Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 5/2006

01-05-2006 | Cardiac

Global left ventricular function in cardiac CT. Evaluation of an automated 3D region-growing segmentation algorithm

Authors: Georg Mühlenbruch, Marco Das, Christian Hohl, Joachim E. Wildberger, Daniel Rinck, Thomas G. Flohr, Ralf Koos, Christian Knackstedt, Rolf W. Günther, Andreas H. Mahnken

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 5/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

The purpose was to evaluate a new semi-automated 3D region-growing segmentation algorithm for functional analysis of the left ventricle in multislice CT (MSCT) of the heart. Twenty patients underwent contrast-enhanced MSCT of the heart (collimation 16×0.75 mm; 120 kV; 550 mAseff). Multiphase image reconstructions with 1-mm axial slices and 8-mm short-axis slices were performed. Left ventricular volume measurements (end-diastolic volume, end-systolic volume, ejection fraction and stroke volume) from manually drawn endocardial contours in the short axis slices were compared to semi-automated region-growing segmentation of the left ventricle from the 1-mm axial slices. The post-processing-time for both methods was recorded. Applying the new region-growing algorithm in 13/20 patients (65%), proper segmentation of the left ventricle was feasible. In these patients, the signal-to-noise ratio was higher than in the remaining patients (3.2±1.0 vs. 2.6±0.6). Volume measurements of both segmentation algorithms showed an excellent correlation (all P≤0.0001); the limits of agreement for the ejection fraction were 2.3±8.3 ml. In the patients with proper segmentation the mean post-processing time using the region-growing algorithm was diminished by 44.2%. On the basis of a good contrast-enhanced data set, a left ventricular volume analysis using the new semi-automated region-growing segmentation algorithm is technically feasible, accurate and more time-effective.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Alfakih K, Reid S, Jones T, Sivananthan M (2004) Assessment of ventricular function and mass by cardiac magnet resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 14:1813–1822CrossRefPubMed Alfakih K, Reid S, Jones T, Sivananthan M (2004) Assessment of ventricular function and mass by cardiac magnet resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 14:1813–1822CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Rerkpattanapipat O, Mazur W, Link KM, Hundley WG (2003) Assessment of cardiac function with MR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 11:67–80CrossRefPubMed Rerkpattanapipat O, Mazur W, Link KM, Hundley WG (2003) Assessment of cardiac function with MR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 11:67–80CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Ropers D, Baum U, Pohle K, Anders K, Ulzheimer S, Ohnesorge B, Schlundt C, Bautz W, Daniel WG, Achenbach S (2003) Detection of coronary artery stenoses with thin-slice multi-detector row spiral computed tomography and multiplanar reconstruction. Circulation 107:664–666CrossRefPubMed Ropers D, Baum U, Pohle K, Anders K, Ulzheimer S, Ohnesorge B, Schlundt C, Bautz W, Daniel WG, Achenbach S (2003) Detection of coronary artery stenoses with thin-slice multi-detector row spiral computed tomography and multiplanar reconstruction. Circulation 107:664–666CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Nieman K, Cademartiri F, Lemos PA, Raaijmakers R, Pattynama PMT, de Feyter PJ (2002) Reliable noninvasive coronary angiography with fast sub-millimeter multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation 106:2051–2054CrossRefPubMed Nieman K, Cademartiri F, Lemos PA, Raaijmakers R, Pattynama PMT, de Feyter PJ (2002) Reliable noninvasive coronary angiography with fast sub-millimeter multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation 106:2051–2054CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Kuettner A, Beck T, Drosch T, Kettering K, Heuschmid M, Burgstahler C, Claussen CD, Kopp AF, Schroeder S (2005) Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary imaging using 16-detector slice spiral computed tomography with 188 ms temporal resolution. J Am Coll Cardiol 45:123–127CrossRefPubMed Kuettner A, Beck T, Drosch T, Kettering K, Heuschmid M, Burgstahler C, Claussen CD, Kopp AF, Schroeder S (2005) Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary imaging using 16-detector slice spiral computed tomography with 188 ms temporal resolution. J Am Coll Cardiol 45:123–127CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Juergens KU, Grude M, Fallenberg EM, Opitz C, Wichter T, Heindel W, Fischbach R (2002) Using ECG-gated multidetector CT to evaluate global left ventricular myocardial function in patients with coronary artery disease. Am J Roentgenol 179:1545–1550PubMed Juergens KU, Grude M, Fallenberg EM, Opitz C, Wichter T, Heindel W, Fischbach R (2002) Using ECG-gated multidetector CT to evaluate global left ventricular myocardial function in patients with coronary artery disease. Am J Roentgenol 179:1545–1550PubMed
7.
go back to reference Mahnken AH, Koos R, Katoh M, Spuentrup E, Busch P, Wildberger JE, Kühl HP, Günther RW (2005) Sixteen-slice spiral CT versus MR imaging for the assessment of left ventricular function in acute myocardial infarction. Eur Radiol 15:714–720CrossRefPubMed Mahnken AH, Koos R, Katoh M, Spuentrup E, Busch P, Wildberger JE, Kühl HP, Günther RW (2005) Sixteen-slice spiral CT versus MR imaging for the assessment of left ventricular function in acute myocardial infarction. Eur Radiol 15:714–720CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Mahnken AH, Katoh M, Bruners P, Spuentrup E, Wildberger JE, Gunther RW, Buecker A (2005) Acute myocardial infarction: assessment of left ventricular function with 16-detector row spiral CT versus MR imaging-study in pigs. Radiology 236:112–117PubMedCrossRef Mahnken AH, Katoh M, Bruners P, Spuentrup E, Wildberger JE, Gunther RW, Buecker A (2005) Acute myocardial infarction: assessment of left ventricular function with 16-detector row spiral CT versus MR imaging-study in pigs. Radiology 236:112–117PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Koch K, Oellig F, Oberholzer K, Bender P, Kunz P, Mildenberger P, Hake U, Kreitner KF, Thelen M (2005) Assessment of right ventricular function by 16-detector-row CT: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 15:312–318CrossRefPubMed Koch K, Oellig F, Oberholzer K, Bender P, Kunz P, Mildenberger P, Hake U, Kreitner KF, Thelen M (2005) Assessment of right ventricular function by 16-detector-row CT: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 15:312–318CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Juergens KU, Fischbach R (2005) Left ventricular function studied with MDCT. Eur Radiol DOI 10.1007/s00330-005-2888-5 Juergens KU, Fischbach R (2005) Left ventricular function studied with MDCT. Eur Radiol DOI 10.1007/s00330-005-2888-5
11.
go back to reference Schlosser T, Pagonidis K, Herborn CU, Hunold P, Waltering KU, Lauenstein TC, Barkhausen J (2005) Assessment of left ventricular parameters using 16-MDCT and new software for endocardial and epicardial border delineation. Am J Roentgenol 184:765–773PubMed Schlosser T, Pagonidis K, Herborn CU, Hunold P, Waltering KU, Lauenstein TC, Barkhausen J (2005) Assessment of left ventricular parameters using 16-MDCT and new software for endocardial and epicardial border delineation. Am J Roentgenol 184:765–773PubMed
12.
go back to reference Lynch M, Ghita O, Whelan PF (2005) Automatic segmentation of the left ventricle cavity and myocardium in MRI data. Comput Biol Med May 27; [Epub ahead of print] Lynch M, Ghita O, Whelan PF (2005) Automatic segmentation of the left ventricle cavity and myocardium in MRI data. Comput Biol Med May 27; [Epub ahead of print]
13.
go back to reference Kaus MR, von Berg J, Weese J, Niessen W, Pekar V (2004) Automated segmentation of the left ventricle in cardiac MRI. Med Image Anal 8:245–254CrossRefPubMed Kaus MR, von Berg J, Weese J, Niessen W, Pekar V (2004) Automated segmentation of the left ventricle in cardiac MRI. Med Image Anal 8:245–254CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Ehrhard K, Oberholzer K, Gast K, Mildenberger P, Kreitner KF, Thelen M (2002) Multi-slice CT (MSCT) in cardiac function imaging: threshold-value-supported 3D volume reconstructions to determine the left ventricular ejection fraction in comparison to MRI. Rofo 174:1566–1569PubMed Ehrhard K, Oberholzer K, Gast K, Mildenberger P, Kreitner KF, Thelen M (2002) Multi-slice CT (MSCT) in cardiac function imaging: threshold-value-supported 3D volume reconstructions to determine the left ventricular ejection fraction in comparison to MRI. Rofo 174:1566–1569PubMed
15.
go back to reference Juergens KU, Grude M, Maintz D, Fallenberg EM, Wichter T, Heindel W, Fischbach R (2004) Multi-detector row CT of left ventricular function with dedicated analysis software versus MR imaging: initial experience. Radiology 230:403–410PubMedCrossRef Juergens KU, Grude M, Maintz D, Fallenberg EM, Wichter T, Heindel W, Fischbach R (2004) Multi-detector row CT of left ventricular function with dedicated analysis software versus MR imaging: initial experience. Radiology 230:403–410PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Dewey M, Muller M, Teige F, Hamm B (2005) Evaluation of a semiautomatic software tool for left ventricular function analysis with 16-slice computed tomography. Eur Radiol. DOI 10.1007/s00330-005-2817-7 Dewey M, Muller M, Teige F, Hamm B (2005) Evaluation of a semiautomatic software tool for left ventricular function analysis with 16-slice computed tomography. Eur Radiol. DOI 10.1007/s00330-005-2817-7
17.
go back to reference Boehm T, Alkadhi H, Roffi M, Willmann JK, Desbiolles LM, Marincek B, Wildermuth S (2004) Time-effectiveness, observer-dependence, and accuracy of measurements of left ventricular ejection fraction using four-channel MDCT. Rofo 176:529–537PubMed Boehm T, Alkadhi H, Roffi M, Willmann JK, Desbiolles LM, Marincek B, Wildermuth S (2004) Time-effectiveness, observer-dependence, and accuracy of measurements of left ventricular ejection fraction using four-channel MDCT. Rofo 176:529–537PubMed
18.
go back to reference Thompson BH, Stanford W (1994) Evaluation of cardiac function with ultrafast computed tomography. Radiol Clin N Am 32:537–551PubMed Thompson BH, Stanford W (1994) Evaluation of cardiac function with ultrafast computed tomography. Radiol Clin N Am 32:537–551PubMed
19.
go back to reference Schalla S, Nagel E, Lehmkuhl H, Klein C, Bornstedt, A, Schnackenburg B, Schneider U, Fleck E (2001) Comparison of magnetic resonance real-time imaging of left ventricular function with conventional magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography. Am J Cardiol 87:95–99CrossRefPubMed Schalla S, Nagel E, Lehmkuhl H, Klein C, Bornstedt, A, Schnackenburg B, Schneider U, Fleck E (2001) Comparison of magnetic resonance real-time imaging of left ventricular function with conventional magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography. Am J Cardiol 87:95–99CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Stamm G, Nagel HD (2002) CT-expo-a novel program for dose evaluation in CT. Rofo 174:1570–1576PubMed Stamm G, Nagel HD (2002) CT-expo-a novel program for dose evaluation in CT. Rofo 174:1570–1576PubMed
21.
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1(8476):307–310PubMed Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1(8476):307–310PubMed
Metadata
Title
Global left ventricular function in cardiac CT. Evaluation of an automated 3D region-growing segmentation algorithm
Authors
Georg Mühlenbruch
Marco Das
Christian Hohl
Joachim E. Wildberger
Daniel Rinck
Thomas G. Flohr
Ralf Koos
Christian Knackstedt
Rolf W. Günther
Andreas H. Mahnken
Publication date
01-05-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 5/2006
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-005-0079-z

Other articles of this Issue 5/2006

European Radiology 5/2006 Go to the issue