Top

Published in:

01-02-2009 | Computer Tomography

Evaluation of a low-dose CT protocol with oral contrast for assessment of acute appendicitis

Authors: Alexandra Platon, Helmi Jlassi, Olivier T. Rutschmann, Christoph D. Becker, Francis R. Verdun, Pascal Gervaz, Pierre-Alexandre Poletti

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 2/2009

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate a low-dose CT with oral contrast medium (LDCT) for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis and compare its performance with standard-dose i.v. contrast-enhanced CT (standard CT) according to patients’ BMIs. Eighty-six consecutive patients admitted with suspicion of acute appendicitis underwent LDCT (30 mAs), followed by standard CT (180 mAs). Both examinations were reviewed by two experienced radiologists for direct and indirect signs of appendicitis. Clinical and surgical follow-up was considered as the reference standard. Appendicitis was confirmed by surgery in 37 (43%) of the 86 patients. Twenty-nine (34%) patients eventually had an alternative discharge diagnosis to explain their abdominal pain. Clinical and biological follow-up was uneventful in 20 (23%) patients. LDCT and standard CT had the same sensitivity (100%, 33/33) and specificity (98%, 45/46) to diagnose appendicitis in patients with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 18.5. In slim patients (BMI < 18.5), sensitivity to diagnose appendicitis was 50% (2/4) for LDCT and 100% (4/4) for standard CT, while specificity was identical for both techniques (67%, 2/3). LDCT may play a role in the diagnostic workup of patients with a BMI ≥ 18.5.

Naffaa LN, Ishak GE, Haddad MC (2005) The value of contrast-enhanced helical CT scan with rectal contrast enema in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Clin Imaging 29:255–258PubMedCrossRef

Funaki B, Grosskreutz SR, Funaki CN (1998) Using unenhanced helical CT with enteric contrast material for suspected appendicitis in patients treated at a community hospital. AJR Am J Roentgenol 171:997–1001PubMed

Stroman DL, Bayouth CV, Kuhn JA et al (1999) The role of computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Am J Surg 178:485–489PubMedCrossRef

Rhea JT, Halpern EF, Ptak T, Lawrason JN, Sacknoff R, Novelline RA (2005) The status of appendiceal CT in an urban medical center 5 years after its introduction: experience with 753 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:1802–1808PubMed

Blackmore CC, Terasawa T (2006) Optimizing the interpretation of CT for appendicitis: modeling health utilities for clinical practice. J Am Coll Radiol 3:115–121PubMedCrossRef

Lane MJ, Liu DM, Huynh MD, Jeffrey RB Jr, Mindelzun RE, Katz DS (1999) Suspected acute appendicitis: nonenhanced helical CT in 300 consecutive patients. Radiology 213:341–346PubMed

Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA, Mostafavi AA, Lawrason JN, McCabe CJ (1997) Helical CT combined with contrast material administered only through the colon for imaging of suspected appendicitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169:1275–1280PubMed

Walker S, Haun W, Clark J, McMillin K, Zeren F, Gilliland T (2000) The value of limited computed tomography with rectal contrast in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Am J Surg 180:450–454 discussion 454–455PubMedCrossRef

Wijetunga R, Tan BS, Rouse JC, Bigg-Wither GW, Doust BD (2001) Diagnostic accuracy of focused appendiceal CT in clinically equivocal cases of acute appendicitis. Radiology 221:747–753PubMedCrossRef

10.

Johnson PT, Horton KM, Mahesh M, Fishman EK (2006) Multidetector computed tomography for suspected appendicitis: multi-institutional survey of 16-MDCT data acquisition protocols and review of pertinent literature. J Comput Assist Tomogr 30:758–764PubMedCrossRef

11.

Dixon AK, Goldstone KE (2002) Abdominal CT and the Euratom Directive. Eur Radiol 12:1567–1570PubMedCrossRef

12.

van Breda Vriesman AC, Kole BJ, Puylaert JB (2003) Effect of ultrasonography and optional computed tomography on the outcome of appendectomy. Eur Radiol 13:2278–2282PubMedCrossRef

13.

Keyzer C, Zalcman M, De Maertelaer V et al (2005) Comparison of US and unenhanced multi-detector row CT in patients suspected of having acute appendicitis. Radiology 236:527–534PubMedCrossRef

14.

Gracey D, McClure MJ (2007) The impact of ultrasound in suspected acute appendicitis. Clin Radiol 62:573–578PubMedCrossRef

15.

Garcia-Aguayo FJ, Gil P (2000) Sonography in acute appendicitis: diagnostic utility and influence upon management and outcome. Eur Radiol 10:1886–1893PubMedCrossRef

16.

Balthazar EJ, Birnbaum BA, Yee J, Megibow AJ, Roshkow J, Gray C (1994) Acute appendicitis: CT and US correlation in 100 patients. Radiology 190:31–35PubMed

17.

Doria AS, Moineddin R, Kellenberger CJ et al (2006) US or CT for diagnosis of appendicitis in children and adults? A meta-analysis. Radiology 241:83–94PubMedCrossRef

18.

Wise SW, Labuski MR, Kasales CJ et al (2001) Comparative assessment of CT and sonographic techniques for appendiceal imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:933–941PubMed

19.

Marincek B (2002) Nontraumatic abdominal emergencies: acute abdominal pain: diagnostic strategies. Eur Radiol 12:2136–2150PubMed

20.

Poletti PA, Platon A, Rutschmann OT, Schmidlin FR, Iselin CE, Becker CD (2007) Low-dose versus standard-dose CT protocol in patients with clinically suspected renal colic. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:927–933PubMedCrossRef

21.

Poletti PA, Platon A, Rutschmann OT et al (2006) Abdominal plain film in patients admitted with clinical suspicion of renal colic: should it be replaced by low-dose computed tomography? Urology 67:64–68PubMedCrossRef

22.

Keyzer C, Tack D, de Maertelaer V, Bohy P, Gevenois PA, Van Gansbeke D (2004) Acute appendicitis: comparison of low-dose and standard-dose unenhanced multi-detector row CT. Radiology 232:164–172PubMedCrossRef

23.

Kim BS, Hwang IK, Choi YW et al (2005) Low-dose and standard-dose unenhanced helical computed tomography for the assessment of acute renal colic: prospective comparative study. Acta Radiol 46:756–763PubMedCrossRef

24.

Grayson DE, Wettlaufer JR, Dalrymple NC, Keesling CA (2001) Appendiceal CT in pediatric patients: relationship of visualization to amount of peritoneal fat. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:497–500PubMed

25.

Garrow JS, Webster J (1985) Quetelet’s index (W/H2) as a measure of fatness. Int J Obes 9:147–153PubMed

26.

Levine CD, Aizenstein O, Lehavi O, Blachar A (2005) Why we miss the diagnosis of appendicitis on abdominal CT: evaluation of imaging features of appendicitis incorrectly diagnosed on CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:855–859PubMed

27.

Malone JF, Bischoff N (2008) IEC standards for radiological equipment: issues for the industry and for end users. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 129(1–3):132–134 Epub 2008 May 10PubMedCrossRef

28.

ImPACT (2006) Imaging performance assessment of CT scanners: a medical devices agency evaluation group. CT scanner matching data, tables of CTDI values in air, CTDIw, and phantom factor values, version 0.99x London UK. http://www.impactscan.org/ctdosimetry.htm. Accessed 14 July 2008

29.

O’Daniel JC, Stevens DM, Cody DD (2005) Reducing radiation exposure from survey CT scans. AJR Am J Roentgenol 185:509–515PubMed

30.

Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA (1997) Sensitivity and specificity of the individual CT signs of appendicitis: experience with 200 helical appendiceal CT examinations. J Comput Assist Tomogr 21:686–692PubMedCrossRef

31.

Rao PM, Wittenberg J, McDowell RK, Rhea JT, Novelline RA (1997) Appendicitis: use of arrowhead sign for diagnosis at CT. Radiology 202:363–366PubMed

32.

Jacobs JE, Birnbaum BA, Macari M et al (2001) Acute appendicitis: comparison of helical CT diagnosis focused technique with oral contrast material versus nonfocused technique with oral and intravenous contrast material. Radiology 220:683–690PubMedCrossRef

33.

Malone AJ Jr., Wolf CR, Malmed AS, Melliere BF (1993) Diagnosis of acute appendicitis: value of unenhanced CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 160:763–766PubMed

34.

Lee SY, Coughlin B, Wolfe JM, Polino J, Blank FS, Smithline HA (2006) Prospective comparison of helical CT of the abdomen and pelvis without and with oral contrast in assessing acute abdominal pain in adult emergency department patients. Emerg Radiol 12:150–157PubMedCrossRef

35.

Tamburrini S, Brunetti A, Brown M, Sirlin C, Casola G (2007) Acute appendicitis: diagnostic value of nonenhanced CT with selective use of contrast in routine clinical settings. Eur Radiol 17:2055–2061PubMedCrossRef

36.

Hershko DD, Awad N, Fischer D et al (2007) Focused helical CT using rectal contrast material only as the preferred technique for the diagnosis of suspected acute appendicitis: a prospective, randomized, controlled study comparing three different techniques. Dis Colon Rectum 50(8):1223–1229PubMedCrossRef

37.

Rao PM, Feltmate CM, Rhea JT, Schulick AH, Novelline RA (1999) Helical computed tomography in differentiating appendicitis and acute gynecologic conditions. Obstet Gynecol 93:417–421PubMedCrossRef

38.

Birnbaum BA, Wilson SR (2000) Appendicitis at the millennium. Radiology 215:337–348PubMed

39.

Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Wildermuth S, Marincek B (2005) Multi-detector computed tomography of acute abdomen. Eur Radiol 15:2435–2447PubMedCrossRef

Title: Evaluation of a low-dose CT protocol with oral contrast for assessment of acute appendicitis
Authors: Alexandra Platon
Helmi Jlassi
Olivier T. Rutschmann
Christoph D. Becker
Francis R. Verdun
Pascal Gervaz
Pierre-Alexandre Poletti
Publication date: 01-02-2009
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Published in: European Radiology / Issue 2/2009
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-008-1164-x

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Evaluation of a low-dose CT protocol with oral contrast for assessment of acute appendicitis

Abstract

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 2/2009

Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma of thoracic vertebra: a case report (2008: 11b)

Estimation of sex and age of “virtual skeletons”–a feasibility study

Using diffusion-weighted MR imaging for tumor detection in the collapsed lung: a preliminary study

Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of anterior prostate cancer: morphometric assessment and correlation with radical prostatectomy findings

Comparison of MRI (including SS SE-EPI and SPIO-enhanced MRI) and FDG-PET/CT for the detection of colorectal liver metastases

Costs and effectiveness of a brief MRI examination of patients with acute knee injury