Skip to main content
Top
Published in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 3/2012

01-06-2012 | Clinical Investigation

Subintimal Angioplasty of Long Chronic Total Femoropopliteal Occlusions: Long-Term Outcomes, Predictors of Angiographic Restenosis, and Role of Stenting

Authors: Dimitris Siablis, Athanasios Diamantopoulos, Konstantinos Katsanos, Stavros Spiliopoulos, George C. Kagadis, Spyros Papadoulas, Dimitris Karnabatidis

Published in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology | Issue 3/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this article is to report the results of a prospective single-center study analyzing the long-term clinical and angiographic outcomes of subintimal angioplasty (SIA) for the treatment of chronic total occlusions (CTOs) of the femoropopliteal artery.

Materials and Methods

Patients with severe intermittent claudication or critical limb ischemia (CLI) were enrolled in the study. All lesions were treated with SIA and provisional stenting. Primary end points were technical success, patient survival, limb salvage, lesion primary patency, angiographic binary restenosis (>50%), and target lesion revascularization (TLR). Regular clinical and angiographic follow-up was set at 6 and 12 months and yearly thereafter. Study end points were calculated with life-table survival analysis. Proportional-hazards regression analysis with a Cox-model was applied to adjust for confounding factors of heterogeneity.

Results

Between May 2004 and July 2009, 98 patients (105 limbs, patient age 69.3 ± 9.9 years) were included in the study. Technical success rate was 91.4% with a lesion length of 121 ± 77 mm. Limb-salvage and survival rates were 88.7% and 84.1% at 3 years, respectively. After 12, 24, and 36 months, primary patency was 80.1%, 42.3%, and 29.0%, angiographic binary restenosis was 37.2%, 68.6%, and 80.0%, and TLR was 84.8%, 73.0%, and 64.5%, respectively. CLI was the only adverse predictor for decreased primary patency (hazard ratio [HR] 0.36; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.16–0.80, p = 0.012), whereas significantly less restenosis was detected after spot stenting of the entry and/or re-entry site (HR 0.31; 95% CI 0.10–0.89, p = 0.01 and HR 0.20; 95% CI 0.07–0.56, p = 0.002, respectively).

Conclusions

Subintimal angioplasty is a safe and effective revascularization technique for the treatment of CTOs of the femoropopliteal artery. Provisional stenting may have a role at the subintimal entry or true lumen re-entry site.
Literature
1.
go back to reference London NJ, Srinivasan R, Naylor AR et al (1994) Subintimal angioplasty of femoropopliteal artery occlusions: the long-term results. Eur J Vasc Surg 8(2):148–155PubMedCrossRef London NJ, Srinivasan R, Naylor AR et al (1994) Subintimal angioplasty of femoropopliteal artery occlusions: the long-term results. Eur J Vasc Surg 8(2):148–155PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Bolia A, Miles KA, Brennan J, Bell PR (1990) Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of occlusions of the femoral and popliteal arteries by subintimal dissection. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 13(6):357–363PubMedCrossRef Bolia A, Miles KA, Brennan J, Bell PR (1990) Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of occlusions of the femoral and popliteal arteries by subintimal dissection. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 13(6):357–363PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Bolia A, Brennan J, Bell PR (1989) Recanalisation of femoro-popliteal occlusions: improving success rate by subintimal recanalisation. Clin Radiol 40(3):325PubMedCrossRef Bolia A, Brennan J, Bell PR (1989) Recanalisation of femoro-popliteal occlusions: improving success rate by subintimal recanalisation. Clin Radiol 40(3):325PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Bolia A, Bell PR (1995) Femoropopliteal and crural artery recanalization using subintimal angioplasty. Semin Vasc Surg 8(3):253–264PubMed Bolia A, Bell PR (1995) Femoropopliteal and crural artery recanalization using subintimal angioplasty. Semin Vasc Surg 8(3):253–264PubMed
5.
go back to reference Lipsitz EC, Veith FJ, Ohki T (2005) Subintimal angioplasty in the management of critical lower-extremity ischemia: value in limb salvage. Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther 17(1):11–20PubMedCrossRef Lipsitz EC, Veith FJ, Ohki T (2005) Subintimal angioplasty in the management of critical lower-extremity ischemia: value in limb salvage. Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther 17(1):11–20PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Lipsitz EC, Ohki T, Veith FJ et al (2003) Does subintimal angioplasty have a role in the treatment of severe lower extremity ischemia? J Vasc Surg 37(2):386–391PubMedCrossRef Lipsitz EC, Ohki T, Veith FJ et al (2003) Does subintimal angioplasty have a role in the treatment of severe lower extremity ischemia? J Vasc Surg 37(2):386–391PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Bown MJ, Bolia A, Sutton AJ (2009) Subintimal angioplasty: meta-analytical evidence of clinical utility. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 38(3):323–337PubMedCrossRef Bown MJ, Bolia A, Sutton AJ (2009) Subintimal angioplasty: meta-analytical evidence of clinical utility. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 38(3):323–337PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Met R, Van Lienden KP, Koelemay MJ, Bipat S, Legemate DA, Reekers JA (2008) Subintimal angioplasty for peripheral arterial occlusive disease: a systematic review. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 31(4):687–697PubMedCrossRef Met R, Van Lienden KP, Koelemay MJ, Bipat S, Legemate DA, Reekers JA (2008) Subintimal angioplasty for peripheral arterial occlusive disease: a systematic review. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 31(4):687–697PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Markose G, Miller FN, Bolia A (2010) Subintimal angioplasty for femoro-popliteal occlusive disease. J Vasc Surg 52(5):1410–1416PubMedCrossRef Markose G, Miller FN, Bolia A (2010) Subintimal angioplasty for femoro-popliteal occlusive disease. J Vasc Surg 52(5):1410–1416PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Keeling AN, Khalidi K, Leong S et al (2009) Subintimal angioplasty: predictors of long-term success. J Vasc Interv Radiol 20(8):1013–1022PubMedCrossRef Keeling AN, Khalidi K, Leong S et al (2009) Subintimal angioplasty: predictors of long-term success. J Vasc Interv Radiol 20(8):1013–1022PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kim SJ, Kim W, Kim JB, Hong MJ, Kang WY, Hwang SH (2010) Determinants of procedural success and patency following subintimal angioplasty in patients with TASC C and D femoropopliteal arterial disease. Circ J 74(9):1959–1964 Kim SJ, Kim W, Kim JB, Hong MJ, Kang WY, Hwang SH (2010) Determinants of procedural success and patency following subintimal angioplasty in patients with TASC C and D femoropopliteal arterial disease. Circ J 74(9):1959–1964
12.
go back to reference Schmieder GC, Richardson AI, Scott EC, Stokes GK, Meier GH III, Panneton JM (2008) Selective stenting in subintimal angioplasty: analysis of primary stent outcomes. J Vasc Surg 48(5):1175–1181PubMedCrossRef Schmieder GC, Richardson AI, Scott EC, Stokes GK, Meier GH III, Panneton JM (2008) Selective stenting in subintimal angioplasty: analysis of primary stent outcomes. J Vasc Surg 48(5):1175–1181PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Treiman GS, Treiman R, Whiting J (2006) Results of percutaneous subintimal angioplasty using routine stenting. J Vasc Surg 43(3):513–519PubMedCrossRef Treiman GS, Treiman R, Whiting J (2006) Results of percutaneous subintimal angioplasty using routine stenting. J Vasc Surg 43(3):513–519PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Kim JS, Kang TS, Ahn CM et al (2006) Efficacy of subintimal angioplasty/stent implantation for long, multisegmental lower limb occlusive lesions in patients unsuitable for surgery. J Endovasc Ther 13(4):514–521PubMedCrossRef Kim JS, Kang TS, Ahn CM et al (2006) Efficacy of subintimal angioplasty/stent implantation for long, multisegmental lower limb occlusive lesions in patients unsuitable for surgery. J Endovasc Ther 13(4):514–521PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Boufi M, Dona B, Orsini B, Auquier P, Hartung O, Alimi YS (2010) A comparison of the standard Bolia technique versus subintimal recanalization plus Viabahn stent graft in the management of femoro-popliteal occlusions. J Vasc Surg 52(5):1211–1217PubMedCrossRef Boufi M, Dona B, Orsini B, Auquier P, Hartung O, Alimi YS (2010) A comparison of the standard Bolia technique versus subintimal recanalization plus Viabahn stent graft in the management of femoro-popliteal occlusions. J Vasc Surg 52(5):1211–1217PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Rutherford RB, Baker JD, Ernst C et al (1997) Recommended standards for reports dealing with lower extremity ischemia: revised version. J Vasc Surg 26(3):517–538PubMedCrossRef Rutherford RB, Baker JD, Ernst C et al (1997) Recommended standards for reports dealing with lower extremity ischemia: revised version. J Vasc Surg 26(3):517–538PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Thomsen HS (2006) European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) guidelines on the safe use of iodinated contrast media. Eur J Radiol 60(3):307–313PubMedCrossRef Thomsen HS (2006) European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) guidelines on the safe use of iodinated contrast media. Eur J Radiol 60(3):307–313PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Siablis D, Karnabatidis D, Katsanos K et al (2007) Sirolimus-eluting versus bare stents after suboptimal infrapopliteal angioplasty for critical limb ischemia: enduring 1-year angiographic and clinical benefit. J Endovasc Ther 14(2):241–250PubMedCrossRef Siablis D, Karnabatidis D, Katsanos K et al (2007) Sirolimus-eluting versus bare stents after suboptimal infrapopliteal angioplasty for critical limb ischemia: enduring 1-year angiographic and clinical benefit. J Endovasc Ther 14(2):241–250PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Sacks D, Marinelli DL, Martin LG, Spies JB (2003) Reporting standards for clinical evaluation of new peripheral arterial revascularization devices. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14(9 Pt 2):S395–S404PubMedCrossRef Sacks D, Marinelli DL, Martin LG, Spies JB (2003) Reporting standards for clinical evaluation of new peripheral arterial revascularization devices. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14(9 Pt 2):S395–S404PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Scott EC, Biuckians A, Light RE, Burgess J, Meier GH 3rd, Panneton JM (2008) Subintimal angioplasty: our experience in the treatment of 506 infrainguinal arterial occlusions. J Vasc Surg 48(4):878–884PubMedCrossRef Scott EC, Biuckians A, Light RE, Burgess J, Meier GH 3rd, Panneton JM (2008) Subintimal angioplasty: our experience in the treatment of 506 infrainguinal arterial occlusions. J Vasc Surg 48(4):878–884PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Scott EC, Biuckians A, Light RE et al (2007) Subintimal angioplasty for the treatment of claudication and critical limb ischemia: 3-year results. J Vasc Surg 46(5):959–964PubMedCrossRef Scott EC, Biuckians A, Light RE et al (2007) Subintimal angioplasty for the treatment of claudication and critical limb ischemia: 3-year results. J Vasc Surg 46(5):959–964PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Subintimal Angioplasty of Long Chronic Total Femoropopliteal Occlusions: Long-Term Outcomes, Predictors of Angiographic Restenosis, and Role of Stenting
Authors
Dimitris Siablis
Athanasios Diamantopoulos
Konstantinos Katsanos
Stavros Spiliopoulos
George C. Kagadis
Spyros Papadoulas
Dimitris Karnabatidis
Publication date
01-06-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology / Issue 3/2012
Print ISSN: 0174-1551
Electronic ISSN: 1432-086X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-011-0244-5

Other articles of this Issue 3/2012

CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 3/2012 Go to the issue