Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 5/2014

01-05-2014

Surgeons Are Overlooking Post-Discharge Complications: A Prospective Cohort Study

Authors: A. Visser, D. T. Ubbink, D. J. Gouma, J. C. Goslings

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 5/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

The registration of surgical complications is an important quality indicator of hospital medical care. Previous research has suggested that surgeons only record certain complications after discharge. The extent and impact of this potential under-recording of post-discharge complications is unknown. Therefore, we aimed to determine the frequency, type, and grade of post-discharge complications as reported by patients and their surgeons.

Methods

A prospective cohort study was performed in the Department of Surgery of a University Medical Center. From December 2008 until August 2009, all adult surgical patients were interviewed by phone or questionnaire 1 month after their discharge to inquire about any new complications after discharge. These complications were compared with the surgeon-reported post-discharge complications and letters from the outpatient clinic as documented in the patients’ medical files.

Results

A total of 976 patients were included. Patients reported more complications (659) than did surgeons (465), especially psychological disturbances (4.2 vs. 0 %). A medical consult was needed in 527 (80 %) of the patient-reported complications. Of all patient-reported complications, 291 (44 %) resulted in a visit to the outpatient clinic, 144 (22 %) in a consultation with a general practitioner, and 92 (14 %) led to referral to a hospital; 743 (76 %) were treated non-operatively.

Conclusion

Surgeons are unaware of many of the complications their patients experience after discharge. These post-discharge complications are important to patients and are therefore relevant to be aware of and to act upon whenever necessary.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kievit J, Krukerink M, Marang-van de Mheen PJ (2010) Surgical adverse outcome reporting as part of routine clinical care. Qual Saf Health Care 19:e20PubMedCrossRef Kievit J, Krukerink M, Marang-van de Mheen PJ (2010) Surgical adverse outcome reporting as part of routine clinical care. Qual Saf Health Care 19:e20PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Brennan TA, Leape LL, Laird NM et al (1991) Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients: results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I. N Engl J Med 324:370–376PubMedCrossRef Brennan TA, Leape LL, Laird NM et al (1991) Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients: results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I. N Engl J Med 324:370–376PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference de Bruijne MC, Zegers M, Hoornhout LH et al (2007) Onbedoelde schade in Nederlandse Ziekenhuizen. EMGI Instituut en NIVEL, Utrecht. ISBN 978-90-6905-845-0 de Bruijne MC, Zegers M, Hoornhout LH et al (2007) Onbedoelde schade in Nederlandse Ziekenhuizen. EMGI Instituut en NIVEL, Utrecht. ISBN 978-90-6905-845-0
4.
go back to reference Cima RR, Lackore KA, Nehring AA et al (2011) How best to measure surgical quality? Comparison of the Agency of Healthcare Research and Quality Patient Safety Indicators (AHRQ-PSI) and the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) postoperative adverse events at a single institution. Surgery 150(5):943–949PubMedCrossRef Cima RR, Lackore KA, Nehring AA et al (2011) How best to measure surgical quality? Comparison of the Agency of Healthcare Research and Quality Patient Safety Indicators (AHRQ-PSI) and the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) postoperative adverse events at a single institution. Surgery 150(5):943–949PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Grosse Frie KJ, van der Meulen J, Black N (2012) Relationship between patient’s report of complications and symptoms, disability and quality of life after surgery. Br J Surg 99:1156–1163PubMedCrossRef Grosse Frie KJ, van der Meulen J, Black N (2012) Relationship between patient’s report of complications and symptoms, disability and quality of life after surgery. Br J Surg 99:1156–1163PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kazaure HS, Roman SA, Sosa JA (2012) Association of postdischarge complications with reoperation and mortality in general surgery. Arch Surg 147(11):1000–1007PubMedCrossRef Kazaure HS, Roman SA, Sosa JA (2012) Association of postdischarge complications with reoperation and mortality in general surgery. Arch Surg 147(11):1000–1007PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kaasschieter EG, van Olden GJ (2007) Complicatieregistratie en fractuurbehandeling. Ned Tijdschr Trauma 6:182–185 Kaasschieter EG, van Olden GJ (2007) Complicatieregistratie en fractuurbehandeling. Ned Tijdschr Trauma 6:182–185
9.
go back to reference Marang-van de Mheen PJ, van Duijn-Bakker N, Kievit J (2008) Adverse outcome after discharge: occurrence, treatment and determinants. Qual Saf Health Care 17:47–52PubMedCrossRef Marang-van de Mheen PJ, van Duijn-Bakker N, Kievit J (2008) Adverse outcome after discharge: occurrence, treatment and determinants. Qual Saf Health Care 17:47–52PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Marang-van de Mheen PJ, van Duijn-Bakker N, Kievit J (2003) Automated registration of adverse events in surgical patients in the Netherlands: current status. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 147:1273–1277PubMed Marang-van de Mheen PJ, van Duijn-Bakker N, Kievit J (2003) Automated registration of adverse events in surgical patients in the Netherlands: current status. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 147:1273–1277PubMed
12.
13.
go back to reference Clavien PA, Sanabria JR, Strasberg SM (1992) Proposed classifications of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. Surgery 111(5):518–526PubMed Clavien PA, Sanabria JR, Strasberg SM (1992) Proposed classifications of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. Surgery 111(5):518–526PubMed
14.
go back to reference Ubbink DT, Visser A, Gouma DJ et al (2012) Registration of surgical adverse outcome: a reliability study in a university hospital. BMJ Open 2(3):e000891PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Ubbink DT, Visser A, Gouma DJ et al (2012) Registration of surgical adverse outcome: a reliability study in a university hospital. BMJ Open 2(3):e000891PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Ward JK, Armitage G (2012) Can patients report patient safety incidents in a hospital setting? A systematic review. BMJ Qual Saf 21(8):685–699PubMedCrossRef Ward JK, Armitage G (2012) Can patients report patient safety incidents in a hospital setting? A systematic review. BMJ Qual Saf 21(8):685–699PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Surgeons Are Overlooking Post-Discharge Complications: A Prospective Cohort Study
Authors
A. Visser
D. T. Ubbink
D. J. Gouma
J. C. Goslings
Publication date
01-05-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 5/2014
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2376-z

Other articles of this Issue 5/2014

World Journal of Surgery 5/2014 Go to the issue