Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 4/2007

01-09-2007 | Original Article

A phase II trial of gemcitabine plus capecitabine for patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Authors: Byeong-Bae Park, Joon Oh Park, Hyo Rak Lee, Jeeyun Lee, Dong Wook Choi, Seong-Ho Choi, Jin Seok Heo, Jong Kyun Lee, Kyu Taek Lee, Do Hoon Lim, Young Suk Park, Ho-Yeong Lim, Won Ki Kang, Keunchil Park

Published in: Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology | Issue 4/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

While gemcitabine (GEM) is widely accepted for the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer, capecitabine (CAP) has shown single agent activity and promising efficacy in combination with GEM. This phase II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of GEM combined with dose escalated 14-day CAP as first-line chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer. In addition, we also analyzed the correlation between CA19-9 response and clinical outcomes.

Methods

Patients had advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma, no prior systemic chemotherapy other than that given concurrently with radiation therapy, at lease one measurable disease, and adequate organ functions. The patients were treated with GEM 1,000 mg/m2 IV on days 1, 8 and CAP 1,000 mg/m2 twice a day PO on days 1–14, in 21-day cycles.

Results

The objective RR among 45 patients was 40.0% (95% CI; 25.1–54.9), including 1CR (2.2%). The median TTP and OS were 5.4 months (95% CI; 1.8–9.0) and 10.4 months (95% CI; 6.2–14.5), respectively. Patients with ≥25% decline of serum CA19-9 had significantly better outcomes in terms of TTP and OS than those who did not (P < 0.03). The most frequent, grade 3–4, non-hematologic toxicity was hand–foot syndrome (6.7%).

Conclusions

The combination of GEM with dose escalated 14-day CAP is well tolerated and offers encouraging activity in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer. In addition, CA19-9 response correlates well with clinical outcomes in this population.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cullinan S, Moertel CG, Wieand HS, Schutt AJ, Krook JE, Foley JF et al (1990) A phase III trial on the therapy of advanced pancreatic carcinoma. Evaluations of the Mallinson regimen and combined 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cisplatin. Cancer 65:2207–2212PubMedCrossRef Cullinan S, Moertel CG, Wieand HS, Schutt AJ, Krook JE, Foley JF et al (1990) A phase III trial on the therapy of advanced pancreatic carcinoma. Evaluations of the Mallinson regimen and combined 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cisplatin. Cancer 65:2207–2212PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Burris HA 3rd, Moore MJ, Andersen J, Green MR, Rothenberg ML, Modiano MR et al (1997) Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: a randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 15:2403–2413PubMed Burris HA 3rd, Moore MJ, Andersen J, Green MR, Rothenberg ML, Modiano MR et al (1997) Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: a randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 15:2403–2413PubMed
3.
go back to reference Colucci G, Giuliani F, Gebbia V, Biglietto M, Rabitti P, Uomo G et al (2002) Gemcitabine alone or with cisplatin for the treatment of patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic pancreatic carcinoma: a prospective, randomized phase III study of the Gruppo Oncologia dell’Italia Meridionale. Cancer 94:902–910PubMedCrossRef Colucci G, Giuliani F, Gebbia V, Biglietto M, Rabitti P, Uomo G et al (2002) Gemcitabine alone or with cisplatin for the treatment of patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic pancreatic carcinoma: a prospective, randomized phase III study of the Gruppo Oncologia dell’Italia Meridionale. Cancer 94:902–910PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Di Costanzo F, Carlini P, Doni L, Massidda B, Mattioli R, Iop A et al (2005) Gemcitabine with or without continuous infusion 5-FU in advanced pancreatic cancer: a randomised phase II trial of the Italian oncology group for clinical research (GOIRC). Br J Cancer 93:185–189PubMedCrossRef Di Costanzo F, Carlini P, Doni L, Massidda B, Mattioli R, Iop A et al (2005) Gemcitabine with or without continuous infusion 5-FU in advanced pancreatic cancer: a randomised phase II trial of the Italian oncology group for clinical research (GOIRC). Br J Cancer 93:185–189PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Louvet C, Labianca R, Hammel P, Lledo G, Zampino MG, Andre T et al (2005) Gemcitabine in combination with oxaliplatin compared with gemcitabine alone in locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer: results of a GERCOR and GISCAD phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 23:3509–3516PubMedCrossRef Louvet C, Labianca R, Hammel P, Lledo G, Zampino MG, Andre T et al (2005) Gemcitabine in combination with oxaliplatin compared with gemcitabine alone in locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer: results of a GERCOR and GISCAD phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 23:3509–3516PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Rocha Lima CM, Green MR, Rotche R, Miller WH Jr, Jeffrey GM, Cisar LA et al (2004) Irinotecan plus gemcitabine results in no survival advantage compared with gemcitabine monotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer despite increased tumor response rate. J Clin Oncol 22:3776–3783PubMedCrossRef Rocha Lima CM, Green MR, Rotche R, Miller WH Jr, Jeffrey GM, Cisar LA et al (2004) Irinotecan plus gemcitabine results in no survival advantage compared with gemcitabine monotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer despite increased tumor response rate. J Clin Oncol 22:3776–3783PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Schilsky RL (2000) Pharmacology and clinical status of capecitabine. Oncology (Williston Park) 14:1297–1306 (discussion 1309–1211) Schilsky RL (2000) Pharmacology and clinical status of capecitabine. Oncology (Williston Park) 14:1297–1306 (discussion 1309–1211)
8.
go back to reference Cartwright TH, Cohn A, Varkey JA, Chen YM, Szatrowski TP, Cox JV et al (2002) Phase II study of oral capecitabine in patients with advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol 20:160–164PubMedCrossRef Cartwright TH, Cohn A, Varkey JA, Chen YM, Szatrowski TP, Cox JV et al (2002) Phase II study of oral capecitabine in patients with advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol 20:160–164PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Mackean M, Planting A, Twelves C, Schellens J, Allman D, Osterwalder B et al (1998) Phase I and pharmacologic study of intermittent twice-daily oral therapy with capecitabine in patients with advanced and/or metastatic cancer. J Clin Oncol 16:2977–2985PubMed Mackean M, Planting A, Twelves C, Schellens J, Allman D, Osterwalder B et al (1998) Phase I and pharmacologic study of intermittent twice-daily oral therapy with capecitabine in patients with advanced and/or metastatic cancer. J Clin Oncol 16:2977–2985PubMed
10.
go back to reference Lamont EB, Schilsky RL (1999) The oral fluoropyrimidines in cancer chemotherapy. Clin Cancer Res 5:2289–2296PubMed Lamont EB, Schilsky RL (1999) The oral fluoropyrimidines in cancer chemotherapy. Clin Cancer Res 5:2289–2296PubMed
11.
go back to reference Herrmann R, Bodoky G, Ruhstaller T, Barletta E, Moscetti L, Recchia F et al (2005) Gemcitabine (G) plus Capecitabine (C) versus G alone in locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. A randomized phase III study of the Swiss group for clinical cancer research (SAKK) and the Central European cooperative oncology group (CECOG). J Clin Oncol 23. Abstract LBA4010 Herrmann R, Bodoky G, Ruhstaller T, Barletta E, Moscetti L, Recchia F et al (2005) Gemcitabine (G) plus Capecitabine (C) versus G alone in locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. A randomized phase III study of the Swiss group for clinical cancer research (SAKK) and the Central European cooperative oncology group (CECOG). J Clin Oncol 23. Abstract LBA4010
12.
go back to reference Steinberg WM, Gelfand R, Anderson KK, Glenn J, Kurtzman SH, Sindelar WF et al (1986) Comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of the CA19-9 and carcinoembryonic antigen assays in detecting cancer of the pancreas. Gastroenterology 90:343–349PubMed Steinberg WM, Gelfand R, Anderson KK, Glenn J, Kurtzman SH, Sindelar WF et al (1986) Comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of the CA19-9 and carcinoembryonic antigen assays in detecting cancer of the pancreas. Gastroenterology 90:343–349PubMed
13.
go back to reference Glenn J, Steinberg WM, Kurtzman SH, Steinberg SM, Sindelar WF (1988) Evaluation of the utility of a radioimmunoassay for serum CA 19-9 levels in patients before and after treatment of carcinoma of the pancreas. J Clin Oncol 6:462–468PubMed Glenn J, Steinberg WM, Kurtzman SH, Steinberg SM, Sindelar WF (1988) Evaluation of the utility of a radioimmunoassay for serum CA 19-9 levels in patients before and after treatment of carcinoma of the pancreas. J Clin Oncol 6:462–468PubMed
14.
go back to reference Ni XG, Bai XF, Mao YL, Shao YF, Wu JX, Shan Y et al (2005) The clinical value of serum CEA, CA19-9, and CA242 in the diagnosis and prognosis of pancreatic cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 31:164–169PubMedCrossRef Ni XG, Bai XF, Mao YL, Shao YF, Wu JX, Shan Y et al (2005) The clinical value of serum CEA, CA19-9, and CA242 in the diagnosis and prognosis of pancreatic cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 31:164–169PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Ko AH, Hwang J, Venook AP, Abbruzzese JL, Bergsland EK, Tempero MA (2005) Serum CA19-9 response as a surrogate for clinical outcome in patients receiving fixed-dose rate gemcitabine for advanced pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer 93:195–199PubMedCrossRef Ko AH, Hwang J, Venook AP, Abbruzzese JL, Bergsland EK, Tempero MA (2005) Serum CA19-9 response as a surrogate for clinical outcome in patients receiving fixed-dose rate gemcitabine for advanced pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer 93:195–199PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Hess V, Salzberg M, Borner M, Morant R, Roth AD, Ludwig C et al (2003) Combining capecitabine and gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma: a phase I/II trial. J Clin Oncol 21:66–68PubMedCrossRef Hess V, Salzberg M, Borner M, Morant R, Roth AD, Ludwig C et al (2003) Combining capecitabine and gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma: a phase I/II trial. J Clin Oncol 21:66–68PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Stathopoulos GP, Syrigos K, Polyzos A, Fountzilas G, Rigatos SK, Ziras N et al (2004) Front-line treatment of inoperable or metastatic pancreatic cancer with gemcitabine and capecitabine: an intergroup, multicenter, phase II study. Ann Oncol 15:224–229PubMedCrossRef Stathopoulos GP, Syrigos K, Polyzos A, Fountzilas G, Rigatos SK, Ziras N et al (2004) Front-line treatment of inoperable or metastatic pancreatic cancer with gemcitabine and capecitabine: an intergroup, multicenter, phase II study. Ann Oncol 15:224–229PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Cunningham D, Chau I, Stocken D, Barletta E, Moscetti L, Recchia F et al (2005) Phase III randomised comparison of gemcitabine (GEM) versus gemcitabine plus capecitabine (GEM-CAP) in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Eur J Cancer (Suppl 3). Abstract PS11 Cunningham D, Chau I, Stocken D, Barletta E, Moscetti L, Recchia F et al (2005) Phase III randomised comparison of gemcitabine (GEM) versus gemcitabine plus capecitabine (GEM-CAP) in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Eur J Cancer (Suppl 3). Abstract PS11
19.
go back to reference Moore M, Goldstein D, Hamm J, Figer A, Hecht J, Gallinger S et al (2005) Erlotinib plus gemcitabine compared to gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. A phase III trial of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group [NCIC-CTG]. J Clin Oncol 23. Abstract 1 Moore M, Goldstein D, Hamm J, Figer A, Hecht J, Gallinger S et al (2005) Erlotinib plus gemcitabine compared to gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. A phase III trial of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group [NCIC-CTG]. J Clin Oncol 23. Abstract 1
20.
go back to reference Halm U, Schumann T, Schiefke I, Witzigmann H, Mossner J, Keim V (2000) Decrease of CA 19-9 during chemotherapy with gemcitabine predicts survival time in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer 82:1013–1016PubMedCrossRef Halm U, Schumann T, Schiefke I, Witzigmann H, Mossner J, Keim V (2000) Decrease of CA 19-9 during chemotherapy with gemcitabine predicts survival time in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer 82:1013–1016PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Maisey NR, Norman AR, Hill A, Massey A, Oates J, Cunningham D (2005) CA19-9 as a prognostic factor in inoperable pancreatic cancer: the implication for clinical trials. Br J Cancer 93:740–743PubMedCrossRef Maisey NR, Norman AR, Hill A, Massey A, Oates J, Cunningham D (2005) CA19-9 as a prognostic factor in inoperable pancreatic cancer: the implication for clinical trials. Br J Cancer 93:740–743PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
A phase II trial of gemcitabine plus capecitabine for patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma
Authors
Byeong-Bae Park
Joon Oh Park
Hyo Rak Lee
Jeeyun Lee
Dong Wook Choi
Seong-Ho Choi
Jin Seok Heo
Jong Kyun Lee
Kyu Taek Lee
Do Hoon Lim
Young Suk Park
Ho-Yeong Lim
Won Ki Kang
Keunchil Park
Publication date
01-09-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology / Issue 4/2007
Print ISSN: 0344-5704
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0843
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-006-0390-7

Other articles of this Issue 4/2007

Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 4/2007 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine