Skip to main content
Top
Published in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 2/2014

01-04-2014 | Clinical Investigation

Anatomic Risk Factors for Type-2 Endoleak Following EVAR: A Retrospective Review of Preoperative CT Angiography in 326 patients

Authors: Thomas J. Ward, Stuart Cohen, Rahul S. Patel, Edward Kim, Aaron M. Fischman, Francis S. Nowakowski, Sharif H. Ellozy, Peter L. Faries, Michael L. Marin, Robert A. Lookstein

Published in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology | Issue 2/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

We describe the anatomic characteristics on preoperative CT angiography (CTA) that predispose to type-2 endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for an abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA).

Methods

Between 1999 and 2010, 326 patients had a CTA before and after EVAR. CTAs were reviewed for maximal sac diameter, >50 % circumferential luminal thrombus, and patency of the infrarenal aortic side branches, including the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) and L2-L5 lumbar arteries. Postoperative CTAs were reviewed for a persistent type-2 endoleak.

Results

Of 326 patients, 30.4 % had a type-2 endoleak on CTA. Univariate analysis demonstrated a patent IMA, increased patent individual L2, L3, and L4 lumbar arteries, and an increased number of total patent lumbar arteries in patients with type-2 endoleak compared to those without (p < 0.001, 0.002, <0.001, <0.001, and <0.001 respectively). Sac diameter, patent L5 lumbar arteries, and >50 % circumferential mural thrombus were not significantly different (p = 0.652, 0.617, and 0.16). Univariate logistic regression demonstrated increased risk of endoleak with each additional patent lumbar artery (odds ratio (OR) 1.26, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis of the 326 patients resulted in the delineation of the optimal anatomic variables that predicted a type-2 endoleak: occluded L3 lumbar arteries (OR 0.1, p = 0.002), occluded L4 lumbar vertebral arteries (OR 0.31, p = 0.034), and IMA occlusion (OR 0.38, p = 0.008).

Conclusions

Univariate analysis demonstrated total patent lumbar arteries as a significant predictor of type-2 endoleak. Multivariate analysis demonstrated IMA occlusion, L3 lumbar artery occlusion, and L4 lumbar artery occlusion as independently protective against type-2 endoleak after EVAR.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Hirsch AT, Haskal ZJ, Hertzer NR et al (2006) ACC/AHA 2005 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease (Lower Extremity, Renal, Mesenteric, and Abdominal Aortic): Executive Summary A Collaborative Report From the American Association for Vascular Surgery/Society for Vascular Surgery, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, Society of Interventional Radiology, and the ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease): Endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Society for Vascular Nursing; TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus; and Vascular Disease Foundation. J Am Coll Cardiol 47:1239–1312PubMedCrossRef Hirsch AT, Haskal ZJ, Hertzer NR et al (2006) ACC/AHA 2005 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease (Lower Extremity, Renal, Mesenteric, and Abdominal Aortic): Executive Summary A Collaborative Report From the American Association for Vascular Surgery/Society for Vascular Surgery, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, Society of Interventional Radiology, and the ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease): Endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Society for Vascular Nursing; TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus; and Vascular Disease Foundation. J Am Coll Cardiol 47:1239–1312PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Greenhalgh RM, Brown LC, Kwong GP, Powell JT, Thompson SG (2004) Comparison of endovascular aneurysm repair with open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1), 30-day operative mortality results: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 364:843–848PubMedCrossRef Greenhalgh RM, Brown LC, Kwong GP, Powell JT, Thompson SG (2004) Comparison of endovascular aneurysm repair with open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1), 30-day operative mortality results: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 364:843–848PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference United Kingdom ETI, Greenhalgh RM, Brown LC et al (2010) Endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. N Engl J Med 362:1863–1871PubMedCrossRef United Kingdom ETI, Greenhalgh RM, Brown LC et al (2010) Endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. N Engl J Med 362:1863–1871PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Lederle FA, Freischlag JA, Kyriakides TC et al (2009) Outcomes following endovascular vs open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a randomized trial. JAMA 302:1535–1542PubMedCrossRef Lederle FA, Freischlag JA, Kyriakides TC et al (2009) Outcomes following endovascular vs open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a randomized trial. JAMA 302:1535–1542PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Albuquerque FC, Tonnessen BH, Noll RE, Cires G, Kim JK, Sternbergh WC (2010) Paradigm shifts in the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm: trends in 721 patients between 1996 and 2008. J Vasc Surg 51:1348–1353PubMedCrossRef Albuquerque FC, Tonnessen BH, Noll RE, Cires G, Kim JK, Sternbergh WC (2010) Paradigm shifts in the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm: trends in 721 patients between 1996 and 2008. J Vasc Surg 51:1348–1353PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Schanzer A, Greenberg RK, Hevelone N et al (2011) Predictors of abdominal aortic aneurysm sac enlargement after endovascular repair. Circulation 123:2848–2855PubMedCrossRef Schanzer A, Greenberg RK, Hevelone N et al (2011) Predictors of abdominal aortic aneurysm sac enlargement after endovascular repair. Circulation 123:2848–2855PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Jones JE, Atkins MD, Brewster DC et al (2007) Persistent type 2 endoleak after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm is associated with adverse late outcomes. J Vasc Surg 46:1–8PubMedCrossRef Jones JE, Atkins MD, Brewster DC et al (2007) Persistent type 2 endoleak after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm is associated with adverse late outcomes. J Vasc Surg 46:1–8PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Lewin RL, Fatterpekar G, Doshi A, Cohen E, Nowakowski F (2005) Anatomic risk factors for type 2 endoleak following EVAR: a retrospective review of CT angiography in 184 patients. Scientific Abstract presented at the RSNA Annual Meeting, Chicago Lewin RL, Fatterpekar G, Doshi A, Cohen E, Nowakowski F (2005) Anatomic risk factors for type 2 endoleak following EVAR: a retrospective review of CT angiography in 184 patients. Scientific Abstract presented at the RSNA Annual Meeting, Chicago
10.
go back to reference Axelrod DJ, Lookstein RA, Guller J et al (2004) Inferior mesenteric artery embolization before endovascular aneurysm repair: technique and initial results. J Vasc Interv Radiol 15:1263–1267PubMedCrossRef Axelrod DJ, Lookstein RA, Guller J et al (2004) Inferior mesenteric artery embolization before endovascular aneurysm repair: technique and initial results. J Vasc Interv Radiol 15:1263–1267PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Jackson R, Chang DC, Freischlag JA (2012) Comparison of long-term survival after open vs endovascular repair of intact abdominal aortic aneurysm among medicare beneficiaries. JAMA 307:1621–1628PubMedCrossRef Jackson R, Chang DC, Freischlag JA (2012) Comparison of long-term survival after open vs endovascular repair of intact abdominal aortic aneurysm among medicare beneficiaries. JAMA 307:1621–1628PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Arko FR, Rubin GD, Johnson BL, Hill BB, Fogarty TJ, Zarins CK (2001) Type-II endoleaks following endovascular AAA repair: preoperative predictors and long-term effects. J Endovasc Ther 8:503–510PubMedCrossRef Arko FR, Rubin GD, Johnson BL, Hill BB, Fogarty TJ, Zarins CK (2001) Type-II endoleaks following endovascular AAA repair: preoperative predictors and long-term effects. J Endovasc Ther 8:503–510PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Fan CM, Rafferty EA, Geller SC, Kaufman JA, Brewster DC, Cambria RP, Waltman AC (2001) Endovascular stent-graft in abdominal aortic aneurysms: the relationship between patent vessels that arise from the aneurysmal sac and early endoleak. Radiology 218:176–182PubMedCrossRef Fan CM, Rafferty EA, Geller SC, Kaufman JA, Brewster DC, Cambria RP, Waltman AC (2001) Endovascular stent-graft in abdominal aortic aneurysms: the relationship between patent vessels that arise from the aneurysmal sac and early endoleak. Radiology 218:176–182PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Görich J, Rilinger N, Sokiranski R et al (2001) Endoleaks after endovascular repair of aortic aneurysm: are they predictable? Initial results. Radiology 218:477–480PubMedCrossRef Görich J, Rilinger N, Sokiranski R et al (2001) Endoleaks after endovascular repair of aortic aneurysm: are they predictable? Initial results. Radiology 218:477–480PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Marchiori A, von Ristow A, Guimaraes M, Schönholz C, Uflacker R (2011) Predictive factors for the development of type II endoleaks. J Endovasc Ther 18:299–305PubMedCrossRef Marchiori A, von Ristow A, Guimaraes M, Schönholz C, Uflacker R (2011) Predictive factors for the development of type II endoleaks. J Endovasc Ther 18:299–305PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Brountzos E, Karagiannis G, Panagiotou I, Tzavara C, Efstathopoulos E, Kelekis N (2012) Risk factors for the development of persistent type II endoleaks after endovascular repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms. Diagn Interv Radiol 18:307–313PubMed Brountzos E, Karagiannis G, Panagiotou I, Tzavara C, Efstathopoulos E, Kelekis N (2012) Risk factors for the development of persistent type II endoleaks after endovascular repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms. Diagn Interv Radiol 18:307–313PubMed
17.
go back to reference Marchiori A, von Ristow A, Guimaraes M, Schönholz C, Uflacker R (2011) Predictive factors for the development of type II endoleaks. J Endovasc Ther 18(3):299–305PubMedCrossRef Marchiori A, von Ristow A, Guimaraes M, Schönholz C, Uflacker R (2011) Predictive factors for the development of type II endoleaks. J Endovasc Ther 18(3):299–305PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Revel MP, Bissery A, Bienvenu M, Aycard L, Lefort C, Frija G (2004) Are two-dimensional CT measurements of small noncalcified pulmonary nodules reliable? Radiology 231(2):453–458PubMedCrossRef Revel MP, Bissery A, Bienvenu M, Aycard L, Lefort C, Frija G (2004) Are two-dimensional CT measurements of small noncalcified pulmonary nodules reliable? Radiology 231(2):453–458PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Erasmus JJ, Gladish GW, Broemeling L, Sabloff BS, Truong MT, Herbst RS, Munden RF (2003) Interobserver and intraobserver variability in measurement of non-small-cell carcinoma lung lesions: implications for assessment of tumor response. J Clin Oncol 21(13):2574–2582PubMedCrossRef Erasmus JJ, Gladish GW, Broemeling L, Sabloff BS, Truong MT, Herbst RS, Munden RF (2003) Interobserver and intraobserver variability in measurement of non-small-cell carcinoma lung lesions: implications for assessment of tumor response. J Clin Oncol 21(13):2574–2582PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Picozzi G, Diciotti S, Falchini M, Foresti S, Gallesi F, Cavigli E, Livi L, Villari N, Mascalchi M (2006) Operator-dependent reproducibility of size measurements of small phantoms and lung nodules examined with low-dose thin-section computed tomography. Invest Radiol 41(11):831–839PubMedCrossRef Picozzi G, Diciotti S, Falchini M, Foresti S, Gallesi F, Cavigli E, Livi L, Villari N, Mascalchi M (2006) Operator-dependent reproducibility of size measurements of small phantoms and lung nodules examined with low-dose thin-section computed tomography. Invest Radiol 41(11):831–839PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Bonvini R, Alerci M, Antonucci F et al (2003) Preoperative embolization of collateral side branches: a valid means to reduce type II endoleaks after endovascular AAA repair. J Endovasc Ther 10:227–232PubMedCrossRef Bonvini R, Alerci M, Antonucci F et al (2003) Preoperative embolization of collateral side branches: a valid means to reduce type II endoleaks after endovascular AAA repair. J Endovasc Ther 10:227–232PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Nevala T, Biancari F, Manninen H, Matsi P, Mäkinen K, Ylönen K, Perälä J (2010) Inferior mesenteric artery embolization before endovascular repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm: effect on type II endoleak and aneurysm shrinkage. J Vasc Interv Radiol 21(2):181–185PubMedCrossRef Nevala T, Biancari F, Manninen H, Matsi P, Mäkinen K, Ylönen K, Perälä J (2010) Inferior mesenteric artery embolization before endovascular repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm: effect on type II endoleak and aneurysm shrinkage. J Vasc Interv Radiol 21(2):181–185PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Ward TJ, Cohen S, Fischman AM, Kim E, Nowakowski FS, Ellozy SH, Faries PL, Marin ML, Lookstein RA (2013) Preoperative inferior mesenteric artery embolization before endovascular aneurysm repair: decreased incidence of type II endoleak and aneurysm sac enlargement with 24-month follow-up. J Vasc Interv Radiol 24(1):49–55PubMedCrossRef Ward TJ, Cohen S, Fischman AM, Kim E, Nowakowski FS, Ellozy SH, Faries PL, Marin ML, Lookstein RA (2013) Preoperative inferior mesenteric artery embolization before endovascular aneurysm repair: decreased incidence of type II endoleak and aneurysm sac enlargement with 24-month follow-up. J Vasc Interv Radiol 24(1):49–55PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Anatomic Risk Factors for Type-2 Endoleak Following EVAR: A Retrospective Review of Preoperative CT Angiography in 326 patients
Authors
Thomas J. Ward
Stuart Cohen
Rahul S. Patel
Edward Kim
Aaron M. Fischman
Francis S. Nowakowski
Sharif H. Ellozy
Peter L. Faries
Michael L. Marin
Robert A. Lookstein
Publication date
01-04-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology / Issue 2/2014
Print ISSN: 0174-1551
Electronic ISSN: 1432-086X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-013-0646-7

Other articles of this Issue 2/2014

CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 2/2014 Go to the issue