Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 8/2014

01-08-2014

Patients Recovering From Abdominal Surgery Who Walked With Volunteers Had Improved Postoperative Recovery Profiles during Their Hospitalization

Authors: Hai Le, Pouya Khankhanian, Neha Joshi, John Maa, Henry Crevensten

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 8/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Early walking as part of a perioperative care program benefits patients who have had surgery. However, the impact of early walking by itself on the mental and physical recovery of postoperative patients has not been examined.

Methods

We established a program called walking to recovery (WTR) in which college volunteers provided walking assistance to patients recovering after abdominal surgery. Patients who participated in the program were compared with patients who did not. The postoperative recovery profile survey (PRP-17) was administered on day of discharge to 15 participants and 15 non-participants. Medical records were reviewed to obtain indication for surgery, type of surgery, length of hospital stay, and postoperative complications. At 1 month post-discharge, a short form (SF)-12v2 questionnaire was administered by telephone to assess postoperative quality of life as defined by mental and physical level of function and measured with the mental component score (MCS) and the physical component score (PCS).

Results

The average age of participants and non-participants was similar (48.9 ± 9.8 vs. 51.4 ± 8.7 years; p = 0.28). When the two groups were approximately matched by type and severity of surgery, participants had lower PRP-17 composite scores (9.9 vs. 12.5, p = 0.003) and higher indicator sums (9.8 vs. 8.4, p = 0.04) than non-participants, both of which indicate better postoperative recovery in participants. The mean immobilization score was significantly lower in participants (0.3 vs. 0.8, p = 0.04). Postoperative length of stay and MCS did not differ between the two groups, but in participants there was a trend for higher scores in the PCS.

Conclusions

Walking with volunteers was associated with a better PRP during the hospitalization period but not at 1 month follow-up. The WTR program is a sustainable, cost-effective model program for other hospitals to emulate as part of the standard of care of postoperative patients.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Smetana GW (2009) Postoperative pulmonary complications: an update on risk assessment and reduction. Cleve Clin J Med 76:S60–S65PubMedCrossRef Smetana GW (2009) Postoperative pulmonary complications: an update on risk assessment and reduction. Cleve Clin J Med 76:S60–S65PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Varadhan KK, Lobo DN, Ljungqvist O (2010) Enhanced recovery after surgery: the future of improving surgical care. Crit Care Clin 26:527–547PubMedCrossRef Varadhan KK, Lobo DN, Ljungqvist O (2010) Enhanced recovery after surgery: the future of improving surgical care. Crit Care Clin 26:527–547PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Varadhan KK, Neal KR, Dejong CHC, Fearon KCH, Ljungqvist O, Lobo DN (2010) The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing major elective open colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Nutr 29:434–440PubMedCrossRef Varadhan KK, Neal KR, Dejong CHC, Fearon KCH, Ljungqvist O, Lobo DN (2010) The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing major elective open colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Nutr 29:434–440PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Spanjersberg WR, Reurings J, Keus F, van Laarhoven CJHM (2011) Fast track surgery versus conventional recovery strategies for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 16(2):CD007635 Spanjersberg WR, Reurings J, Keus F, van Laarhoven CJHM (2011) Fast track surgery versus conventional recovery strategies for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 16(2):CD007635
6.
go back to reference Bradshaw BGG, Liu SS, Thirlby RC (1998) Standard perioperative care protocols and reduced length of stay after colon surgery. J Am Coll Surg 186:501–506PubMedCrossRef Bradshaw BGG, Liu SS, Thirlby RC (1998) Standard perioperative care protocols and reduced length of stay after colon surgery. J Am Coll Surg 186:501–506PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kariv Y, Delaney CP, Senagore AJ, Manilich EA, Hammel JP, Church JM, Ravas J, Fazio VW (2006) Clinical outcomes and cost analysis of a “fast track” postoperative care pathway for ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: a case control study. Dis Colon Rectum 50:137–146CrossRef Kariv Y, Delaney CP, Senagore AJ, Manilich EA, Hammel JP, Church JM, Ravas J, Fazio VW (2006) Clinical outcomes and cost analysis of a “fast track” postoperative care pathway for ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: a case control study. Dis Colon Rectum 50:137–146CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Wichmann MW, Eben R, Angele MK, Brandenburg F, Goetz AE, Jauch KW (2007) Fast-track rehabilitation in elective colorectal surgery patients: a prospective clinical and immunological single-centre study. ANZ J Surg 77:502–507PubMedCrossRef Wichmann MW, Eben R, Angele MK, Brandenburg F, Goetz AE, Jauch KW (2007) Fast-track rehabilitation in elective colorectal surgery patients: a prospective clinical and immunological single-centre study. ANZ J Surg 77:502–507PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Muller S, Zalunardo MP, Hubner M, Clavien PA, Demartines N (2009) A fast-track program reduces complications and length of hospital stay after open colonic surgery. Gastroenterology 136:842–847PubMedCrossRef Muller S, Zalunardo MP, Hubner M, Clavien PA, Demartines N (2009) A fast-track program reduces complications and length of hospital stay after open colonic surgery. Gastroenterology 136:842–847PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kibler VA, Hayes RM, Johnson DE, Anderson LW, Just SL, Wells NL (2012) Early postoperative ambulation: Back to basics. Am J Nurs 112:63–69PubMedCrossRef Kibler VA, Hayes RM, Johnson DE, Anderson LW, Just SL, Wells NL (2012) Early postoperative ambulation: Back to basics. Am J Nurs 112:63–69PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Allvin R, Svensson E, Rawal N, Ehnfors M, Kling AM, Idvall E (2011) The postoperative recovery profile (PRP): a multidimensional questionnaire for evaluation of recovery profiles. J Eval Clin Pract 17:236–243PubMedCrossRef Allvin R, Svensson E, Rawal N, Ehnfors M, Kling AM, Idvall E (2011) The postoperative recovery profile (PRP): a multidimensional questionnaire for evaluation of recovery profiles. J Eval Clin Pract 17:236–243PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD (1996) A 12-item short-form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 34:220–233PubMedCrossRef Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD (1996) A 12-item short-form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 34:220–233PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Burdine JN, Felix MRJ, Abel AL, Wiltraut CJ, Musselman YJ (2000) The SF-12 as a population health measure: an exploratory examination of potential for application. Health Serv Res 35:885–904PubMedCentralPubMed Burdine JN, Felix MRJ, Abel AL, Wiltraut CJ, Musselman YJ (2000) The SF-12 as a population health measure: an exploratory examination of potential for application. Health Serv Res 35:885–904PubMedCentralPubMed
15.
go back to reference Bureau of Surveillance and Analysis (2001) Health status in Utah: the Medical Outcomes Study SF-12 (2001 Utah Health Status Survey Report). Utah Department of Health, Salt Lake City (UT) Bureau of Surveillance and Analysis (2001) Health status in Utah: the Medical Outcomes Study SF-12 (2001 Utah Health Status Survey Report). Utah Department of Health, Salt Lake City (UT)
Metadata
Title
Patients Recovering From Abdominal Surgery Who Walked With Volunteers Had Improved Postoperative Recovery Profiles during Their Hospitalization
Authors
Hai Le
Pouya Khankhanian
Neha Joshi
John Maa
Henry Crevensten
Publication date
01-08-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 8/2014
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2491-5

Other articles of this Issue 8/2014

World Journal of Surgery 8/2014 Go to the issue