Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 8/2015

01-08-2015 | Original Scientific Report

Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Resection in High-Volume Surgical Centers: Long-Term Outcomes from the LAPCOLON Group Trial

Authors: Cristiano G. S. Huscher, Frederic Bretagnol, Francesco Corcione

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 8/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Strong evidence has confirmed the benefit of laparoscopy in colorectal cancer resection but remains a challenging procedure. It is not clear that such promising results in selected patients translate into a favorable risk–benefit balance in real practice. We conducted a multicenter national observational registry to assess operative and oncologic long-term outcomes following laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection.

Methods

All patients with laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection between 2001 and 2004 were included. Data were extracted from the prospective Italian national database of 10 high-volume centers (≥40 colorectal cancer laparoscopic resections per year). Surgical technique and follow-up were standardized. Survivals were analyzed by Kaplan–Meier method.

Results

We reported 1832 patients with colon (58.5 %) and rectal cancer (41.5 %). TNM stage was 0–I–II in 1044 patients (57 %) and III–IV in 788 patients (43 %). Surgery included a totally laparoscopic procedure in 1820 patients (99.3 %). Conversion was 10.5 %. Postoperative morbidity and 30-day mortality rates were 17 and 1.2 %, respectively. Clinical anastomotic leakage rate was 8.3 % (n = 152). R0 resection was 95 %. With a median follow-up of 54.2 months, cancer recurrence rate was 13.3 %. At 5 years, cancer-free survival was 86.7 %. Upon multivariate analysis, age (P = 0.001) and TNM stage (P < 0.001) were associated with cancer-free survival. Predictive factors of cancer recurrence were gender (P = 0.029) and TNM stage (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

In high-volume centers and non-selective patients, laparoscopic colorectal resection for cancer achieves good operative results with satisfactory long-term oncologic results. Even in the laparoscopy era, age, gender, and TNM stage remain the most powerful predictor of oncologic outcomes.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Wilkinson N, Scott-Coner CE (2008) Surgical therapy for colorectal adenocarcinoma. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 371:253–267CrossRef Wilkinson N, Scott-Coner CE (2008) Surgical therapy for colorectal adenocarcinoma. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 371:253–267CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Martel G, Boushey RP (2006) Laparoscopic colon surgery: past, present, future. Surg Clin North Am 86:867–897PubMedCrossRef Martel G, Boushey RP (2006) Laparoscopic colon surgery: past, present, future. Surg Clin North Am 86:867–897PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Abraham NS, Young JM, Solomon MJ (2004) Meta-analysis of short term outcomes after laparoscopic colorectal resection for cancer. Br J Surg 91:1111–1124PubMedCrossRef Abraham NS, Young JM, Solomon MJ (2004) Meta-analysis of short term outcomes after laparoscopic colorectal resection for cancer. Br J Surg 91:1111–1124PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Buunen M, Veldkamp R, Hop WC et al (2009) Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncol 10:44–52PubMedCrossRef Buunen M, Veldkamp R, Hop WC et al (2009) Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncol 10:44–52PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Jayne DG, Thorpe HC, Copeland J et al (2010) Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparospically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 97:1638–1645PubMedCrossRef Jayne DG, Thorpe HC, Copeland J et al (2010) Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparospically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 97:1638–1645PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Braga M, Frasson M, Zuliani W et al (2010) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open left colonic surgery. Br J Surg 97:1180–1186PubMedCrossRef Braga M, Frasson M, Zuliani W et al (2010) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open left colonic surgery. Br J Surg 97:1180–1186PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Garlipp B, Ptok H, Schmidt U et al (2012) Factors influencing the quality of total mesorectal excision. Br J Surg 99:714–720PubMedCrossRef Garlipp B, Ptok H, Schmidt U et al (2012) Factors influencing the quality of total mesorectal excision. Br J Surg 99:714–720PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H et al (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial):multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726PubMedCrossRef Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H et al (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial):multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H et al (2007) Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol 25:3061–3068PubMedCrossRef Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H et al (2007) Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol 25:3061–3068PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Hohenberger W, Merkel S, Hermanek P (2013) Volume and outcome in rectal cancer surgery: the importance of quality management. Int J Colorectal Dis 28:197–206PubMedCrossRef Hohenberger W, Merkel S, Hermanek P (2013) Volume and outcome in rectal cancer surgery: the importance of quality management. Int J Colorectal Dis 28:197–206PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Berends FJ, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ et al (1994) Subcutaneous metastases after laparoscopic colectomy. Lancet 344:58PubMedCrossRef Berends FJ, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ et al (1994) Subcutaneous metastases after laparoscopic colectomy. Lancet 344:58PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Lujan J, Valero G, Hernandez Q et al (2009) Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery in patients with rectal cancer. Br J Surg 96:982–989PubMedCrossRef Lujan J, Valero G, Hernandez Q et al (2009) Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery in patients with rectal cancer. Br J Surg 96:982–989PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA et al (2013) Colorectal cancer laparoscopic or open resection II (COLOR II) study group. laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 14:210–218PubMedCrossRef Van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA et al (2013) Colorectal cancer laparoscopic or open resection II (COLOR II) study group. laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 14:210–218PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Ohtani H, Tamamori Y, Azuma T et al (2011) A meta-analysis of the short- and long-term results of randomized controlled trials that compared laparoscopy-assisted and conventional open surgery for rectal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 15:1375–1385PubMedCrossRef Ohtani H, Tamamori Y, Azuma T et al (2011) A meta-analysis of the short- and long-term results of randomized controlled trials that compared laparoscopy-assisted and conventional open surgery for rectal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 15:1375–1385PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Panis Y, Maggiori L, Caranhac G et al (2011) Mortality after colorectal cancer surgery: a French survey of more than 84,000 patients. Ann Surg 254:738–743PubMedCrossRef Panis Y, Maggiori L, Caranhac G et al (2011) Mortality after colorectal cancer surgery: a French survey of more than 84,000 patients. Ann Surg 254:738–743PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Bege T, Lelong B, Esterni B et al (2010) The learning curve for the laparoscopic approach to conservative mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: lessons drawn from a single institution’s experience. Ann Surg 51:249–253CrossRef Bege T, Lelong B, Esterni B et al (2010) The learning curve for the laparoscopic approach to conservative mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: lessons drawn from a single institution’s experience. Ann Surg 51:249–253CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Laparoscopic versus open surgery for the treatment of colorectal cancer: a literature review and recommendations from the Comite de l’Evolution des Pratiques en Oncologie (2013). Can J Surg 56:297–310 Laparoscopic versus open surgery for the treatment of colorectal cancer: a literature review and recommendations from the Comite de l’Evolution des Pratiques en Oncologie (2013). Can J Surg 56:297–310
18.
go back to reference Prakash K, Kamalesh NP, Pramil K et al (2013) Does case selection and outcome following laparoscopic colorectal resection change after initial learning curve? Analysis of 235 consecutive elective laparoscopic colorectal resections. J Minim Access Surg. 9:99–103PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Prakash K, Kamalesh NP, Pramil K et al (2013) Does case selection and outcome following laparoscopic colorectal resection change after initial learning curve? Analysis of 235 consecutive elective laparoscopic colorectal resections. J Minim Access Surg. 9:99–103PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Dincler S, Koller MT, Steurer J et al (2003) Multidimensional analysis of learning curves in laparoscopic sigmoid resection: eight-year results. Dis Colon Rectum 46:1371–1378PubMedCrossRef Dincler S, Koller MT, Steurer J et al (2003) Multidimensional analysis of learning curves in laparoscopic sigmoid resection: eight-year results. Dis Colon Rectum 46:1371–1378PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Park IJ, Choi GS, Lim KH et al (2009) Multidimensional analysis of the learning curve for laparoscopic resection in rectal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 13:275–281PubMedCrossRef Park IJ, Choi GS, Lim KH et al (2009) Multidimensional analysis of the learning curve for laparoscopic resection in rectal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 13:275–281PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Ito M, Sugito M, Kobayashi A et al (2009) Influence of learning curve on short-term results after laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 23:403–408PubMedCrossRef Ito M, Sugito M, Kobayashi A et al (2009) Influence of learning curve on short-term results after laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 23:403–408PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RD (1982) The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery. The clue to pelvic recurrence ? Br J Surg 69:613–616PubMedCrossRef Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RD (1982) The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery. The clue to pelvic recurrence ? Br J Surg 69:613–616PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Rullier E, Denost Q, Vendrely V et al (2013) Low rectal cancer: Classification and standardization for surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 56:560–567PubMedCrossRef Rullier E, Denost Q, Vendrely V et al (2013) Low rectal cancer: Classification and standardization for surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 56:560–567PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Compton CC. Colorectal cancer. In: Gospodarowicz MK, O’Sullivan B, Sobin LH (eds) UICC (2006). Prognostic factors in cancer, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York, p 133–137 Compton CC. Colorectal cancer. In: Gospodarowicz MK, O’Sullivan B, Sobin LH (eds) UICC (2006). Prognostic factors in cancer, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York, p 133–137
25.
go back to reference Siegel EM, Jacobsen PB, Malafa M et al (2012) Evaluating the quality of colorectal cancer care in the state of Florida: results from the Florida initiative for quality cancer care. J Oncol Pract. 8:239–245PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Siegel EM, Jacobsen PB, Malafa M et al (2012) Evaluating the quality of colorectal cancer care in the state of Florida: results from the Florida initiative for quality cancer care. J Oncol Pract. 8:239–245PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Resection in High-Volume Surgical Centers: Long-Term Outcomes from the LAPCOLON Group Trial
Authors
Cristiano G. S. Huscher
Frederic Bretagnol
Francesco Corcione
Publication date
01-08-2015
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 8/2015
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-3050-4

Other articles of this Issue 8/2015

World Journal of Surgery 8/2015 Go to the issue