Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 7/2008

01-07-2008 | Musculoskeletal

An MRI-based technique for assessment of lower extremity deformities—reproducibility, accuracy, and clinical application

Authors: Stefan Hinterwimmer, Heiko Graichen, Thomas J. Vogl, Nasreddin Abolmaali

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 7/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

The hypothesis of this study was that length, torsion, and axis of a leg phantom can be measured accurately and reproducibly by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and that this can be applied to patients with leg deformities. Two phantoms and 30 patients (genu varum, n = 15; genu valgum, n = 15) were investigated using an optimized MRI technique. Reference measurements were performed with a micrometer screw and a goniometer. Patient leg length and axis were compared with long radiographs in bipedal stance. Intra- and interobserver reproducibility and accuracy were calculated using the mean absolute difference (MAD) and the 95% confidence interval. In patients, comparisons were done using a paired Student’s t-test. MAD, intraobserver MAD, and interobserver MAD were 0.03, 0.03, 0.04 mm (length); 0.98, 1.2, 0.98° (torsion); and 0.18, 0.23, 0.22° (axis), respectively. In patients, leg length was underestimated by MRI (−2.4 ± 0.7%; 1.9 ± 0.7 cm; P < 0.001). The hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) did not show significant differences in varus knees (−0.5 ± 1.0°; P > 0.05), while it was significantly underestimated in valgus knees (−3.6 ± 2.8°; P < 0.05). The phantom study revealed that leg length, torsion, and axis can be measured accurately and reproducibly by MRI. Although underestimation of leg length and HKA in valgus knees occurred, this optimized MRI technique can be applied to patients with leg deformities.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Paley D, Tetsworth K (1992) Mechanical axis deviation of the lower limbs. Preoperative planning of uniapical angular deformities of the tibia or femur. Clin Orthop 280:48–64PubMed Paley D, Tetsworth K (1992) Mechanical axis deviation of the lower limbs. Preoperative planning of uniapical angular deformities of the tibia or femur. Clin Orthop 280:48–64PubMed
2.
go back to reference Paley D, Tetsworth K (1992) Mechanical axis deviation of the lower limbs. Preoperative planning of multiapical frontal plane angular and bowing deformities of the femur and tibia. Clin Orthop 280:65–71PubMed Paley D, Tetsworth K (1992) Mechanical axis deviation of the lower limbs. Preoperative planning of multiapical frontal plane angular and bowing deformities of the femur and tibia. Clin Orthop 280:65–71PubMed
3.
go back to reference Paley D, Herzenberg JE, Tetsworth K, McKie J, Bhave A (1994) Deformity planning for frontal and sagittal plane corrective osteotomies. Orthop Clin North Am 25:425–465PubMed Paley D, Herzenberg JE, Tetsworth K, McKie J, Bhave A (1994) Deformity planning for frontal and sagittal plane corrective osteotomies. Orthop Clin North Am 25:425–465PubMed
4.
go back to reference Keppler P, Strecker W, Kinzl L (1999) CT determination of leg length and torsion in children and adolescents. Unfallchirurg 102:936–941PubMed Keppler P, Strecker W, Kinzl L (1999) CT determination of leg length and torsion in children and adolescents. Unfallchirurg 102:936–941PubMed
5.
go back to reference Keppler P, Strecker W, Kinzl L, Simmnacher M, Claes L (1999) Sonographic imaging of leg geometry. Orthopade 28:1015–1022PubMed Keppler P, Strecker W, Kinzl L, Simmnacher M, Claes L (1999) Sonographic imaging of leg geometry. Orthopade 28:1015–1022PubMed
6.
go back to reference Strecker W, Keppler P, Gebhard F, Kinzl L (1997) Length and torsion of the lower limb. J Bone Joint Surg Br 79:1019–1023CrossRefPubMed Strecker W, Keppler P, Gebhard F, Kinzl L (1997) Length and torsion of the lower limb. J Bone Joint Surg Br 79:1019–1023CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL et al (2004) Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. Radiology 230:619–628CrossRefPubMed Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL et al (2004) Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. Radiology 230:619–628CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Terjesen T, Benum P, Rossvoll I, Svenningsen S, Floystad Isern AE, Nordbo T (1991) Leg-length discrepancy measured by ultrasonography. Acta Orthop Scand 62:121–124PubMedCrossRef Terjesen T, Benum P, Rossvoll I, Svenningsen S, Floystad Isern AE, Nordbo T (1991) Leg-length discrepancy measured by ultrasonography. Acta Orthop Scand 62:121–124PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference van der Schoot DK, Den Outer AJ, Bode PJ, Obermann WR, van Vugt AB (1996) Degenerative changes at the knee and ankle related to malunion of tibial fractures. 15-year follow-up of 88 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78:722–725PubMed van der Schoot DK, Den Outer AJ, Bode PJ, Obermann WR, van Vugt AB (1996) Degenerative changes at the knee and ankle related to malunion of tibial fractures. 15-year follow-up of 88 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78:722–725PubMed
10.
go back to reference Leitzes AH, Potter HG, Amaral T, Marx RG, Lyman S, Widmann RF (2005) Reliability and accuracy of MRI scanogram in the evaluation of limb length discrepancy. J Pediatr Orthop 25:747–749CrossRefPubMed Leitzes AH, Potter HG, Amaral T, Marx RG, Lyman S, Widmann RF (2005) Reliability and accuracy of MRI scanogram in the evaluation of limb length discrepancy. J Pediatr Orthop 25:747–749CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Tomczak RJ, Guenther KP, Rieber A, Mergo P, Ros PR, Brambs HJ (1997) MR imaging measurement of the femoral antetorsional angle as a new technique: comparison with CT in children and adults. AJR Am J Roentgenol 168:791–794PubMed Tomczak RJ, Guenther KP, Rieber A, Mergo P, Ros PR, Brambs HJ (1997) MR imaging measurement of the femoral antetorsional angle as a new technique: comparison with CT in children and adults. AJR Am J Roentgenol 168:791–794PubMed
12.
go back to reference Synder M, Vera J, Harcke HT, Bowen JR (2003) Magnetic resonance imaging of the growth plate in late-onset tibia vara. Int Orthop 27:217–222CrossRefPubMed Synder M, Vera J, Harcke HT, Bowen JR (2003) Magnetic resonance imaging of the growth plate in late-onset tibia vara. Int Orthop 27:217–222CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Aamodt A, Terjesen T, Eine J, Kvistad KA (1995) Femoral anteversion measured by ultrasound and CT: a comparative study. Skelet Radiol 24:105–109CrossRef Aamodt A, Terjesen T, Eine J, Kvistad KA (1995) Femoral anteversion measured by ultrasound and CT: a comparative study. Skelet Radiol 24:105–109CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Keats TE, Teeslink R, Diamond AE, Williams JH (1966) Normal axial relationships of the major joints. Radiology 87:904–907PubMed Keats TE, Teeslink R, Diamond AE, Williams JH (1966) Normal axial relationships of the major joints. Radiology 87:904–907PubMed
15.
go back to reference Hsu RWW, Himeno S, Coventry MB, Chao EYS (1990) Normal axial alignment of the lower extremity and load bearing distribution at the knee. Clin Orthop Rel Research 255:215–227 Hsu RWW, Himeno S, Coventry MB, Chao EYS (1990) Normal axial alignment of the lower extremity and load bearing distribution at the knee. Clin Orthop Rel Research 255:215–227
16.
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman DG (1995) Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading. Lancet 346:1085–1087CrossRefPubMed Bland JM, Altman DG (1995) Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading. Lancet 346:1085–1087CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman DG (1990) A note on the use of the intraclass correlation coefficient in the evaluation of agreement between two methods of measurement. Comput Biol Med 20:337–340CrossRefPubMed Bland JM, Altman DG (1990) A note on the use of the intraclass correlation coefficient in the evaluation of agreement between two methods of measurement. Comput Biol Med 20:337–340CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310PubMed Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310PubMed
19.
go back to reference Wright JG, Treble N, Feinstein AR (1991) Measurement of lower limb alignment using long radiographs. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73:721–723PubMed Wright JG, Treble N, Feinstein AR (1991) Measurement of lower limb alignment using long radiographs. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73:721–723PubMed
20.
go back to reference Koshino T, Takeyama M, Jiang LS, Yoshida T, Saito T (2002) Underestimation of varus angulation in knees with flexion deformity. Knee 9:275–279CrossRefPubMed Koshino T, Takeyama M, Jiang LS, Yoshida T, Saito T (2002) Underestimation of varus angulation in knees with flexion deformity. Knee 9:275–279CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Lang P, Genant HK, Jergesen HE, Murray WR (1992) Imaging of the hip joint. Computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Orthop 274:135–153PubMed Lang P, Genant HK, Jergesen HE, Murray WR (1992) Imaging of the hip joint. Computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Orthop 274:135–153PubMed
22.
go back to reference Sabharwal S, Zhao C, McKeon J, Melaghari T, Blacksin M, Wenekor C (2007) Reliability analysis for radiographic measurement of limb length discrepancy: full-length standing anteroposterior radiograph versus scanogram. J Pediatr Orthop 27:46–50PubMed Sabharwal S, Zhao C, McKeon J, Melaghari T, Blacksin M, Wenekor C (2007) Reliability analysis for radiographic measurement of limb length discrepancy: full-length standing anteroposterior radiograph versus scanogram. J Pediatr Orthop 27:46–50PubMed
23.
go back to reference Terry MA, Winell JJ, Green DW, Schneider R, Peterson M, Marx RG, Widmann RF (2005) Measurement variance in limb length discrepancy: clinical and radiographic assessment of interobserver and intraobserver variability. J Pediatr Orthop 25:197–201CrossRefPubMed Terry MA, Winell JJ, Green DW, Schneider R, Peterson M, Marx RG, Widmann RF (2005) Measurement variance in limb length discrepancy: clinical and radiographic assessment of interobserver and intraobserver variability. J Pediatr Orthop 25:197–201CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Cleveland RH, Kushner DC, Ogden MC, Herman TE, Kermond W, Correia JA (1988) Determination of leg length discrepancy. A comparison of weight-bearing and supine imaging. Invest Radiol 23:301–304CrossRefPubMed Cleveland RH, Kushner DC, Ogden MC, Herman TE, Kermond W, Correia JA (1988) Determination of leg length discrepancy. A comparison of weight-bearing and supine imaging. Invest Radiol 23:301–304CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Brouwer RW, Jakma TS, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Ginai AZ, Verhaar JA (2003) The whole leg radiograph: standing versus supine for determining axial alignment. Acta Orthop Scand 74:565–568CrossRefPubMed Brouwer RW, Jakma TS, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Ginai AZ, Verhaar JA (2003) The whole leg radiograph: standing versus supine for determining axial alignment. Acta Orthop Scand 74:565–568CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Fishkin Z, Miller D, Ritter C, Ziv I (2002) Changes in human knee ligament stiffness secondary to osteoarthritis. J Orthop Res 20:204–207CrossRefPubMed Fishkin Z, Miller D, Ritter C, Ziv I (2002) Changes in human knee ligament stiffness secondary to osteoarthritis. J Orthop Res 20:204–207CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Markolf KL, Mensch JS, Amstutz HC (1976) Stiffness and laxity of the knee - the contributions of the supporting structures. A quantitative in vitro study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 58:583–594PubMed Markolf KL, Mensch JS, Amstutz HC (1976) Stiffness and laxity of the knee - the contributions of the supporting structures. A quantitative in vitro study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 58:583–594PubMed
28.
go back to reference Saeki K, Mihalko WM, Patel V et al (2001) Stability after medial collateral ligament release in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 392:184–189CrossRefPubMed Saeki K, Mihalko WM, Patel V et al (2001) Stability after medial collateral ligament release in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 392:184–189CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Patel VV, Hall K, Ries M, Lotz J, Ozhinsky E, Lindsey C, Lu Y, Majumdar S (2004) A three-dimensional MRI analysis of knee kinematics. J Orthop Res 22:283–292CrossRefPubMed Patel VV, Hall K, Ries M, Lotz J, Ozhinsky E, Lindsey C, Lu Y, Majumdar S (2004) A three-dimensional MRI analysis of knee kinematics. J Orthop Res 22:283–292CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
An MRI-based technique for assessment of lower extremity deformities—reproducibility, accuracy, and clinical application
Authors
Stefan Hinterwimmer
Heiko Graichen
Thomas J. Vogl
Nasreddin Abolmaali
Publication date
01-07-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 7/2008
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-008-0896-y

Other articles of this Issue 7/2008

European Radiology 7/2008 Go to the issue

Interpretation Corner

A cervical mass (2008: 7a)