Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 5/2005

01-05-2005 | Musculoskeletal

Short tau inversion recovery and proton density-weighted fat suppressed sequences for the evaluation of osteoarthritis of the knee with a 1.0 T dedicated extremity MRI: development of a time-efficient sequence protocol

Authors: Frank W. Roemer, Ali Guermazi, John A. Lynch, Charles G. Peterfy, Michael C. Nevitt, Nita Webb, Jing Li, Andreas Mohr, Harry K. Genant, David T. Felson

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 5/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

Aim of this study was to develop a time-efficient sequence protocol for a 1.0 T dedicated MR system to be used for whole-organ scoring of osteoarthritis (OA). Thirty-four knees were examined using a protocol that included fat suppressed fast spin echo proton density weighted sequences (PDFS) in three planes plus a coronal STIR sequence. Two radiologists scored each knee by consensus for five OA features. In separate sessions, all knees were scored using three different combinations of sequences: (1) all four sequences (reference protocol, 16 min 31 s scanning time), (2) three PDFS sequences without STIR (“No STIR”, 12 min 25 s scanning time) and (3) sagittal and axial PDFS sequences plus a coronal STIR sequence (“No PDFS”, 11 min 49 s scanning time). Agreement of the readings using both subsets of sequences compared to the reference protocol was evaluated using weighted kappa statistics. κ-coefficients showed good or excellent agreement for both sequence subsets in comparison to the reference protocol for all assessed features. κ-coefficients for No PDFS/No STIR: bone marrow abnormalities (0.74/0.67), subarticular cysts (0.84/0.63), marginal osteophytes (0.77/0.71), menisci (0.75/0.79), tibial cartilage (0.71/0.78). Optimization of sequence protocols consisting of three sequences results in time savings and cost efficiency in imaging of knee OA without loss of information over a more time consuming protocol.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Peterfy CG (1998) Magnetic resonance imaging. In: Brandt KD, Doherty M, Lohmander S (eds) Osteoarthritis. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 473–494 Peterfy CG (1998) Magnetic resonance imaging. In: Brandt KD, Doherty M, Lohmander S (eds) Osteoarthritis. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 473–494
3.
go back to reference Guermazi A, Zaim S, Taouli B, Miaux Y, Peterfy CG, Genant HK (2003) MR findings in knee osteoarthritis. Eur Radiol 13:1370–1386CrossRefPubMed Guermazi A, Zaim S, Taouli B, Miaux Y, Peterfy CG, Genant HK (2003) MR findings in knee osteoarthritis. Eur Radiol 13:1370–1386CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Peterfy CG, Guermazi A, Zaim S, Tirman PFJ, Miaux Y, White D, Kothari M, Lu Y, Fye K, Zhao S, Genant HK (2004) Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (WORMS) of the knee in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil 12:177–190CrossRef Peterfy CG, Guermazi A, Zaim S, Tirman PFJ, Miaux Y, White D, Kothari M, Lu Y, Fye K, Zhao S, Genant HK (2004) Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (WORMS) of the knee in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil 12:177–190CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Masciocchi C, Barile A, Satragno L (2000) Musculoskeletal MRI: dedicated systems. Eur Radiol 10:250–255CrossRef Masciocchi C, Barile A, Satragno L (2000) Musculoskeletal MRI: dedicated systems. Eur Radiol 10:250–255CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Peterfy CG, Roberts T, Genant HK (1998) Dedicated extremity MR imaging: an emerging technology. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 6:849–870 Peterfy CG, Roberts T, Genant HK (1998) Dedicated extremity MR imaging: an emerging technology. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 6:849–870
7.
go back to reference Pessis E, Drape JL, Ravaud P, Chevrot A, Dougados M, Ayral X (2003) Assessment of progression in knee osteoarthritis: results of a 1 year study comparing arthroscopy and MRI. Osteoarthr Cartil 11:361–369CrossRef Pessis E, Drape JL, Ravaud P, Chevrot A, Dougados M, Ayral X (2003) Assessment of progression in knee osteoarthritis: results of a 1 year study comparing arthroscopy and MRI. Osteoarthr Cartil 11:361–369CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Drape JL, Pessis E, Auleley GR, Chevrot A, Dougados M, Ayral X (1998) Quantitative MR imaging evaluation of chondropathy in osteoarthritic knees. Radiology 208:49–55 Drape JL, Pessis E, Auleley GR, Chevrot A, Dougados M, Ayral X (1998) Quantitative MR imaging evaluation of chondropathy in osteoarthritic knees. Radiology 208:49–55
9.
go back to reference Bredella MA, Tirman PF, Peterfy CG, Zarlingo M, Feller JF, Bost FW, Belzer JP, Wischer TK, Genant HK (1999) Accuracy of T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR imaging with fat saturation in detecting cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with arthroscopy in 130 patients. Am J Roentgenol 172:1073–1080PubMed Bredella MA, Tirman PF, Peterfy CG, Zarlingo M, Feller JF, Bost FW, Belzer JP, Wischer TK, Genant HK (1999) Accuracy of T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR imaging with fat saturation in detecting cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with arthroscopy in 130 patients. Am J Roentgenol 172:1073–1080PubMed
10.
go back to reference Mohr A (2003) The value of water-excitation 3D FLASH and fat-saturated PDw TSE MR imaging for detecting and grading articular cartilage lesions of the knee. Skelet Radiol 32:396–402CrossRef Mohr A (2003) The value of water-excitation 3D FLASH and fat-saturated PDw TSE MR imaging for detecting and grading articular cartilage lesions of the knee. Skelet Radiol 32:396–402CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Recht MP, Kramer J, Marcelis S, Pathria MN, Trudell D, Haghighi P, Sartoris DJ, Resnick D (1993) Abnormalities of articular cartilage in the knee: analysis of available MR techniques. Radiology 187:473–478PubMed Recht MP, Kramer J, Marcelis S, Pathria MN, Trudell D, Haghighi P, Sartoris DJ, Resnick D (1993) Abnormalities of articular cartilage in the knee: analysis of available MR techniques. Radiology 187:473–478PubMed
12.
go back to reference Brennan P, Silman A (1992) Statistical methods for assessing observer variability in clinical measures. BMJ 304:1491–1494 Brennan P, Silman A (1992) Statistical methods for assessing observer variability in clinical measures. BMJ 304:1491–1494
13.
go back to reference Wohlgemuth WA, Roemer FW, Bohndorf K (2002) Short tau inversion recovery and three-point Dixon water-fat separation sequences in acute traumatic bone fractures at open 0.35 Tesla MRI. Skelet Radiol 31:343–348CrossRef Wohlgemuth WA, Roemer FW, Bohndorf K (2002) Short tau inversion recovery and three-point Dixon water-fat separation sequences in acute traumatic bone fractures at open 0.35 Tesla MRI. Skelet Radiol 31:343–348CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Delfaut EM, Beltran J, Johnson G, Rousseau J, Marchandise X, Cotten A (1999) Fat suppression in MR imaging: techniques and pitfalls. Radiographics 19:373–382 Delfaut EM, Beltran J, Johnson G, Rousseau J, Marchandise X, Cotten A (1999) Fat suppression in MR imaging: techniques and pitfalls. Radiographics 19:373–382
15.
go back to reference Mohr A, Roemer FW, Genant HK, Liess C (2003) Using fat-saturated proton density-weighted MR imaging to evaluate articular cartilage. Am J Roentgenol 181:280–281 Mohr A, Roemer FW, Genant HK, Liess C (2003) Using fat-saturated proton density-weighted MR imaging to evaluate articular cartilage. Am J Roentgenol 181:280–281
16.
go back to reference Burgkart R, Glaser C, Hyhlik-Durr A, Englmeier KH, Reiser M, Eckstein F (2001) Magnetic resonance imaging-based assessment of cartilage loss in severe osteoarthritis: accuracy, precision, and diagnostic value. Arthritis Rheum 44:2072–2077CrossRef Burgkart R, Glaser C, Hyhlik-Durr A, Englmeier KH, Reiser M, Eckstein F (2001) Magnetic resonance imaging-based assessment of cartilage loss in severe osteoarthritis: accuracy, precision, and diagnostic value. Arthritis Rheum 44:2072–2077CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Short tau inversion recovery and proton density-weighted fat suppressed sequences for the evaluation of osteoarthritis of the knee with a 1.0 T dedicated extremity MRI: development of a time-efficient sequence protocol
Authors
Frank W. Roemer
Ali Guermazi
John A. Lynch
Charles G. Peterfy
Michael C. Nevitt
Nita Webb
Jing Li
Andreas Mohr
Harry K. Genant
David T. Felson
Publication date
01-05-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 5/2005
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-004-2608-6

Other articles of this Issue 5/2005

European Radiology 5/2005 Go to the issue