Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 11/2008

01-11-2008 | Breast

Utilization and cost of diagnostic imaging and biopsies following positive screening mammography in the southern breast cancer screening region of the Netherlands, 2000–2005

Authors: Lucien E. M. Duijm, Johanna H. Groenewoud, Jacques Fracheboud, Menno L. Plaisier, Rudi M. H. Roumen, B. Martin van Ineveld, Mike van Beek, Harry J. de Koning

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 11/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

We prospectively assessed trends in utilization and costs of diagnostic services of screen-positive women in a biennial breast cancer screening program for women aged 50–75 years. All 2,062 women with suspicious findings at screening mammography in the southern region of the Netherlands between 1 January 2000 and 1 July 2005 (158,997 screens) were included. Data were collected on any diagnostic examinations, interventional procedures, and surgical consultations with two-year follow-up. We used national reimbursement rates to estimate imaging costs and percutaneous biopsy costs. Cost prices, charged by hospitals, were used to estimate open surgical biopsy costs and surgical consultation costs. The largest increase in utilization of diagnostic procedures per 100 referrals was observed for axillary ultrasound (from 3.9 in 2000 to 33.5 in 2005) and for stereotactic core biopsy (from 2.1 in 2000 to 26.8 in 2005). Per 100 referrals, the open surgical biopsy rate decreased from 34.7 (2000) to 4.6 (2005) and the number of outpatient surgical consultations fluctuated between 269.8 (2000) and 309.7 (2004). Mean costs for the diagnosis of one cancer were €1,501 and ranged from €1,223 (2002) to €1,647 (2003). Surgical biopsies comprised 54.1% of total diagnostic costs for women screened in 2000, but decreased to 9.9% for women screened in 2005. Imaging costs increased from 23.7 to 43.8%, percutaneous biopsy costs from 9.9 to 27.2%, and consultation costs from 12.3 to 19.1%. We conclude that diagnostic costs per screen-detected cancer remained fairly stable through the years, although huge changes in the use of different diagnostic procedures were observed.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Fletcher SW, Elmore JG (2003) Mammographic screening for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 348:1672–1680PubMedCrossRef Fletcher SW, Elmore JG (2003) Mammographic screening for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 348:1672–1680PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Miles A, Cockburn J, Smith RA, Wardle J (2004) A perspective from countries using organized screening programs. Cancer 101:1201–1213PubMedCrossRef Miles A, Cockburn J, Smith RA, Wardle J (2004) A perspective from countries using organized screening programs. Cancer 101:1201–1213PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Broeders MJM, Scharpantgen A, Ascunce N, Gairard B, Olsen AH, Mantellini P, Mota TC, Van Limbergen E, Seradour B, Ponti A, Trejo LS, Nystrom L (2005) Comparison of early performance indicators for screening projects within the European Breast Cancer Network: 1989–2000. European Breast Cancer Network Eur J Cancer Prev 14:107–116PubMedCrossRef Broeders MJM, Scharpantgen A, Ascunce N, Gairard B, Olsen AH, Mantellini P, Mota TC, Van Limbergen E, Seradour B, Ponti A, Trejo LS, Nystrom L (2005) Comparison of early performance indicators for screening projects within the European Breast Cancer Network: 1989–2000. European Breast Cancer Network Eur J Cancer Prev 14:107–116PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Otto SJ, Fracheboud J, Looman CWN, Broeders MJM, Boer R, Hendriks JHCL, Verbeek ALM, de Koning HJ (2003) Initiation of population-based mammography screening in Dutch municipalities and effect on breast-cancer mortality: a systematic review. Lancet 361:1411–1417PubMedCrossRef Otto SJ, Fracheboud J, Looman CWN, Broeders MJM, Boer R, Hendriks JHCL, Verbeek ALM, de Koning HJ (2003) Initiation of population-based mammography screening in Dutch municipalities and effect on breast-cancer mortality: a systematic review. Lancet 361:1411–1417PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Tabar L, Yen MF, Vitak B, Chen HHT, Smith RA, Duffy SW (2003) Mammography service screening and mortality in breast cancer patients: 20-year follow-up before and after introduction of screening. Lancet 361:1405–1410PubMedCrossRef Tabar L, Yen MF, Vitak B, Chen HHT, Smith RA, Duffy SW (2003) Mammography service screening and mortality in breast cancer patients: 20-year follow-up before and after introduction of screening. Lancet 361:1405–1410PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Berry DA, Cronin KA, Plevritis SK, Fryback DG, Clarke L, Zelen M, Mandelblatt JS, Yakovlev AY, Habbema JDF, Feuer EJ (2005) Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer. The Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET) collaborators. N Engl J Med 353:1784–1792PubMedCrossRef Berry DA, Cronin KA, Plevritis SK, Fryback DG, Clarke L, Zelen M, Mandelblatt JS, Yakovlev AY, Habbema JDF, Feuer EJ (2005) Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer. The Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET) collaborators. N Engl J Med 353:1784–1792PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kauhava L, Immonen-Räihä P, Parvinen I, Helenius H, Kaljonen A, Räsänen O, Pylkkänen L, Klemi PJ (2004) Lower costs of hospital treatment of breast cancer through a population-based mammography screening programme. Eur J Public Health 14:128–133PubMedCrossRef Kauhava L, Immonen-Räihä P, Parvinen I, Helenius H, Kaljonen A, Räsänen O, Pylkkänen L, Klemi PJ (2004) Lower costs of hospital treatment of breast cancer through a population-based mammography screening programme. Eur J Public Health 14:128–133PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kauhava L, Immonen-Räihä P, Parvinen I, Holli K, Kronqvist P, Pylkkänen L, Helenius H, Kaljonen A, Räsänen O, Klemi PJ (2006) Population-based mammography screening results in substantial savings in treatment costs for fatal breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 98:143–150PubMedCrossRef Kauhava L, Immonen-Räihä P, Parvinen I, Holli K, Kronqvist P, Pylkkänen L, Helenius H, Kaljonen A, Räsänen O, Klemi PJ (2006) Population-based mammography screening results in substantial savings in treatment costs for fatal breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 98:143–150PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Fracheboud J, de Koning HJ, Boer R, Groenewoud JH, Verbeek ALM, Broeders MJM, Van Ineveld M, Hendriks JHCL, De Bruyn AE, Holland R, Van der Maas PJ (2001) National Evaluation Team for Breast cancer screening in the Netherlands (NETB). Nationwide breast cancer screening programme fully implemented in the Netherlands. Breast 10:6–11PubMedCrossRef Fracheboud J, de Koning HJ, Boer R, Groenewoud JH, Verbeek ALM, Broeders MJM, Van Ineveld M, Hendriks JHCL, De Bruyn AE, Holland R, Van der Maas PJ (2001) National Evaluation Team for Breast cancer screening in the Netherlands (NETB). Nationwide breast cancer screening programme fully implemented in the Netherlands. Breast 10:6–11PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Duijm LEM, Groenewoud JH, Hendriks JHCL, de Koning HJ (2004) Independent double reading of screening mammograms in the Netherlands: effect of arbitration following reader disagreements. Radiology 231:564–570PubMedCrossRef Duijm LEM, Groenewoud JH, Hendriks JHCL, de Koning HJ (2004) Independent double reading of screening mammograms in the Netherlands: effect of arbitration following reader disagreements. Radiology 231:564–570PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Duijm LEM, Groenewoud JH, Fracheboud J, de Koning HJ (2007) Additional double reading of screening mammograms by radiologic technologists: impact on screening performance parameters. J Natl Cancer Inst 99:1162–1170PubMedCrossRef Duijm LEM, Groenewoud JH, Fracheboud J, de Koning HJ (2007) Additional double reading of screening mammograms by radiologic technologists: impact on screening performance parameters. J Natl Cancer Inst 99:1162–1170PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference UICC (International Union against Cancer) (1987) TNM classification of malignant tumours, 4th edn. Springer-Verlag, Berlin UICC (International Union against Cancer) (1987) TNM classification of malignant tumours, 4th edn. Springer-Verlag, Berlin
14.
go back to reference Brewer NT, Salz T, Lillie SE (2007) Systematic review: the long-term effects of false-positive mammograms. Ann Intern Med 146:502–510PubMed Brewer NT, Salz T, Lillie SE (2007) Systematic review: the long-term effects of false-positive mammograms. Ann Intern Med 146:502–510PubMed
15.
go back to reference Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) (2003) American College of Radiology, 4th edn. American College of Radiology, Reston, VA Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) (2003) American College of Radiology, 4th edn. American College of Radiology, Reston, VA
16.
go back to reference Vizcaino I, Gadea L, Andreo L, Salas D, Ruiz-Perales F, Cuevas D, Herranz C, Bueno F, and the Screening Program Working Group (2001) Short-term follow-up results in 795 nonpalpable probably benign lesions detected at screening mammography. Radiology 219:475–483PubMed Vizcaino I, Gadea L, Andreo L, Salas D, Ruiz-Perales F, Cuevas D, Herranz C, Bueno F, and the Screening Program Working Group (2001) Short-term follow-up results in 795 nonpalpable probably benign lesions detected at screening mammography. Radiology 219:475–483PubMed
17.
go back to reference Yasmeen S, Romano PS, Pettinger M, Chlebowski RT, Robbins JA, Lane DS, Hendrix SL (2003) Frequency and predictive value of a mammographic recommendation for short-interval follow-up. J Natl Cancer Inst 95:429–436PubMed Yasmeen S, Romano PS, Pettinger M, Chlebowski RT, Robbins JA, Lane DS, Hendrix SL (2003) Frequency and predictive value of a mammographic recommendation for short-interval follow-up. J Natl Cancer Inst 95:429–436PubMed
18.
go back to reference BOBZ annual report 2005 (in Dutch). Hub. Tonnaer bv, Kelpen-Oler BOBZ annual report 2005 (in Dutch). Hub. Tonnaer bv, Kelpen-Oler
19.
go back to reference Poplack SP, Carney PA, Weiss JE, Titus-Ernstoff L, Goodrich ME, Tosteson AN (2005) Screening mammography: costs and use of screening-related services. Radiology 234:79–85PubMedCrossRef Poplack SP, Carney PA, Weiss JE, Titus-Ernstoff L, Goodrich ME, Tosteson AN (2005) Screening mammography: costs and use of screening-related services. Radiology 234:79–85PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Otten JD, Karssemeijer N, Hendriks JHCL, Groenewoud JH, Fracheboud J, Verbeek ALM, de Koning HJ, Holland R (2005) Effect of recall rate on earlier screen detection of breast cancers based on the Dutch performance indicators. J Natl Cancer Inst 97:748–754PubMedCrossRef Otten JD, Karssemeijer N, Hendriks JHCL, Groenewoud JH, Fracheboud J, Verbeek ALM, de Koning HJ, Holland R (2005) Effect of recall rate on earlier screen detection of breast cancers based on the Dutch performance indicators. J Natl Cancer Inst 97:748–754PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Kwaliteitsinstituut voor de Gezondheidszorg CBO, Vereniging van Integrale Kankercentra (2005) Richtlijn Behandeling van het mammacarcinoom. Van Zuiden Communications, Alphen aan den Rijn Kwaliteitsinstituut voor de Gezondheidszorg CBO, Vereniging van Integrale Kankercentra (2005) Richtlijn Behandeling van het mammacarcinoom. Van Zuiden Communications, Alphen aan den Rijn
22.
go back to reference Skaane P, Balleyguier C, Diekmann F, Diekmann S, Piguet JC, Young K, Niklason LT (2005) Breast lesion detection and classification: comparison of screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading–observer performance study. Radiology 237:37–44PubMedCrossRef Skaane P, Balleyguier C, Diekmann F, Diekmann S, Piguet JC, Young K, Niklason LT (2005) Breast lesion detection and classification: comparison of screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading–observer performance study. Radiology 237:37–44PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Pisano EA, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E, Yaffe M, Baum JK, Acharyya S, Conant EF, Fajardo LL, Bassett L, D’Orsi C, Jong R, Rebner M, for the Digital Mammographic Imaging Screening Trial (DMIST) Investigators Group (2005) Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. New Engl J Med 353:1773–1783PubMedCrossRef Pisano EA, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E, Yaffe M, Baum JK, Acharyya S, Conant EF, Fajardo LL, Bassett L, D’Orsi C, Jong R, Rebner M, for the Digital Mammographic Imaging Screening Trial (DMIST) Investigators Group (2005) Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. New Engl J Med 353:1773–1783PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Fenton JJ, Taplin SH, Carney PA, Abraham L, Sickles EA, D’Orsi C, Berns EA, Cutter G, Hendrick E, Barlow WE, Elmore JG (2007) Influence of computer-aided detection performance of screening mammography. New Engl J Med 356:1399–1409PubMedCrossRef Fenton JJ, Taplin SH, Carney PA, Abraham L, Sickles EA, D’Orsi C, Berns EA, Cutter G, Hendrick E, Barlow WE, Elmore JG (2007) Influence of computer-aided detection performance of screening mammography. New Engl J Med 356:1399–1409PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Skaane P, Hofvind S, Skjennald A (2007) Randomized trial of screen-film versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading in population-based screening program: follow-up and final results of Oslo II study. Radiology 244:708–717PubMedCrossRef Skaane P, Hofvind S, Skjennald A (2007) Randomized trial of screen-film versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading in population-based screening program: follow-up and final results of Oslo II study. Radiology 244:708–717PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Duijm LEM, Groenewoud JH, Roumen RMH, de Koning HJ, Plaisier ML, Fracheboud J (2007) A decade of breast cancer screening in The Netherlands: trends in the preoperative diagnosis of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 106:113–119PubMedCrossRef Duijm LEM, Groenewoud JH, Roumen RMH, de Koning HJ, Plaisier ML, Fracheboud J (2007) A decade of breast cancer screening in The Netherlands: trends in the preoperative diagnosis of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 106:113–119PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Damera A, Evans AJ, Cornford EJ, Wilson ARM, Burrell HC, James JJ, Pinder SE, Ellis IO, Lee AHS, Macmillan RD (2003) Diagnosis of axillary nodal metastases by ultrasound-guided core biopsy in primary operable breast cancer. Br J Cancer 89:1310–1313PubMedCrossRef Damera A, Evans AJ, Cornford EJ, Wilson ARM, Burrell HC, James JJ, Pinder SE, Ellis IO, Lee AHS, Macmillan RD (2003) Diagnosis of axillary nodal metastases by ultrasound-guided core biopsy in primary operable breast cancer. Br J Cancer 89:1310–1313PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Ciatto S, Brancato B, Risso G, Ambrogetti D, Bulgaresi P, Maddau C, Turco P, Houssami N (2007) Accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of axillary lymph nodes as a triage test in breast cancer staging. Breast Cancer Res Treat 103:85–91PubMedCrossRef Ciatto S, Brancato B, Risso G, Ambrogetti D, Bulgaresi P, Maddau C, Turco P, Houssami N (2007) Accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of axillary lymph nodes as a triage test in breast cancer staging. Breast Cancer Res Treat 103:85–91PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Lehman CD, Gatsonis C, Kuhl CK, Hendrick E, Pisano ED, Hanna L, Peacock S, Smazal SF, Maki DD, Julian TB, DePeri ER, Bluemke DA, Schnall MD, for the ACRIN Trial 6667 Investigators Group (2007) MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. New Engl J Med 356:1295–1303PubMedCrossRef Lehman CD, Gatsonis C, Kuhl CK, Hendrick E, Pisano ED, Hanna L, Peacock S, Smazal SF, Maki DD, Julian TB, DePeri ER, Bluemke DA, Schnall MD, for the ACRIN Trial 6667 Investigators Group (2007) MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. New Engl J Med 356:1295–1303PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Utilization and cost of diagnostic imaging and biopsies following positive screening mammography in the southern breast cancer screening region of the Netherlands, 2000–2005
Authors
Lucien E. M. Duijm
Johanna H. Groenewoud
Jacques Fracheboud
Menno L. Plaisier
Rudi M. H. Roumen
B. Martin van Ineveld
Mike van Beek
Harry J. de Koning
Publication date
01-11-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 11/2008
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-008-1043-5

Other articles of this Issue 11/2008

European Radiology 11/2008 Go to the issue