Radiol Med (Torino) 111:440–448CrossRef Corsetti V, Ferrari A, Ghirardi M et al (2006) Role of ultrasonography in detecting mammographically occult breast carcinoma in women with dense breasts. Radiol Med (Torino) 111:440–448CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Houssami N, Irwig L, Simpson JM, McKessar M, Blome S, Noakes J (2003) Sydney Breast Imaging Accuracy Study: comparative sensitivity and specificity of mammography and sonography in young women with symptoms. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180:935–940PubMed Houssami N, Irwig L, Simpson JM, McKessar M, Blome S, Noakes J (2003) Sydney Breast Imaging Accuracy Study: comparative sensitivity and specificity of mammography and sonography in young women with symptoms. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180:935–940PubMed
4.
go back to reference Krouskop TA, Wheeler TM, Kallel F, Garra BS, Hall T (1998) Elastic moduli of breast and prostate tissues under compression. Ultrason Imaging 20:260–274PubMed Krouskop TA, Wheeler TM, Kallel F, Garra BS, Hall T (1998) Elastic moduli of breast and prostate tissues under compression. Ultrason Imaging 20:260–274PubMed
5.
go back to reference Burnside ES, Hall TJ, Sommer AM et al (2007) Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast masses with US strain imaging. Radiology 245:401–410PubMedCrossRef Burnside ES, Hall TJ, Sommer AM et al (2007) Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast masses with US strain imaging. Radiology 245:401–410PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Itoh A, Ueno E, Tohno E et al (2006) Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis. Radiology 239:341–350PubMedCrossRef Itoh A, Ueno E, Tohno E et al (2006) Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis. Radiology 239:341–350PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Chang JM, Moon WK, Cho N, Kim SJ (2011) Breast mass evaluation: factors influencing the quality of US elastography. Radiology 259:59–64PubMedCrossRef Chang JM, Moon WK, Cho N, Kim SJ (2011) Breast mass evaluation: factors influencing the quality of US elastography. Radiology 259:59–64PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Athanasiou A, Tardivon A, Tanter M et al (2010) Breast lesions: quantitative elastography with supersonic shear imaging–preliminary results. Radiology 256:297–303PubMedCrossRef Athanasiou A, Tardivon A, Tanter M et al (2010) Breast lesions: quantitative elastography with supersonic shear imaging–preliminary results. Radiology 256:297–303PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Mendelson EB, Baum JK, Berg WA, Merritt CRB, Rubin E (2003) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System, BI-RADS: ultrasound, 1st edn. American College of Radiology Reston Mendelson EB, Baum JK, Berg WA, Merritt CRB, Rubin E (2003) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System, BI-RADS: ultrasound, 1st edn. American College of Radiology Reston
10.
go back to reference Berg W, Cosgrove D, Doré C, et al (2011 accepted, pending revision) Shear wave elastography improves the specificity of breast ultrasound: the BE1 Multinational Study of 939 Masses. Radiology Berg W, Cosgrove D, Doré C, et al (2011 accepted, pending revision) Shear wave elastography improves the specificity of breast ultrasound: the BE1 Multinational Study of 939 Masses. Radiology
11.
go back to reference Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. Biometrics 33:363–374PubMedCrossRef Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. Biometrics 33:363–374PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Fleiss J, Cohen J (1973) The equivalence of weighted kappa and the intraclass correlation coefficient as measures of reliability. J Educational and Psychological Measurement 33:613–619CrossRef Fleiss J, Cohen J (1973) The equivalence of weighted kappa and the intraclass correlation coefficient as measures of reliability. J Educational and Psychological Measurement 33:613–619CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Lazarus E, Mainiero MB, Schepps B, Koelliker SL, Livingston LS (2006) BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value. Radiology 239:385–391PubMedCrossRef Lazarus E, Mainiero MB, Schepps B, Koelliker SL, Livingston LS (2006) BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value. Radiology 239:385–391PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Lee HJ, Kim EK, Kim MJ et al (2008) Observer variability of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) for breast ultrasound. Eur J Radiol 65:293–298PubMedCrossRef Lee HJ, Kim EK, Kim MJ et al (2008) Observer variability of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) for breast ultrasound. Eur J Radiol 65:293–298PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Abdullah N, Mesurolle B, El-Khoury M, Kao E (2009) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System lexicon for US: interobserver agreement for assessment of breast masses. Radiology 252:665–672PubMedCrossRef Abdullah N, Mesurolle B, El-Khoury M, Kao E (2009) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System lexicon for US: interobserver agreement for assessment of breast masses. Radiology 252:665–672PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Garra BS, Cespedes EI, Ophir J et al (1997) Elastography of breast lesions: initial clinical results. Radiology 202:79–86PubMed Garra BS, Cespedes EI, Ophir J et al (1997) Elastography of breast lesions: initial clinical results. Radiology 202:79–86PubMed
17.
go back to reference Thomas A, Fischer T, Frey H et al (2006) Real-time elastography–an advanced method of ultrasound: first results in 108 patients with breast lesions. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 28:335–340PubMedCrossRef Thomas A, Fischer T, Frey H et al (2006) Real-time elastography–an advanced method of ultrasound: first results in 108 patients with breast lesions. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 28:335–340PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Evans A, Whelehan P, Thomson K et al (2010) Quantitative shear wave ultrasound elastography: initial experience in solid breast masses. Breast Cancer Res Treat 12:R104 Evans A, Whelehan P, Thomson K et al (2010) Quantitative shear wave ultrasound elastography: initial experience in solid breast masses. Breast Cancer Res Treat 12:R104
19.
go back to reference Mendelson E, Böhm-Vélez M, Berg W, et al (2012 in press) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System, BI-RADS: Ultrasound, 2nd edition. American College of Radiology, Reston Mendelson E, Böhm-Vélez M, Berg W, et al (2012 in press) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System, BI-RADS: Ultrasound, 2nd edition. American College of Radiology, Reston
Metadata
Title
Shear wave elastography for breast masses is highly reproducible
Authors
David O. Cosgrove
Wendie A. Berg
Caroline J Doré
Danny M. Skyba
Jean-Pierre Henry
Joel Gay
Claude Cohen-Bacrie
the BE1 Study Group
Publication date
01-05-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 5/2012
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-011-2340-y

Other articles of this Issue 5/2012

European Radiology 5/2012 Go to the issue