Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 7/2006

01-07-2006 | Cardiac

Non-invasive coronary angiography with 16-slice spiral computed tomography: image quality in patients with high heart rates

Authors: H. Brodoefel, A. Reimann, M. Heuschmid, A. Küttner, T. Beck, C. Burgstahler, C. D. Claussen, S. Schroeder, A. F. Kopp

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 7/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess segment image quality at high heart rates using 16-slice computed tomography and differential reconstruction for major coronary vessels. According to the following protocol, 16-slice CT coronary angiography in 46 patients with a mean heart rate of 86.3±11.8 was reconstructed. At three transverse planes, preview series were obtained and motion artifacts evaluated in 5% increments from 0-95% within the cardiac cycle. Relying on image quality in the previews, reconstructions were performed at three z-positions for each patient. Segment image quality was assessed in terms of artifacts and visibility. The effects of heart rate and trigger delay on image quality were analyzed. Optimal image quality was achieved at 25 to 35% of the cardiac cycle for the left circumflex (CX) and right coronary artery (RCA) or 30 to 40% for the left main (LM) and left anterior descending artery (LAD). Sixteen-slice CT and differential reconstruction produced good image quality with a low percentage of motion-degraded proximal and middle segments (8.8%). Grades were 1.5 for the LM, 1.9 for the LAD, 2.0 for the CX and 2.3 for the RCA. At high heart rates, good image quality of the coronary arteries is achieved by 16-slice CT and a sophisticated reconstruction strategy at peak to late systole.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Rumberger JA (2002) Noninvasive coronary angiography using computed tomography: ready to kick it up another notch? Circulation 106(16):2036-2038CrossRefPubMed Rumberger JA (2002) Noninvasive coronary angiography using computed tomography: ready to kick it up another notch? Circulation 106(16):2036-2038CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Kim WY et al (2001) Coronary magnetic resonance angiography for the detection of coronary stenoses. N Engl J Med 345(26):1863-1869CrossRefPubMed Kim WY et al (2001) Coronary magnetic resonance angiography for the detection of coronary stenoses. N Engl J Med 345(26):1863-1869CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Lu B et al (2002) Image quality of three-dimensional electron beam coronary angiography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 26(2):202-209CrossRefPubMed Lu B et al (2002) Image quality of three-dimensional electron beam coronary angiography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 26(2):202-209CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Schroeder S et al (2002) Influence of heart rate on vessel visibility in noninvasive coronary angiography using new multislice computed tomography: experience in 94 patients. Clin Imaging 26(2):106-111CrossRefPubMed Schroeder S et al (2002) Influence of heart rate on vessel visibility in noninvasive coronary angiography using new multislice computed tomography: experience in 94 patients. Clin Imaging 26(2):106-111CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Flohr TG et al (2003) Advances in cardiac imaging with 16-section CT systems. Acad Radiol 10(4):386-401CrossRefPubMed Flohr TG et al (2003) Advances in cardiac imaging with 16-section CT systems. Acad Radiol 10(4):386-401CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Kopp AF et al (2003) MDCT: cardiology indications. Eur Radiol 13(Suppl 5):M102-M115PubMed Kopp AF et al (2003) MDCT: cardiology indications. Eur Radiol 13(Suppl 5):M102-M115PubMed
8.
go back to reference Nieman K et al (2002) Usefulness of multislice computed tomography for detecting obstructive coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 89(8):913-918CrossRefPubMed Nieman K et al (2002) Usefulness of multislice computed tomography for detecting obstructive coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 89(8):913-918CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Nieman K et al (2002) Reliable noninvasive coronary angiography with fast submillimeter multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation 106(16):2051-2054CrossRefPubMed Nieman K et al (2002) Reliable noninvasive coronary angiography with fast submillimeter multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation 106(16):2051-2054CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Ropers D et al (2003) Detection of coronary artery stenoses with thin-slice multi-detector row spiral computed tomography and multiplanar reconstruction. Circulation 107(5):664-666CrossRefPubMed Ropers D et al (2003) Detection of coronary artery stenoses with thin-slice multi-detector row spiral computed tomography and multiplanar reconstruction. Circulation 107(5):664-666CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Cademartiri F et al (2005) Diagnostic accuracy of multislice computed tomography coronary angiography is improved at low heart rates. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging:1-5 Cademartiri F et al (2005) Diagnostic accuracy of multislice computed tomography coronary angiography is improved at low heart rates. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging:1-5
12.
go back to reference Hoffmann MH et al (2005) Noninvasive coronary angiography with 16-detector row CT: effect of heart rate. Radiology 234(1):86-97PubMedCrossRef Hoffmann MH et al (2005) Noninvasive coronary angiography with 16-detector row CT: effect of heart rate. Radiology 234(1):86-97PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kuettner A et al (2004) Noninvasive detection of coronary lesions using 16-detector multislice spiral computed tomography technology: initial clinical results. J Am Coll Cardiol 44(6):1230-1237PubMed Kuettner A et al (2004) Noninvasive detection of coronary lesions using 16-detector multislice spiral computed tomography technology: initial clinical results. J Am Coll Cardiol 44(6):1230-1237PubMed
14.
go back to reference Shim SS, Kim Y, Lim SM (2005) Improvement of image quality with beta-blocker premedication on ECG-gated 16-MDCT coronary angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184(2):649-654PubMed Shim SS, Kim Y, Lim SM (2005) Improvement of image quality with beta-blocker premedication on ECG-gated 16-MDCT coronary angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184(2):649-654PubMed
15.
go back to reference Zhang SZ et al (2005) Evaluation of computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with a high heart rate using 16-slice spiral computed tomography with 0.37-s gantry rotation time. Eur Radiol 15(6):1105-1109PubMedCrossRef Zhang SZ et al (2005) Evaluation of computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with a high heart rate using 16-slice spiral computed tomography with 0.37-s gantry rotation time. Eur Radiol 15(6):1105-1109PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Bashore TM et al (2001) American College of Cardiology/Society for cardiac angiography and interventions clinical expert consensus document on cardiac catheterization laboratory standards. A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on clinical expert consensus documents. J Am Coll Cardiol 37(8):2170-2214CrossRefPubMed Bashore TM et al (2001) American College of Cardiology/Society for cardiac angiography and interventions clinical expert consensus document on cardiac catheterization laboratory standards. A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on clinical expert consensus documents. J Am Coll Cardiol 37(8):2170-2214CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Vogl TJ et al (2002) Techniques for the detection of coronary atherosclerosis: multi-detector row CT coronary angiography. Radiology 223(1):212-220PubMedCrossRef Vogl TJ et al (2002) Techniques for the detection of coronary atherosclerosis: multi-detector row CT coronary angiography. Radiology 223(1):212-220PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Kopp AF et al (2002) Non-invasive coronary angiography with high resolution multidetector-row computed tomography. Results in 102 patients. Eur Heart J 23(21):1714-1725PubMed Kopp AF et al (2002) Non-invasive coronary angiography with high resolution multidetector-row computed tomography. Results in 102 patients. Eur Heart J 23(21):1714-1725PubMed
19.
go back to reference Knez A et al (2001) Usefulness of multislice spiral computed tomography angiography for determination of coronary artery stenoses. Am J Cardiol 88(10):1191-1194CrossRefPubMed Knez A et al (2001) Usefulness of multislice spiral computed tomography angiography for determination of coronary artery stenoses. Am J Cardiol 88(10):1191-1194CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Nieman K et al (2001) Coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography. Lancet 357(9256):599-603CrossRefPubMed Nieman K et al (2001) Coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography. Lancet 357(9256):599-603CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Achenbach S et al (2001) Detection of coronary artery stenoses by contrast-enhanced, retrospectively electrocardiographically-gated, multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation 103(21):2535-2538PubMed Achenbach S et al (2001) Detection of coronary artery stenoses by contrast-enhanced, retrospectively electrocardiographically-gated, multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation 103(21):2535-2538PubMed
22.
go back to reference Hong C et al (2001) ECG-gated reconstructed multi-detector row CT coronary angiography: effect of varying trigger delay on image quality. Radiology 220(3):712-717PubMedCrossRef Hong C et al (2001) ECG-gated reconstructed multi-detector row CT coronary angiography: effect of varying trigger delay on image quality. Radiology 220(3):712-717PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Nieman K et al (2002) Non-invasive coronary angiography with multislice spiral computed tomography: impact of heart rate. Heart 88(5):470-474CrossRefPubMed Nieman K et al (2002) Non-invasive coronary angiography with multislice spiral computed tomography: impact of heart rate. Heart 88(5):470-474CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Heuschmid M et al (2005) ECG-gated 16-MDCT of the coronary arteries: assessment of image quality and accuracy in detecting stenoses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184(5):1413-1419PubMed Heuschmid M et al (2005) ECG-gated 16-MDCT of the coronary arteries: assessment of image quality and accuracy in detecting stenoses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184(5):1413-1419PubMed
25.
go back to reference Hamoir XL et al (2005) Coronary arteries: assessment of image quality and optimal reconstruction window in retrospective ECG-gated multislice CT at 375-ms gantry rotation time. Eur Radiol 15(2):296-304PubMedCrossRef Hamoir XL et al (2005) Coronary arteries: assessment of image quality and optimal reconstruction window in retrospective ECG-gated multislice CT at 375-ms gantry rotation time. Eur Radiol 15(2):296-304PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Kopp AF et al (2002) Multidetector-row CT cardiac imaging with 4 and 16 slices for coronary CTA and imaging of atherosclerotic plaques. Eur Radiol 12(Suppl 2):S17-S24CrossRefPubMed Kopp AF et al (2002) Multidetector-row CT cardiac imaging with 4 and 16 slices for coronary CTA and imaging of atherosclerotic plaques. Eur Radiol 12(Suppl 2):S17-S24CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Giesler T et al (2002) Noninvasive visualization of coronary arteries using contrast-enhanced multidetector CT: influence of heart rate on image quality and stenosis detection. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179(4):911-916PubMed Giesler T et al (2002) Noninvasive visualization of coronary arteries using contrast-enhanced multidetector CT: influence of heart rate on image quality and stenosis detection. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179(4):911-916PubMed
28.
go back to reference Hofman MB, Wickline SA, Lorenz CH (1998) Quantification of in-plane motion of the coronary arteries during the cardiac cycle: implications for acquisition window duration for MR flow quantification. J Magn Reson Imaging 8(3):568-576PubMedCrossRef Hofman MB, Wickline SA, Lorenz CH (1998) Quantification of in-plane motion of the coronary arteries during the cardiac cycle: implications for acquisition window duration for MR flow quantification. J Magn Reson Imaging 8(3):568-576PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Achenbach S et al (2000) In-plane coronary arterial motion velocity: measurement with electron-beam CT. Radiology 216(2):457-463PubMed Achenbach S et al (2000) In-plane coronary arterial motion velocity: measurement with electron-beam CT. Radiology 216(2):457-463PubMed
30.
go back to reference Wang Y, Vidan E, Bergman GW (1999) Cardiac motion of coronary arteries: variability in the rest period and implications for coronary MR angiography. Radiology 213(3):751-758PubMed Wang Y, Vidan E, Bergman GW (1999) Cardiac motion of coronary arteries: variability in the rest period and implications for coronary MR angiography. Radiology 213(3):751-758PubMed
31.
go back to reference Potel MJ et al (1983) Methods for evaluating cardiac wall motion in three dimensions using bifurcation points of the coronary arterial tree. Invest Radiol 18(1):47-57PubMedCrossRef Potel MJ et al (1983) Methods for evaluating cardiac wall motion in three dimensions using bifurcation points of the coronary arterial tree. Invest Radiol 18(1):47-57PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Kopp AF et al (2004) Multislice CT in cardiac and coronary angiography. Br J Radiol 77(Spec No 1):S87-S97CrossRefPubMed Kopp AF et al (2004) Multislice CT in cardiac and coronary angiography. Br J Radiol 77(Spec No 1):S87-S97CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Pannu HK et al (2003) Current concepts in multi-detector row CT evaluation of the coronary arteries: principles, techniques, and anatomy. Radiographics 23 Spec No:S111-S125PubMedCrossRef Pannu HK et al (2003) Current concepts in multi-detector row CT evaluation of the coronary arteries: principles, techniques, and anatomy. Radiographics 23 Spec No:S111-S125PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Non-invasive coronary angiography with 16-slice spiral computed tomography: image quality in patients with high heart rates
Authors
H. Brodoefel
A. Reimann
M. Heuschmid
A. Küttner
T. Beck
C. Burgstahler
C. D. Claussen
S. Schroeder
A. F. Kopp
Publication date
01-07-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 7/2006
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-006-0155-z

Other articles of this Issue 7/2006

European Radiology 7/2006 Go to the issue