Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Hematology 11/2012

01-11-2012 | Original Article

(Bortezomib plus lenalidomide/thalidomide)- vs (bortezomib or lenalidomide/thalidomide)-containing regimens as induction therapy in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Authors: Anyou Wang, Qiaohong Duan, Xin Liu, Kaiyang Ding, Yongsheng Han, Weibo Zhu, Xiaoyan Cai, Jingsheng Wu, Zimin Sun

Published in: Annals of Hematology | Issue 11/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

The aim of the study was to perform a meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of (bortezomib plus lenalidomide/thalidomide)- vs (bortezomib or lenalidomide/thalidomide)-containing regimens as induction therapy in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. We searched electronic and printed sources for relevant articles published. Inclusion criteria was as follows: randomized controlled trials (RCT) of (bortezomib plus lenalidomide/thalidomide) vs (bortezomib or lenalidomide/thalidomide)-containing regimens as induction therapy in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Two reviewers independently assessed potentially eligible studies and extracted relevant data. We retrieved five RCT studies including a total of 1,200 patients. Using the random-effects model to pool the five RCT with a statistically significant heterogeneity (P = 0.03; X 2 = 10.69; df = 4; I 2 = 63 %), the weighted risk ratios of a complete response (CR) for (bortezomib plus lenalidomide/thalidomide)-containing regimens was 1.81 (P = 0.005; 95 % CI: 1.20–2.73). When we excluded the study by Cavo et al. (Lancet 376:2075–2085, 2010), the pooled risk ratio for CR was 1.59 (P < 0.0001, 95 %CI: 1.29–1.96) with no statistically significant heterogeneity (P = 0.54; X 2 = 2.14; df = 3; I 2 = 0 %) among four RCT under the fixed effects mode. The pooled odds ratio for the main grade III/IV adverse events (the peripheral neuropathy, thrombotic events, and infections) were 1.76 (P = 0.32; 95 % CI: 0.58–5.31), 0.92 (P = 0.76, 95 %CI: 0.52–1.61), and 1.05 (P = 0.82, 95 % CI: 0.70–1.57), respectively. Our analysis showed (bortezomib plus lenalidomide/thalidomide)-containing regimens as induction treatment in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma improved CR but did not increase the risk of major adverse events (the peripheral neuropathy, thrombotic events, and infections).
Literature
1.
go back to reference Laubach JP, Schlossman RL, Mitsiades CS, Anderson KC, Richardson PG (2011) Thalidomide, lenalidomide and bortezomib in the management of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Expert Rev Hematol 4(1):51–60PubMedCrossRef Laubach JP, Schlossman RL, Mitsiades CS, Anderson KC, Richardson PG (2011) Thalidomide, lenalidomide and bortezomib in the management of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Expert Rev Hematol 4(1):51–60PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Kumar SK, Rajkumar SV, Dispenzieri A, Lacy MQ, Hayman SR, Buadi FK et al (2008) Improved survival in multiple myeloma and the impact of novel therapies. Blood 111(5):2516–2520PubMedCrossRef Kumar SK, Rajkumar SV, Dispenzieri A, Lacy MQ, Hayman SR, Buadi FK et al (2008) Improved survival in multiple myeloma and the impact of novel therapies. Blood 111(5):2516–2520PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Mitsiades N, Mitsiades CS, Poulaki V, Chauhan D, Richardson PG, Hideshima T et al (2002) Apoptotic signaling induced by immunomodulatory thalidomide analogs in human multiple myeloma cells: therapeutic implications. Blood 99(12):4525–4530PubMedCrossRef Mitsiades N, Mitsiades CS, Poulaki V, Chauhan D, Richardson PG, Hideshima T et al (2002) Apoptotic signaling induced by immunomodulatory thalidomide analogs in human multiple myeloma cells: therapeutic implications. Blood 99(12):4525–4530PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Mitsiades N, Mitsiades CS, Richardson PG, Poulaki V, Tai YT, Chauhan D et al (2003) The proteasome inhibitor PS-341 potentiates sensitivity of multiple myeloma cells to conventional chemotherapeutic agents: therapeutic applications. Blood 101(6):2377–2380PubMedCrossRef Mitsiades N, Mitsiades CS, Richardson PG, Poulaki V, Tai YT, Chauhan D et al (2003) The proteasome inhibitor PS-341 potentiates sensitivity of multiple myeloma cells to conventional chemotherapeutic agents: therapeutic applications. Blood 101(6):2377–2380PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Chanan-Khan AA, Giralt S (2010) Importance of achieving a complete response in multiple myeloma, and the impact of novel agents. J Clin Oncol 28(15):2612–2624PubMedCrossRef Chanan-Khan AA, Giralt S (2010) Importance of achieving a complete response in multiple myeloma, and the impact of novel agents. J Clin Oncol 28(15):2612–2624PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Dingli D, Pacheco JM, Nowakowski GS, Kumar SK, Dispenzieri A, Hayman SR et al (2007) Relationship between depth of response and outcome in multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol 25(31):4933–4937PubMedCrossRef Dingli D, Pacheco JM, Nowakowski GS, Kumar SK, Dispenzieri A, Hayman SR et al (2007) Relationship between depth of response and outcome in multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol 25(31):4933–4937PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Durie BG, Harousseau JL, Miguel JS, Bladé J, Barlogie B, Anderson K et al (2006) International uniform response criteria for multiple myeloma. Leukemia 20(9):1467–1473PubMedCrossRef Durie BG, Harousseau JL, Miguel JS, Bladé J, Barlogie B, Anderson K et al (2006) International uniform response criteria for multiple myeloma. Leukemia 20(9):1467–1473PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Altman DG, Schulz KF, Moher D, Egger M, Davidoff F, Elbourne D et al (2001) The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 134(8):663–694PubMed Altman DG, Schulz KF, Moher D, Egger M, Davidoff F, Elbourne D et al (2001) The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 134(8):663–694PubMed
10.
go back to reference Juni P, Altman DG, Egger M (2001) Systematic reviews in health care: assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials. BMJ 323:42–46PubMedCrossRef Juni P, Altman DG, Egger M (2001) Systematic reviews in health care: assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials. BMJ 323:42–46PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Cavo M, Tacchetti P, Patriarca F, Petrucci MT, Pantani L, Galli M et al (2010) Bortezomib with thalidomide plus dexamethasone compared with thalidomide plus dexamethasone as induction therapy before, and consolidation therapy after, double autologous stem-cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a randomised phase 3 study. Lancet 376(9758):2075–2085PubMedCrossRef Cavo M, Tacchetti P, Patriarca F, Petrucci MT, Pantani L, Galli M et al (2010) Bortezomib with thalidomide plus dexamethasone compared with thalidomide plus dexamethasone as induction therapy before, and consolidation therapy after, double autologous stem-cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a randomised phase 3 study. Lancet 376(9758):2075–2085PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Kumar S, Flinn I, Richardson PG, Hari P, Callander N, Noga SJ et al (2012) Randomized, multicenter, phase 2 study (EVOLUTION) of combinations of bortezomib, dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide, and lenalidomide in previously untreated multiple myeloma. Blood. doi:10.1182/blood-2011-11-395749 Kumar S, Flinn I, Richardson PG, Hari P, Callander N, Noga SJ et al (2012) Randomized, multicenter, phase 2 study (EVOLUTION) of combinations of bortezomib, dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide, and lenalidomide in previously untreated multiple myeloma. Blood. doi:10.​1182/​blood-2011-11-395749
13.
go back to reference Moreau P, Avet-Loiseau H, Facon T, Attal M, Tiab M, Hulin C et al (2011) Bortezomib plus dexamethasone versus reduced-dose bortezomib, thalidomide plus dexamethasone as induction treatment before autologous stem cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Blood 118(22):5752–5758PubMedCrossRef Moreau P, Avet-Loiseau H, Facon T, Attal M, Tiab M, Hulin C et al (2011) Bortezomib plus dexamethasone versus reduced-dose bortezomib, thalidomide plus dexamethasone as induction treatment before autologous stem cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Blood 118(22):5752–5758PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Palumbo A, Bringhen S, Rossi D, Cavalli M, Larocca A, Ria R et al (2010) Bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone-thalidomide followed by maintenance with bortezomib-thalidomide compared with bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone for initial treatment of multiple myeloma: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 28(34):5101–5109PubMedCrossRef Palumbo A, Bringhen S, Rossi D, Cavalli M, Larocca A, Ria R et al (2010) Bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone-thalidomide followed by maintenance with bortezomib-thalidomide compared with bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone for initial treatment of multiple myeloma: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 28(34):5101–5109PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Rosinol L, Cibeira MT, Martinez J, Mateos MV, Oriol A, Terol MJ et al (2009) Thalidomide/Dexamethasone (TD) vs Velcade/Thalidomide/Dexamethasone (VTD) vs. VBMCP/VBAD/Velcade as induction regimens prior to autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT): results of a prospective phase III PETHEMA/GEM trial. ASH Ann Meet Abstr 114:130 Rosinol L, Cibeira MT, Martinez J, Mateos MV, Oriol A, Terol MJ et al (2009) Thalidomide/Dexamethasone (TD) vs Velcade/Thalidomide/Dexamethasone (VTD) vs. VBMCP/VBAD/Velcade as induction regimens prior to autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT): results of a prospective phase III PETHEMA/GEM trial. ASH Ann Meet Abstr 114:130
Metadata
Title
(Bortezomib plus lenalidomide/thalidomide)- vs (bortezomib or lenalidomide/thalidomide)-containing regimens as induction therapy in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Authors
Anyou Wang
Qiaohong Duan
Xin Liu
Kaiyang Ding
Yongsheng Han
Weibo Zhu
Xiaoyan Cai
Jingsheng Wu
Zimin Sun
Publication date
01-11-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Hematology / Issue 11/2012
Print ISSN: 0939-5555
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0584
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-012-1520-4

Other articles of this Issue 11/2012

Annals of Hematology 11/2012 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine