Skip to main content
Top
Published in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 1/2007

01-02-2007 | CLINICAL INVESTIGATION

Cost and Reimbursement for Three Fibroid Treatments: Abdominal Hysterectomy, Abdominal Myomectomy, and Uterine Fibroid Embolization

Authors: Jay Goldberg, Anne Bussard, Jean McNeil, James Diamond

Published in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology | Issue 1/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To compare costs and reimbursements for three different treatments for uterine fibroids.

Methods

Costs and reimbursements were collected and analyzed from the Thomas Jefferson University Hospital decision support database from 540 women who underwent abdominal hysterectomy (n = 299), abdominal myomectomy (n = 105), or uterine fibroid embolization (UFE) (n = 136) for uterine fibroids during 2000–2002. We used the chi-square test and ANOVA, followed by Fisher’s Least Significant Difference test, for statistical analysis.

Results

The mean total hospital cost (US$) for UFE was $2,707, which was significantly less than for hysterectomy ($5,707) or myomectomy ($5,676) (p < 0.05). The mean hospital net income (hospital net reimbursement minus total hospital cost) for UFE was $57, which was significantly greater than for hysterectomy (−$572) or myomectomy (-$715) (p < 0.05). The mean professional (physician) reimbursements for UFE, hysterectomy, and myomectomy were $1,306, $979, and $1,078, respectively.

Conclusion

UFE has lower hospital costs and greater hospital net income than abdominal hysterectomy or abdominal myomectomy for treating uterine fibroids. UFE may be more financially advantageous than hysterectomy or myomectomy for the insurer, hospital, and health care system. Costs and reimbursements may vary amongst different hospitals and regions.
Literature
1.
go back to reference ACOG Committee Opinion No. 293, Uterine artery embolization, February 2004 ACOG Committee Opinion No. 293, Uterine artery embolization, February 2004
2.
go back to reference Anon (2003) The advancing role of uterine artery embolization. Medtech Insight 5:80 Anon (2003) The advancing role of uterine artery embolization. Medtech Insight 5:80
3.
go back to reference Floridon C, Lund N, Thomsen SG (2001) Alternative treatment for symptomatic fibroids. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 13:491–495PubMedCrossRef Floridon C, Lund N, Thomsen SG (2001) Alternative treatment for symptomatic fibroids. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 13:491–495PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Subramanian S, Spies JB (2001) Uterine artery embolization for leiomyomata: Resource use and cost estimation. J Vasc Radiol 12:571–574 Subramanian S, Spies JB (2001) Uterine artery embolization for leiomyomata: Resource use and cost estimation. J Vasc Radiol 12:571–574
5.
go back to reference Baker CM, Winkel CA, Subramanian S, Spies JB (2002) Estimated costs for uterine artery embolization and abdominal myomectomy for uterine leiomyomata: A comparative study at a single institution. J Vasc Interv Radiol 13:1207–1210PubMed Baker CM, Winkel CA, Subramanian S, Spies JB (2002) Estimated costs for uterine artery embolization and abdominal myomectomy for uterine leiomyomata: A comparative study at a single institution. J Vasc Interv Radiol 13:1207–1210PubMed
6.
go back to reference Al-Fozan H, Dufort J, Kaplow M, Valenti D, Tulandi T (2002) Cost analysis of myomectomy, hysterectomy, and uterine artery embolization. Am J Obstet Gynecol 187:1401–1404PubMedCrossRef Al-Fozan H, Dufort J, Kaplow M, Valenti D, Tulandi T (2002) Cost analysis of myomectomy, hysterectomy, and uterine artery embolization. Am J Obstet Gynecol 187:1401–1404PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Beinfeld MT, Bosch JL, Gazelle GS (2002) Hospital costs of uterine artery embolization and hysterectomy for uterine fibroid tumors. Acad Radiol 9:1300–1304PubMedCrossRef Beinfeld MT, Bosch JL, Gazelle GS (2002) Hospital costs of uterine artery embolization and hysterectomy for uterine fibroid tumors. Acad Radiol 9:1300–1304PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Anon (1998) International classification of diseases, 5th edn. Practice Management Information Corporation, Los Angeles, CA Anon (1998) International classification of diseases, 5th edn. Practice Management Information Corporation, Los Angeles, CA
9.
go back to reference Spies JB, Cooper JM, Worthington-Kirsch R, Lipman JC, Mills BB, Benenati JF (2004) Outcome of uterine embolization and hysterectomy for leiomyomas: Results of a multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191:22–31PubMedCrossRef Spies JB, Cooper JM, Worthington-Kirsch R, Lipman JC, Mills BB, Benenati JF (2004) Outcome of uterine embolization and hysterectomy for leiomyomas: Results of a multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191:22–31PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Goldberg J, Pereira L, Berghella V (2002 Pregnancy after uterine artery embolization. Obstet Gynecol 100:869–872PubMedCrossRef Goldberg J, Pereira L, Berghella V (2002 Pregnancy after uterine artery embolization. Obstet Gynecol 100:869–872PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Goldberg J, Pereira L, Diamond J, Berghella V, Daraï E, Seinera P, Seracchioli R (2004) Pregnancy outcomes following treatment for fibroids: Uterine artery embolization versus laparoscopic myomectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191:18–21PubMedCrossRef Goldberg J, Pereira L, Diamond J, Berghella V, Daraï E, Seinera P, Seracchioli R (2004) Pregnancy outcomes following treatment for fibroids: Uterine artery embolization versus laparoscopic myomectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191:18–21PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Stringer NH, Walker JC, Meyer PM (1997) Comparison of 49 laparoscopic myomectomies with 49 open myomectomies. JAAGL 4:457–464 Stringer NH, Walker JC, Meyer PM (1997) Comparison of 49 laparoscopic myomectomies with 49 open myomectomies. JAAGL 4:457–464
13.
go back to reference Simon NV, Laveran RL, Cavanaugh S, Gerlach DH, Jackson JR (1999) Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy vs. abdominal hysterectomy in a community hospital. A cost comparison. J Reprod Med 44:339–345PubMed Simon NV, Laveran RL, Cavanaugh S, Gerlach DH, Jackson JR (1999) Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy vs. abdominal hysterectomy in a community hospital. A cost comparison. J Reprod Med 44:339–345PubMed
14.
go back to reference Roumm AR, Pizzi L, Goldfarb NI, Cohn H (2005) Minimally invasive: minimally reimbursed? An examination of six laparoscopic surgical procedures. Surg Innovation 12:261–287CrossRef Roumm AR, Pizzi L, Goldfarb NI, Cohn H (2005) Minimally invasive: minimally reimbursed? An examination of six laparoscopic surgical procedures. Surg Innovation 12:261–287CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Cost and Reimbursement for Three Fibroid Treatments: Abdominal Hysterectomy, Abdominal Myomectomy, and Uterine Fibroid Embolization
Authors
Jay Goldberg
Anne Bussard
Jean McNeil
James Diamond
Publication date
01-02-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology / Issue 1/2007
Print ISSN: 0174-1551
Electronic ISSN: 1432-086X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-005-0369-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2007

CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 1/2007 Go to the issue