Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy 2/2015

01-03-2015 | Original Article

Tomographic evaluation on bone morphology in posterior mandibular region for safe placement of dental implant

Authors: Selda Yildiz, Gurkan Rasit Bayar, Inanc Guvenc, Necdet Kocabiyik, Ayhan Cömert, Fatih Yazar

Published in: Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy | Issue 2/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the morphology of submandibular fossae at edentulous posterior regions of dried mandibles and to determine a safe range for proper lingual angulation during the placement of a dental implant in the posterior mandibular region, with a computerized tomographic scan study. Spiral computed tomographic images of 77 dry adult human mandibles were evaluated to determine the deepest area in the submandibular fossa. Then, the proper lingual angulations for the placement of a dental implant at these regions were measured. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was calculated to show the relation between the depths of submandibular fossa and lingual implant angulations. “Paired t test” was used for differences between the lingual implant angulations and the depths of submandibular fossa on each side of the mandibles. Depths of the submandibular fossa and lingual implant angulations were varied between 1.1 and 4.6 mm: 62°–84° on right side of the mandibles, and 1.1–4.5 mm, 65°–83° on left side of the mandibles. There were statistically medium negative correlations between the degree of lingual implant angulations and the depth of submandibular fossa on each side of the mandible (r = −0.44, p < 0.001, and r = −0.38, p = 0.001). There was a statistically significant difference between the right and left sides of the mandibles in terms of the depth of submandibular fossa (p = 0.01). Within the limits of this study, the depth of submandibular fossa was measured as ≥2 mm in around 71.5 % of examined regions, and lingual implant angulations were between 62° and 84°. These results may be considered by clinicians who are planning the dental implant placement in posterior mandible to avoid potential risk of lingual cortical plate perforation.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Annibali S, Ripari M, La Monaca G, Tonoli F, Cristalli MP (2009) Local accidents in dental implant surgery: prevention and treatment. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 29:325–331PubMed Annibali S, Ripari M, La Monaca G, Tonoli F, Cristalli MP (2009) Local accidents in dental implant surgery: prevention and treatment. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 29:325–331PubMed
2.
3.
go back to reference Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357:2277–2284CrossRefPubMed Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357:2277–2284CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Chan HL, Benavides E, Yeh CY, Fu JH, Rudek IE, Wang HL (2011) Risk assessment of lingual plate perforation in posterior mandibular region: a virtual implant placement study using cone-beam computed tomography. J Periodontol 82(1):129–135CrossRefPubMed Chan HL, Benavides E, Yeh CY, Fu JH, Rudek IE, Wang HL (2011) Risk assessment of lingual plate perforation in posterior mandibular region: a virtual implant placement study using cone-beam computed tomography. J Periodontol 82(1):129–135CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Chen LC, Lundgren T, Hallstrom H, Cherel F (2008) Comparison of different methods of assessing alveolar ridge dimensions prior to dental implant placement. J Periodontol 79:401–405CrossRefPubMed Chen LC, Lundgren T, Hallstrom H, Cherel F (2008) Comparison of different methods of assessing alveolar ridge dimensions prior to dental implant placement. J Periodontol 79:401–405CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Dao TT, Mellor A (1998) Sensory disturbances associated with implant surgery. Int J Prosthodont 11:462–469PubMed Dao TT, Mellor A (1998) Sensory disturbances associated with implant surgery. Int J Prosthodont 11:462–469PubMed
7.
go back to reference De Moraes MEL, Hollender LG, Chen CSK, Moraes LC, Balducci I (2011) Evaluating craniofacial asymmetry with digital cephalometric images and cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 139:e523–e531CrossRefPubMed De Moraes MEL, Hollender LG, Chen CSK, Moraes LC, Balducci I (2011) Evaluating craniofacial asymmetry with digital cephalometric images and cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 139:e523–e531CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Flanagan D (2003) Important arterial supply of the mandible, control of an arterial hemorrhage, and report of a hemorrhagic incident. J Oral Implantol 29:165–173CrossRefPubMed Flanagan D (2003) Important arterial supply of the mandible, control of an arterial hemorrhage, and report of a hemorrhagic incident. J Oral Implantol 29:165–173CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Froum S, Casanova L, Byrne S, Cho SC (2011) Risk assessment before extraction for immediate implant placement in the posterior mandible: a computerized tomographic scan study. J Periodontol 82(3):395–402CrossRefPubMed Froum S, Casanova L, Byrne S, Cho SC (2011) Risk assessment before extraction for immediate implant placement in the posterior mandible: a computerized tomographic scan study. J Periodontol 82(3):395–402CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Greenstein G, Cavallaro J, Tarnow D (2008) Practical application of anatomy for the dental implant surgeon. J Periodontol 79:1833–1846CrossRefPubMed Greenstein G, Cavallaro J, Tarnow D (2008) Practical application of anatomy for the dental implant surgeon. J Periodontol 79:1833–1846CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Harris D, Horner K, Gröndahl K, Jacobs R, Helmrot E, Benic GI, Bornstein MM, Dawood A, Quirynen M (2011) E.A.O. guidelines for the use of diagnostic imaging in implant dentistry 2011. A consensus workshop organized by the European Association for Osseointegration at the Medical University of Warsaw. Clin Oral Implants Res 23(11):1243–1253CrossRef Harris D, Horner K, Gröndahl K, Jacobs R, Helmrot E, Benic GI, Bornstein MM, Dawood A, Quirynen M (2011) E.A.O. guidelines for the use of diagnostic imaging in implant dentistry 2011. A consensus workshop organized by the European Association for Osseointegration at the Medical University of Warsaw. Clin Oral Implants Res 23(11):1243–1253CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Hanazawa T, Sano T, Seki K, Okano T (2004) Radiologic measurements of the mandible: a comparison between CT-reformatted and conventional tomographic images. Clin Oral Implants Res 15:226–232CrossRefPubMed Hanazawa T, Sano T, Seki K, Okano T (2004) Radiologic measurements of the mandible: a comparison between CT-reformatted and conventional tomographic images. Clin Oral Implants Res 15:226–232CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Isaacson TJ (2004) Sublingual hematoma formation during immediate implant placement of mandibular endosseous implants. J Am Dent Assoc 135:168–172CrossRefPubMed Isaacson TJ (2004) Sublingual hematoma formation during immediate implant placement of mandibular endosseous implants. J Am Dent Assoc 135:168–172CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Kalpidis CD, Setayesh RM (2004) Hemorrhaging associated with endosseous implant placement in the anterior mandible: a review of the literature. J Periodontol 75:631–645CrossRefPubMed Kalpidis CD, Setayesh RM (2004) Hemorrhaging associated with endosseous implant placement in the anterior mandible: a review of the literature. J Periodontol 75:631–645CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Leite GM, Lana JP, de Carvalho Machado V, Manzi FR, Souza PE, Horta MC (2013) Anatomic variations and lesions of the mandibular canal detected by cone beam computed tomography. Surg Radiol Anat (Epub ahead of print) Leite GM, Lana JP, de Carvalho Machado V, Manzi FR, Souza PE, Horta MC (2013) Anatomic variations and lesions of the mandibular canal detected by cone beam computed tomography. Surg Radiol Anat (Epub ahead of print)
16.
go back to reference Leong DJM, Chan HL, Yeh CY, Takarakis N, Fu JH, Wang HL (2011) Risk of lingual plate perforation during implant placement in the posterior mandible: a human cadaver study. Implant Dent 20(5):360–362CrossRefPubMed Leong DJM, Chan HL, Yeh CY, Takarakis N, Fu JH, Wang HL (2011) Risk of lingual plate perforation during implant placement in the posterior mandible: a human cadaver study. Implant Dent 20(5):360–362CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Momin MA, Matsumoto K, Ejima K, Asaumi R, Kawai T, Arai Y, Honda K, Yosue T (2013) Correlation of mandibular impacted tooth and bone morphology determined by cone beam computed topography on a premise of third molar operation. Surg Radiol Anat 35:311–318CrossRefPubMed Momin MA, Matsumoto K, Ejima K, Asaumi R, Kawai T, Arai Y, Honda K, Yosue T (2013) Correlation of mandibular impacted tooth and bone morphology determined by cone beam computed topography on a premise of third molar operation. Surg Radiol Anat 35:311–318CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Niamtu J 3rd (2001) Near-fatal airway obstruction after routine implant placement. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 92:597–600CrossRefPubMed Niamtu J 3rd (2001) Near-fatal airway obstruction after routine implant placement. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 92:597–600CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Parnia F, Fard EM, Mahboub F, Hafezeqoran A, Gavgani FE (2010) Tomographic volume evaluation of submandibular fossa in patients requiring dental implants. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 109:e32–e36CrossRefPubMed Parnia F, Fard EM, Mahboub F, Hafezeqoran A, Gavgani FE (2010) Tomographic volume evaluation of submandibular fossa in patients requiring dental implants. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 109:e32–e36CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Reilly DT, Burstein AH (1975) The elastic and ultimate properties of compact bone tissue. J Biomech 8:393–405CrossRefPubMed Reilly DT, Burstein AH (1975) The elastic and ultimate properties of compact bone tissue. J Biomech 8:393–405CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Tyndall DA, Brooks SL (2000) Selection criteria for dental implant site imaging: a position paper of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 89:630–637CrossRefPubMed Tyndall DA, Brooks SL (2000) Selection criteria for dental implant site imaging: a position paper of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 89:630–637CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference van Steenberghe D, Lekholm U, Bolender C, Folmer T, Henry P, Herrmann I, Higuchi K, Laney W, Linden U, Astrand P (1990) Applicability of osseointegrated oral implants in the rehabilitation of partial edentulism: a prospective multicenter study on 558 fixtures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 5:272–281PubMed van Steenberghe D, Lekholm U, Bolender C, Folmer T, Henry P, Herrmann I, Higuchi K, Laney W, Linden U, Astrand P (1990) Applicability of osseointegrated oral implants in the rehabilitation of partial edentulism: a prospective multicenter study on 558 fixtures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 5:272–281PubMed
23.
go back to reference Watanabe H, Mohammad Abdul M, Kurabayashi T, Aoki H (2010) Mandible size and morphology determined with CT on a premise of dental implant operation. Surg Radiol Anat 32:343–349CrossRefPubMed Watanabe H, Mohammad Abdul M, Kurabayashi T, Aoki H (2010) Mandible size and morphology determined with CT on a premise of dental implant operation. Surg Radiol Anat 32:343–349CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Tomographic evaluation on bone morphology in posterior mandibular region for safe placement of dental implant
Authors
Selda Yildiz
Gurkan Rasit Bayar
Inanc Guvenc
Necdet Kocabiyik
Ayhan Cömert
Fatih Yazar
Publication date
01-03-2015
Publisher
Springer Paris
Published in
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy / Issue 2/2015
Print ISSN: 0930-1038
Electronic ISSN: 1279-8517
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-014-1351-1

Other articles of this Issue 2/2015

Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy 2/2015 Go to the issue