Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 5/2011

01-05-2011 | Breast

Interval growth of probably benign breast lesions on follow-up ultrasound: how can these be managed?

Authors: Hee Jung Moon, Eun-Kyung Kim, Jin Young Kwak, Jung Hyun Yoon, Min Jung Kim

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 5/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To investigate the malignancy rate in probably benign lesions with interval growth on follow-up ultrasound (US) and the cut-off values for predicting malignancy.

Methods

By retrospective reviewing 19,435 US examinations assessed as probably benign lesions, a total of 214 lesions with interval growth in 199 patients were included. The increased volume (%V),%V per month, the most increased diameter (D), and D per month were compared between malignant and benign lesions. Malignancy rates were compared between lesions with or without newly developed suspicious malignant features.

Results

Twenty-two (10.3%) malignancies showed significant increase in%V,%V per month, D, and D per month compared with 192 (89.7%) benign lesions (p = 0.0083, <0.0001, <0.0001, and <0.0001, respectively). Fifteen (38.5%) of 39 lesions where suspicious features developed proved malignant, whereas 7 (4%) out of 175 without were malignant (p = 0.0011). In nodules without suspicious features, 24.2% of%V per month and 1.9 mm of D per month showed high sensitivity (85.7% and 71.4%) and specificity (67.8% and 97.6%) for predicting malignancy.

Conclusions

Probably benign lesions with interval growth should undergo prompt biopsy because of the 10.3% malignancy rate. In lesions where suspicious features developed, the malignancy rate increased to 38.5%.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Chala L, Endo E, Kim S et al (2007) Gray-scale sonography of solid breast masses: diagnosis of probably benign masses and reduction of the number of biopsies. J Clin Ultrasound 35:9–19PubMedCrossRef Chala L, Endo E, Kim S et al (2007) Gray-scale sonography of solid breast masses: diagnosis of probably benign masses and reduction of the number of biopsies. J Clin Ultrasound 35:9–19PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Graf O, Helbich TH, Fuchsjaeger MH et al (2004) Follow-up of palpable circumscribed noncalcified solid breast masses at mammography and US: can biopsy be averted? Radiology 233:850–856PubMedCrossRef Graf O, Helbich TH, Fuchsjaeger MH et al (2004) Follow-up of palpable circumscribed noncalcified solid breast masses at mammography and US: can biopsy be averted? Radiology 233:850–856PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Graf O, Helbich TH, Hopf G, Graf C, Sickles EA (2007) Probably benign breast masses at US: is follow-up an acceptable alternative to biopsy? Radiology 244:87–93PubMedCrossRef Graf O, Helbich TH, Hopf G, Graf C, Sickles EA (2007) Probably benign breast masses at US: is follow-up an acceptable alternative to biopsy? Radiology 244:87–93PubMedCrossRef
4.
5.
go back to reference American College of Radiology (2003) Breast imaging reporting and data system. American College of Radiology, Reston American College of Radiology (2003) Breast imaging reporting and data system. American College of Radiology, Reston
6.
go back to reference Rahbar G, Sie AC, Hansen GC et al (1999) Benign versus malignant solid breast masses: US differentiation. Radiology 213:889–894PubMed Rahbar G, Sie AC, Hansen GC et al (1999) Benign versus malignant solid breast masses: US differentiation. Radiology 213:889–894PubMed
7.
go back to reference Raza S, Chikarmane SA, Neilsen S, Zorn LM, Birdwell RL (2008) BI-RADS 3, 4, and 5 lesions: value of US in management–follow-up and outcome. Radiology 248:773–781CrossRef Raza S, Chikarmane SA, Neilsen S, Zorn LM, Birdwell RL (2008) BI-RADS 3, 4, and 5 lesions: value of US in management–follow-up and outcome. Radiology 248:773–781CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Stavros A (2003) Breast ultrasound. LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS, Philadelphia Stavros A (2003) Breast ultrasound. LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS, Philadelphia
9.
go back to reference Stavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL, Dennis MA, Parker SH, Sisney GA (1995) Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology 196:123–134PubMed Stavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL, Dennis MA, Parker SH, Sisney GA (1995) Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology 196:123–134PubMed
10.
go back to reference Kim EK, Ko KH, Oh KK et al (2008) Clinical application of the BI-RADS final assessment to breast sonography in conjunction with mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:1209–1215PubMedCrossRef Kim EK, Ko KH, Oh KK et al (2008) Clinical application of the BI-RADS final assessment to breast sonography in conjunction with mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:1209–1215PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Helvie MA, Pennes DR, Rebner M, Adler DD (1991) Mammographic follow-up of low-suspicion lesions: compliance rate and diagnostic yield. Radiology 178:155–158PubMed Helvie MA, Pennes DR, Rebner M, Adler DD (1991) Mammographic follow-up of low-suspicion lesions: compliance rate and diagnostic yield. Radiology 178:155–158PubMed
12.
go back to reference Hermann G, Keller RJ, Tartter P, Bleiweiss I, Rabinowitz JG (1995) Interval changes in nonpalpable breast lesions as an indication of malignancy. Can Assoc Radiol J 46:105–110PubMed Hermann G, Keller RJ, Tartter P, Bleiweiss I, Rabinowitz JG (1995) Interval changes in nonpalpable breast lesions as an indication of malignancy. Can Assoc Radiol J 46:105–110PubMed
13.
go back to reference Sickles EA (1991) Periodic mammographic follow-up of probably benign lesions: results in 3, 184 consecutive cases. Radiology 179:463–468PubMed Sickles EA (1991) Periodic mammographic follow-up of probably benign lesions: results in 3, 184 consecutive cases. Radiology 179:463–468PubMed
14.
go back to reference Gordon PB, Gagnon FA, Lanzkowsky L (2003) Solid breast masses diagnosed as fibroadenoma at fine-needle aspiration biopsy: acceptable rates of growth at long-term follow-up. Radiology 229:233–238PubMedCrossRef Gordon PB, Gagnon FA, Lanzkowsky L (2003) Solid breast masses diagnosed as fibroadenoma at fine-needle aspiration biopsy: acceptable rates of growth at long-term follow-up. Radiology 229:233–238PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Park YM, Kim EK, Lee JH et al (2008) Palpable breast masses with probably benign morphology at sonography: can biopsy be deferred? Acta Radiol 49:1104–1111PubMedCrossRef Park YM, Kim EK, Lee JH et al (2008) Palpable breast masses with probably benign morphology at sonography: can biopsy be deferred? Acta Radiol 49:1104–1111PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Shin JH, Han B, Ko EY, Choe YH, Nam S (2009) Probably benign breast masses diagnosed by sonography: is there a difference in the cancer rate according to palpability? AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:W187–W191PubMedCrossRef Shin JH, Han B, Ko EY, Choe YH, Nam S (2009) Probably benign breast masses diagnosed by sonography: is there a difference in the cancer rate according to palpability? AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:W187–W191PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Jackson VP (1995) Management of solid breast nodules: what is the role of sonography? Radiology 196:14–15PubMed Jackson VP (1995) Management of solid breast nodules: what is the role of sonography? Radiology 196:14–15PubMed
18.
go back to reference Costantini M, Belli P, Ierardi C, Franceschini G, La Torre G, Bonomo L (2007) Solid breast mass characterisation: use of the sonographic BI-RADS classification. Radiol Med 112:877–894PubMedCrossRef Costantini M, Belli P, Ierardi C, Franceschini G, La Torre G, Bonomo L (2007) Solid breast mass characterisation: use of the sonographic BI-RADS classification. Radiol Med 112:877–894PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Hong AS, Rosen EL, Soo MS, Baker JA (2005) BI-RADS for sonography: positive and negative predictive values of sonographic features. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:1260–1265PubMed Hong AS, Rosen EL, Soo MS, Baker JA (2005) BI-RADS for sonography: positive and negative predictive values of sonographic features. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:1260–1265PubMed
20.
go back to reference Moon HJ, Kim MJ, Kwak JY, Kim EK (2010) Probably benign breast lesions on ultrasonography: a retrospective review of ultrasonographic features and clinical factors affecting the BI-RADS categorization. Acta Radiol 51:375–382PubMedCrossRef Moon HJ, Kim MJ, Kwak JY, Kim EK (2010) Probably benign breast lesions on ultrasonography: a retrospective review of ultrasonographic features and clinical factors affecting the BI-RADS categorization. Acta Radiol 51:375–382PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Varas X, Leborgne F, Leborgne JH (1992) Nonpalpable, probably benign lesions: role of follow-up mammography. Radiology 184:409–414PubMed Varas X, Leborgne F, Leborgne JH (1992) Nonpalpable, probably benign lesions: role of follow-up mammography. Radiology 184:409–414PubMed
22.
go back to reference Rosen EL, Baker JA, Soo MS (2002) Malignant lesions initially subjected to short-term mammographic follow-up. Radiology 223:221–228PubMedCrossRef Rosen EL, Baker JA, Soo MS (2002) Malignant lesions initially subjected to short-term mammographic follow-up. Radiology 223:221–228PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Moon HJ, Kim MJ, Kwak JY et al (2010) Malignant lesions initially categorized as probably benign breast lesions: retrospective review of ultrasonographic, clinical, and pathological characteristics. Ultrasound Med Biol 36:551–559PubMedCrossRef Moon HJ, Kim MJ, Kwak JY et al (2010) Malignant lesions initially categorized as probably benign breast lesions: retrospective review of ultrasonographic, clinical, and pathological characteristics. Ultrasound Med Biol 36:551–559PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Adler DD, Helvie MA, Ikeda DM (1990) Nonpalpable, probably benign breast lesions: follow-up strategies after initial detection on mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 155:1195–1201PubMed Adler DD, Helvie MA, Ikeda DM (1990) Nonpalpable, probably benign breast lesions: follow-up strategies after initial detection on mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 155:1195–1201PubMed
26.
go back to reference Meyer JE, Frenna TH, Polger M, Sonnenfeld MR, Shaffer K (1992) Enlarging occult fibroadenomas. Radiology 183:639–641PubMed Meyer JE, Frenna TH, Polger M, Sonnenfeld MR, Shaffer K (1992) Enlarging occult fibroadenomas. Radiology 183:639–641PubMed
27.
go back to reference Swisher RC, Gade NR, Suk JJ, Fu YS, Bassett LW (1992) Enlarging fibroadenoma in a postmenopausal woman: case report. Radiology 184:425–426PubMed Swisher RC, Gade NR, Suk JJ, Fu YS, Bassett LW (1992) Enlarging fibroadenoma in a postmenopausal woman: case report. Radiology 184:425–426PubMed
28.
go back to reference Nixon AJ, Neuberg D, Hayes DF et al (1994) Relationship of patient age to pathologic features of the tumor and prognosis for patients with stage I or II breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 12:888–894PubMed Nixon AJ, Neuberg D, Hayes DF et al (1994) Relationship of patient age to pathologic features of the tumor and prognosis for patients with stage I or II breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 12:888–894PubMed
Metadata
Title
Interval growth of probably benign breast lesions on follow-up ultrasound: how can these be managed?
Authors
Hee Jung Moon
Eun-Kyung Kim
Jin Young Kwak
Jung Hyun Yoon
Min Jung Kim
Publication date
01-05-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 5/2011
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-010-2012-3

Other articles of this Issue 5/2011

European Radiology 5/2011 Go to the issue