Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 6/2014

01-06-2014

A Qualitative Study Assessing the Barriers to Implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery

Authors: Alison Lyon, Michael J. Solomon, James D. Harrison

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 6/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Previous studies have quantitatively assessed Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) guideline implementation and compliance, and identified the existence of compliance issues with the programs. This is the first study to qualitatively assess the reasons behind compliance issues in ERAS programs. The aim of this study was to elicit barriers to implementation and functioning of the ERAS program at Royal Prince Alfred Hospital.

Methods

A series of interviews were carried out with key stakeholders in order to explore barriers preventing effective functioning of the program 1 year after implementation. Interview transcripts were analysed. Data analysis involved a grounded theory methodology.

Results

Analysis of the data identified four key themed areas of practice that presented barriers: patient-related factors, staff-related factors, practice-related issues, and resources. These overarching themes were generated from subcategories that were linked to generate theory.

Conclusions

For the ERAS program to be implemented successfully with high levels of element compliance, the four key areas need to be addressed. As barriers to ongoing effective care become apparent, these should be managed in order to optimize the synergistic effects of this multimodal program of patient care.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Donohoe CL, Nguyen M, Cook J, Geagan Murray S, Chen N, Zaki F, Mehigan BJ, McCormick PH, Reynolds JV (2011) Fast-track protocols in colorectal surgery. Surgeon 9(2):95–103PubMedCrossRef Donohoe CL, Nguyen M, Cook J, Geagan Murray S, Chen N, Zaki F, Mehigan BJ, McCormick PH, Reynolds JV (2011) Fast-track protocols in colorectal surgery. Surgeon 9(2):95–103PubMedCrossRef
2.
3.
go back to reference Polle SW, Wind J, Fuhring JW, Hofland J, Gouma DJ, Bemelman WA (2007) Implementation of a fast-track perioperative care program: what are the difficulties? Dig Surg 24:441–449PubMedCrossRef Polle SW, Wind J, Fuhring JW, Hofland J, Gouma DJ, Bemelman WA (2007) Implementation of a fast-track perioperative care program: what are the difficulties? Dig Surg 24:441–449PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Maessen J, Dejong CHC, Hausel J et al (2007) A protocol is not enough to implement an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal resection. Br J Surg 94:224–231PubMedCrossRef Maessen J, Dejong CHC, Hausel J et al (2007) A protocol is not enough to implement an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal resection. Br J Surg 94:224–231PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Gustafsson UO, Hausel J, Thorell A, Ljungqvist O, Soop M, Nygren J, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Working Group (2011) Adherence to the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocol and outcomes after colorectal cancer surgery. Arch Surg 146(5):571–577PubMedCrossRef Gustafsson UO, Hausel J, Thorell A, Ljungqvist O, Soop M, Nygren J, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Working Group (2011) Adherence to the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocol and outcomes after colorectal cancer surgery. Arch Surg 146(5):571–577PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Varadhan KK, Neal KR, Dejong CHC et al (2010) The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing major elective open colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Nutr 29(4):434–440PubMedCrossRef Varadhan KK, Neal KR, Dejong CHC et al (2010) The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing major elective open colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Nutr 29(4):434–440PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kehlet H, Wilmore DW (2008) Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery. Ann Surg 248(2):189–198PubMedCrossRef Kehlet H, Wilmore DW (2008) Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery. Ann Surg 248(2):189–198PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Bickman L, Rog DJ (2005) The SAGE handbook of applied social research methods, vol 2. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, p 236 Bickman L, Rog DJ (2005) The SAGE handbook of applied social research methods, vol 2. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, p 236
10.
go back to reference Woods P (2006) A standard approach to organisation in successful writing for qualitative researchers, vol 2. Routledge, New York, pp 32–35 Woods P (2006) A standard approach to organisation in successful writing for qualitative researchers, vol 2. Routledge, New York, pp 32–35
13.
go back to reference Kehlet H, Wilmore DW (2002) Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome. Am J Surg 183(6):630–641PubMedCrossRef Kehlet H, Wilmore DW (2002) Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome. Am J Surg 183(6):630–641PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Fearon KCH, Ljungqvist O, Von Meyenfeldt M, Revhaug A, Dejong CH, Lassen K et al (2005) Enhanced recovery after surgery: a consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection. Clin Nutr 24:466–477PubMedCrossRef Fearon KCH, Ljungqvist O, Von Meyenfeldt M, Revhaug A, Dejong CH, Lassen K et al (2005) Enhanced recovery after surgery: a consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection. Clin Nutr 24:466–477PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Vlug MS, Wind J, Hollmann MW et al (2011) Laparoscopy in combination with fast track multimodal management is the best perioperative strategy in patients undergoing colonic surgery: a randomised clinical trial (LAFA-study). Ann Surg 254(6):868–875PubMedCrossRef Vlug MS, Wind J, Hollmann MW et al (2011) Laparoscopy in combination with fast track multimodal management is the best perioperative strategy in patients undergoing colonic surgery: a randomised clinical trial (LAFA-study). Ann Surg 254(6):868–875PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Vlug MS, Wind J, Van der Zaag E, Ubbink DT, Cense HA, Bemelman WA (2009) Systematic review of laparoscopic vs open colonic surgery within an enhanced recovery programme. Colorectal Dis 11:335–343PubMedCrossRef Vlug MS, Wind J, Van der Zaag E, Ubbink DT, Cense HA, Bemelman WA (2009) Systematic review of laparoscopic vs open colonic surgery within an enhanced recovery programme. Colorectal Dis 11:335–343PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Raymond TM, Kumar S, Dastur JK, Adamek JP, Khot UP, Stewart MS, Parker MC (2010) Case controlled study of the hospital stay and return to full activity following laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery before and after the introduction of an enhanced recovery programme. Colorectal Dis 12:1001–1006PubMedCrossRef Raymond TM, Kumar S, Dastur JK, Adamek JP, Khot UP, Stewart MS, Parker MC (2010) Case controlled study of the hospital stay and return to full activity following laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery before and after the introduction of an enhanced recovery programme. Colorectal Dis 12:1001–1006PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Eng J Med 350(20):2050–2059CrossRef Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Eng J Med 350(20):2050–2059CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Marusch F, Koch A, Schmidt U et al (2005) The impact of the risk factor “age” on the early postoperative results of surgery for colorectal carcinoma and its significance for perioperative management. World J Surg 29(8):1013–1021. doi:10.1007/s00268-005-7711-6 PubMedCrossRef Marusch F, Koch A, Schmidt U et al (2005) The impact of the risk factor “age” on the early postoperative results of surgery for colorectal carcinoma and its significance for perioperative management. World J Surg 29(8):1013–1021. doi:10.​1007/​s00268-005-7711-6 PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Stewart BT, Stitz RW, Lumley LW (1999) Laparoscopically assisted colorectal surgery in the elderly. Br J Surg 86(7):938–941PubMedCrossRef Stewart BT, Stitz RW, Lumley LW (1999) Laparoscopically assisted colorectal surgery in the elderly. Br J Surg 86(7):938–941PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Scharfenberg M, Raue W, Junghans T, Schwenk W (2007) “Fast-track” rehabilitation after colonic surgery in elderly patients: is it feasible? Int J Colorectal Dis 22:1469–1474PubMedCrossRef Scharfenberg M, Raue W, Junghans T, Schwenk W (2007) “Fast-track” rehabilitation after colonic surgery in elderly patients: is it feasible? Int J Colorectal Dis 22:1469–1474PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Bardram L, Funch-Jensen P, Kehlet H (2000) Rapid rehabilitation in elderly patient after laparoscopic colonic resection. Br J Surg 87:1540–1545PubMedCrossRef Bardram L, Funch-Jensen P, Kehlet H (2000) Rapid rehabilitation in elderly patient after laparoscopic colonic resection. Br J Surg 87:1540–1545PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Brown D, McCormick B (2006) Determining factors that have an impact upon effective evidence-based pain management with older people, following colorectal surgery: an ethnographic study. J Clin Nurs 15:1287–1298PubMedCrossRef Brown D, McCormick B (2006) Determining factors that have an impact upon effective evidence-based pain management with older people, following colorectal surgery: an ethnographic study. J Clin Nurs 15:1287–1298PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Brown C, Constance K, Bédard D, Purden M (2013) Colorectal surgery patients’ pain status, activities, satisfaction and beliefs about pain and pain management. Pain Manag Nurs 14(4):184–192PubMedCrossRef Brown C, Constance K, Bédard D, Purden M (2013) Colorectal surgery patients’ pain status, activities, satisfaction and beliefs about pain and pain management. Pain Manag Nurs 14(4):184–192PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Hathaway D (1996) Effect of pre-operative instruction on post-operative outcomes: a meta-analysis. Nurs Res 35(5):269–275 Hathaway D (1996) Effect of pre-operative instruction on post-operative outcomes: a meta-analysis. Nurs Res 35(5):269–275
26.
go back to reference Solberg LI (2000) Guideline implementation: what the literature doesn’t tell us. Jt Comm J Qual Improv 26(9):525–537PubMed Solberg LI (2000) Guideline implementation: what the literature doesn’t tell us. Jt Comm J Qual Improv 26(9):525–537PubMed
27.
go back to reference Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR et al (1999) Why don’t physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA 282(15):1458–1465PubMedCrossRef Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR et al (1999) Why don’t physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA 282(15):1458–1465PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Grimshaw JM, Russell IT (1993) Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations. Lancet 342:1317–1322PubMedCrossRef Grimshaw JM, Russell IT (1993) Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations. Lancet 342:1317–1322PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Young GJ, Charns MP, Daley J et al (1997) Best practices for managing surgical services: the role of coordination. Health Care Manage Rev 22:72–81PubMedCrossRef Young GJ, Charns MP, Daley J et al (1997) Best practices for managing surgical services: the role of coordination. Health Care Manage Rev 22:72–81PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Inouye SK, Peduzzi P, Robinson J, Hughes J, Horwifz R, Concat J (1998) Importance of functional measures in predicting mortality among older hospitalized patients. JAMA 279:1187–1193PubMedCrossRef Inouye SK, Peduzzi P, Robinson J, Hughes J, Horwifz R, Concat J (1998) Importance of functional measures in predicting mortality among older hospitalized patients. JAMA 279:1187–1193PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
A Qualitative Study Assessing the Barriers to Implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
Authors
Alison Lyon
Michael J. Solomon
James D. Harrison
Publication date
01-06-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 6/2014
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2441-7

Other articles of this Issue 6/2014

World Journal of Surgery 6/2014 Go to the issue