Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 5/2008

01-04-2008 | Original Article

Pharmacokinetic comparison of oral and intravenous etoposide in patients treated with the CHOEP-regimen for malignant lymphomas

Authors: Frank P. Kroschinsky, Kai Friedrichsen, Juliane Mueller, Stefan Pursche, Mathias Haenel, Roland Prondzinsky, Gerhard Ehninger, Eberhard Schleyer

Published in: Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology | Issue 5/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The addition of etoposide to the CHOP protocol (CHOEP) has been shown to improve outcome in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. The intravenous administration of etoposide on three consecutive days represents a logistic problem and needs resources particular in the outpatient setting. This could be avoided by using etoposide capsules on days 2 and 3. However, the oral administration of cytotoxic agents is often affected by variable absorption and drug interactions.

Patients and methods

We investigated the pharmacokinetic equivalency of oral and intravenous etoposide in ten patients (male, n = 7; female, n = 3; median age 56 years) with aggressive lymphomas. Treatment consisted of standard CHOP plus etoposide 100 mg/m2 given intravenously on day 1, and 200 mg/m2 orally on days 3 and 4. Samples from blood and urine were taken on days 1 (i.v. study) and 3 (p.o. study) before and after etoposide administration. Etoposide levels were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated with the TOPFIT computer program.

Results

Mean peak plasma level after intravenous etoposide was significantly higher compared to oral administration (16.3 ± 3.7 vs. 12.0 ± 4.2 μg/ml; P = 0.015). The mean bioavailability of oral etoposide was 58 ± 15% with an interpatient variability of 26%. Significant differences of bioavailability of oral etoposide between the used dose levels (350, 400 and 450 mg) were not observed. Mean AUC after a 100 mg/m2 intravenous and a 200 mg/m2 oral dose of etoposide were 74.0 ± 18.3 and 84.9 ± 29.6 μg h/ml (P = 0.481). Interpatient variability of AUC was 25% for the intravenous route and 35% after oral intake. Urinary etoposide excretion as percentage of administered dose was 39.4 ± 10.6% after intravenous infusion versus 35.4 ± 9.4% after oral intake (P = 0.422). Renal clearance was also very similar with intravenous and oral route (18.5 ± 7.4 vs. 16.7 ± 6.6 ml/min; P = 0.546).

Conclusion

The equivalency of AUC after 200 mg/m2 of oral and 100 mg/m2 of intravenous etoposide support the use of the oral preparation in patients treated with the CHOEP regimen, which makes the chemotherapy more convenient for the patients and help to reduce costs.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Adde M, Enblad G, Hagberg H, Sundstrom C, Laurell A (2006) Outcome for young high-risk aggressive B-cell lymphoma patients treated with CHOEP-14 and rituximab (R-CHOEP-14). Med Oncol 23:283–293PubMedCrossRef Adde M, Enblad G, Hagberg H, Sundstrom C, Laurell A (2006) Outcome for young high-risk aggressive B-cell lymphoma patients treated with CHOEP-14 and rituximab (R-CHOEP-14). Med Oncol 23:283–293PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Celsing F, Widell S, Merk K, Bernell P, Grimfors G, Hedlund A, Liliemark J, Svedmyr E, Ösby E, Björkholm M (1998) Addition of etoposide to CHOP chemotherapy in untreated patients with high-grade non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Ann Oncol 9(11):1213–1217PubMedCrossRef Celsing F, Widell S, Merk K, Bernell P, Grimfors G, Hedlund A, Liliemark J, Svedmyr E, Ösby E, Björkholm M (1998) Addition of etoposide to CHOP chemotherapy in untreated patients with high-grade non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Ann Oncol 9(11):1213–1217PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Cunningham D, McTaggart L, Soukop M, Cummings J, Forrest GJ, Stuart JF (1986) Etoposide: a pharmacokinetic profile including an assessment of bioavailability. Med Oncol Tumor Pharmacother 3:95–99PubMed Cunningham D, McTaggart L, Soukop M, Cummings J, Forrest GJ, Stuart JF (1986) Etoposide: a pharmacokinetic profile including an assessment of bioavailability. Med Oncol Tumor Pharmacother 3:95–99PubMed
4.
go back to reference DeMario MD, Ratain MJ (1998) Oral chemotherapy: rationale and future directions. J Clin Oncol 17:3362–3365 DeMario MD, Ratain MJ (1998) Oral chemotherapy: rationale and future directions. J Clin Oncol 17:3362–3365
5.
go back to reference Fisher RI, Gaynor ER, Dahlberg S, Oken MM, Grogan TM, Mize EM, Glick JH, Coltman CA Jr, Miller TP (1993) Comparison of a standard regimen (CHOP) with three intensive chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. N Engl J Med 328:1002–1006PubMedCrossRef Fisher RI, Gaynor ER, Dahlberg S, Oken MM, Grogan TM, Mize EM, Glick JH, Coltman CA Jr, Miller TP (1993) Comparison of a standard regimen (CHOP) with three intensive chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. N Engl J Med 328:1002–1006PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Fujiwara Y, Ohune T, Okusaki K, Niitani K, Sumiyoshi H, Takemoto Y, Yamaoka N, Yamakido M (1996) Bioavailability of 50- and 75-mg oral etoposide in lung cancer patients. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 37:327–331PubMedCrossRef Fujiwara Y, Ohune T, Okusaki K, Niitani K, Sumiyoshi H, Takemoto Y, Yamaoka N, Yamakido M (1996) Bioavailability of 50- and 75-mg oral etoposide in lung cancer patients. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 37:327–331PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Hande K, Messenger M, Wagner J, Krozely M, Kaul S (1999) Inter- and intrapatient variability in etoposide kinetics with oral and intravenous drug administration. Clin Cancer Res 5:2742–2747PubMed Hande K, Messenger M, Wagner J, Krozely M, Kaul S (1999) Inter- and intrapatient variability in etoposide kinetics with oral and intravenous drug administration. Clin Cancer Res 5:2742–2747PubMed
8.
go back to reference Hande KR, Krozely MG, Greco FA, Hainsworth JD, Johnson DH (1993) Bioavailability of low-dose oral etoposide. J Clin Oncol 11:374–377PubMed Hande KR, Krozely MG, Greco FA, Hainsworth JD, Johnson DH (1993) Bioavailability of low-dose oral etoposide. J Clin Oncol 11:374–377PubMed
9.
go back to reference Harvey VJ, Slevin ML, Joel SP, Johnston A, Wrigley PF (1986) Effect of dose on the bioavailability of oral etoposide. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 16:178–181PubMedCrossRef Harvey VJ, Slevin ML, Joel SP, Johnston A, Wrigley PF (1986) Effect of dose on the bioavailability of oral etoposide. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 16:178–181PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Heinzel G, Hammer R, Wolf M, Koss FW, Bozler G (1977) Modellentwicklung in der Pharmakokinetik. Drug Res 27:904 Heinzel G, Hammer R, Wolf M, Koss FW, Bozler G (1977) Modellentwicklung in der Pharmakokinetik. Drug Res 27:904
11.
go back to reference Ioannides C (1996) Cytochromes P450: metabolic and toxicological aspects. CRC Press, New York, p 31 Ioannides C (1996) Cytochromes P450: metabolic and toxicological aspects. CRC Press, New York, p 31
12.
go back to reference Joel SP, Clark PI, Heap L, Webster L, Robbins S, Craft H, Slevin ML (1995) Pharmacological attempts to improve the bioavailability of oral etoposide. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 37:125–133PubMedCrossRef Joel SP, Clark PI, Heap L, Webster L, Robbins S, Craft H, Slevin ML (1995) Pharmacological attempts to improve the bioavailability of oral etoposide. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 37:125–133PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Koppler H, Pfluger KH, Eschenbach I, Pfab R, Lennert K, Wellens W, Schmidt M, Gassel WD, Kolb T, Hassler R (1989) CHOP-VP16 chemotherapy and involved field irradiation for high-grade non-Hodkin’s ymphomas: a phase II multicentre study. Br J Cancer 60(1):79–82PubMed Koppler H, Pfluger KH, Eschenbach I, Pfab R, Lennert K, Wellens W, Schmidt M, Gassel WD, Kolb T, Hassler R (1989) CHOP-VP16 chemotherapy and involved field irradiation for high-grade non-Hodkin’s ymphomas: a phase II multicentre study. Br J Cancer 60(1):79–82PubMed
14.
go back to reference Köppler H, Pflüger KH, Eschenbach I, Pfab R, Birkmann J, Zeller W, Holle R, Steinhauer UE, Gropp C, Oehl S (1994) Randomized comparison of CHOEP versus alternating hCHOP/IVEP for high-grade non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas: treatment results and prognostic factor analysis in a multi-centre trial. Ann Oncol 5:49–55PubMed Köppler H, Pflüger KH, Eschenbach I, Pfab R, Birkmann J, Zeller W, Holle R, Steinhauer UE, Gropp C, Oehl S (1994) Randomized comparison of CHOEP versus alternating hCHOP/IVEP for high-grade non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas: treatment results and prognostic factor analysis in a multi-centre trial. Ann Oncol 5:49–55PubMed
15.
go back to reference McKelvey EM, Gottlieb JA, Wilson HE, Haut A, Talley RW, Stephens R, Lane M, Gamble JF, Jones SE, Grozea PN, Gutterman J, Coltman C, Moon TE (1976) Hydroxyldaunomycin (Adriamycin) combination in malignant lymphoma. Cancer 38:1484–1493PubMedCrossRef McKelvey EM, Gottlieb JA, Wilson HE, Haut A, Talley RW, Stephens R, Lane M, Gamble JF, Jones SE, Grozea PN, Gutterman J, Coltman C, Moon TE (1976) Hydroxyldaunomycin (Adriamycin) combination in malignant lymphoma. Cancer 38:1484–1493PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Pfreundschuh M, Trümper L, Kloess M, Schmits R, Feller AC, Rudolph C, Reiser M, Hossfeld DK, Metzner B, Hasenclever D, Schmitz N, Glass B, Rübe C, Loeffler M, for the German High-Grade Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Study Group (DSHHNL) (2004) Two-weekly or 3-weekly CHOP chemotherapy with or without etoposide for the treatment of young patients with good-prognosis (normal LDH) aggressive lymphomas: results of the NHL-B1 trial of the DSHNHL. Blood 104:626–633PubMedCrossRef Pfreundschuh M, Trümper L, Kloess M, Schmits R, Feller AC, Rudolph C, Reiser M, Hossfeld DK, Metzner B, Hasenclever D, Schmitz N, Glass B, Rübe C, Loeffler M, for the German High-Grade Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Study Group (DSHHNL) (2004) Two-weekly or 3-weekly CHOP chemotherapy with or without etoposide for the treatment of young patients with good-prognosis (normal LDH) aggressive lymphomas: results of the NHL-B1 trial of the DSHNHL. Blood 104:626–633PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Pfreundschuh M, Trümper L, Kloess M, Schmits R, Feller AC, Rübe C, Rudolph C, Reiser M, Hossfeld DK, Eimermacher H, Hasenclever D, Schmitz N, Loeffler M, for the German High-Grade Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Study Group (DSHHNL) (2004) Two-weekly or 3-weekly CHOP chemotherapy with or without etoposide for the treatment of elderly patients with aggressive lymphomas: results of the NHL-B2 trial of the DSHNHL. Blood 104:634–641PubMedCrossRef Pfreundschuh M, Trümper L, Kloess M, Schmits R, Feller AC, Rübe C, Rudolph C, Reiser M, Hossfeld DK, Eimermacher H, Hasenclever D, Schmitz N, Loeffler M, for the German High-Grade Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Study Group (DSHHNL) (2004) Two-weekly or 3-weekly CHOP chemotherapy with or without etoposide for the treatment of elderly patients with aggressive lymphomas: results of the NHL-B2 trial of the DSHNHL. Blood 104:634–641PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Pfreundschuh M, Trumper L, Osterborg A, Pettengell R, Trneny M, Imrie K, Ma D, Gill D, Walewski J, Zinzani PL, Stahel R, Kvaloy S, Shpilberg O, Jaeger U, Hansen M, Lehtinen T, Lopez-Guillermo A, Corrado C, Scheliga A, Milpied N, Mendila M, Rashford M, Kuhnt E, Loeffler M (2006) CHOP-like chemotherapy plus rituximab versus CHOP-like chemotherapy alone in young patients with good-prognosis diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma: a randomised controlled trial by the MabThera International Trial (MInT) Group. Lancet Oncol 7:379–391PubMedCrossRef Pfreundschuh M, Trumper L, Osterborg A, Pettengell R, Trneny M, Imrie K, Ma D, Gill D, Walewski J, Zinzani PL, Stahel R, Kvaloy S, Shpilberg O, Jaeger U, Hansen M, Lehtinen T, Lopez-Guillermo A, Corrado C, Scheliga A, Milpied N, Mendila M, Rashford M, Kuhnt E, Loeffler M (2006) CHOP-like chemotherapy plus rituximab versus CHOP-like chemotherapy alone in young patients with good-prognosis diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma: a randomised controlled trial by the MabThera International Trial (MInT) Group. Lancet Oncol 7:379–391PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Slevin ML, Joel SP, Whomsley R, Devenport K, Harvey VJ, Osborne RJ, Wrigley PF (1989) The effect of dose on the bioavailability of oral etoposide: confirmation of a clinically relevant observation. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 24:329–331PubMedCrossRef Slevin ML, Joel SP, Whomsley R, Devenport K, Harvey VJ, Osborne RJ, Wrigley PF (1989) The effect of dose on the bioavailability of oral etoposide: confirmation of a clinically relevant observation. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 24:329–331PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Smyth RD, Pfeffer M, Scalzo A, Comis RL (1985) Bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of etoposide (VP-16). Semin Oncol 12:48–51PubMed Smyth RD, Pfeffer M, Scalzo A, Comis RL (1985) Bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of etoposide (VP-16). Semin Oncol 12:48–51PubMed
22.
go back to reference Toffoli G, Corona G, Basso B, Boiocchi M (2004) Pharmacokinetic optimisation of treatment with oral etoposide. Clin Pharmacokinet 43:441–466PubMedCrossRef Toffoli G, Corona G, Basso B, Boiocchi M (2004) Pharmacokinetic optimisation of treatment with oral etoposide. Clin Pharmacokinet 43:441–466PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Trümper L, Renner Ch, Klöss M, Nahler ME, Diehl V (1994) Intensification of the CHOEP regimen for high grade non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma by g-CSF: feasibility of a 14-day regimen. Onkologie 17:69–71CrossRef Trümper L, Renner Ch, Klöss M, Nahler ME, Diehl V (1994) Intensification of the CHOEP regimen for high grade non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma by g-CSF: feasibility of a 14-day regimen. Onkologie 17:69–71CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Wurthwein G, Krumpelmann S, Tillman B, Real E, Schulze-Westhoff P, Jurgens H, Boos J (1999) Population pharmacokinetic approach to compare oral and i.v. administration of etoposide. Anticancer Drugs 10:807–814PubMedCrossRef Wurthwein G, Krumpelmann S, Tillman B, Real E, Schulze-Westhoff P, Jurgens H, Boos J (1999) Population pharmacokinetic approach to compare oral and i.v. administration of etoposide. Anticancer Drugs 10:807–814PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Pharmacokinetic comparison of oral and intravenous etoposide in patients treated with the CHOEP-regimen for malignant lymphomas
Authors
Frank P. Kroschinsky
Kai Friedrichsen
Juliane Mueller
Stefan Pursche
Mathias Haenel
Roland Prondzinsky
Gerhard Ehninger
Eberhard Schleyer
Publication date
01-04-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology / Issue 5/2008
Print ISSN: 0344-5704
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0843
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-007-0535-3

Other articles of this Issue 5/2008

Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 5/2008 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine