Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy 9/2010

01-11-2010 | Original Article

Gender differences in subcutaneous and perirenal fat distribution

Authors: Brian H. Eisner, Javaad Zargooshi, Aaron D. Berger, Matthew R. Cooperberg, Sean M. Doyle, Sonali Sheth, Marshall L. Stoller

Published in: Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy | Issue 9/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Body mass index (BMI) has been shown to influence the outcome of various surgical procedures. The purpose of this study is to assess the relationship between BMI, gender, and the distribution of subcutaneous and perirenal fat.

Methods

A retrospective review was performed for 123 patients who underwent radical or partial nephrectomy. Preoperative CT scans were reviewed by two independent observers. Subcutaneous fat was measured at three locations and perirenal fat was measured at six locations. Statistical analysis was performed using the Student’s t test and the Pearson’s correlation coefficient.

Results

Mean anterior subcutaneous fat was significantly greater in females than in males (2.54 vs. 1.78 cm, p < 0.001) as was mean right posterolateral subcutaneous fat (2.78 vs. 2.21 cm, p = 0.03). With regard to perirenal fat, men were greater than women for all perirenal locations around the left kidney. For the right kidney, men were greater than women for four out of six perirenal positions. In both men and women, BMI was strongly correlated with subcutaneous fat. However, BMI was weakly correlated with perirenal fat.

Conclusions

Women exceed men in subcutaneous fat, while men exceed women in perirenal fat. Obese patients are very likely to have large amounts of subcutaneous fat, but will not necessarily have proportionally increased fat around their kidneys when compared to the patients with lower BMI. These differences may have important implications for surgical approaches to the kidney.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Anderson KM, Lindler TU, Lamberton GR, Baron PW, Ojogho OK, Baldwin DD (2008) Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: effect of perirenal fat upon donor operative time. J Endourol 22(10):2269–2274CrossRefPubMed Anderson KM, Lindler TU, Lamberton GR, Baron PW, Ojogho OK, Baldwin DD (2008) Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: effect of perirenal fat upon donor operative time. J Endourol 22(10):2269–2274CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Brown JA, Rodin DM, Lee B, Dahl DM (2005) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and body mass index: an assessment of 151 sequential cases. J Urol 173:442–445CrossRefPubMed Brown JA, Rodin DM, Lee B, Dahl DM (2005) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and body mass index: an assessment of 151 sequential cases. J Urol 173:442–445CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge Academic, New York Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge Academic, New York
4.
go back to reference Ferrara CM, Goldberg AP, Nicklas BJ, Sorkin JD, Ryan AS (2008) Sex differences in insulin action and body fat distribution in overweight and obese middle-aged and older men and women. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 33:784–790CrossRefPubMed Ferrara CM, Goldberg AP, Nicklas BJ, Sorkin JD, Ryan AS (2008) Sex differences in insulin action and body fat distribution in overweight and obese middle-aged and older men and women. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 33:784–790CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Friedl KE (2004) Can you be large, not obese? The distinction between body weight, body fat, abdominal fat in occupational standards. Diabetes Technol Ther 6:732–749CrossRefPubMed Friedl KE (2004) Can you be large, not obese? The distinction between body weight, body fat, abdominal fat in occupational standards. Diabetes Technol Ther 6:732–749CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Hamdy O, Porramatikul S, Al-Ozairi E (2006) Metabolic obesity: the paradox between visceral and subcutaneous fat. Curr Diabetes Rev 2:367–3739PubMed Hamdy O, Porramatikul S, Al-Ozairi E (2006) Metabolic obesity: the paradox between visceral and subcutaneous fat. Curr Diabetes Rev 2:367–3739PubMed
7.
go back to reference Lemieux S, Prud’homme D, Bouchard C, Tremblay A, Despres JP (1993) Sex differences in the relation of visceral adipose tissue accumulation to total body fatness. Am J Clin Nutr 58:463–467PubMed Lemieux S, Prud’homme D, Bouchard C, Tremblay A, Despres JP (1993) Sex differences in the relation of visceral adipose tissue accumulation to total body fatness. Am J Clin Nutr 58:463–467PubMed
8.
go back to reference Pareek G, Hedican SP, Lee FT Jr, Nakada SY (2005) Shock wave lithotripsy success determined by skin-to-stone distance on computed tomography. Urology 66:941–944CrossRefPubMed Pareek G, Hedican SP, Lee FT Jr, Nakada SY (2005) Shock wave lithotripsy success determined by skin-to-stone distance on computed tomography. Urology 66:941–944CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Pareek G, Armenakas NA, Panagopoulos G, Bruno JJ, Fracchia JA (2005) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy success based on body mass index and Hounsfield units. Urology 65:33–36CrossRefPubMed Pareek G, Armenakas NA, Panagopoulos G, Bruno JJ, Fracchia JA (2005) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy success based on body mass index and Hounsfield units. Urology 65:33–36CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Gender differences in subcutaneous and perirenal fat distribution
Authors
Brian H. Eisner
Javaad Zargooshi
Aaron D. Berger
Matthew R. Cooperberg
Sean M. Doyle
Sonali Sheth
Marshall L. Stoller
Publication date
01-11-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy / Issue 9/2010
Print ISSN: 0930-1038
Electronic ISSN: 1279-8517
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-010-0692-7

Other articles of this Issue 9/2010

Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy 9/2010 Go to the issue