Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 5/2015

01-05-2015 | Original Scientific Report

Clinicopathological Significance of Mucin Production in Patients with Papillary Cholangiocarcinoma

Authors: Shunsuke Onoe, Yoshie Shimoyama, Tomoki Ebata, Yukihiro Yokoyama, Tsuyoshi Igami, Gen Sugawara, Takashi Mizuno, Shigeo Nakamura, Masato Nagino

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 5/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The clinicopathologic significance of mucin production in patients with papillary cholangiocarcinoma (PCC) is still controversial. We aimed at clarifying the similarities and differences between PCC cases with and without mucin secretion with regard to biological behavior and clinical course.

Methods

Among 644 patients with surgically resected cholangiocarcinoma (1998–2011), 184 (28 %) patients were considered to have PCC and were enrolled in the study. Those patients were divided into two groups based on whether their PCC was mucin-producing (PCC-M, n = 89) or not (PCC-NM, n = 95). The presence of mucin secretion was determined by the cut surface of the specimens and by pathologic examination.

Results

The clinicopathological features of PCC-M and PCC-NM largely overlapped. No significant between-group differences in malignant potential characteristics, including the depth of invasion, pathological T classification, and regional/periaortic lymph node metastasis, were observed (P = 0.193, 0.181, 0.083, and 0.674, respectively). However, a few clinicopathological differences existed between the two PCC types, i.e., the predominant histological type and epithelial subtype (P < 0.001 and P = 0.016, respectively). Immunohistochemically, MUC2, MUC5AC, MUC6, and HGM were more frequently expressed in PCC-M than PCC-NM (P < 0.002 in all). The disease-specific survival values were not significantly different between the two PCC types (PCC-M; 60 % at 5 year, PCC-NM; 46 %, P = 0.097).

Conclusion

PCC-M and PCC-NM were similar in morphology and prognosis. Although a few clinicopathological differences exist between them, their overlapping features and identical survival curves appear to justify the lack of a specific treatment modality for either type.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Shibahara H, Tamada S, Goto M et al (2004) Pathologic features of mucin-producing bile duct tumors: two histopathologic categories as counterparts of pancreatic intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasms. Am J Surg Pathol 28:327–338CrossRefPubMed Shibahara H, Tamada S, Goto M et al (2004) Pathologic features of mucin-producing bile duct tumors: two histopathologic categories as counterparts of pancreatic intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasms. Am J Surg Pathol 28:327–338CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Sakamoto E, Hayakawa N, Kamiya J et al (1999) Treatment strategy for mucin-producing intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: value of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage and cholangioscopy. World J Surg 23:1038–1043. doi:10.1007/s002689900620 CrossRefPubMed Sakamoto E, Hayakawa N, Kamiya J et al (1999) Treatment strategy for mucin-producing intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: value of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage and cholangioscopy. World J Surg 23:1038–1043. doi:10.​1007/​s002689900620 CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Chen MF, Jan YY, Chen TC (1998) Clinical studies of mucin-producing cholangiocellular carcinoma: a study of 22 histopathology-proven cases. Ann Surg 227:63–69CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Chen MF, Jan YY, Chen TC (1998) Clinical studies of mucin-producing cholangiocellular carcinoma: a study of 22 histopathology-proven cases. Ann Surg 227:63–69CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
4.
go back to reference Sakamoto E, Nimura Y, Hayakawa N et al (1997) Clinicopathological studies of mucin-producing cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepato Biliary Pancreat Surg 2:157–162CrossRef Sakamoto E, Nimura Y, Hayakawa N et al (1997) Clinicopathological studies of mucin-producing cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepato Biliary Pancreat Surg 2:157–162CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Lee SS, Kim MH, Lee SK et al (2004) Clinicopathologic review of 58 patients with biliary papillomatosis. Cancer 100:783–793CrossRefPubMed Lee SS, Kim MH, Lee SK et al (2004) Clinicopathologic review of 58 patients with biliary papillomatosis. Cancer 100:783–793CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Onoe S, Shimoyama Y, Ebata T et al (2014) Prognostic delineation of papillary cholangiocarcinoma based on the invasive proportion: a single-institution study with 184 patients. Surgery 155:280–291CrossRefPubMed Onoe S, Shimoyama Y, Ebata T et al (2014) Prognostic delineation of papillary cholangiocarcinoma based on the invasive proportion: a single-institution study with 184 patients. Surgery 155:280–291CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Jarnagin WR, Bowne W, Klimstra DS et al (2005) Papillary phenotype confers improved survival after resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg 241:703–714CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Jarnagin WR, Bowne W, Klimstra DS et al (2005) Papillary phenotype confers improved survival after resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg 241:703–714CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
8.
go back to reference Ohtsuka M, Kimura F, Shimizu H et al (2011) Similarities and differences between intraductal papillary tumors of the bile duct with and without macroscopically visible mucin secretion. Am J Surg Pathol 35:512–521CrossRefPubMed Ohtsuka M, Kimura F, Shimizu H et al (2011) Similarities and differences between intraductal papillary tumors of the bile duct with and without macroscopically visible mucin secretion. Am J Surg Pathol 35:512–521CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Ebata T, Kamiya J, Nishio H et al (2009) The concept of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma is valid. Br J Surg 96:926–934CrossRefPubMed Ebata T, Kamiya J, Nishio H et al (2009) The concept of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma is valid. Br J Surg 96:926–934CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Ebata T, Kosuge T, Hirano S et al (2014) Proposal to modify the International Union Against Cancer staging system for perihilar cholangiocarcinomas. Br J Surg 101:79–88CrossRefPubMed Ebata T, Kosuge T, Hirano S et al (2014) Proposal to modify the International Union Against Cancer staging system for perihilar cholangiocarcinomas. Br J Surg 101:79–88CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference International Union Against Cancer (UICC) (2009) In: Sobin LH, Gospodarwicz MK, Wittekind C (eds) TNM classification of malignant tumours. Blackwell, Oxford International Union Against Cancer (UICC) (2009) In: Sobin LH, Gospodarwicz MK, Wittekind C (eds) TNM classification of malignant tumours. Blackwell, Oxford
12.
go back to reference Bosman FT, World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer (2010) WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon Bosman FT, World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer (2010) WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon
13.
go back to reference Zen Y, Fujii T, Itatsu K et al (2006) Biliary papillary tumors share pathological features with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas. Hepatology 44:1333–1343CrossRefPubMed Zen Y, Fujii T, Itatsu K et al (2006) Biliary papillary tumors share pathological features with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas. Hepatology 44:1333–1343CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Rocha FG, Lee H, Katabi N et al (2012) Intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct: a biliary equivalent to intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas? Hepatology 56:1352–1360CrossRefPubMed Rocha FG, Lee H, Katabi N et al (2012) Intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct: a biliary equivalent to intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas? Hepatology 56:1352–1360CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Jung G, Park KM, Lee SS et al (2012) Long-term clinical outcome of the surgically resected intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct. J Hepatol 57:787–793CrossRefPubMed Jung G, Park KM, Lee SS et al (2012) Long-term clinical outcome of the surgically resected intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct. J Hepatol 57:787–793CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Nakanuma Y, Zen Y, Harada K et al (2010) Tumorigenesis and phenotypic characteristics of mucin-producing bile duct tumors: an immunohistochemical approach. J Hepato-Biliary-Pancreat Sci 17:211–222CrossRef Nakanuma Y, Zen Y, Harada K et al (2010) Tumorigenesis and phenotypic characteristics of mucin-producing bile duct tumors: an immunohistochemical approach. J Hepato-Biliary-Pancreat Sci 17:211–222CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Igami T, Nagino M, Oda K et al (2009) Clinicopathologic study of cholangiocarcinoma with superficial spread. Ann Surg 249:296–302CrossRefPubMed Igami T, Nagino M, Oda K et al (2009) Clinicopathologic study of cholangiocarcinoma with superficial spread. Ann Surg 249:296–302CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Ebata T, Watanabe H, Ajioka Y et al (2002) Pathological appraisal of lines of resection for bile duct carcinoma. Br J Surg 89:1260–1267CrossRefPubMed Ebata T, Watanabe H, Ajioka Y et al (2002) Pathological appraisal of lines of resection for bile duct carcinoma. Br J Surg 89:1260–1267CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Sakamoto E, Nimura Y, Hayakawa N et al (1998) The pattern of infiltration at the proximal border of hilar bile duct carcinoma: a histologic analysis of 62 resected cases. Ann Surg 227:405–411CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Sakamoto E, Nimura Y, Hayakawa N et al (1998) The pattern of infiltration at the proximal border of hilar bile duct carcinoma: a histologic analysis of 62 resected cases. Ann Surg 227:405–411CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
20.
go back to reference Wakai T, Shirai Y, Moroda T et al (2005) Impact of ductal resection margin status on long-term survival in patients undergoing resection for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Cancer 103:1210–1216CrossRefPubMed Wakai T, Shirai Y, Moroda T et al (2005) Impact of ductal resection margin status on long-term survival in patients undergoing resection for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Cancer 103:1210–1216CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Yang J, Wang W, Yan L (2012) The clinicopathological features of intraductal papillary neoplasms of the bile duct in a Chinese population. Dig Liver Dis 44:251–256CrossRefPubMed Yang J, Wang W, Yan L (2012) The clinicopathological features of intraductal papillary neoplasms of the bile duct in a Chinese population. Dig Liver Dis 44:251–256CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Choi SC, Lee JK, Jung JH et al (2010) The clinicopathological features of biliary intraductal papillary neoplasms according to the location of tumors. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 25:725–730CrossRefPubMed Choi SC, Lee JK, Jung JH et al (2010) The clinicopathological features of biliary intraductal papillary neoplasms according to the location of tumors. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 25:725–730CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Shoda J, Tanaka N, Osuga T (2003) Hepatolithiasis–epidemiology and pathogenesis update. Front Biosci 8:e398–e409CrossRefPubMed Shoda J, Tanaka N, Osuga T (2003) Hepatolithiasis–epidemiology and pathogenesis update. Front Biosci 8:e398–e409CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Kim KM, Lee JK, Shin JU et al (2012) Clinicopathologic features of intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct according to histologic subtype. Am J Gastroenterol 107:118–125CrossRefPubMed Kim KM, Lee JK, Shin JU et al (2012) Clinicopathologic features of intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct according to histologic subtype. Am J Gastroenterol 107:118–125CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Sasaki M, Matsubara T, Yoneda N et al (2013) Overexpression of enhancer of zeste homolog 2 and MUC1 may be related to malignant behaviour in intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct. Histopathology 62:446–457CrossRefPubMed Sasaki M, Matsubara T, Yoneda N et al (2013) Overexpression of enhancer of zeste homolog 2 and MUC1 may be related to malignant behaviour in intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct. Histopathology 62:446–457CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Nagino M (2012) Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a surgeon’s viewpoint on current topics. J Gastroenterol 47:1165–1176CrossRefPubMed Nagino M (2012) Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a surgeon’s viewpoint on current topics. J Gastroenterol 47:1165–1176CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Hirano S, Tanaka E, Tsuchikawa T et al (2014) Oncological benefit of preoperative endoscopic biliary drainage in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepato-Biliary-Pancreat Sci 21:533–540CrossRef Hirano S, Tanaka E, Tsuchikawa T et al (2014) Oncological benefit of preoperative endoscopic biliary drainage in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepato-Biliary-Pancreat Sci 21:533–540CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Takahashi Y, Nagino M, Nishio H et al (2010) Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage catheter tract recurrence in cholangiocarcinoma. Br J Surg 97:1860–1866CrossRefPubMed Takahashi Y, Nagino M, Nishio H et al (2010) Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage catheter tract recurrence in cholangiocarcinoma. Br J Surg 97:1860–1866CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Clinicopathological Significance of Mucin Production in Patients with Papillary Cholangiocarcinoma
Authors
Shunsuke Onoe
Yoshie Shimoyama
Tomoki Ebata
Yukihiro Yokoyama
Tsuyoshi Igami
Gen Sugawara
Takashi Mizuno
Shigeo Nakamura
Masato Nagino
Publication date
01-05-2015
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 5/2015
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2923-2

Other articles of this Issue 5/2015

World Journal of Surgery 5/2015 Go to the issue