Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 3/2007

01-03-2007 | Hepatobiliary-Pancreas

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Authors: Wolfgang Schima, Ahmed Ba-Ssalamah, Claus Kölblinger, Christiane Kulinna-Cosentini, Andreas Puespoek, Peter Götzinger

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 3/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Adenocarcinoma is the most common malignant pancreatic tumor, affecting the head of the pancreas in 60–70% of cases. By the time of diagnosis, at least 80% of tumors are unresectable. Helical computed tomography (CT) is very effective in detecting and staging adenocarcinoma, with a sensitivity of up to 90% for detection and an accuracy of 80–90% for staging, but it has limitations in detecting small cancers. Moreover, it is not very accurate for determining nonresectability because small liver metastases, peritoneal carcinomatosis, and subtle signs of vascular infiltration may be missed. Multidetector-row CT (MDCT) has brought substantial improvements with its inherent ability to visualize vascular involvement in three dimensions. MDCT has been found to be at least equivalent to contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for detecting adenocarcinoma. MRI can be used as a problem-solving tool in equivocal CT: MRI may help rule out pitfalls, such as inflammatory pseudotumor, focal lipomatosis, abscess, or cystic tumors. Mangafodipir-enhanced MRI reveals a very high tumor-pancreas contrast, which helps in diagnosing small cancers. Endosonography is, if available, also a very accurate tool for detecting small cancers, with a sensitivity of up to 98%. It is the technique of choice for image-guided biopsy if a histologic diagnosis is required for further therapy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Parkin DM, Pisani P, Lopez AD, Masuyer E (1994) At least one in seven cases of cancer is caused by smoking. Global estimates for 1985. Int J Cancer 59:494–504PubMed Parkin DM, Pisani P, Lopez AD, Masuyer E (1994) At least one in seven cases of cancer is caused by smoking. Global estimates for 1985. Int J Cancer 59:494–504PubMed
2.
go back to reference Lowenfels AB, Maisonneuve PM, Cavallini G et al (1993) Pancreatitis and the risk of pancreatic cancer. New Engl J Med 328:1435–1437CrossRef Lowenfels AB, Maisonneuve PM, Cavallini G et al (1993) Pancreatitis and the risk of pancreatic cancer. New Engl J Med 328:1435–1437CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Lowenfels AB, Maisonneuve P, DiMagno EP et al (1997) Hereditary pancreatitis and the risk of pancreatic cancer. International Hereditary Pancreatitis Study Group. J Natl Cancer Inst 89:442–446PubMedCrossRef Lowenfels AB, Maisonneuve P, DiMagno EP et al (1997) Hereditary pancreatitis and the risk of pancreatic cancer. International Hereditary Pancreatitis Study Group. J Natl Cancer Inst 89:442–446PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Alexakis N, Halloran C, Raraty M, Ghaneh P, Sutton R, Neoptolemos JP (2004) Current standards of surgery for pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg 91:1410–1427PubMedCrossRef Alexakis N, Halloran C, Raraty M, Ghaneh P, Sutton R, Neoptolemos JP (2004) Current standards of surgery for pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg 91:1410–1427PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Trede M, Schwall G, Saeger H-D (1990) Survival after pancreatoduodenectomy. 118 consecutive resections without an operative mortality. Ann Surg 211:447–458PubMedCrossRef Trede M, Schwall G, Saeger H-D (1990) Survival after pancreatoduodenectomy. 118 consecutive resections without an operative mortality. Ann Surg 211:447–458PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Warshaw AL, Gu Z, Wittenberg J, Waltman AC (1990) Preoperative staging and assessment of resectability of pancreatic cancer. Arch Surg 125:230–233PubMed Warshaw AL, Gu Z, Wittenberg J, Waltman AC (1990) Preoperative staging and assessment of resectability of pancreatic cancer. Arch Surg 125:230–233PubMed
7.
8.
go back to reference Tsiotos GG, Farnell MB, Sarr MG (1999) Are the results of pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer improving? World J Surg 23:913–919PubMedCrossRef Tsiotos GG, Farnell MB, Sarr MG (1999) Are the results of pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer improving? World J Surg 23:913–919PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Tran KT, Smeenk HG, van Eijck CH et al (2004) Pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy versus standard Whipple procedure: a prospective, randomized, multicenter analysis of 170 patients with pancreatic and periampullary tumors. Ann Surg 240:738–745PubMedCrossRef Tran KT, Smeenk HG, van Eijck CH et al (2004) Pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy versus standard Whipple procedure: a prospective, randomized, multicenter analysis of 170 patients with pancreatic and periampullary tumors. Ann Surg 240:738–745PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference DelMaschio A, Vanzulli A, Sironi S et al (1991) Pancreatic cancer versus chronic pancreatitis: diagnosis with CA 19-9 assessment, US, CT, and CT-guided fine-needle biopsy. Radiology 178:95–99PubMed DelMaschio A, Vanzulli A, Sironi S et al (1991) Pancreatic cancer versus chronic pancreatitis: diagnosis with CA 19-9 assessment, US, CT, and CT-guided fine-needle biopsy. Radiology 178:95–99PubMed
11.
go back to reference Richter GM, Wunsch C, Schneider B et al (1998) Hydro-CT in der detektion und im staging des pankreaskarzinoms. Radiologe 38:279–286PubMedCrossRef Richter GM, Wunsch C, Schneider B et al (1998) Hydro-CT in der detektion und im staging des pankreaskarzinoms. Radiologe 38:279–286PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Prokesch RW, Chow LC, Beaulieu CF et al (2002) Local staging of pancreatic carcinoma with multi-detector row CT: use of curved planar reformations-initial experience. Radiology 225:759–765PubMed Prokesch RW, Chow LC, Beaulieu CF et al (2002) Local staging of pancreatic carcinoma with multi-detector row CT: use of curved planar reformations-initial experience. Radiology 225:759–765PubMed
13.
go back to reference Vargas R, Nino-Murcia M, Trueblood W, Jeffrey RBJ (2004) MDCT in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: prediction of vascular invasion and resectability using a multiphasic technique with curved planar reformations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182:419–425PubMed Vargas R, Nino-Murcia M, Trueblood W, Jeffrey RBJ (2004) MDCT in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: prediction of vascular invasion and resectability using a multiphasic technique with curved planar reformations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182:419–425PubMed
14.
go back to reference Graf O, Boland GW, Warshaw AL, Fernandez-del Castillo C, Hahn PF, Mueller PR (1997) Arterial versus portal venous helical CT for revealing pancreatic adenocarcinoma: conspicuity of tumor and critical vascular anatomy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169:119–123PubMed Graf O, Boland GW, Warshaw AL, Fernandez-del Castillo C, Hahn PF, Mueller PR (1997) Arterial versus portal venous helical CT for revealing pancreatic adenocarcinoma: conspicuity of tumor and critical vascular anatomy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169:119–123PubMed
15.
go back to reference Keogan MT, McDermott VG, Paulson EK et al (1997) Pancreatic malignancy: effect of dual-phase helical CT in tumor detection and vascular opacification. Radiology 205:513–518PubMed Keogan MT, McDermott VG, Paulson EK et al (1997) Pancreatic malignancy: effect of dual-phase helical CT in tumor detection and vascular opacification. Radiology 205:513–518PubMed
16.
go back to reference Fletcher JG, Wiersma MJ, Farrell MA et al (2003) Pancreatic malignancy: value of arterial, pancreatic, and hepatic phase imaging with multi-detector row CT. Radiology 229:81–90PubMed Fletcher JG, Wiersma MJ, Farrell MA et al (2003) Pancreatic malignancy: value of arterial, pancreatic, and hepatic phase imaging with multi-detector row CT. Radiology 229:81–90PubMed
17.
go back to reference McNulty NJ, Francis IR, Platt JF, Cohan RH, Korobkin M, Gebramaniam A (2001) Multi-detector row helical CT of the pancreas: effect of contrast-enhanced multiphasic imaging on enhancement of the pancreas, peripancreatic vasculature, and pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Radiology 220:97–102PubMed McNulty NJ, Francis IR, Platt JF, Cohan RH, Korobkin M, Gebramaniam A (2001) Multi-detector row helical CT of the pancreas: effect of contrast-enhanced multiphasic imaging on enhancement of the pancreas, peripancreatic vasculature, and pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Radiology 220:97–102PubMed
18.
go back to reference Lu DSK, Vedantham S, Krasny RM, Kadell B, Berger WL, Reber HA (1996) Two-phase helical CT for pancreatic tumors: pancreatic versus hepatic phase enhancement of tumor, pancreas, and vascular structures. Radiology 199:697–701PubMed Lu DSK, Vedantham S, Krasny RM, Kadell B, Berger WL, Reber HA (1996) Two-phase helical CT for pancreatic tumors: pancreatic versus hepatic phase enhancement of tumor, pancreas, and vascular structures. Radiology 199:697–701PubMed
19.
go back to reference Freeny PC (2005) CT diagnosis and staging of pancreatic carcinoma. Eur Radiol 15[Suppl 4]:D96–D99PubMed Freeny PC (2005) CT diagnosis and staging of pancreatic carcinoma. Eur Radiol 15[Suppl 4]:D96–D99PubMed
20.
go back to reference Schueller G, Schima W, Schueller-Weidekamm C et al (2006) Multi-detector row CT of the pancreas: effects of contrast material flow rates and individualized scan delay on enhancement of the pancreas and tumor contrast. Radiology (in press) Schueller G, Schima W, Schueller-Weidekamm C et al (2006) Multi-detector row CT of the pancreas: effects of contrast material flow rates and individualized scan delay on enhancement of the pancreas and tumor contrast. Radiology (in press)
21.
go back to reference Prokesch R, Chow LC, Beaulieu CF, Bammer R, Jeffrey RB (2002) Isoattenuating pancreatic carcinoma at multi-detector row CT: secondary signs. Radiology 224:764–768PubMed Prokesch R, Chow LC, Beaulieu CF, Bammer R, Jeffrey RB (2002) Isoattenuating pancreatic carcinoma at multi-detector row CT: secondary signs. Radiology 224:764–768PubMed
22.
go back to reference Bluemke DA, Cameron JL, Hruban RH et al (1995) Potentially resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: spiral CT assessment with surgical and pathologic correlation. Radiology 197:381–385PubMed Bluemke DA, Cameron JL, Hruban RH et al (1995) Potentially resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: spiral CT assessment with surgical and pathologic correlation. Radiology 197:381–385PubMed
23.
go back to reference Ichikawa T, Haradome H, Hachiya J et al (1997) Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: preoperative assessment with helical CT versus dynamic MR imaging. Radiology 202:655–662PubMed Ichikawa T, Haradome H, Hachiya J et al (1997) Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: preoperative assessment with helical CT versus dynamic MR imaging. Radiology 202:655–662PubMed
24.
go back to reference Legmann P, Vignaux O, Dousset B et al (1998) Pancreatic tumors: comparison of dual-phase helical CT and endoscopic sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 170:1315–1322PubMed Legmann P, Vignaux O, Dousset B et al (1998) Pancreatic tumors: comparison of dual-phase helical CT and endoscopic sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 170:1315–1322PubMed
25.
go back to reference Schima W, Függer R, Schober E et al (2002) Diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer: comparison of mangafodipir-enhanced MRI and contrast-enhanced helical hydro-CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:717–724PubMed Schima W, Függer R, Schober E et al (2002) Diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer: comparison of mangafodipir-enhanced MRI and contrast-enhanced helical hydro-CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:717–724PubMed
26.
go back to reference Irie H, Honda H, Kaneko K, Kuroiwa T, Yoshimitsu K, Masuda K (1997) Comparison of helical CT and MR imaging in detecting and staging small pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Abdom Imaging 22:429–433PubMedCrossRef Irie H, Honda H, Kaneko K, Kuroiwa T, Yoshimitsu K, Masuda K (1997) Comparison of helical CT and MR imaging in detecting and staging small pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Abdom Imaging 22:429–433PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Bronstein YL, Loyer EM, Kaur H et al (2004) Detection of small pancreatic tumors with multiphasic helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182:619–623PubMed Bronstein YL, Loyer EM, Kaur H et al (2004) Detection of small pancreatic tumors with multiphasic helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182:619–623PubMed
28.
go back to reference Fukushima H, Itoh S, Takada A et al (2006) Diagnostic value of curved multiplanar reformatted images in multislice CT for the detection of resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Eur Radiol 16(8):1709–1718PubMedCrossRef Fukushima H, Itoh S, Takada A et al (2006) Diagnostic value of curved multiplanar reformatted images in multislice CT for the detection of resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Eur Radiol 16(8):1709–1718PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Grenacher L, Klauss M, Dukic L et al (2004) Hochauflösende Bildgebung beim Pankreaskarzinom: prospektiver Vergleich von MRT und 4-Zeilen-Spiral-CT. Fortschr Röntgenstr 176:1624–1633CrossRef Grenacher L, Klauss M, Dukic L et al (2004) Hochauflösende Bildgebung beim Pankreaskarzinom: prospektiver Vergleich von MRT und 4-Zeilen-Spiral-CT. Fortschr Röntgenstr 176:1624–1633CrossRef
30.
go back to reference DeWitt J, Deveraux B, Chriswell M et al (2004) Comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography and multidetector computed tomography for detecting and staging pancreatic cancer. Ann Intern Med 141:753–763PubMed DeWitt J, Deveraux B, Chriswell M et al (2004) Comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography and multidetector computed tomography for detecting and staging pancreatic cancer. Ann Intern Med 141:753–763PubMed
31.
go back to reference Klapman JB, Chang KJ, Lee JG, Nguyen P (2005) Negative predictive value of endoscopic ultrasound in a large series of patients with a clinical suspicion of pancreatic cancer. Am J Gastronterol 100:2658–2661CrossRef Klapman JB, Chang KJ, Lee JG, Nguyen P (2005) Negative predictive value of endoscopic ultrasound in a large series of patients with a clinical suspicion of pancreatic cancer. Am J Gastronterol 100:2658–2661CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Akahoshi K, Chijiwa Y, Nakano I, Nawara H, Ogawa Y (1998) Diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer by endoscopic ultrasound. Br J Radiol 492–496 Akahoshi K, Chijiwa Y, Nakano I, Nawara H, Ogawa Y (1998) Diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer by endoscopic ultrasound. Br J Radiol 492–496
33.
go back to reference Romijn MG, Stoker J, van Eijck CHJ, van Muiswinkel JM, Torres CG, Lameris JS (2000) MRI with mangafodipir trisodium in the detection and staging of pancreatic cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging 12:261–268PubMedCrossRef Romijn MG, Stoker J, van Eijck CHJ, van Muiswinkel JM, Torres CG, Lameris JS (2000) MRI with mangafodipir trisodium in the detection and staging of pancreatic cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging 12:261–268PubMedCrossRef
34.
35.
go back to reference Birchard KR, Semelka RC, Hyslop WB et al (2005) Suspected pancreatic cancer: evaluation by dynamic gadolinium-enhanced 3D gradient-echo MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 185:700–703PubMed Birchard KR, Semelka RC, Hyslop WB et al (2005) Suspected pancreatic cancer: evaluation by dynamic gadolinium-enhanced 3D gradient-echo MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 185:700–703PubMed
36.
go back to reference Gehl H-B, Vorwerk D, Klose K-C, Günther R-W (1991) Pancreatic enhancement after low-dose infusion of Mn-DPDP. Radiology 180:337–339PubMed Gehl H-B, Vorwerk D, Klose K-C, Günther R-W (1991) Pancreatic enhancement after low-dose infusion of Mn-DPDP. Radiology 180:337–339PubMed
37.
go back to reference Gehl H-B, Urhahn R, Bohndorf K et al (1993) Mn-DPDP in MR imaging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: initial clinical experience. Radiology 186:795–798PubMed Gehl H-B, Urhahn R, Bohndorf K et al (1993) Mn-DPDP in MR imaging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: initial clinical experience. Radiology 186:795–798PubMed
38.
go back to reference Mayo-Smith W, Schima W, Saini S, Slater GJ, McFarland EG (1998) Pancreatic enhancement and pulse sequence analysis using low-dose mangafodipir trisodium. AJR Am J Roentgenol 170:649–652PubMed Mayo-Smith W, Schima W, Saini S, Slater GJ, McFarland EG (1998) Pancreatic enhancement and pulse sequence analysis using low-dose mangafodipir trisodium. AJR Am J Roentgenol 170:649–652PubMed
39.
go back to reference Kettritz U, Warshauer DM, Brown ED, Schlund JF, Eisenberg LB, Semelka RC (1996) Enhancement of the normal pancreas: comparison of manganese-DPDP and gadolinium chelate. Eur Radiol 6:14–18PubMedCrossRef Kettritz U, Warshauer DM, Brown ED, Schlund JF, Eisenberg LB, Semelka RC (1996) Enhancement of the normal pancreas: comparison of manganese-DPDP and gadolinium chelate. Eur Radiol 6:14–18PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Diehl SJ, Lehmann KJ, Gaa J, McGill S, Hoffmann V, Georgi M (1999) MR imaging of pancreatic lesions. Comparison of manganese-DPDP and gadolinium chelate. Invest Radiol 34:589–595PubMedCrossRef Diehl SJ, Lehmann KJ, Gaa J, McGill S, Hoffmann V, Georgi M (1999) MR imaging of pancreatic lesions. Comparison of manganese-DPDP and gadolinium chelate. Invest Radiol 34:589–595PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Schima W, Függer R (2002) Evaluation of focal pancreatic masses: comparison of mangafodipir-enhanced MR imaging and contrast-enhanced helical CT. Eur Radiol 12:2998–3008PubMed Schima W, Függer R (2002) Evaluation of focal pancreatic masses: comparison of mangafodipir-enhanced MR imaging and contrast-enhanced helical CT. Eur Radiol 12:2998–3008PubMed
42.
go back to reference Heinrich S, Goerres GW, Schäfer M et al (2005) Positron emission tomography/computed tomography influences on the management of resectable pancreatic cancer and its cost-effectiveness. Ann Surg 242:235–243PubMedCrossRef Heinrich S, Goerres GW, Schäfer M et al (2005) Positron emission tomography/computed tomography influences on the management of resectable pancreatic cancer and its cost-effectiveness. Ann Surg 242:235–243PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Bipat S, Phoa SSKS, van Delden OM et al (2005) Ultrasonography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis and determining resectability of pancreatic carcinoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 29:438–445PubMedCrossRef Bipat S, Phoa SSKS, van Delden OM et al (2005) Ultrasonography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis and determining resectability of pancreatic carcinoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 29:438–445PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Park DI, Lee JK, Kim J-E et al (2001) The analysis of resectability and survival in pancreatic cancer patients with vascular invasion. J Clin Gastroenterol 32:231–234PubMedCrossRef Park DI, Lee JK, Kim J-E et al (2001) The analysis of resectability and survival in pancreatic cancer patients with vascular invasion. J Clin Gastroenterol 32:231–234PubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Lu DSK, Reber HA, Krasny RM, Kadell BM, Sayre J (1997) Local staging of pancreatic cancer: criteria for unresectability of major vessels as revealed by pancreatic-phase thin section helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 168:1439–1443PubMed Lu DSK, Reber HA, Krasny RM, Kadell BM, Sayre J (1997) Local staging of pancreatic cancer: criteria for unresectability of major vessels as revealed by pancreatic-phase thin section helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 168:1439–1443PubMed
46.
go back to reference O’Malley ME, Boland GWL, Wood BJ, Fernandez-del Castillo C, Warshaw AL, Mueller PR (1999) Adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas: determination of surgical unresectability with thin-section pancreatic-phase helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 173:1513–1518PubMed O’Malley ME, Boland GWL, Wood BJ, Fernandez-del Castillo C, Warshaw AL, Mueller PR (1999) Adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas: determination of surgical unresectability with thin-section pancreatic-phase helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 173:1513–1518PubMed
47.
go back to reference Li H, Zeng MS, Zhou KR, Jin DY, Lou WH (2005) Pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The different CT criteria for peripancreatic major arterial and venous invasion. J Comput Assist Tomogr 29:170–175PubMedCrossRef Li H, Zeng MS, Zhou KR, Jin DY, Lou WH (2005) Pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The different CT criteria for peripancreatic major arterial and venous invasion. J Comput Assist Tomogr 29:170–175PubMedCrossRef
48.
go back to reference Yamada Y, Mori H, Kiyosue H, Matsumoto S, Hori Y, Maeda T (2000) CT assessment of the inferior peripancreatic veins: clinical significance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174:677–684PubMed Yamada Y, Mori H, Kiyosue H, Matsumoto S, Hori Y, Maeda T (2000) CT assessment of the inferior peripancreatic veins: clinical significance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174:677–684PubMed
49.
go back to reference Trede M, Rumstadt B, Wendl K et al (1997) Ultrafast magnetic resonance imaging improves the staging of pancreatic tumors. Ann Surg 226:393–407PubMedCrossRef Trede M, Rumstadt B, Wendl K et al (1997) Ultrafast magnetic resonance imaging improves the staging of pancreatic tumors. Ann Surg 226:393–407PubMedCrossRef
50.
go back to reference Diehl SJ, Lehmann KJ, Sadlick M, Lachmann R, Georgi M (1998) Pancreatic cancer: value of dual-phase helical CT in assessing resectability. Radiology 206:373–378PubMed Diehl SJ, Lehmann KJ, Sadlick M, Lachmann R, Georgi M (1998) Pancreatic cancer: value of dual-phase helical CT in assessing resectability. Radiology 206:373–378PubMed
51.
go back to reference Bartolozzi C, Donati F, Cioni D et al (2004) Detection of colorectal liver metastases: a prospective multicenter trial comparing unenhanced MRI, MnDPDP-enhanced MRI, and spiral CT. Eur Radiol 14:14–20PubMedCrossRef Bartolozzi C, Donati F, Cioni D et al (2004) Detection of colorectal liver metastases: a prospective multicenter trial comparing unenhanced MRI, MnDPDP-enhanced MRI, and spiral CT. Eur Radiol 14:14–20PubMedCrossRef
52.
go back to reference Megibow AJ, Zhou XH, Rotterdam H et al (1995) Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: CT versus MR imaging in the evaluation of resectability. Report of the Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Study Group. Radiology 195:327–332PubMed Megibow AJ, Zhou XH, Rotterdam H et al (1995) Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: CT versus MR imaging in the evaluation of resectability. Report of the Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Study Group. Radiology 195:327–332PubMed
53.
go back to reference Kaneko K, Honda H, Hayashi T et al (1997) Helical CT evaluation of arterial invasion in pancreatic tumors: comparison with angiography. Abdom Imaging 22:204–207PubMedCrossRef Kaneko K, Honda H, Hayashi T et al (1997) Helical CT evaluation of arterial invasion in pancreatic tumors: comparison with angiography. Abdom Imaging 22:204–207PubMedCrossRef
54.
go back to reference Fishman EK (2001) Imaging pancreatic cancer: the role of multidetector CT with three-dimensional CT angiography. Pancreatology 1:610–624PubMedCrossRef Fishman EK (2001) Imaging pancreatic cancer: the role of multidetector CT with three-dimensional CT angiography. Pancreatology 1:610–624PubMedCrossRef
55.
go back to reference To’o KJ, Raman SS, Yu NC et al (2005) Pancreatic and peripancreatic diseases mimicking primary pancreatic neoplasia. Radiographics 25:949–965PubMed To’o KJ, Raman SS, Yu NC et al (2005) Pancreatic and peripancreatic diseases mimicking primary pancreatic neoplasia. Radiographics 25:949–965PubMed
56.
go back to reference Boll DT, Merkle EM (2003) Differentiating a chronic hyperplastic mass from pancreatic cancer: a challenge remaining in multidetector CT of the pancreas. Eur Radiol 13:M42–M49PubMed Boll DT, Merkle EM (2003) Differentiating a chronic hyperplastic mass from pancreatic cancer: a challenge remaining in multidetector CT of the pancreas. Eur Radiol 13:M42–M49PubMed
57.
go back to reference Ichikawa T, Sou H, Araki T et al (2001) Duct-penetrating sign at MRCP: usefulness for differentiating inflammatory pancreatic mass from pancreatic carcinomas. Radiology 221:107–116PubMed Ichikawa T, Sou H, Araki T et al (2001) Duct-penetrating sign at MRCP: usefulness for differentiating inflammatory pancreatic mass from pancreatic carcinomas. Radiology 221:107–116PubMed
58.
go back to reference Manfredi R, Costamagna G, Brizi MG et al (2000) Severe chronic pancreatitis versus suspected pancreatic disease: dynamic MR cholangiopancreatography after secretin stimulation. Radiology 214:849–855PubMed Manfredi R, Costamagna G, Brizi MG et al (2000) Severe chronic pancreatitis versus suspected pancreatic disease: dynamic MR cholangiopancreatography after secretin stimulation. Radiology 214:849–855PubMed
59.
go back to reference Eloubeidi MA, Jhala D, Chhieng DC et al (2003) Yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy in patients with suspected pancreatic carcinoma. Cancer 99:285–292PubMedCrossRef Eloubeidi MA, Jhala D, Chhieng DC et al (2003) Yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy in patients with suspected pancreatic carcinoma. Cancer 99:285–292PubMedCrossRef
60.
go back to reference Raut CP, Grau AM, Staerkel GA et al (2003) Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic fine-needle aspiration in patients with presumed pancreatic cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 7:118–128PubMedCrossRef Raut CP, Grau AM, Staerkel GA et al (2003) Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic fine-needle aspiration in patients with presumed pancreatic cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 7:118–128PubMedCrossRef
61.
go back to reference Mallery JS, Centeno BA, Hahn PF, Chang Y, Warshaw AL, Brugge WR (2002) Pancreatic tissue sampling guided by EUS, CT/US, and surgery: a comparison of sensitivity and specificity. Gastrointest Endoscopy 56:218–224CrossRef Mallery JS, Centeno BA, Hahn PF, Chang Y, Warshaw AL, Brugge WR (2002) Pancreatic tissue sampling guided by EUS, CT/US, and surgery: a comparison of sensitivity and specificity. Gastrointest Endoscopy 56:218–224CrossRef
62.
go back to reference Zech CJ, Helmberger T, Wichmann MW, Holzknecht N, Diebold J, Reiser MF (2002) Large core biopsy of the pancreas under CT fluoroscopy control: results and complications. J Compout Assist Tomogr 26:743–749CrossRef Zech CJ, Helmberger T, Wichmann MW, Holzknecht N, Diebold J, Reiser MF (2002) Large core biopsy of the pancreas under CT fluoroscopy control: results and complications. J Compout Assist Tomogr 26:743–749CrossRef
63.
go back to reference Kariniemi J, Blanco Sequeiros R, Ojala R, Tervonen O (2005) MRI-guided abdominal biopsy in a 0.23-T open-configuration MRI system. Eur Radiol 15:1256–1262PubMedCrossRef Kariniemi J, Blanco Sequeiros R, Ojala R, Tervonen O (2005) MRI-guided abdominal biopsy in a 0.23-T open-configuration MRI system. Eur Radiol 15:1256–1262PubMedCrossRef
64.
go back to reference Cameron JL, Crist DW, Sitzmann JV et al (1991) Factors influencing survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer. Am J Surg 161:120–125PubMedCrossRef Cameron JL, Crist DW, Sitzmann JV et al (1991) Factors influencing survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer. Am J Surg 161:120–125PubMedCrossRef
65.
go back to reference Rieber A, Tomczak R, Nüssle K, Klaus H, Brambs H-J (2000) MRI with mangafodipir trisodium in the detection of pancreatic tumours: comparison with helical CT. Br J Radiol 73:1165–1169PubMed Rieber A, Tomczak R, Nüssle K, Klaus H, Brambs H-J (2000) MRI with mangafodipir trisodium in the detection of pancreatic tumours: comparison with helical CT. Br J Radiol 73:1165–1169PubMed
Metadata
Title
Pancreatic adenocarcinoma
Authors
Wolfgang Schima
Ahmed Ba-Ssalamah
Claus Kölblinger
Christiane Kulinna-Cosentini
Andreas Puespoek
Peter Götzinger
Publication date
01-03-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 3/2007
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-006-0435-7

Other articles of this Issue 3/2007

European Radiology 3/2007 Go to the issue