Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 4/2017

01-04-2017 | Original Scientific Report

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Compliance with Guidelines of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in Elderly Patients Undergoing Gastrectomy

Authors: Oh Jeong, Young Kyu Park, Mi Ran Jung, Seong Yeob Ryu

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 4/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) aims at expediting postoperative recovery by implementing specific strategies in perioperative management. However, the tolerance to such fast-tracking protocols is under debate, especially in elderly patients. We aimed to investigate rate of compliance with the main ERAS guidelines in elderly gastrectomy patients.

Methods

Using data for 168 gastric cancer patients who underwent ERAS after gastrectomy as part of Clinical Trial NCT01653496, we calculated the rates of compliance with nine main ERAS guidelines and compared the compliance rates of elderly (≥70 years) and non-elderly (<70 years) patients. Surgical outcomes and fulfillment of criteria for postoperative discharge were also compared.

Results

The study included 55 elderly and 113 non-elderly patients. There were no significant differences between these groups of patients with respect to operative techniques and tumor stage. Except for restricted intravenous fluid administration, the patients in both groups showed very high compliance rates (>90%) for every ERAS guideline. Notably, the overall compliance rates did not differ significantly between the groups. Postoperatively, the mean time to fulfillment of discharge criteria was slightly longer for elderly patients (4.7 vs. 4.2 days, p = 0.005), but there were no significant differences between the groups with respect to the incidence of postoperative complications, length of hospitalization, and readmission rate.

Conclusion

Compliance of the medically and physically fit elderly patients with the main ERAS guidelines is comparable to that of non-elderly patients, and such protocols can be safely applied to elderly patients without significant modification.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Jeong O, Park YK (2011) Clinicopathological features and surgical treatment of gastric cancer in South Korea: the results of 2009 nationwide survey on surgically treated gastric cancer patients. J Gastric Cancer 11:69–77CrossRef Jeong O, Park YK (2011) Clinicopathological features and surgical treatment of gastric cancer in South Korea: the results of 2009 nationwide survey on surgically treated gastric cancer patients. J Gastric Cancer 11:69–77CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Turrentine FE, Wang H, Simpson VB et al (2006) Surgical risk factors, morbidity, and mortality in elderly patients. J Am Coll Surg 203:865–877CrossRef Turrentine FE, Wang H, Simpson VB et al (2006) Surgical risk factors, morbidity, and mortality in elderly patients. J Am Coll Surg 203:865–877CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Kehlet H, Wilmore DW (2008) Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery. Ann Surg 248:189–198CrossRef Kehlet H, Wilmore DW (2008) Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery. Ann Surg 248:189–198CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Paton F, Chambers D, Wilson P et al (2014) Effectiveness and implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery programmes: a rapid evidence synthesis. BMJ Open 4:e005015CrossRef Paton F, Chambers D, Wilson P et al (2014) Effectiveness and implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery programmes: a rapid evidence synthesis. BMJ Open 4:e005015CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Varadhan KK, Neal KR, Dejong CH et al (2010) The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing major elective open colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial. Clin Nutr 29:434–440CrossRef Varadhan KK, Neal KR, Dejong CH et al (2010) The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing major elective open colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial. Clin Nutr 29:434–440CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Feroci F, Lenzi E, Baraghini M et al (2013) Fast-track surgery in real life: how patient factors influence outcomes and compliance with an enhanced recovery clinical pathway after colorectal surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 23:259–265CrossRef Feroci F, Lenzi E, Baraghini M et al (2013) Fast-track surgery in real life: how patient factors influence outcomes and compliance with an enhanced recovery clinical pathway after colorectal surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 23:259–265CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Japanese Gastric Association (2011) Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3). Gastric Cancer 14:113–123CrossRef Japanese Gastric Association (2011) Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3). Gastric Cancer 14:113–123CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Jeong O, Ryu SY, Park YK (2016) Postoperative functional recovery after gastrectomy in patients undergoing enhanced recovery after surgery: a prospective assessment using standard discharge criteria. Medicine (Baltimore) 95:e3140CrossRef Jeong O, Ryu SY, Park YK (2016) Postoperative functional recovery after gastrectomy in patients undergoing enhanced recovery after surgery: a prospective assessment using standard discharge criteria. Medicine (Baltimore) 95:e3140CrossRef
9.
10.
go back to reference Gustafsson UO, Hausel J, Thorell A et al (2011) Adherence to the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol and outcomes after colorectal cancer surgery. Arch Surg 146:571–577CrossRef Gustafsson UO, Hausel J, Thorell A et al (2011) Adherence to the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol and outcomes after colorectal cancer surgery. Arch Surg 146:571–577CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Ahmed J, Khan S, Lim M et al (2012) Enhanced recovery after surgery protocols—compliance and variations in practice during routine colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 14:1045–1051CrossRef Ahmed J, Khan S, Lim M et al (2012) Enhanced recovery after surgery protocols—compliance and variations in practice during routine colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 14:1045–1051CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Nygren J, Hausel J, Kehlet H et al (2005) A comparison in five European Centres of case mix, clinical management and outcomes following either conventional or fast-track perioperative care in colorectal surgery. Clin Nutr 24:455–461CrossRef Nygren J, Hausel J, Kehlet H et al (2005) A comparison in five European Centres of case mix, clinical management and outcomes following either conventional or fast-track perioperative care in colorectal surgery. Clin Nutr 24:455–461CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Jeong O, Ryu SY, Jung MR et al (2014) The safety and feasibility of early postoperative oral nutrition on the first postoperative day after gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma. Gastric Cancer 17:324–331CrossRef Jeong O, Ryu SY, Jung MR et al (2014) The safety and feasibility of early postoperative oral nutrition on the first postoperative day after gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma. Gastric Cancer 17:324–331CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Mortensen K, Nilsson M, Slim K et al (2014) Consensus guidelines for enhanced recovery after gastrectomy: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) society recommendations. Br J Surg 101:1209–1229CrossRef Mortensen K, Nilsson M, Slim K et al (2014) Consensus guidelines for enhanced recovery after gastrectomy: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) society recommendations. Br J Surg 101:1209–1229CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Adamina M, Kehlet H, Tomlinson GA et al (2011) Enhanced recovery pathways optimize health outcomes and resource utilization: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in colorectal surgery. Surgery 149:830–840CrossRef Adamina M, Kehlet H, Tomlinson GA et al (2011) Enhanced recovery pathways optimize health outcomes and resource utilization: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in colorectal surgery. Surgery 149:830–840CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Eskicioglu C, Forbes SS, Aarts M-A et al (2009) Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs for patients having colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Gastrointest Surg 13:2321–2329CrossRef Eskicioglu C, Forbes SS, Aarts M-A et al (2009) Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs for patients having colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Gastrointest Surg 13:2321–2329CrossRef
Metadata
Title
RETRACTED ARTICLE: Compliance with Guidelines of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in Elderly Patients Undergoing Gastrectomy
Authors
Oh Jeong
Young Kyu Park
Mi Ran Jung
Seong Yeob Ryu
Publication date
01-04-2017
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 4/2017
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3845-y

Other articles of this Issue 4/2017

World Journal of Surgery 4/2017 Go to the issue

Innovative Surgical Techniques Around the World

Completely Thoracoscopic Diaphragmatic Plication