Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 5/2011

01-05-2011 | Contrast Media

Intra-individual, randomised comparison of the MRI contrast agents gadobutrol and gadoterate in imaging the distal lower limb of patients with known or suspected osteomyelitis, evaluated in an off-site blinded read

Authors: Werner Pennekamp, Daniela Roggenland, Steffen Hering, Stefan Lemburg, Soeren Peters, Sabrina Sterl, Carsten Schwenke, Volkmar Nicolas

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 5/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To prove that 1.0 M gadobutrol provides superior contrast enhancement in suspicion of osteomyelitis of the feet compared with 0.5 M gadoterate.

Methods

MRI of feet was performed on 2 separate occasions. Independent injections of 1.0 M gadobutrol and 0.5 M gadoterate at doses of 0.1 mmol Gd/kg body weight were administered per patient. The interval between the two MR examinations was between 24 h and 7 days. Evaluation was performed in an off-site blinded read.

Results

41 patients were eligible for efficacy analysis. Results of secondary efficacy variables did not show statistically significant differences. For the primary efficacy variable, a trend in favour of gadobutrol was seen in the full analysis set (ITT) population resulting in at least non-inferiority. In the per protocol (PP) analysis set gadobutrol had better contrast than gadoterate (Wilcoxon signed rank test, p = 0.0466).

Conclusion

Imaging of the distal lower limb in this special patient population requires a large number of patients to obtain enough comparative images where non-contrast-agent-dependent factors do not disturb contrast agent efficacy. The ITT analysis showed at least non-inferiority of gadobutrol in comparison to gadoterate. The avoidance of imaging artefacts demonstrates a better outcome for gadobutrol.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Grayson ML, Gibbons GW, Balogh K, Levin E, Karchmer AW (1995) Probing to bone in infected pedal ulcers. A clinical sign of underlying osteomyelitis in diabetic patients. JAMA 273:721–723PubMedCrossRef Grayson ML, Gibbons GW, Balogh K, Levin E, Karchmer AW (1995) Probing to bone in infected pedal ulcers. A clinical sign of underlying osteomyelitis in diabetic patients. JAMA 273:721–723PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Meyers SP, Wiener SN (1991) Diagnosis of hematogenous pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis by magnetic resonance imaging. Arch Intern Med 151:683–687PubMedCrossRef Meyers SP, Wiener SN (1991) Diagnosis of hematogenous pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis by magnetic resonance imaging. Arch Intern Med 151:683–687PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Schmid MR, Hodler J, Vienne P, Binkert CA, Zanetti M (2002) Bone marrow abnormalities of foot and ankle: STIR versus T1-weighted contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed spin-echo MR imaging. Radiology 224:463–469PubMedCrossRef Schmid MR, Hodler J, Vienne P, Binkert CA, Zanetti M (2002) Bone marrow abnormalities of foot and ankle: STIR versus T1-weighted contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed spin-echo MR imaging. Radiology 224:463–469PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Maley JE, Yuh WT (1998) Contrast dosage in the neuroimaging of brain tumors. Principles and indications. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 6:113–124PubMed Maley JE, Yuh WT (1998) Contrast dosage in the neuroimaging of brain tumors. Principles and indications. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 6:113–124PubMed
5.
go back to reference Morcos SK (2008) Extracellular gadolinium contrast agents: differences in stability. Eur J Radiol 66:175–179PubMedCrossRef Morcos SK (2008) Extracellular gadolinium contrast agents: differences in stability. Eur J Radiol 66:175–179PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Morcos SK, Thomsen HS (2008) Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: more questions and some answers. Nephron Clin Pract 110:c24–31, discussion c32PubMedCrossRef Morcos SK, Thomsen HS (2008) Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: more questions and some answers. Nephron Clin Pract 110:c24–31, discussion c32PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Rohrer M, Bauer H, Mintorovitch J, Requardt M, Weinmann HJ (2005) Comparison of magnetic properties of MRI contrast media solutions at different magnetic field strengths. Invest Radiol 40:715–724PubMedCrossRef Rohrer M, Bauer H, Mintorovitch J, Requardt M, Weinmann HJ (2005) Comparison of magnetic properties of MRI contrast media solutions at different magnetic field strengths. Invest Radiol 40:715–724PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Huppertz A, Rohrer M (2004) Gadobutrol, a highly concentrated MR-imaging contrast agent: its physicochemical characteristics and the basis for its use in contrast-enhanced MR angiography and perfusion imaging. Eur Radiol 14(Suppl 5):M12–18PubMed Huppertz A, Rohrer M (2004) Gadobutrol, a highly concentrated MR-imaging contrast agent: its physicochemical characteristics and the basis for its use in contrast-enhanced MR angiography and perfusion imaging. Eur Radiol 14(Suppl 5):M12–18PubMed
9.
go back to reference Lemke AJ, Sander B, Balzer T, Geens V, Hosten N, Felix R (1997) Safety and use of gadobutrol in patients with brain tumors (phase III trial). Rofo 167:591–598PubMed Lemke AJ, Sander B, Balzer T, Geens V, Hosten N, Felix R (1997) Safety and use of gadobutrol in patients with brain tumors (phase III trial). Rofo 167:591–598PubMed
10.
go back to reference Mohrs OK, Oberholzer K, Krummenauer F, Bernhard S, Kalden P, Neufang A, Thelen M, Kreitner KF (2004) Comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the aortoiliac vessels using a 1.0 molar contrast agent at 1.0T with intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography. Rofo 176:985–991 Mohrs OK, Oberholzer K, Krummenauer F, Bernhard S, Kalden P, Neufang A, Thelen M, Kreitner KF (2004) Comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the aortoiliac vessels using a 1.0 molar contrast agent at 1.0T with intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography. Rofo 176:985–991
11.
go back to reference Schaefer FK, Schaefer PJ, Altjohann C, Bourne M, Decobelli F, Goyen M, Griffiths PD, Kopka L, Kreitner KF, Link J, Oberholzer K, Pering C, Poeckler-Schoeninger C, Ruehm SG, Sachoran MR, Schulte-Altedorneburg G, Springer OS, Steiner P, Wall A, Winterer J, Tombach B (2007) A multicenter, site-independent, blinded study to compare the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography using 1.0 M gadobutrol (Gadovist) to intraarterial digital subtraction angiography in body arteries. Eur J Radiol 61:315–323PubMedCrossRef Schaefer FK, Schaefer PJ, Altjohann C, Bourne M, Decobelli F, Goyen M, Griffiths PD, Kopka L, Kreitner KF, Link J, Oberholzer K, Pering C, Poeckler-Schoeninger C, Ruehm SG, Sachoran MR, Schulte-Altedorneburg G, Springer OS, Steiner P, Wall A, Winterer J, Tombach B (2007) A multicenter, site-independent, blinded study to compare the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography using 1.0 M gadobutrol (Gadovist) to intraarterial digital subtraction angiography in body arteries. Eur J Radiol 61:315–323PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Tombach B (2004) Whole-body CE-MRA with Gadovist. Eur Radiol 14(Suppl 5):M26–27PubMed Tombach B (2004) Whole-body CE-MRA with Gadovist. Eur Radiol 14(Suppl 5):M26–27PubMed
13.
go back to reference Tombach B, Bremer C, Reimer P, Matzkies F, Schaefer RM, Ebert W, Geens V, Eisele J, Heindel W (2002) Using highly concentrated gadobutrol as an MR contrast agent in patients also requiring hemodialysis: safety and dialysability. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178:105–109PubMed Tombach B, Bremer C, Reimer P, Matzkies F, Schaefer RM, Ebert W, Geens V, Eisele J, Heindel W (2002) Using highly concentrated gadobutrol as an MR contrast agent in patients also requiring hemodialysis: safety and dialysability. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178:105–109PubMed
14.
go back to reference Tombach B, Heindel W (2002) Value of 1.0- M gadolinium chelates: review of preclinical and clinical data on gadobutrol. Eur Radiol 12:1550–1556PubMedCrossRef Tombach B, Heindel W (2002) Value of 1.0- M gadolinium chelates: review of preclinical and clinical data on gadobutrol. Eur Radiol 12:1550–1556PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Vogler H, Platzek J, Schuhmann-Giampieri G, Frenzel T, Weinmann HJ, Raduchel B, Press WR (1995) Pre-clinical evaluation of gadobutrol: a new, neutral, extracellular contrast agent for magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Radiol 21:1–10PubMedCrossRef Vogler H, Platzek J, Schuhmann-Giampieri G, Frenzel T, Weinmann HJ, Raduchel B, Press WR (1995) Pre-clinical evaluation of gadobutrol: a new, neutral, extracellular contrast agent for magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Radiol 21:1–10PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Goyen M, Lauenstein TC, Herborn CU, Debatin JF, Bosk S, Ruehm SG (2001) 0.5 M Gd chelate (Magnevist) versus 1.0 M Gd chelate (Gadovist): dose-independent effect on image quality of pelvic three-dimensional MR-angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 14:602–607PubMedCrossRef Goyen M, Lauenstein TC, Herborn CU, Debatin JF, Bosk S, Ruehm SG (2001) 0.5 M Gd chelate (Magnevist) versus 1.0 M Gd chelate (Gadovist): dose-independent effect on image quality of pelvic three-dimensional MR-angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 14:602–607PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Vosshenrich R, Engeroff B, Obenauer S, Grabbe E (2003) Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the arterial and portovenous system of the liver with varying concentrations of contrast medium. Rofo 175:1239–1243PubMed Vosshenrich R, Engeroff B, Obenauer S, Grabbe E (2003) Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the arterial and portovenous system of the liver with varying concentrations of contrast medium. Rofo 175:1239–1243PubMed
18.
go back to reference Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174PubMedCrossRef Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Bellin MF, Van Der Molen AJ (2008) Extracellular gadolinium-based contrast media: an overview. Eur J Radiol 66:160–167PubMedCrossRef Bellin MF, Van Der Molen AJ (2008) Extracellular gadolinium-based contrast media: an overview. Eur J Radiol 66:160–167PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Hadizadeh DR, Von Falkenhausen M, Kukuk GM, Schoneseiffen K, Gieseke J, Schild HH, Willinek WA Contrast material for abdominal dynamic contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography with parallel imaging: intraindividual equimolar comparison of a macrocyclic 1.0 M gadolinium chelate and a linear ionic 0.5 M gadolinium chelate. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:821–829 Hadizadeh DR, Von Falkenhausen M, Kukuk GM, Schoneseiffen K, Gieseke J, Schild HH, Willinek WA Contrast material for abdominal dynamic contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography with parallel imaging: intraindividual equimolar comparison of a macrocyclic 1.0 M gadolinium chelate and a linear ionic 0.5 M gadolinium chelate. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:821–829
21.
go back to reference Hammerstingl R, Adam G, Ayuso JR, Van Beers B, Belfiore G, Bellin MF, Bongartz G, Ernst O, Frericks B, Giuseppetti G, Heinz-Peer G, Laghi A, Martin J, Pering C, Reimer P, Richter GM, Roemer FW, Schafer FK, Vilgrain V, Vogl TJ, Weishaupt D, Wall A, Zech C, Tombach B (2009) Comparison of 1.0 M Gadobutrol and 0.5 M Gadopentetate Dimeglumine-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Five Hundred Seventy-Two Patients With Known or Suspected Liver Lesions: Results of a Multicenter, Double-Blind, Interindividual, Randomized Clinical Phase-III Trial. Invest Radiol Hammerstingl R, Adam G, Ayuso JR, Van Beers B, Belfiore G, Bellin MF, Bongartz G, Ernst O, Frericks B, Giuseppetti G, Heinz-Peer G, Laghi A, Martin J, Pering C, Reimer P, Richter GM, Roemer FW, Schafer FK, Vilgrain V, Vogl TJ, Weishaupt D, Wall A, Zech C, Tombach B (2009) Comparison of 1.0 M Gadobutrol and 0.5 M Gadopentetate Dimeglumine-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Five Hundred Seventy-Two Patients With Known or Suspected Liver Lesions: Results of a Multicenter, Double-Blind, Interindividual, Randomized Clinical Phase-III Trial. Invest Radiol
22.
go back to reference Tombach B, Bohndorf K, Brodtrager W, Claussen CD, Duber C, Galanski M, Grabbe E, Gortenuti G, Kuhn M, Gross-Fengels W, Hammerstingl R, Happel B, Heinz-Peer G, Jung G, Kittner T, Lagalla R, Lengsfeld P, Loose R, Oyen RH, Pavlica P, Pering C, Pozzi-Mucelli R, Persigehl T, Reimer P, Renken NS, Richter GM, Rummeny EJ, Schafer F, Szczerbo-Trojanowska M, Urbanik A, Vogl TJ, Hajek P (2008) Comparison of 1.0 M gadobutrol and 0.5 M gadopentate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI in 471 patients with known or suspected renal lesions: results of a multicenter, single-blind, interindividual, randomized clinical phase III trial. Eur Radiol 18:2610–2619PubMedCrossRef Tombach B, Bohndorf K, Brodtrager W, Claussen CD, Duber C, Galanski M, Grabbe E, Gortenuti G, Kuhn M, Gross-Fengels W, Hammerstingl R, Happel B, Heinz-Peer G, Jung G, Kittner T, Lagalla R, Lengsfeld P, Loose R, Oyen RH, Pavlica P, Pering C, Pozzi-Mucelli R, Persigehl T, Reimer P, Renken NS, Richter GM, Rummeny EJ, Schafer F, Szczerbo-Trojanowska M, Urbanik A, Vogl TJ, Hajek P (2008) Comparison of 1.0 M gadobutrol and 0.5 M gadopentate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI in 471 patients with known or suspected renal lesions: results of a multicenter, single-blind, interindividual, randomized clinical phase III trial. Eur Radiol 18:2610–2619PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Idee JM, Port M, Raynal I, Schaefer M, Le Greneur S, Corot C (2006) Clinical and biological consequences of transmetallation induced by contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging: a review. Fundam Clin Pharmacol 20:563–576PubMedCrossRef Idee JM, Port M, Raynal I, Schaefer M, Le Greneur S, Corot C (2006) Clinical and biological consequences of transmetallation induced by contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging: a review. Fundam Clin Pharmacol 20:563–576PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Frenzel T, Lengsfeld P, Schirmer H, Hutter J, Weinmann HJ (2008) Stability of gadolinium-based magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents in human serum at 37 degrees C. Invest Radiol 43:817–828PubMedCrossRef Frenzel T, Lengsfeld P, Schirmer H, Hutter J, Weinmann HJ (2008) Stability of gadolinium-based magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents in human serum at 37 degrees C. Invest Radiol 43:817–828PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Anzalone N, Gerevini S, Scotti R, Vezzulli P, Picozzi P (2009) Detection of cerebral metastases on magnetic resonance imaging: intraindividual comparison of gadobutrol with gadopentetate dimeglumine. Acta Radiol 50:933–940PubMedCrossRef Anzalone N, Gerevini S, Scotti R, Vezzulli P, Picozzi P (2009) Detection of cerebral metastases on magnetic resonance imaging: intraindividual comparison of gadobutrol with gadopentetate dimeglumine. Acta Radiol 50:933–940PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Attenberger UI, Runge VM, Jackson CB, Baumann S, Birkemeier K, Michaely HJ, Schoenberg SO, Reiser MF, Wintersperger BJ (2009) Comparative evaluation of lesion enhancement using 1 M gadobutrol vs. 2 conventional gadolinium chelates, all at a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg, in a rat brain tumor model at 3 T. Invest Radiol 44:251–256PubMedCrossRef Attenberger UI, Runge VM, Jackson CB, Baumann S, Birkemeier K, Michaely HJ, Schoenberg SO, Reiser MF, Wintersperger BJ (2009) Comparative evaluation of lesion enhancement using 1 M gadobutrol vs. 2 conventional gadolinium chelates, all at a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg, in a rat brain tumor model at 3 T. Invest Radiol 44:251–256PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Hentsch A, Aschauer MA, Balzer JO, Brossmann J, Busch HP, Davis K, Douek P, Ebner F, van Engelshoven JM, Gregor M, Kersting C, Knusel PR, Leen E, Leiner T, Loewe C, McPherson S, Reimer P, Schafer FK, Taupitz M, Thurnher SA, Tombach B, Wegener R, Weishaupt D, Meaney JF (2003) Gadobutrol-enhanced moving-table magnetic resonance angiography in patients with peripheral vascular disease: a prospective, multi-centre blinded comparison with digital subtraction angiography. Eur Radiol 13:2103–2114PubMedCrossRef Hentsch A, Aschauer MA, Balzer JO, Brossmann J, Busch HP, Davis K, Douek P, Ebner F, van Engelshoven JM, Gregor M, Kersting C, Knusel PR, Leen E, Leiner T, Loewe C, McPherson S, Reimer P, Schafer FK, Taupitz M, Thurnher SA, Tombach B, Wegener R, Weishaupt D, Meaney JF (2003) Gadobutrol-enhanced moving-table magnetic resonance angiography in patients with peripheral vascular disease: a prospective, multi-centre blinded comparison with digital subtraction angiography. Eur Radiol 13:2103–2114PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Huppertz A, Balzer T, Blakeborough A, Breuer J, Giovagnoni A, Heinz-Peer G, Laniado M, Manfredi RM, Mathieu DG, Mueller D, Reimer P, Robinson PJ, Strotzer M, Taupitz M, Vogl TJ (2004) Improved detection of focal liver lesions at MR imaging: multicenter comparison of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR images with intraoperative findings. Radiology 230:266–275PubMedCrossRef Huppertz A, Balzer T, Blakeborough A, Breuer J, Giovagnoni A, Heinz-Peer G, Laniado M, Manfredi RM, Mathieu DG, Mueller D, Reimer P, Robinson PJ, Strotzer M, Taupitz M, Vogl TJ (2004) Improved detection of focal liver lesions at MR imaging: multicenter comparison of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR images with intraoperative findings. Radiology 230:266–275PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Reimer P, Schneider G, Schima W (2004) Hepatobiliary contrast agents for contrast-enhanced MRI of the liver: properties, clinical development and applications. Eur Radiol 14:559–578PubMedCrossRef Reimer P, Schneider G, Schima W (2004) Hepatobiliary contrast agents for contrast-enhanced MRI of the liver: properties, clinical development and applications. Eur Radiol 14:559–578PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Intra-individual, randomised comparison of the MRI contrast agents gadobutrol and gadoterate in imaging the distal lower limb of patients with known or suspected osteomyelitis, evaluated in an off-site blinded read
Authors
Werner Pennekamp
Daniela Roggenland
Steffen Hering
Stefan Lemburg
Soeren Peters
Sabrina Sterl
Carsten Schwenke
Volkmar Nicolas
Publication date
01-05-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 5/2011
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-010-2008-z

Other articles of this Issue 5/2011

European Radiology 5/2011 Go to the issue