Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 6/2006

01-06-2006 | Contrast Media

Safety of iobitridol in the general population and at-risk patients

Authors: Thomas J. Vogl, Elmar Honold, Michael Wolf, H. Mohajeri, R. Hammerstingl

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 6/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to review the rate of adverse events after contrast medium administration in the general population and at-risk patients (renal impairment, heart failure (NYHA III or IV), hypotension or hypertension, coronary artery disease, previous reaction to contrast media, asthma and/or allergies, dehydration, diabetes mellitus, poor general condition) under daily practice conditions in a post-marketing surveillance study. Two hundred and ten radiologists conducted various X-ray examinations in 52,057 patients. To document the safety of iobitridol in routine use, all patients undergoing X-ray examinations were included. Exclusion criteria were contraindications listed in the locally approved summary of product characteristics. The adverse event rate was 0.96% (at-risk patients 1.39%); the rate of serious adverse events 0.044% in all patients (at-risk patients 0.057%). Adverse events occurred more often in women than in men (P<0.001). In patients who had previously reacted to a contrast medium, adverse events were reported in 3.43% with mild to moderate symptoms. In 47.76% of these patients, a premedication was administered. There was no difference in the frequency of adverse events and serious adverse events whether premedicated or not (P=0.311 and P=0.295, respectively). Iobitridol was well-tolerated in 99.04% of cases (at-risk patients 98.61%).
Literature
1.
go back to reference Petersein J, Peters CR, Wolf M, Hamm B (2003) Results of the safety and efficacy of iobitridol in more than 61,000 patients. Eur Radiol 13:2006–2011CrossRefPubMed Petersein J, Peters CR, Wolf M, Hamm B (2003) Results of the safety and efficacy of iobitridol in more than 61,000 patients. Eur Radiol 13:2006–2011CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Katayama H, Yamaguchi K, Kozuka T, Takashima T, Seez P, Matsuura K (1990) Adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media. Radiology 175:621–628PubMed Katayama H, Yamaguchi K, Kozuka T, Takashima T, Seez P, Matsuura K (1990) Adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media. Radiology 175:621–628PubMed
3.
go back to reference Schrott VKM, Behrends B, Clauss W et al (1986) Iohexol in der Ausscheidungsurographie. Ergebnisse des Drug-monitoring. Fortschr Med 104 153–156 Schrott VKM, Behrends B, Clauss W et al (1986) Iohexol in der Ausscheidungsurographie. Ergebnisse des Drug-monitoring. Fortschr Med 104 153–156
4.
go back to reference Bettman MA, Heeren T, Greenfield A et al (1997) Adverse events with radiographic contrast agents: results of the SCVIR contrast agent registry. Radiology 203:611–620PubMed Bettman MA, Heeren T, Greenfield A et al (1997) Adverse events with radiographic contrast agents: results of the SCVIR contrast agent registry. Radiology 203:611–620PubMed
5.
go back to reference Palmer FJ (1988) The RACR survey of intravenous contrast media reactions final report. Australas Radiol 32:426–428PubMed Palmer FJ (1988) The RACR survey of intravenous contrast media reactions final report. Australas Radiol 32:426–428PubMed
6.
go back to reference Mortele KJ, Oliva MR, Ondategui S, Ros PR, Silverman SG (2005) Universal use of nonionic iodinated contrast medium for CT: evaluation of safety in a large urban teaching hospital. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005 Jan 184:31–34 Mortele KJ, Oliva MR, Ondategui S, Ros PR, Silverman SG (2005) Universal use of nonionic iodinated contrast medium for CT: evaluation of safety in a large urban teaching hospital. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005 Jan 184:31–34
7.
go back to reference Lasser EC, Berry CC, Mishkin MM et al (1994) Pretreatment with corticosteroids to prevent adverse reactions to non-ionic contrast media. AJR Am J Roentgenol 162:523–526PubMed Lasser EC, Berry CC, Mishkin MM et al (1994) Pretreatment with corticosteroids to prevent adverse reactions to non-ionic contrast media. AJR Am J Roentgenol 162:523–526PubMed
8.
go back to reference Lang DM, Alpern MB, Visintainer PF, Smith ST (1995) Gender risk for anaphylactoid reaction to radiographic contrast media. J Allergy Clin Immunol 95:813–817CrossRefPubMed Lang DM, Alpern MB, Visintainer PF, Smith ST (1995) Gender risk for anaphylactoid reaction to radiographic contrast media. J Allergy Clin Immunol 95:813–817CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Lasser EC, Lyon SG, Berry CC (1997) Reports on contrast media reactions: analysis of data from reports to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Radiology 203:605–610PubMed Lasser EC, Lyon SG, Berry CC (1997) Reports on contrast media reactions: analysis of data from reports to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Radiology 203:605–610PubMed
10.
go back to reference Spring DB, Bettmann MA, Barkan HE (1997) Deaths related to iodinated contrast media reported spontaneously to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 1979–1994: effect of the availability of low-osmolality contrast media. Radiology 204:333–337PubMed Spring DB, Bettmann MA, Barkan HE (1997) Deaths related to iodinated contrast media reported spontaneously to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 1979–1994: effect of the availability of low-osmolality contrast media. Radiology 204:333–337PubMed
11.
go back to reference Steinberg EP, Moore RD, Powe NR et al (1992) Safety and cost effectiveness of high- osmolality as compared with low-osmolality contrast material in patients undergoing cardiac angiography. N Engl J Med 326:425PubMedCrossRef Steinberg EP, Moore RD, Powe NR et al (1992) Safety and cost effectiveness of high- osmolality as compared with low-osmolality contrast material in patients undergoing cardiac angiography. N Engl J Med 326:425PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Wagner HJ, Evers JP, Hoppe M, Klose KJ (1997) Must the patient fast before intravascular injection of a non-ionic contrast medium? Results of a controlled study. Fortschr Röntgenstr 166:370–375CrossRef Wagner HJ, Evers JP, Hoppe M, Klose KJ (1997) Must the patient fast before intravascular injection of a non-ionic contrast medium? Results of a controlled study. Fortschr Röntgenstr 166:370–375CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Eloy R, Corot C, Belleville J (1991) Contrast media for angiography. Physicochemical properties, pharmacokinetics and biocompatibility. Clin Mat 7:89–197CrossRefPubMed Eloy R, Corot C, Belleville J (1991) Contrast media for angiography. Physicochemical properties, pharmacokinetics and biocompatibility. Clin Mat 7:89–197CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Sickmüller B, Müller J. (2004) Observational studies - The German experience. Regulatory Affairs Journals RAJ Pharma, Apr 2004 Sickmüller B, Müller J. (2004) Observational studies - The German experience. Regulatory Affairs Journals RAJ Pharma, Apr 2004
15.
go back to reference WHO (1998) International monitoring of adverse reactions to drugs: adverse reaction terminology. WHO Collaborating Centre for International Drug Monitoring, Uppsala WHO (1998) International monitoring of adverse reactions to drugs: adverse reaction terminology. WHO Collaborating Centre for International Drug Monitoring, Uppsala
16.
go back to reference Idée JM, Pinès E, Prigent P, Corot C (2005) Allergy-like reactions to iodinated contrast agents. A critical analysis. Fundam Clin Pharmacol 19:263–281CrossRefPubMed Idée JM, Pinès E, Prigent P, Corot C (2005) Allergy-like reactions to iodinated contrast agents. A critical analysis. Fundam Clin Pharmacol 19:263–281CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Safety of iobitridol in the general population and at-risk patients
Authors
Thomas J. Vogl
Elmar Honold
Michael Wolf
H. Mohajeri
R. Hammerstingl
Publication date
01-06-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 6/2006
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-005-0061-9

Other articles of this Issue 6/2006

European Radiology 6/2006 Go to the issue