Skip to main content
Top
Published in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 1/2006

01-02-2006 | CLINICAL INVESTIGATION

Effective Dose of CT- and Fluoroscopy-Guided Perineural/Epidural Injections of the Lumbar Spine: A Comparative Study

Authors: Gebhard Schmid, Alexander Schmitz, Dieter Borchardt, Klaus Ewen, Thomas von Rothenburg, Odo Koester, Michael Jergas

Published in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology | Issue 1/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare the effective radiation dose of perineural and epidural injections of the lumbar spine under computed tomography (CT) or fluoroscopic guidance with respect to dose-reduced protocols. We assessed the radiation dose with an Alderson Rando phantom at the lumbar segment L4/5 using 29 thermoluminescence dosimeters. Based on our clinical experience, 4–10 CT scans and 1-min fluoroscopy are appropriate. Effective doses were calculated for CT for a routine lumbar spine protocol and for maximum dose reduction; as well as for fluoroscopy in a continuous and a pulsed mode (3–15 pulses/s). Effective doses under CT guidance were 1.51 mSv for 4 scans and 3.53 mSv for 10 scans using a standard protocol and 0.22 mSv and 0.43 mSv for the low-dose protocol. In continuous mode, the effective doses ranged from 0.43 to 1.25 mSv for 1–3 min of fluoroscopy. Using 1 min of pulsed fluoroscopy, the effective dose was less than 0.1 mSv for 3 pulses/s. A consequent low-dose CT protocol reduces the effective dose compared to a standard lumbar spine protocol by more than 85%. The latter dose might be expected when applying about 1 min of continuous fluoroscopy for guidance. A pulsed mode further reduces the effective dose of fluoroscopy by 80–90%.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Johnson BA, Schellhas KP, Pollei SR (1999) Epidurography and therapeutic epidural injections: technical considerations and experience with 5334 cases. Am J Neuroradiol 20:697–705PubMed Johnson BA, Schellhas KP, Pollei SR (1999) Epidurography and therapeutic epidural injections: technical considerations and experience with 5334 cases. Am J Neuroradiol 20:697–705PubMed
2.
go back to reference Gangi A, Dietemann JL, Mortazavi R, et al. (1998) CT-guided interventional procedures for pain management in the lumbosacral spine. RadioGraphics 18:621–633PubMed Gangi A, Dietemann JL, Mortazavi R, et al. (1998) CT-guided interventional procedures for pain management in the lumbosacral spine. RadioGraphics 18:621–633PubMed
3.
go back to reference El-Khoury GY, Ehara S, Weinstein JN, et al. (1988) Epidural steroid injection: a procedure ideally performed with fluoroscopic control. Radiology 168:554–557PubMed El-Khoury GY, Ehara S, Weinstein JN, et al. (1988) Epidural steroid injection: a procedure ideally performed with fluoroscopic control. Radiology 168:554–557PubMed
4.
go back to reference Renfrew DL, Moore TE, Kathol MH, et al. (1991) Correct placement of epidural steroid injections: fluoroscopic guidance and contrast administration. Am J Neuroradiol 12(5):1003–1007PubMed Renfrew DL, Moore TE, Kathol MH, et al. (1991) Correct placement of epidural steroid injections: fluoroscopic guidance and contrast administration. Am J Neuroradiol 12(5):1003–1007PubMed
5.
go back to reference Golding SJ, Shrimpton PC (2002) Radiation dose in CT: are we meeting the challenge? Br J Radiol 75:1–4PubMed Golding SJ, Shrimpton PC (2002) Radiation dose in CT: are we meeting the challenge? Br J Radiol 75:1–4PubMed
6.
go back to reference Boland GW, Murphy B, Arellano R, et al. (2000) Dose reduction in gastrointestinal and genitourinary fluoroscopy: use of grid-controlled pulsed fluoroscopy. Am J Roentgenol 175(5):1453–1457 Boland GW, Murphy B, Arellano R, et al. (2000) Dose reduction in gastrointestinal and genitourinary fluoroscopy: use of grid-controlled pulsed fluoroscopy. Am J Roentgenol 175(5):1453–1457
7.
go back to reference Huda W, Sandison GA (1984) Estimation of mean organ doses in diagnostic radiology from Rando Phantom measurments. Health Phys 47(3):463–467PubMed Huda W, Sandison GA (1984) Estimation of mean organ doses in diagnostic radiology from Rando Phantom measurments. Health Phys 47(3):463–467PubMed
8.
go back to reference International Commission on Radiological Protection (1990) 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Pergamon. Oxford International Commission on Radiological Protection (1990) 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Pergamon. Oxford
9.
go back to reference Anon. (1976) Environmental radioactivity and radiation exposure. Annual Report. The Secretary of State for Home Affairs of Germany Anon. (1976) Environmental radioactivity and radiation exposure. Annual Report. The Secretary of State for Home Affairs of Germany
10.
go back to reference Evans W (1930) Intrasacral epidural injection therapy in the treatment of sciatica. Lancet 2:1225–1229 Evans W (1930) Intrasacral epidural injection therapy in the treatment of sciatica. Lancet 2:1225–1229
11.
go back to reference White AH, Derby R, Wynne G (1980) Epidural injections for the diagnosis and treatment of low back pain. Spine 5:78–86PubMed White AH, Derby R, Wynne G (1980) Epidural injections for the diagnosis and treatment of low back pain. Spine 5:78–86PubMed
12.
go back to reference Zennaro H, Dousset V, Viaud B, et al. (1998) Periganglionic foraminal steroid injections performed under CT control. Am J Neuroradiol 19:349–352PubMed Zennaro H, Dousset V, Viaud B, et al. (1998) Periganglionic foraminal steroid injections performed under CT control. Am J Neuroradiol 19:349–352PubMed
13.
go back to reference CT guided perineural injection technique. In: Kraemer J, Koester K (eds) MR Imaging of the Lumbar Spine. A Teaching Atlas. Thieme: New York, pp 18–26 CT guided perineural injection technique. In: Kraemer J, Koester K (eds) MR Imaging of the Lumbar Spine. A Teaching Atlas. Thieme: New York, pp 18–26
14.
go back to reference Carette S, Leclaire R, Marcoux S et al. (1997) Epidural corticosteroid injections for sciatica due to herniated nucleus pulposus. N Engl J Med 336:1634–1640CrossRefPubMed Carette S, Leclaire R, Marcoux S et al. (1997) Epidural corticosteroid injections for sciatica due to herniated nucleus pulposus. N Engl J Med 336:1634–1640CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Schmid G, Vetter S, Göttmann D, et al. (1999) CT-guided epidural/perineural injections in painful disorders of the lumbar spine: short and extended-term results. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 22(6):493–498PubMed Schmid G, Vetter S, Göttmann D, et al. (1999) CT-guided epidural/perineural injections in painful disorders of the lumbar spine: short and extended-term results. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 22(6):493–498PubMed
16.
go back to reference Becker CR, Schatzl M, Feist H, et al. (1998) Radiation exposure during CT examination of thorax and abdomen. Comparision of sequential, spiral and electron beam computed tomography. Radiologe 38(9):726–729CrossRefPubMed Becker CR, Schatzl M, Feist H, et al. (1998) Radiation exposure during CT examination of thorax and abdomen. Comparision of sequential, spiral and electron beam computed tomography. Radiologe 38(9):726–729CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Van Unnik JG, Broerse JJ, Geleijns J, et al. (1997) Survey of CT techniques and absorbed dose in various Dutch hospitals. Br J Radiol 70(832):367–371PubMed Van Unnik JG, Broerse JJ, Geleijns J, et al. (1997) Survey of CT techniques and absorbed dose in various Dutch hospitals. Br J Radiol 70(832):367–371PubMed
18.
go back to reference Calzado A, Rodríguez R, Munoz A (2000) Quality criteria implementation for brain and lumbar spine CT examinations. Br J Radiol 73:384–395PubMed Calzado A, Rodríguez R, Munoz A (2000) Quality criteria implementation for brain and lumbar spine CT examinations. Br J Radiol 73:384–395PubMed
19.
go back to reference Galanski M, Nagel HD, Stamm G (2001) CT-Expositionspraxis in derBundesrepublik Deutschland: Ergebnisse einer bundesweiten Umfrage im Jahr 1999. Fortschr Röntgenstr 173:1–66 Galanski M, Nagel HD, Stamm G (2001) CT-Expositionspraxis in derBundesrepublik Deutschland: Ergebnisse einer bundesweiten Umfrage im Jahr 1999. Fortschr Röntgenstr 173:1–66
20.
go back to reference Geleijns J, Broerse JJ, Shaw MP, et al.(1997) Patient dose due to colon examination: dose assessment and results from a survey in The Netherlands. Radiology 204(2):553–559PubMed Geleijns J, Broerse JJ, Shaw MP, et al.(1997) Patient dose due to colon examination: dose assessment and results from a survey in The Netherlands. Radiology 204(2):553–559PubMed
21.
go back to reference Scanavacca M, D´Avila A, Velarde JL, et al. (1998) Reduction of radiation exposure time during cathetzer ablation with the use of pulsed fluoroscopy. Int J Cardiol 63(1):71–74CrossRefPubMed Scanavacca M, D´Avila A, Velarde JL, et al. (1998) Reduction of radiation exposure time during cathetzer ablation with the use of pulsed fluoroscopy. Int J Cardiol 63(1):71–74CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Nicolic B, Spies JB, Campbell L, et al. (2001) Uterine artery embolization: reduced radiation with refined technique. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 12(1):39–44 Nicolic B, Spies JB, Campbell L, et al. (2001) Uterine artery embolization: reduced radiation with refined technique. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 12(1):39–44
23.
go back to reference Hernandez RJ, Goodsitt MM (1996) Reduction of radiation dose in pediatric patients using pulsed fluoroscopy. Am J Roentgenol 167:1247–1253 Hernandez RJ, Goodsitt MM (1996) Reduction of radiation dose in pediatric patients using pulsed fluoroscopy. Am J Roentgenol 167:1247–1253
24.
go back to reference Vetter S, Heckmann H, Strecker EP, et al. (1998) Klinische Aspekte zu Bildqualität und Dosis bei gittergesteuerter gepulster Durchleuchtung. Akt Radiol 8:191–195 Vetter S, Heckmann H, Strecker EP, et al. (1998) Klinische Aspekte zu Bildqualität und Dosis bei gittergesteuerter gepulster Durchleuchtung. Akt Radiol 8:191–195
25.
go back to reference Andrews RT, Brown PH (2000) Uterine arterial embolization: factors influencing patient radiation exposure. Radiology 217(3):713–722PubMed Andrews RT, Brown PH (2000) Uterine arterial embolization: factors influencing patient radiation exposure. Radiology 217(3):713–722PubMed
26.
go back to reference Nicolic B, Abbara S, Levy E, et al. (2000) Influence of radiographic technique and equipment on absorbed ovarian dose associated with uterine artery embolization. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 11(9):1173–1178 Nicolic B, Abbara S, Levy E, et al. (2000) Influence of radiographic technique and equipment on absorbed ovarian dose associated with uterine artery embolization. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 11(9):1173–1178
27.
go back to reference McParland BJ (1998) A study of patient radiation doses in interventional radiological procedures. Br J Radiol 71(842):175–185PubMed McParland BJ (1998) A study of patient radiation doses in interventional radiological procedures. Br J Radiol 71(842):175–185PubMed
28.
go back to reference Teeuwisse WM, Geleijns J, Broerse JJ, et al. (2001) Patient and staff dose during CT guided biopsy, drainage and coagulation. Br J Radiol 74(884):720–726 PubMed Teeuwisse WM, Geleijns J, Broerse JJ, et al. (2001) Patient and staff dose during CT guided biopsy, drainage and coagulation. Br J Radiol 74(884):720–726 PubMed
29.
go back to reference Slomczykowski M, Roberto M, Schneeberger P, et al. (1999) Radiation dose for pedicle screw insertion. Fluoroscopic method versus computer-assisted surgery. Spine 24(10):975–982CrossRefPubMed Slomczykowski M, Roberto M, Schneeberger P, et al. (1999) Radiation dose for pedicle screw insertion. Fluoroscopic method versus computer-assisted surgery. Spine 24(10):975–982CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Schaeren S, Roth J, Dick W (2002) Effective in vivo radiation dose with image reconstruction controlled pedicle instrumentation vs. CT-based navigation. Orthopade 31(4):392–396CrossRefPubMed Schaeren S, Roth J, Dick W (2002) Effective in vivo radiation dose with image reconstruction controlled pedicle instrumentation vs. CT-based navigation. Orthopade 31(4):392–396CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Botwin KP, Thomas S, Torres FM, et al. (2002) Radiation exposure of the spinal interventionalist performing fluoroscopically guided lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 83(5):697–701CrossRefPubMed Botwin KP, Thomas S, Torres FM, et al. (2002) Radiation exposure of the spinal interventionalist performing fluoroscopically guided lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 83(5):697–701CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Crawley MT, Rogers AT (2000) Dose–area product measurements in a range of common orthopaedic procedures and their possible use in establishing local diagnostic reference levels. Br J Radiol 73:740–744PubMed Crawley MT, Rogers AT (2000) Dose–area product measurements in a range of common orthopaedic procedures and their possible use in establishing local diagnostic reference levels. Br J Radiol 73:740–744PubMed
33.
go back to reference Buls N, Pages J, de Mey J, et al. (2003) Evaluation of patient and staff doses during various CT fluoroscopy guided interventions. Health Phys 85(2):165–73PubMed Buls N, Pages J, de Mey J, et al. (2003) Evaluation of patient and staff doses during various CT fluoroscopy guided interventions. Health Phys 85(2):165–73PubMed
Metadata
Title
Effective Dose of CT- and Fluoroscopy-Guided Perineural/Epidural Injections of the Lumbar Spine: A Comparative Study
Authors
Gebhard Schmid
Alexander Schmitz
Dieter Borchardt
Klaus Ewen
Thomas von Rothenburg
Odo Koester
Michael Jergas
Publication date
01-02-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology / Issue 1/2006
Print ISSN: 0174-1551
Electronic ISSN: 1432-086X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-004-0355-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2006

CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 1/2006 Go to the issue