Top

Published in:

01-05-2005 | Magnetic Resonance

Whole-body MRI at high field: technical limits and clinical potential

Author: Fritz Schick

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 5/2005

Abstract

This review seeks to clarify the most important implications of higher magnetic field strength for clinical examinations of the whole body. An overview is provided on the resulting advantages and disadvantages for anatomical, functional and biochemical magnetic resonance examinations in different regions of the body. It is demonstrated that susceptibility-dependent imaging, chemical shift selective (e.g., fat-suppressed) imaging, and spectroscopic techniques clearly gain from higher field strength. Problems due to shorter wavelength and higher radio frequency energy deposition at higher field strength are reported, especially in examinations of the body trunk. Thorax examinations provided sufficient homogeneity of the radio frequency field for common examination techniques in most cases, whereas abdominal and pelvic imaging was often hampered by undesired dielectric effects. Currently available and potential future strategies to overcome related limitations are discussed. Whole-body MRI at higher field strength currently leads to clearly improved image quality using a variety of established sequence types and for examination of many body regions. But some major problems at higher field strength have to be solved before high-field magnetic resonance systems can really replace the well-established and technically developed magnetic resonance systems operating at 1.5 T for each clinical application.

Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Scheidegger MB, Boesiger P (1999) SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med 42:952–962CrossRefPubMed

Wang Y (2000) Description of parallel imaging in MRI using multiple coils. Magn Reson Med 44:495–499

Paschal CB, Morris HD (2004) K-space in the clinic. J Magn Reson Imaging 19:145–159CrossRef

De Zwart JA, Ledden PJ, van Gelderen P, Bodurka J, Chu R, Duyn JH (2004) Signal-to-noise ratio and parallel imaging performance of a 16-channel receive-only brain coil array at 3.0 Tesla. Magn Reson Med 51:22–26CrossRef

Marzola P, Osculati F, Sbarbati A (2003) High field MRI in preclinical research. Eur J Radiol 48:165–170CrossRef

Chen W, Ugurbil K (1999) High spatial resolution functional magnetic resonance imaging at very-high-magnetic field. Top Magn Reson Imaging 10:63–78

Silvennoinen MJ, Clingman CS, Golay X, Kauppinen RA, van Zijl PC (2003) Comparison of the dependence of blood R2 and R2* on oxygen saturation at 1.5 and 4.7 Tesla. Magn Reson Med 49:47–60CrossRef

Tkac I, Andersen P, Adriany G, Merkle H, Ugurbil K, Gruetter R (2001) In vivo ¹H NMR spectroscopy of the human brain at 7 T. Magn Reson Med 46:451–456CrossRef

Ugurbil K, Adriany G, Andersen P, Chen W, Garwood M, Gruetter R, Henry PG, Kim SG, Lieu H, Tkac I, Vaughan T, Van De Moortele PF, Yacoub E, Zhu XH (2003) Ultrahigh field magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy. Magn Reson Imaging 21:1263–1281CrossRef

10.

Rotter M, Berg A, Langenberger H, Grampp S, Imhof H, Moser E (2001) Autocorrelation analysis of bone structure. J Magn Reson Imaging 14(1):87–93CrossRef

11.

Uematsu H, Dougherty L, Takahashi M, Ohno Y, Nakatsu M, Song HK, Ferrari VA, Gefter WB, Schnall MD, Hatabu H (2001) Pulmonary MR angiography with contrast agent at 4 Tesla: a preliminary result. Magn Reson Med 46:1028–1030

12.

Dougherty L, Connick TJ, Mizsei G (2001) Cardiac imaging at 4 Tesla. Magn Reson Med 45:176–178CrossRef

13.

Klarhofer M, Csapo B, Balassy C, Szeles JC, Moser E (2001) High-resolution blood flow velocity measurements in the human finger. Magn Reson Med 45:716–719CrossRef

14.

Szeles JC, Csapo B, Klarhofer M, Balassy C, Hoda R, Berg A, Roden M, Polterauer P, Waldhausl W, Moser E (2001) In vivo magnetic resonance micro-imaging of the human toe at 3 Tesla. Magn Reson Imaging 19:1235–1238CrossRef

15.

Csapo B, Szeles J, Helbich TH, Klarhofer M, Balassy C, Pammer J, Obermair A (2002) Histopathologic correlation of high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging of human cervical tissue samples at 3 Tesla: validation of a technique. Invest Radiol 37:381–385CrossRef

16.

Lin W, An H, Chen Y, Nicholas P, Zhai G, Gerig G, Gilmore J, Bullitt E (2003) Practical consideration for 3T imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 11:615–639

17.

Uematsu H, Dougherty L, Takahashi M, Ohno Y, Nakatsu M, Schnall MD, Hatabu H (2003) Abdominal imaging at 4 T MR system: a preliminary result. Eur J Radiol 47:161–163CrossRef

18.

Price SJ, Burnet NG, Donovan T, Green HA, Pena A, Antoun NM, Pickard JD, Carpenter TA, Gillard JH (2003) Diffusion tensor imaging of brain tumours at 3T: a potential tool for assessing white matter tract invasion? Clin Radiol 58:455–462CrossRefPubMed

19.

Norris D (2003) High field human imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 18:519–529CrossRefPubMed

20.

Hormann M, Traxler H, Ba-Ssalamah A, Mlynarik V, Shodaj-Baghini M, Kubiena H, Trattnig S (2003) Correlative high-resolution MR-anatomic study of sciatic, ulnar, and proper palmar digital nerve. Magn Reson Imaging 21:879–885CrossRef

21.

Hinton DP, Wald LL, Pitts J, Schmitt F (2003) Comparison of cardiac MRI on 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla clinical whole body systems. Invest Radiol 38:436–442CrossRef

22.

Sosna J, Pedrosa I, Dewolf WC, Mahallati H, Lenkinski RE, Rofsky NM (2004) MR imaging of the prostate at 3 Tesla: comparison of an external phased-array coil to imaging with an endorectal coil at 1.5 Tesla. Acad Radiol 11:857–862CrossRef

23.

Uematsu H, Takahashi M, Dougherty L, Hatabu H (2004) High field body MR imaging—preliminary experiences. J Clin Imaging 28:159–162CrossRef

24.

Karlberg M, Annertz M, Magnusson M (2004) Acute vestibular neuritis visualized by 3-T magnetic resonance imaging with high-dose gadolinium. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 130:229–232CrossRef

25.

Huber ME, Kozerke S, Pruessmann KP, Smink J, Boesiger P (2004) Sensitivity-encoded coronary MRA at 3T. Magn Reson Med 52:221–227CrossRef

26.

Nayak KS, Cunningham CH, Santos JM, Pauly JM (2004) Real-time cardiac MRI at 3 Tesla. Magn Reson Med 51:655–660CrossRef

27.

Fuetterer JJ, Scheenen TW, Huisman HJ, Klomp DW, van Dorsten FA, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA, Witjes JA, Heerschap A, Barentsz JO (2004) Initial experience of 3 Tesla endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging and 1H-spectroscopic imaging of the prostate. Invest Radiol 39:671–680CrossRef

28.

Graf H, Schick F, Claussen CD, Seemann MD (2004) MR visualization of the inner ear structures: comparison of 1.5 Tesla and 3 Tesla images. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 176:17–20CrossRef

29.

Baudendistel KT, Heverhagen JT, Knopp MV (2004) Clinical MR at 3 Tesla: current status. Radiologe 44:11–18CrossRefPubMed

30.

Lenk S, Ludescher B, Martirosan P, Schick F, Claussen CD, Schlemmer HP (2004) 3.0 T high-resolution MR imaging of carpal ligaments and TFCC. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 176:664–667CrossRef

31.

Bloch BN, Rofsky NM, Baroni RH, Marquis RP, Pedrosa I, Lenkinski RE (2004) 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate with combined pelvic phased-array and endorectal coils; initial experience (1). Acad Radiol 11:863–877CrossRef

32.

Lutterbey G, Gieseke J, von Falkenhausen M, Morakkabati N, Schild H (2005) Lung MRI at 3.0T: a comparison of helical CT and high-field MRI in the detection of diffuse lung disease. Eur Radiol. DOI 10.1007/s00330-004-2548-1

33.

Hoult DI (2000) Sensitivity and power deposition in a high-field imaging experiment. J Magn Reson Imag 12:46–67CrossRef

34.

Michaeli S, Garwood M, Zhu XH, DelaBarre L, Andersen P, Adriany G, Merkle H, Ugurbil K, Chen W (2002) Proton T2 relaxation study of water, N-acetylaspartate, and creatine in human brain using Hahn and Carr–Purcell spin echoes at 4T and 7T. Magn Reson Med 47:629–633CrossRef

35.

Ethofer T, Mader I, Seeger U, Helms G, Erb M, Grodd W, Ludolph A, Klose U (2003) Magn Reson Med 50:1296–1301CrossRef

36.

Bezelaire CMJ, Duhamel GD, Rofsky NM, Alsop DC (2004) MR imaging relaxation times of abdominal and pelvic tissues measured in vivo at 3.0 T: preliminary results. Radiology 230:652–659

37.

Hennig J, Scheffler K (2001) Hyperechoes. Magn Reson Med 46:6–12

38.

Carr JC, Simonetti O, Bundy J, Li D, Pereles S, Finn JP (2001) Cine MR angiography of the heart with segmented true fast imaging with steady-state precession. Radiology 219:828–834PubMed

39.

Posse S, Kemna LJ, Elghahwagi B, Wiese S, Kiselev VG (2001) Effect of graded hypo- and hypercapnia on fMRI contrast in visual cortex: quantification of T2* changes by multiecho EPI. Magn Reson Med 46:264–271CrossRef

40.

Reimer P, Muller M, Marx C, Wiedermann D, Muller R, Rummeny EJ, Ebert W, Shamsi K, Peters PE (1998) T1 effects of a bolus-injectable superparamagnetic iron oxide, SH U 555 A: dependence on field strength and plasma concentration—preliminary clinical experience with dynamic T1-weighted MR imaging. Radiology 209:831–836PubMed

41.

Huppertz A, Rohrer M (2004) Gadobutrol, a highly concentrated MR imaging contrast agent: its physicochemical characteristics and the basis for its use in contrast enhanced MR angiography and perfusion imaging. Eur Radiol Suppl 14(Suppl 5):M12–M18CrossRef

42.

Kim SG (1995) Quantification of relative cerebral blood flow change by flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery (FAIR) technique: application to functional mapping. Magn Reson Med 37:293–301

43.

Calamante F, Thomas DL, Pell GS, Wiersma J, Turner R (1999) Measuring cerebral blood flow using magnetic resonance imaging techniques. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 19:701–735CrossRef

44.

Martirosian P, Klose U, Mader I, Schick F (2004) FAIR True-FISP perfusion imaging of the kidneys. Magn Reson Med 51:353–361CrossRef

45.

Kurhanewicz J, Swanson MG, Nelson SJ, Vigneron DB (2002) Combined magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopic imaging approach to molecular imaging of prostate cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging 16:451–463CrossRef

46.

Hasumi M, Suzuki K, Taketomi A, Matsui H, Yamamoto T, Ito K, Kurokawa K, Aoki J, Endo K, Yamanaka H (2003) The combination of multi-voxel MR spectroscopy with MR imaging improve the diagnostic accuracy for localization of prostate cancer. Anticancer Res 23:4223–4227

47.

Schmitt M, Feiweier T, Horger W, Krueger G, Schoen L, Lazar R, Kiefer B (2004) Improved uniformity of RF-distribution in clinical whole body—imaging at 3T by means of dielectric pads. In: Proceedings of the 12th annual meeting of ISMRM, p. 197

48.

Vaughan JT, Adriany G, Snyder CJ, Tian J, Thiel T, Bolinger L, Liu H, DelaBarre L, Ugurbil K (2004) Efficient high-frequency body coil for high-field MRI. Magn Reson Med 52:851–859CrossRef

49.

Nitz WR, Oppelt A, Renz W, Manke C, Lenhart M, Link J (2001) On the heating of linear conductive structures as guide wires and catheters in interventional MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 13:105–114

50.

Kangarlu A, Shellock FG, Chakeres DW (2003) 8.0-Tesla human MR system: temperature changes associated with radiofrequency-induced heating of a head phantom. J Magn Reson Imaging 17:220–226CrossRef

51.

Graf H, Lauer UA, Berger A, Schick F (2005) RF interactions with metallic instruments and implants get more prominent at 3 Tesla—an in-vitro study. Magn Reson Imaging (accepted for publication)

52.

Yacoub E, Shmuel A, Pfeuffer J, Van De Moortele PF, Adriany G, Andersen P, Vaughan JT, Merkle H, Ugurbil K, Hu X (2001) Imaging brain function in humans at 7 Tesla. Magn Reson Med 45:588–594CrossRef

53.

Hattori N, Abe K, Sakoda S, Sawada T (2001) Proton MR spectroscopic study at 3 Tesla glutamate/glutamine in Alzheimer’s disease. NeuroReport 13:183–186

54.

Barker PB, Hearshen DO, Boska MD (2001) Single-voxel proton MRS of the human brain at 1.5T and 3.0T. Magn Reson Med 45:765–769CrossRef

55.

Schubert F, Gallinat J, Seifert F, Rinneberg H (2004) Glutamate concentrations in human brain using single voxel proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy at 3 Tesla. NeuroImage 21:1762–1771CrossRef

56.

Kim DS, Garwood M (2003) High-field magnetic resonance techniques for brain research. Curr Opin Neurobiol 13:612–619CrossRef

57.

Hennig J, Speck O, Koch MA, Weiller C (2003) Functional magnetic resonance imaging: a review of methodological aspects and clinical applications. J Magn Reson Imaging 18:1–15CrossRef

58.

Frayne R, Goodyear BG, Dickhoff P, Lauzon ML, Sevick RJ (2003) Magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 Tesla: challenges and advantages in clinical neurological imaging. Invest Radiol 38:385–402CrossRef

59.

Schwindt W, Kugel H, Bachmann R, Kloska S, Allkemper T, Maintz D, Pfleiderer B, Tombach B, Heindel W (2003) Magnetic resonance imaging protocols for examination of the neurocranium at 3T. Eur Radiol 13:2170–2179CrossRefPubMed

60.

Allkemper T, Schwindt W, Maintz D, Heindel W, Tombach B (2004) Sensitivity of T2-weighted FSE sequences towards physiological iron depositions in normal brains at 1.5 and 3.0 T. Eur Radiol 14:1000–1004CrossRefPubMed

Title: Whole-body MRI at high field: technical limits and clinical potential
Author: Fritz Schick
Publication date: 01-05-2005
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Published in: European Radiology / Issue 5/2005
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-005-2678-0

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Whole-body MRI at high field: technical limits and clinical potential

Abstract

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 5/2005

MRI in guiding and assessing intramyocardial therapy

Prospective, multireader evaluation of image quality and vascular delineation of multislice CT angiography of the brain

Displaced aortic arch sign on chest radiographs: a new sign for the detection of a left paratracheal esophageal mass

Study on motion artifacts in coronary arteries with an anthropomorphic moving heart phantom on an ECG-gated multidetector computed tomography unit

Role of ultrasound in the preoperative staging of patients with breast cancer

Letter to the editor