Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 3/2017

01-03-2017 | Original Scientific Report

Patients Undergoing Breast-Conserving Surgery Can Benefit from the Opportunity to Participate in Choosing Their Surgical Technique

Authors: Cecilia Dahlbäck, Jonas Manjer, Martin Rehn, Anita Ringberg

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 3/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Shared decision-making is increasingly advocated in many countries. The aims of this study were to investigate whether patients receiving breast-conserving surgery at Skåne University Hospital Malmö, Sweden, perceived an offered possibility to join in the decision-making process regarding the surgical method; to identify potential determinants for not having perceived such an offer; and to study how this perception of being offered an opportunity to take part in the decision-making process affected satisfaction with the aesthetic outcome.

Methods

Women offered breast-conserving surgery were consecutively recruited over a period of 4 years. In all, 324 women completed a study-specific questionnaire.

Results

A majority of the women (53 %) perceived that they had not, or had only partly, been offered a possibility to take part in the decision-making process. Patients who reported that they had received enough preoperative information regarding the expected aesthetic result were more likely to have perceived such an offer (odds ratio (OR) 5.44; confidence interval (CI) 2.83–10.43). Women who had perceived an opportunity to be involved were more satisfied with the aesthetic result (OR 2.71; CI 1.18–6.25) and more likely to have had their expectations met regarding the aesthetic result (OR 5.91; CI 2.01–17.38).

Conclusion

When deciding on a suitable surgical approach for women with early breast cancer, physicians could try to more clearly communicate to the women that they can choose whether or not to participate in the decision-making regarding surgical technique. This might improve satisfaction. An important part of patient involvement is sufficient preoperative information.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J et al (2002) Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347:1233–1241CrossRefPubMed Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J et al (2002) Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347:1233–1241CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L et al (2002) Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347:1227–1232CrossRefPubMed Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L et al (2002) Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347:1227–1232CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Hansson E, Manjer J, Ringberg A (2014) Reliability of plastic cups to measure breast volume. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 48:254–258CrossRefPubMed Hansson E, Manjer J, Ringberg A (2014) Reliability of plastic cups to measure breast volume. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 48:254–258CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Strombeck JO, Malm M (1986) Priority grouping in a waiting list of patients for reduction mammaplasty. Ann Plast Surg 17:498–502CrossRefPubMed Strombeck JO, Malm M (1986) Priority grouping in a waiting list of patients for reduction mammaplasty. Ann Plast Surg 17:498–502CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Galimberti V, Zurrida S, Zanini V et al (1993) Central small size breast cancer: how to overcome the problem of nipple and areola involvement. Eur J Cancer 29A:1093–1096CrossRefPubMed Galimberti V, Zurrida S, Zanini V et al (1993) Central small size breast cancer: how to overcome the problem of nipple and areola involvement. Eur J Cancer 29A:1093–1096CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference McCulley SJ, Macmillan RD (2005) Planning and use of therapeutic mammoplasty—Nottingham approach. Br J Plast Surg 58:889–901CrossRefPubMed McCulley SJ, Macmillan RD (2005) Planning and use of therapeutic mammoplasty—Nottingham approach. Br J Plast Surg 58:889–901CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Cochrane RA, Valasiadou P, Wilson AR et al (2003) Cosmesis and satisfaction after breast-conserving surgery correlates with the percentage of breast volume excised. Br J Surg 90:1505–1509CrossRefPubMed Cochrane RA, Valasiadou P, Wilson AR et al (2003) Cosmesis and satisfaction after breast-conserving surgery correlates with the percentage of breast volume excised. Br J Surg 90:1505–1509CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Socialstyrelsen Nationella riktlinjer för bröstcancersjukvård (2007), pp. 20–27 Socialstyrelsen Nationella riktlinjer för bröstcancersjukvård (2007), pp. 20–27
10.
go back to reference Hawley ST, Lantz PM, Janz NK et al (2007) Factors associated with patient involvement in surgical treatment decision making for breast cancer. Patient Educ Couns 65:387–395CrossRefPubMed Hawley ST, Lantz PM, Janz NK et al (2007) Factors associated with patient involvement in surgical treatment decision making for breast cancer. Patient Educ Couns 65:387–395CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Keating NL, Guadagnoli E, Landrum MB et al (2002) Treatment decision making in early-stage breast cancer: Should surgeons match patients’ desired level of involvement? J Clin Oncol 20:1473–1479CrossRefPubMed Keating NL, Guadagnoli E, Landrum MB et al (2002) Treatment decision making in early-stage breast cancer: Should surgeons match patients’ desired level of involvement? J Clin Oncol 20:1473–1479CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Lantz PM, Janz NK, Fagerlin A et al (2005) Satisfaction with surgery outcomes and the decision process in a population-based sample of women with breast cancer. Health Serv Res 40:745–767CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lantz PM, Janz NK, Fagerlin A et al (2005) Satisfaction with surgery outcomes and the decision process in a population-based sample of women with breast cancer. Health Serv Res 40:745–767CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Wallberg B, Michelson H, Nystedt M et al (2000) Information needs and preferences for participation in treatment decisions among Swedish breast cancer patients. Acta Oncol 39:467–476CrossRefPubMed Wallberg B, Michelson H, Nystedt M et al (2000) Information needs and preferences for participation in treatment decisions among Swedish breast cancer patients. Acta Oncol 39:467–476CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Arora NK, McHorney CA (2000) Patient preferences for medical decision making: Who really wants to participate? Med Care 38:335–341CrossRefPubMed Arora NK, McHorney CA (2000) Patient preferences for medical decision making: Who really wants to participate? Med Care 38:335–341CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Ende J, Kazis L, Ash A et al (1989) Measuring patients’ desire for autonomy: decision making and information-seeking preferences among medical patients. J Gen Intern Med 4:23–30CrossRefPubMed Ende J, Kazis L, Ash A et al (1989) Measuring patients’ desire for autonomy: decision making and information-seeking preferences among medical patients. J Gen Intern Med 4:23–30CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Levinson W, Kao A, Kuby A et al (2005) Not all patients want to participate in decision making. A national study of public preferences. J Gen Intern Med 20:531–535CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Levinson W, Kao A, Kuby A et al (2005) Not all patients want to participate in decision making. A national study of public preferences. J Gen Intern Med 20:531–535CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Bleicher RJ, Abrahamse P, Hawley ST et al (2008) The influence of age on the breast surgery decision-making process. Ann Surg Oncol 15:854–862CrossRefPubMed Bleicher RJ, Abrahamse P, Hawley ST et al (2008) The influence of age on the breast surgery decision-making process. Ann Surg Oncol 15:854–862CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Degner LF, Sloan JA (1992) Decision making during serious illness: What role do patients really want to play? J Clin Epidemiol 45:941–950CrossRefPubMed Degner LF, Sloan JA (1992) Decision making during serious illness: What role do patients really want to play? J Clin Epidemiol 45:941–950CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Schou I, Ekeberg O, Ruland CM et al (2002) Do women newly diagnosed with breast cancer and consulting surgeon assess decision-making equally? Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) 11:434–441CrossRef Schou I, Ekeberg O, Ruland CM et al (2002) Do women newly diagnosed with breast cancer and consulting surgeon assess decision-making equally? Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) 11:434–441CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Katz SJ, Lantz PM, Janz NK et al (2005) Patient involvement in surgery treatment decisions for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:5526–5533CrossRefPubMed Katz SJ, Lantz PM, Janz NK et al (2005) Patient involvement in surgery treatment decisions for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:5526–5533CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Collins ED, Moore CP, Clay KF et al (2009) Can women with early-stage breast cancer make an informed decision for mastectomy? J Clin Oncol 27:519–525CrossRefPubMed Collins ED, Moore CP, Clay KF et al (2009) Can women with early-stage breast cancer make an informed decision for mastectomy? J Clin Oncol 27:519–525CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Fallowfield LJ, Hall A, Maguire GP et al (1990) Psychological outcomes of different treatment policies in women with early breast cancer outside a clinical trial. BMJ 301:575–580 (Clinical researched) CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fallowfield LJ, Hall A, Maguire GP et al (1990) Psychological outcomes of different treatment policies in women with early breast cancer outside a clinical trial. BMJ 301:575–580 (Clinical researched) CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Patients Undergoing Breast-Conserving Surgery Can Benefit from the Opportunity to Participate in Choosing Their Surgical Technique
Authors
Cecilia Dahlbäck
Jonas Manjer
Martin Rehn
Anita Ringberg
Publication date
01-03-2017
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 3/2017
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3768-7

Other articles of this Issue 3/2017

World Journal of Surgery 3/2017 Go to the issue