Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 5/2018

01-05-2018 | Original Scientific Report

Margin Width of Resected Lepidic Lung Cancer Does Not Affect Recurrence After Sublobar Resection

Authors: Youngkyu Moon, Kyo Young Lee, Jae Kil Park

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 5/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

A sufficient resection margin is required for the sublobar resection of lung cancers. However, the width of the resection margin may not be important in lepidic adenocarcinoma, because such tumors are non- or minimally invasive. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of resection margin width on the outcome of patients with lepidic-dominant adenocarcinoma after sublobar resection.

Methods

This study included 133 patients with small (≤2 cm), clinical N0M0 lung cancer who underwent sublobar resection with curative intent. The patients were divided into 4 groups: Group A, lepidic tumor with margin/tumor ratio <1; Group B, lepidic tumor with margin/tumor ratio ≥1; Group C, non-lepidic tumor with margin/tumor ratio <1; Group D, non-lepidic tumor with margin/tumor ratio ≥1. The clinicopathological features and survival outcomes between Group A and B patients, and between Group C and D patients were compared.

Results

The 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates of Group A and B patients were both 100%. The 5-year RFS rates of Group C and D patients were 49.9 and 97.1%, respectively (p = 0.009). By multivariate analysis, the margin/tumor ratio was a significant independent factor for recurrence in patients with non-lepidic tumors (hazard ratio = 0.157, 95% confidence interval 0.027–0.898; p = 0.037).

Conclusions

Tumor recurrence after sublobar resection is not associated with short resection margins in patients with lepidic tumors. However, a short resection margin is a significant risk factor for recurrence in patients with non-lepidic tumors.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ginsberg RJ, Rubinstein LV (1995) Randomized trial of lobectomy versus limited resection for T1 N0 non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer Study Group Ann Thorac Surg 60:615–622 discussion 622–613 CrossRef Ginsberg RJ, Rubinstein LV (1995) Randomized trial of lobectomy versus limited resection for T1 N0 non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer Study Group Ann Thorac Surg 60:615–622 discussion 622–613 CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Yoshida J, Nagai K, Yokose T et al (2005) Limited resection trial for pulmonary ground-glass opacity nodules: fifty-case experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 129:991–996CrossRefPubMed Yoshida J, Nagai K, Yokose T et al (2005) Limited resection trial for pulmonary ground-glass opacity nodules: fifty-case experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 129:991–996CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Cho JH, Choi YS, Kim J et al (2015) Long-term outcomes of wedge resection for pulmonary ground-glass opacity nodules. Ann Thorac Surg 99:218–222CrossRefPubMed Cho JH, Choi YS, Kim J et al (2015) Long-term outcomes of wedge resection for pulmonary ground-glass opacity nodules. Ann Thorac Surg 99:218–222CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Eguchi T, Kadota K, Park BJ et al (2014) The new IASLC-ATS-ERS lung adenocarcinoma classification: what the surgeon should know. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 26:210–222CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Eguchi T, Kadota K, Park BJ et al (2014) The new IASLC-ATS-ERS lung adenocarcinoma classification: what the surgeon should know. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 26:210–222CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Okada M, Koike T, Higashiyama M et al (2006) Radical sublobar resection for small-sized non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 132:769–775CrossRefPubMed Okada M, Koike T, Higashiyama M et al (2006) Radical sublobar resection for small-sized non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 132:769–775CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Koike T, Kitahara A, Sato S et al (2016) Lobectomy versus segmentectomy in radiologically pure solid small-sized non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 101:1354–1360CrossRefPubMed Koike T, Kitahara A, Sato S et al (2016) Lobectomy versus segmentectomy in radiologically pure solid small-sized non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 101:1354–1360CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Cao C, Chandrakumar D, Gupta S et al (2015) Could less be more?—a systematic review and meta-analysis of sublobar resections versus lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer according to patient selection. Lung Cancer 89:121–132CrossRefPubMed Cao C, Chandrakumar D, Gupta S et al (2015) Could less be more?—a systematic review and meta-analysis of sublobar resections versus lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer according to patient selection. Lung Cancer 89:121–132CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Blasberg JD, Pass HI, Donington JS (2010) Sublobar resection: a movement from the Lung Cancer Study Group. J Thorac Oncol 5:1583–1593CrossRefPubMed Blasberg JD, Pass HI, Donington JS (2010) Sublobar resection: a movement from the Lung Cancer Study Group. J Thorac Oncol 5:1583–1593CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Nakamura K, Saji H, Nakajima R et al (2010) A phase III randomized trial of lobectomy versus limited resection for small-sized peripheral non-small cell lung cancer (JCOG0802/WJOG4607L). Jpn J Clin Oncol 40:271–274CrossRefPubMed Nakamura K, Saji H, Nakajima R et al (2010) A phase III randomized trial of lobectomy versus limited resection for small-sized peripheral non-small cell lung cancer (JCOG0802/WJOG4607L). Jpn J Clin Oncol 40:271–274CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Sawabata N, Ohta M, Matsumura A et al (2004) Optimal distance of malignant negative margin in excision of nonsmall cell lung cancer: a multicenter prospective study. Ann Thorac Surg 77:415–420CrossRefPubMed Sawabata N, Ohta M, Matsumura A et al (2004) Optimal distance of malignant negative margin in excision of nonsmall cell lung cancer: a multicenter prospective study. Ann Thorac Surg 77:415–420CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Travis WD, Brambilla E, Noguchi M et al (2011) International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society International multidisciplinary classification of lung adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Oncol 6:244–285CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Travis WD, Brambilla E, Noguchi M et al (2011) International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society International multidisciplinary classification of lung adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Oncol 6:244–285CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Goldstein NS, Ferkowicz M, Kestin L et al (2003) Wedge resection margin distances and residual adenocarcinoma in lobectomy specimens. Am J Clin Pathol 120:720–724CrossRefPubMed Goldstein NS, Ferkowicz M, Kestin L et al (2003) Wedge resection margin distances and residual adenocarcinoma in lobectomy specimens. Am J Clin Pathol 120:720–724CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Travis WD, Brambilla E, Nicholson AG et al (2015) The 2015 World Health Organization classification of lung tumors: impact of genetic, clinical and radiologic advances since the 2004 classification. J Thorac Oncol 10:1243–1260CrossRefPubMed Travis WD, Brambilla E, Nicholson AG et al (2015) The 2015 World Health Organization classification of lung tumors: impact of genetic, clinical and radiologic advances since the 2004 classification. J Thorac Oncol 10:1243–1260CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Taioli E, Yip R, Olkin I et al (2016) Survival after sublobar resection for early-stage lung cancer: methodological obstacles in comparing the efficacy to lobectomy. J Thorac Oncol 11:400–406CrossRefPubMed Taioli E, Yip R, Olkin I et al (2016) Survival after sublobar resection for early-stage lung cancer: methodological obstacles in comparing the efficacy to lobectomy. J Thorac Oncol 11:400–406CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Moon Y, Lee KY, Moon SW et al (2016) Sublobar resection margin width does not affect recurrence of clinical N0 non-small cell lung cancer presenting as GGO-predominant NODULE of 3 cm or less. World J Surg 41:472–479. doi:10.1007/s00268-016-3743-3 CrossRef Moon Y, Lee KY, Moon SW et al (2016) Sublobar resection margin width does not affect recurrence of clinical N0 non-small cell lung cancer presenting as GGO-predominant NODULE of 3 cm or less. World J Surg 41:472–479. doi:10.​1007/​s00268-016-3743-3 CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Moon Y, Sung SW, Lee KY et al (2016) Pure ground-glass opacity on chest computed tomography: predictive factors for invasive adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Dis 8:1561–1570CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Moon Y, Sung SW, Lee KY et al (2016) Pure ground-glass opacity on chest computed tomography: predictive factors for invasive adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Dis 8:1561–1570CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Wilshire CL, Louie BE, Manning KA et al (2015) Radiologic evaluation of small lepidic adenocarcinomas to guide decision making in surgical resection. Ann Thorac Surg 100:979–988CrossRefPubMed Wilshire CL, Louie BE, Manning KA et al (2015) Radiologic evaluation of small lepidic adenocarcinomas to guide decision making in surgical resection. Ann Thorac Surg 100:979–988CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Moon Y, Sung SW, Lee KY et al (2016) Clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of non-lepidic invasive adenocarcinoma presenting as ground glass opacity nodule. J Thorac Dis 8:2562–2570CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Moon Y, Sung SW, Lee KY et al (2016) Clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of non-lepidic invasive adenocarcinoma presenting as ground glass opacity nodule. J Thorac Dis 8:2562–2570CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Moon Y, Sung SW, Lee KY et al (2016) The importance of the lepidic component as a prognostic factor in stage I pulmonary adenocarcinoma. World J Surg Oncol 14:37CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Moon Y, Sung SW, Lee KY et al (2016) The importance of the lepidic component as a prognostic factor in stage I pulmonary adenocarcinoma. World J Surg Oncol 14:37CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Tremblay L, Deslauriers J (2013) What is the most practical, optimal, and cost effective method for performing follow-up after lung cancer surgery, and by whom should it be done? Thorac Surg Clin 23:429–436CrossRefPubMed Tremblay L, Deslauriers J (2013) What is the most practical, optimal, and cost effective method for performing follow-up after lung cancer surgery, and by whom should it be done? Thorac Surg Clin 23:429–436CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Kiankhooy A, Taylor MD, LaPar DJ et al (2014) Predictors of early recurrence for node-negative t1 to t2b non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 98:1175–1183CrossRefPubMed Kiankhooy A, Taylor MD, LaPar DJ et al (2014) Predictors of early recurrence for node-negative t1 to t2b non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 98:1175–1183CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Moon Y, Kim KS, Lee KY et al (2016) Clinicopathologic factors associated with occult lymph node metastasis in patients with clinically diagnosed N0 lung adenocarcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg 101:1928–1935CrossRefPubMed Moon Y, Kim KS, Lee KY et al (2016) Clinicopathologic factors associated with occult lymph node metastasis in patients with clinically diagnosed N0 lung adenocarcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg 101:1928–1935CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Hung JJ, Yeh YC, Jeng WJ et al (2014) Predictive value of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society classification of lung adenocarcinoma in tumor recurrence and patient survival. J Clin Oncol 32:2357–2364CrossRefPubMed Hung JJ, Yeh YC, Jeng WJ et al (2014) Predictive value of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society classification of lung adenocarcinoma in tumor recurrence and patient survival. J Clin Oncol 32:2357–2364CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Moon Y, Sung SW, Namkoong M et al (2016) The effectiveness of mediastinal lymph node evaluation in a patient with ground glass opacity tumor. J Thorac Dis 8:2617–2625CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Moon Y, Sung SW, Namkoong M et al (2016) The effectiveness of mediastinal lymph node evaluation in a patient with ground glass opacity tumor. J Thorac Dis 8:2617–2625CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Heineman DJ, Ten Berge MG, Daniels JM et al (2016) The quality of staging non-small cell lung cancer in the Netherlands: data from the Dutch lung surgery audit. Ann Thorac Surg 102:1622–1629CrossRefPubMed Heineman DJ, Ten Berge MG, Daniels JM et al (2016) The quality of staging non-small cell lung cancer in the Netherlands: data from the Dutch lung surgery audit. Ann Thorac Surg 102:1622–1629CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Ye B, Cheng M, Li W et al (2014) Predictive factors for lymph node metastasis in clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg 98:217–223CrossRefPubMed Ye B, Cheng M, Li W et al (2014) Predictive factors for lymph node metastasis in clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg 98:217–223CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Margin Width of Resected Lepidic Lung Cancer Does Not Affect Recurrence After Sublobar Resection
Authors
Youngkyu Moon
Kyo Young Lee
Jae Kil Park
Publication date
01-05-2018
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 5/2018
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4291-1

Other articles of this Issue 5/2018

World Journal of Surgery 5/2018 Go to the issue