Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Rheumatology International 6/2011

01-06-2011 | Short Communication

Disability of Arm Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire in rheumatoid arthritis patients: relationship with disease activity, HAQ, SF-36

Authors: Lale Akbulut Aktekin, Filiz Eser, Bedriye Mermerci Başkan, Filiz Sivas, Simten Malhan, Ergun Öksüz, Hatice Bodur

Published in: Rheumatology International | Issue 6/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic disease that causes disability. Disability and quality of life indexes are used in the assessment and treatment of patients with RA. Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (DASH) is a patient-based outcome measurement developed to evaluate the upper extremities. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical relevance of DASH in RA patients and the relationship between disease activity and health-related quality of life measurements. One hundred and sixty-six RA patients were included in the study. Disease activity was measured with Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28), Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI), and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI). The DASH questionnaire, Short-Form 36 (SF-36), and Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) were completed by all patients. The DASH score moderately correlated with DAS28 (r = 0.672), SDAI (r = 0.586) and CDAI (r = 0.565). When the patients were grouped according to the activity obtained using the three disease activity measurements, DASH score was statistically significantly higher with higher disease activity (P < 0.001). A high correlation (r = 0.883) was found between DASH and HAQ (r = 0.883). The SF-36 scores were correlated with DASH (r = −0.785 with physical component, r = −0.619 with mental component). DASH scores correlate with disease activity indices, functional disability and QoL and can be used in the assessment of upper extremities in patients with RA.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Tugwell P, Idzerda L, Wells GA (2007) Generic quality of life assessment in rheumatoid arthritis. Am J Manag Care 13(9):224–236 Tugwell P, Idzerda L, Wells GA (2007) Generic quality of life assessment in rheumatoid arthritis. Am J Manag Care 13(9):224–236
2.
go back to reference Fries JF, Spitz P, Kraines RG, Holman HR (1980) Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 23:137–145PubMedCrossRef Fries JF, Spitz P, Kraines RG, Holman HR (1980) Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 23:137–145PubMedCrossRef
3.
4.
go back to reference Wolfe F (2001) Which HAQ is best? A comparison of HAQ, MHAQ and RA-HAQ, a difficult 8 item HAQ (DHAQ), and rescored 20 item HAQ (HAQ20): analyses in 2491 rheumatoid arthritis patients following leflunomide initiation. J Rheumatol 28:982–989PubMed Wolfe F (2001) Which HAQ is best? A comparison of HAQ, MHAQ and RA-HAQ, a difficult 8 item HAQ (DHAQ), and rescored 20 item HAQ (HAQ20): analyses in 2491 rheumatoid arthritis patients following leflunomide initiation. J Rheumatol 28:982–989PubMed
5.
go back to reference Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C (1996) Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand). The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Int Med 29:602–608CrossRef Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C (1996) Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand). The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Int Med 29:602–608CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA, McShane DJ, Fries JF, Cooper NS (1988) The ACR 1987 revised criteria for classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 31:315–324PubMedCrossRef Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA, McShane DJ, Fries JF, Cooper NS (1988) The ACR 1987 revised criteria for classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 31:315–324PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Aletaha D, Smolen J (2005) The Simplified Disease Activity Index and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI): a review of their usefulness and validity in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 23(Suppl 39):S100–S108PubMed Aletaha D, Smolen J (2005) The Simplified Disease Activity Index and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI): a review of their usefulness and validity in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 23(Suppl 39):S100–S108PubMed
8.
go back to reference Pinar R (2005) Reliability and construct validity of the SF-36 in Turkish cancer patients. Qual Life Res 14:259–264PubMedCrossRef Pinar R (2005) Reliability and construct validity of the SF-36 in Turkish cancer patients. Qual Life Res 14:259–264PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30:473–483PubMedCrossRef Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30:473–483PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M, Bayliss MS, McHorney CA, Rogers WH, Raczek A (1995) Comparison of methods for the scoring and statistical analysis of SF-36 health profile and summary measures: summary of results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Med Care 33(Suppl 4):AS64–AS279 Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M, Bayliss MS, McHorney CA, Rogers WH, Raczek A (1995) Comparison of methods for the scoring and statistical analysis of SF-36 health profile and summary measures: summary of results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Med Care 33(Suppl 4):AS64–AS279
11.
go back to reference van Riel PLCM, van Gestel AM, Welsing PMJ (2003) Evaluation and outcome of the patient with established rheumatoid arthritis. In: Hochberg MC, Silman AJ, Smolen JS et al (eds) Rheumatology. Mosby, Toronto, pp 893–905 van Riel PLCM, van Gestel AM, Welsing PMJ (2003) Evaluation and outcome of the patient with established rheumatoid arthritis. In: Hochberg MC, Silman AJ, Smolen JS et al (eds) Rheumatology. Mosby, Toronto, pp 893–905
12.
go back to reference Küçükdeveci AA, Sahin H, Ataman S, Griffiths B, Tennant A (2004) Issues in cross-cultural validity: example from the adaptation, reliability, and validity testing of a Turkish version of the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire. Arthritis Rheum 15(51):14–19CrossRef Küçükdeveci AA, Sahin H, Ataman S, Griffiths B, Tennant A (2004) Issues in cross-cultural validity: example from the adaptation, reliability, and validity testing of a Turkish version of the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire. Arthritis Rheum 15(51):14–19CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Düger T, Yakut E, Öksüz Ç, Yörükhan S, Bilgutay S, Ayhan Ç, Leblebicioğlu G, Kayıhan H, Kırdı N, Yakut Y, Güler Ç (2006) Turkish version of Disability of Arm Shoulder and Hand questionnaire test retest reliablity and validity. Turk J Physiother Rehabil 17(3):99–107 Düger T, Yakut E, Öksüz Ç, Yörükhan S, Bilgutay S, Ayhan Ç, Leblebicioğlu G, Kayıhan H, Kırdı N, Yakut Y, Güler Ç (2006) Turkish version of Disability of Arm Shoulder and Hand questionnaire test retest reliablity and validity. Turk J Physiother Rehabil 17(3):99–107
14.
go back to reference Angst F, Pap G, Mannion AF, Herren DB, Aeschlimann A, Schwyzer HK, Simmen BR (2004) Comprehensive assessment of clinical outcome and quality of life after total shoulder arthroplasty: usefulness and validity of subjective outcome measures. Arthritis Rheum 51:819–828PubMedCrossRef Angst F, Pap G, Mannion AF, Herren DB, Aeschlimann A, Schwyzer HK, Simmen BR (2004) Comprehensive assessment of clinical outcome and quality of life after total shoulder arthroplasty: usefulness and validity of subjective outcome measures. Arthritis Rheum 51:819–828PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Angst F, John M, Pap G, Mannion AF, Herren DB, Flury M, Aeschlimann A, Schwyzer HK, Simmen BR (2005) Comprehensive assessment of clinical outcome and quality of life after total elbow arthroplasty. Arthritis Rheum 53:73–82PubMedCrossRef Angst F, John M, Pap G, Mannion AF, Herren DB, Flury M, Aeschlimann A, Schwyzer HK, Simmen BR (2005) Comprehensive assessment of clinical outcome and quality of life after total elbow arthroplasty. Arthritis Rheum 53:73–82PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Chiari-Grisar C, Koller U, Stamm TA, Wanivenhaus A, Trieb K (2006) Performance of disabilities of arm, shoulder and hand outcome, questionnaire and the Moberg picking up test in patients with finger joint arthroplasty. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 87(2):203–206PubMedCrossRef Chiari-Grisar C, Koller U, Stamm TA, Wanivenhaus A, Trieb K (2006) Performance of disabilities of arm, shoulder and hand outcome, questionnaire and the Moberg picking up test in patients with finger joint arthroplasty. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 87(2):203–206PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Ishikawa H, Murasawa A, Nakazono K, Abe A, Otani H, Netsu T, Sakai T, Sato H (2008) The patient-based outcome of upper-extremity surgeries using the DASH questionnaire and effect of disease activity of the patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rheumatol 27(8):967–973PubMedCrossRef Ishikawa H, Murasawa A, Nakazono K, Abe A, Otani H, Netsu T, Sakai T, Sato H (2008) The patient-based outcome of upper-extremity surgeries using the DASH questionnaire and effect of disease activity of the patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rheumatol 27(8):967–973PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Raven EE, Haverkamp D, Sierevelt IN, van Montfoort DO, Pöll RG, Blankevoort L, Tak PP (2008) Construct validity and reliability of the Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire for upper extremity complaints in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 35(12):2334–2338PubMedCrossRef Raven EE, Haverkamp D, Sierevelt IN, van Montfoort DO, Pöll RG, Blankevoort L, Tak PP (2008) Construct validity and reliability of the Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire for upper extremity complaints in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 35(12):2334–2338PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference SooHoo NF, McDonald AP, Seiler JG III, McGillivary GR (2002) Evaluation of the construct validity of the DASH questionnaire by correlation to the SF-36. Hand Surg Am 27(3):537–541CrossRef SooHoo NF, McDonald AP, Seiler JG III, McGillivary GR (2002) Evaluation of the construct validity of the DASH questionnaire by correlation to the SF-36. Hand Surg Am 27(3):537–541CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Disability of Arm Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire in rheumatoid arthritis patients: relationship with disease activity, HAQ, SF-36
Authors
Lale Akbulut Aktekin
Filiz Eser
Bedriye Mermerci Başkan
Filiz Sivas
Simten Malhan
Ergun Öksüz
Hatice Bodur
Publication date
01-06-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Rheumatology International / Issue 6/2011
Print ISSN: 0172-8172
Electronic ISSN: 1437-160X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-010-1568-1

Other articles of this Issue 6/2011

Rheumatology International 6/2011 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine