Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 4/2007

01-09-2007 | Original Article

Phase II study of gemcitabine and carboplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Authors: Lin Run Wang, Ming Zhu Huang, Guo Bing Zhang, Nong Xu, Xiu Hua Wu

Published in: Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology | Issue 4/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine in combination with carboplatin at standard rate or fixed dose rate infusion in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Patients and methods

In this prospective study, patients with chemonaive advanced NSCLC were randomized to receive gemcitabine at a standard rate (gemcitabine 1,200 mg/m2 over 30 min, the standard arm) or a fixed dose rate (gemcitabine 1,200 mg/m2 over 120 min, the FDR arm) on days 1 and 8 every 3 week cycle. In both treatment arms, carboplatin at AUC of 5 was administered over 4 h following gemcitabine on day 1 of each cycle.

Results

From November 2003 to June 2005, a total of 42 patients, in which 7 (17%) patients had stage IIIB disease and 35 (83%) had stage IV disease, were enrolled into this study. All patients were included in efficacy and toxicity assessment. No patient had a complete response. Seven (33%) patients in the standard arm and 10 (48%) in the FDR arm had a partial response. The median time to progression and median overall survival time in the standard arm was 5.4 months (95% CI, 3.8–7 months) and 11.5 months (95% CI, 8.2–14.8 months), respectively, while in the FDR arm was 6.5 (95% CI, 4.4–8.6 months) months, 12.0 months (95% CI, 11.3–12.7 months), respectively. The most frequently reported grade 3 or 4 hematological toxicities were thrombocytopenia (38% patients in the standard arm and 43% in the FDR arm) and neutropenia (24% in the standard arm and 33% in the FDR arm). Although hematological toxicity occurred in a little higher percent of patients in the FDR arm than in the standard arm, there were no discernible differences by statistical analysis in both treatment arms (P > 0.05). And significant nonhematologic toxicities were infrequent and tolerable in both arms. No significant difference existed also (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

In this phase II study, gemcitabine in combination with carboplatin either at standard rate or fixed dose rate infusion was clinically effective and well tolerated in patients with advanced NSCLC.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J et al (2005) Global cancer statistics,2002. CA Cancer J Clin 55:74–108PubMedCrossRef Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J et al (2005) Global cancer statistics,2002. CA Cancer J Clin 55:74–108PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Collaborative Group (1995) Chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis using updated data on individual patients from 52 randomised clinical trials. Br Med J 311:899–909 Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Collaborative Group (1995) Chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis using updated data on individual patients from 52 randomised clinical trials. Br Med J 311:899–909
3.
go back to reference Kosmidis PA, Kalofonos C, Syrigos K et al (2005) Paclitaxel and gemcitabine vs. carboplatin and gemcitabine. A multicenter, phase III randomized trial in patients with advanced inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). ASCO Meeting Abstracts 23:7000 Kosmidis PA, Kalofonos C, Syrigos K et al (2005) Paclitaxel and gemcitabine vs. carboplatin and gemcitabine. A multicenter, phase III randomized trial in patients with advanced inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). ASCO Meeting Abstracts 23:7000
4.
go back to reference Rudd RM, Gower NH, Spiro SG et al (2005) Gemcitabine plus carboplatin versus mitomycin, ifosfamide, and cisplatin in patients with stage IIIB or IV non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase III randomized study of the London Lung Cancer Group. J Clin Oncol 23:142–153PubMedCrossRef Rudd RM, Gower NH, Spiro SG et al (2005) Gemcitabine plus carboplatin versus mitomycin, ifosfamide, and cisplatin in patients with stage IIIB or IV non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase III randomized study of the London Lung Cancer Group. J Clin Oncol 23:142–153PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Sederholm C, Hillerdal G, Lamberg K et al (2005) Phase III trial of gemcitabine plus carboplatin versus single-agent gemcitabine in the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: The Swedish Lung Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol 23:8380–8388PubMedCrossRef Sederholm C, Hillerdal G, Lamberg K et al (2005) Phase III trial of gemcitabine plus carboplatin versus single-agent gemcitabine in the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: The Swedish Lung Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol 23:8380–8388PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Anderson H, Lund B, Bach F et al (1994) Single-agent activity of weekly gemcitabine in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase II study. J Clin Oncol 12:1821–1826PubMed Anderson H, Lund B, Bach F et al (1994) Single-agent activity of weekly gemcitabine in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase II study. J Clin Oncol 12:1821–1826PubMed
7.
go back to reference Abratt RP, Bezwoda WR, Falkson G et al (1994) Efficacy and safety profile of gemcitabine in non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase II study. J Clin Oncol 12:1535–1540PubMed Abratt RP, Bezwoda WR, Falkson G et al (1994) Efficacy and safety profile of gemcitabine in non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase II study. J Clin Oncol 12:1535–1540PubMed
8.
go back to reference Ma CX, Nair S, Thomas S et al (2005) Randomized phase II trial of three schedules of pemetrexed and gemcitabine as front-line therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:5929–5937PubMedCrossRef Ma CX, Nair S, Thomas S et al (2005) Randomized phase II trial of three schedules of pemetrexed and gemcitabine as front-line therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:5929–5937PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Giovannetti E, Mey V, Nannizzi S et al (2005) Cellular and pharmacogenetics foundation of synergistic interaction of pemetrexed and gemcitabine in human non-small-cell lung cancer cells. Mol Pharmacol 68:110–118PubMed Giovannetti E, Mey V, Nannizzi S et al (2005) Cellular and pharmacogenetics foundation of synergistic interaction of pemetrexed and gemcitabine in human non-small-cell lung cancer cells. Mol Pharmacol 68:110–118PubMed
10.
go back to reference Giovannetti E, Mey V, Danesi R et al (2004) Synergistic cytotoxicity and pharmacogenetics of gemcitabine and pemetrexed combination in pancreatic cancer cell lines. Clin Cancer Res 10:2936–2943PubMedCrossRef Giovannetti E, Mey V, Danesi R et al (2004) Synergistic cytotoxicity and pharmacogenetics of gemcitabine and pemetrexed combination in pancreatic cancer cell lines. Clin Cancer Res 10:2936–2943PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Ogawa M, Hori H, Ohta T et al (2005) Sensitivity to gemcitabine and its metabolizing enzymes in neuroblastoma. Clin Cancer Res 11:3485–3493PubMedCrossRef Ogawa M, Hori H, Ohta T et al (2005) Sensitivity to gemcitabine and its metabolizing enzymes in neuroblastoma. Clin Cancer Res 11:3485–3493PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Gandhi V, Plunkett W, Du M et al (2002) Prolonged infusion of gemcitabine: clinical and pharmacodynamic studies during a phase I trial in relapsed acute myelogenous leukemia. J Clin Oncol 20:665–673PubMedCrossRef Gandhi V, Plunkett W, Du M et al (2002) Prolonged infusion of gemcitabine: clinical and pharmacodynamic studies during a phase I trial in relapsed acute myelogenous leukemia. J Clin Oncol 20:665–673PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Tempero M, Plunkett W, Haperen VR et al (2003) Randomized phase II comparison of dose-intense gemcitabine: thirty-minute infusion and fixed dose rate infusion in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol 21:3402–3408PubMedCrossRef Tempero M, Plunkett W, Haperen VR et al (2003) Randomized phase II comparison of dose-intense gemcitabine: thirty-minute infusion and fixed dose rate infusion in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol 21:3402–3408PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Grunewald R, Abbruzzese JL, Tarassoff P et al (1991) Saturation of 2′, 2′-difluorodeoxycytidine 5′-triphosphate accumulation by mononuclear cells during a phase I trial of gemcitabine. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 27:258–262PubMedCrossRef Grunewald R, Abbruzzese JL, Tarassoff P et al (1991) Saturation of 2′, 2′-difluorodeoxycytidine 5′-triphosphate accumulation by mononuclear cells during a phase I trial of gemcitabine. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 27:258–262PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Abbruzzese JL, Grunewald R, Weeks EA et al (1991) A phase I clinical, plasma, and cellular pharmacology study of gemcitabine. J Clin Oncol 9:491–498PubMed Abbruzzese JL, Grunewald R, Weeks EA et al (1991) A phase I clinical, plasma, and cellular pharmacology study of gemcitabine. J Clin Oncol 9:491–498PubMed
16.
go back to reference Grunewald R, Kantarjian H, Du M et al (1992) Gemcitabine in leukemia: a phase I clinical, plasma, and cellular pharmacology study. J Clin Oncol 10:406–413PubMed Grunewald R, Kantarjian H, Du M et al (1992) Gemcitabine in leukemia: a phase I clinical, plasma, and cellular pharmacology study. J Clin Oncol 10:406–413PubMed
17.
go back to reference Furuse J, Ishii H, Okusaka T et al (2005) Phase I study of fixed dose rate infusion of gemcitabine in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol 35:733–738 Furuse J, Ishii H, Okusaka T et al (2005) Phase I study of fixed dose rate infusion of gemcitabine in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol 35:733–738
18.
go back to reference Gelibter A, Di Cosimo S, Ruggeri EM et al (2004) Fixed dose-rate gemcitabine (GEM) infusion in advanced pancreatic (PDAC) and biliary tree (BTC) carcinoma: a phase II study. ASCO Meeting Abstracts 22:4182 Gelibter A, Di Cosimo S, Ruggeri EM et al (2004) Fixed dose-rate gemcitabine (GEM) infusion in advanced pancreatic (PDAC) and biliary tree (BTC) carcinoma: a phase II study. ASCO Meeting Abstracts 22:4182
19.
go back to reference Ko AH, Dito E, Schillinger B et al (2006) Phase II study of fixed dose rate gemcitabine with cisplatin for metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. J Clin Oncol 24:379–385PubMedCrossRef Ko AH, Dito E, Schillinger B et al (2006) Phase II study of fixed dose rate gemcitabine with cisplatin for metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. J Clin Oncol 24:379–385PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Calvert AH, Newell DR, Gumbrell LA et al (1989) Carboplatin dosage: prospective evaluation of a simple formula based on renal function. J Clin Oncol 7:1748–1756PubMed Calvert AH, Newell DR, Gumbrell LA et al (1989) Carboplatin dosage: prospective evaluation of a simple formula based on renal function. J Clin Oncol 7:1748–1756PubMed
21.
go back to reference Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA et al (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205–216PubMedCrossRef Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA et al (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205–216PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Kaplan EL, Meier P (1958) Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 53:457–481CrossRef Kaplan EL, Meier P (1958) Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 53:457–481CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Maestu I, Gomez-Aldaravi L, Torregrosa MD et al (2003) Gemcitabine and low dose carboplatin in the treatment of elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 42:345–54PubMedCrossRef Maestu I, Gomez-Aldaravi L, Torregrosa MD et al (2003) Gemcitabine and low dose carboplatin in the treatment of elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 42:345–54PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Parente B, Barroso A, Conde S et al (2001) A prospective study of gemcitabine and carboplatin as first-line therapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: toxicity of a three- versus a four-week schedule. Semin Oncol 28(Suppl):10–4PubMedCrossRef Parente B, Barroso A, Conde S et al (2001) A prospective study of gemcitabine and carboplatin as first-line therapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: toxicity of a three- versus a four-week schedule. Semin Oncol 28(Suppl):10–4PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Mazzanti P, Massacesi C, Rocchi MB et al (2003) Randomized, multicenter, phase II study of gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus gemcitabine plus carboplatin in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 41:81–9PubMedCrossRef Mazzanti P, Massacesi C, Rocchi MB et al (2003) Randomized, multicenter, phase II study of gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus gemcitabine plus carboplatin in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 41:81–9PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Zatloukal P, Petruzelka L, Zemanova M et al (2003) Gemcitabine plus cisplatin vs. gemcitabine plus carboplatin in stage IIIb and IV non-small cell lung cancer: a phase III randomized trial. Lung Cancer 41:321–31PubMedCrossRef Zatloukal P, Petruzelka L, Zemanova M et al (2003) Gemcitabine plus cisplatin vs. gemcitabine plus carboplatin in stage IIIb and IV non-small cell lung cancer: a phase III randomized trial. Lung Cancer 41:321–31PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Domine M, Casado V, Estevez LG et al (2001) Gemcitabine and carboplatin for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Semin Oncol 28(Suppl):4–9PubMed Domine M, Casado V, Estevez LG et al (2001) Gemcitabine and carboplatin for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Semin Oncol 28(Suppl):4–9PubMed
28.
go back to reference Bajetta E, Stani SC, Candis DD et al (2003) Preclinical and clinical evaluation of four gemcitabine plus carboplatin schedules as front-line treatment for stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol 14:242–247PubMedCrossRef Bajetta E, Stani SC, Candis DD et al (2003) Preclinical and clinical evaluation of four gemcitabine plus carboplatin schedules as front-line treatment for stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol 14:242–247PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Soo RA, Lim HL, Wang LZ et al (2003) Phase I trial of fixed dose-rate gemcitabine in combination with carboplatin in chemonaive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a Cancer Therapeutics Research Group Study. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 52(2):153–158PubMedCrossRef Soo RA, Lim HL, Wang LZ et al (2003) Phase I trial of fixed dose-rate gemcitabine in combination with carboplatin in chemonaive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a Cancer Therapeutics Research Group Study. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 52(2):153–158PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Wang LR, Huang MZ, Xu N et al (2005) Pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine in Chinese patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B 6:446–450PubMedCrossRef Wang LR, Huang MZ, Xu N et al (2005) Pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine in Chinese patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B 6:446–450PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Bhargava P, Marshall JL, Fried K et al (2001) Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of two sequences of gemcitabine and docetaxel administered weekly to patients with advanced cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 48:95–103PubMedCrossRef Bhargava P, Marshall JL, Fried K et al (2001) Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of two sequences of gemcitabine and docetaxel administered weekly to patients with advanced cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 48:95–103PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Kroep JR, Giaccone G, Voorn DA et al (1999) Gemcitabine and paclitaxel: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions in patients with non–small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 17:2190–2197PubMed Kroep JR, Giaccone G, Voorn DA et al (1999) Gemcitabine and paclitaxel: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions in patients with non–small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 17:2190–2197PubMed
33.
go back to reference Soo RA, Wang LZ, Tham LS et al (2006) A muticentre randomised phase II study of carboplatin in combination with gemcitabine at standard rate or fixed dose rate infusion in patients with advanced stage non-small-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol 17:1128–1133PubMedCrossRef Soo RA, Wang LZ, Tham LS et al (2006) A muticentre randomised phase II study of carboplatin in combination with gemcitabine at standard rate or fixed dose rate infusion in patients with advanced stage non-small-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol 17:1128–1133PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Parker RS, Fisher JW, Florian JA et al (2005) Development of a pharmacokinetically-guided gemcitabine (dFdC) dosing schedule to reduce potentially excessive plasma dFdC concentrations. ASCO MeetingAbstracts 23:2025 Parker RS, Fisher JW, Florian JA et al (2005) Development of a pharmacokinetically-guided gemcitabine (dFdC) dosing schedule to reduce potentially excessive plasma dFdC concentrations. ASCO MeetingAbstracts 23:2025
Metadata
Title
Phase II study of gemcitabine and carboplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer
Authors
Lin Run Wang
Ming Zhu Huang
Guo Bing Zhang
Nong Xu
Xiu Hua Wu
Publication date
01-09-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology / Issue 4/2007
Print ISSN: 0344-5704
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0843
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-007-0504-x

Other articles of this Issue 4/2007

Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 4/2007 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine