Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 2/2014

01-02-2014

Oncological Feasibility of Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy for Adenocarcinoma: A Single-Institution Comparative Study

Authors: S. Rehman, S. K. P. John, R. Lochan, B. C. Jaques, D. M. Manas, R. M. Charnley, J. J. French, S. A. White

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 2/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) is performed increasingly for pancreatic pathology in the body and tail of the pancreas. However, only few reports have compared its oncological efficacy with open distal pancreatectomy (ODP). We compared these two techniques in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Methods

From a prospectively maintained database, all patients who underwent either LDP or ODP for adenocarcinoma in the body and tail of the pancreas between January 2008 and December 2011 were compared. Data were analysed using SPSS® v19 utilising standard tests. A p value <0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Of 101 patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy, 22 had histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma (LDP n = 8, ODP n = 14). Both groups were well matched for age and the size of tumour (22 vs. 32 mm, p = 0.22). Intraoperative blood loss was 306 ml compared with 650 ml for ODP (p = 0.152). A longer operative time was noted for LDP (376 vs. 274 min, p < 0.05). Total length of stay was shorter for LDP compared with ODP (8 vs. 12 days, p = 0.05). The number of postoperative pancreatic fistulas were similar (LDP n = 2 vs. ODP n = 3, p = 0.5). Complete resection (R0) was achieved in 88 % of LDP (n = 7) compared with 86 % of ODP (n = 12). The median number of lymph nodes harvested was 16 for LDP versus 14 for ODP. Overall 3-year survival also was similar: LDP = 82 %, ODP = 74 % (p = 0.89).

Conclusions

From an oncological perspective, LDP is a viable procedure and its results are comparable to ODP for ductal adenocarcinomas arising in the body and tail of the pancreas.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kooby DA, Hawkins WG, Schmidt CM et al (2010) A multicentre analysis of distal pancreatectomy for adenocarcinoma: is laparoscopic resection appropriate? J Am Coll Surg 210:776–779CrossRef Kooby DA, Hawkins WG, Schmidt CM et al (2010) A multicentre analysis of distal pancreatectomy for adenocarcinoma: is laparoscopic resection appropriate? J Am Coll Surg 210:776–779CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Strasberg SM, Linehan DC, Hawkins WG (2007) Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas: ability to obtain negative tangential margins. J Am Coll Surg 204:244–249PubMedCrossRef Strasberg SM, Linehan DC, Hawkins WG (2007) Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas: ability to obtain negative tangential margins. J Am Coll Surg 204:244–249PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Butturini G, Stocken DD, Wente MN et al (2008) Pancreatic cancer meta-analysis: influence of resection margins and treatment on survival in patients with pancreatic cancer: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Surg 143:75–83PubMedCrossRef Butturini G, Stocken DD, Wente MN et al (2008) Pancreatic cancer meta-analysis: influence of resection margins and treatment on survival in patients with pancreatic cancer: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Surg 143:75–83PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Strasberg SM, Drebin JA, Linehan D (2003) Radical antegrade modular pancreatectomy. Surgery 133:521–527PubMedCrossRef Strasberg SM, Drebin JA, Linehan D (2003) Radical antegrade modular pancreatectomy. Surgery 133:521–527PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Shimada K, Sakamoto Y, Sano T, Kosuge T (2006) Prognostic factors after distal pancreatectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for invasive pancreatic adenocarcinoma of the body and tail. Surgery 139(3):288–295PubMedCrossRef Shimada K, Sakamoto Y, Sano T, Kosuge T (2006) Prognostic factors after distal pancreatectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for invasive pancreatic adenocarcinoma of the body and tail. Surgery 139(3):288–295PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Marangose IP, Buanes T, Rosok BI et al (2012) Laparoscopic resection of exocrine carcinoma in central and distal pancreas results in a high rates of radical resections and on post operative survival. Surgery 151(5):717–723CrossRef Marangose IP, Buanes T, Rosok BI et al (2012) Laparoscopic resection of exocrine carcinoma in central and distal pancreas results in a high rates of radical resections and on post operative survival. Surgery 151(5):717–723CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Mabrut JY, Fernandez-Cruz L, Azagra JS et al (2005) Laparoscopic pancreatic resection: results of a multicenter European study of 127 patients. Surgery 137:597–605PubMedCrossRef Mabrut JY, Fernandez-Cruz L, Azagra JS et al (2005) Laparoscopic pancreatic resection: results of a multicenter European study of 127 patients. Surgery 137:597–605PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ozaki H, Kinoshita T, Kosuge T, Yamamoto J et al (1996) An aggressive therapeutic approach to carcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas. Cancer 77:2240–2245PubMedCrossRef Ozaki H, Kinoshita T, Kosuge T, Yamamoto J et al (1996) An aggressive therapeutic approach to carcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas. Cancer 77:2240–2245PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Shoup M, Conlon KC, Klimstra D et al (2003) Is extended resection for adenocarcinoma of the body or tail of the pancreas justified? J Gastrointestinal Surg 7:946–952CrossRef Shoup M, Conlon KC, Klimstra D et al (2003) Is extended resection for adenocarcinoma of the body or tail of the pancreas justified? J Gastrointestinal Surg 7:946–952CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Fernandez-Cruz L, Cosa R, Blanco L et al (2007) Curative laparoscopic resection for pancreatic neoplasms: a critical analysis from a single institution. J Gastrointestinal Surg 11:1607–1621CrossRef Fernandez-Cruz L, Cosa R, Blanco L et al (2007) Curative laparoscopic resection for pancreatic neoplasms: a critical analysis from a single institution. J Gastrointestinal Surg 11:1607–1621CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Song KB, Song CM, Park JM et al (2011) Single-center experience of laparoscopic left pancreatic resection in 359 consecutive patients: changing the surgical paradigm of left pancreatic resection. Surg Endosc 25:3364–3372PubMedCrossRef Song KB, Song CM, Park JM et al (2011) Single-center experience of laparoscopic left pancreatic resection in 359 consecutive patients: changing the surgical paradigm of left pancreatic resection. Surg Endosc 25:3364–3372PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Jayne DG, Guillo PJ, Thorpe H et al (2007) Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASSIC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol 25(21):3061–3068PubMedCrossRef Jayne DG, Guillo PJ, Thorpe H et al (2007) Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASSIC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol 25(21):3061–3068PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Haverkamp L, weijs TJ, van der Sluis PC et al (2012) Laparoscopic total gastrectomy versus open total gastrectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 27(5):1509–1520PubMedCrossRef Haverkamp L, weijs TJ, van der Sluis PC et al (2012) Laparoscopic total gastrectomy versus open total gastrectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 27(5):1509–1520PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Briez N, Piessen G, Bonnetain F et al (2011) Open versus laparoscopically-assisted oesophagectomy for cancer: a randomised controlled phase III trial-the MIRO trial. BMC Cancer 11:30CrossRef Briez N, Piessen G, Bonnetain F et al (2011) Open versus laparoscopically-assisted oesophagectomy for cancer: a randomised controlled phase III trial-the MIRO trial. BMC Cancer 11:30CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Kang CM, Kim DH, Lee WJ (2010) Ten years of experience with resection of left-sided pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: evolution and initial experience to a laparoscopic approach. Surg Endosc 24:1533–1541PubMedCrossRef Kang CM, Kim DH, Lee WJ (2010) Ten years of experience with resection of left-sided pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: evolution and initial experience to a laparoscopic approach. Surg Endosc 24:1533–1541PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Robinson S, Saif R, Charnley RM et al (2011) Surgical adjuncts to laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 20:369–373PubMedCrossRef Robinson S, Saif R, Charnley RM et al (2011) Surgical adjuncts to laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 20:369–373PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Campbell F, Bennett M, Foulis A (2002) Minimum dataset for histopathological reporting of pancreatic, ampulla of Vater and bile duct carcinoma, 1st edn. Royal College of Pathology, London Campbell F, Bennett M, Foulis A (2002) Minimum dataset for histopathological reporting of pancreatic, ampulla of Vater and bile duct carcinoma, 1st edn. Royal College of Pathology, London
18.
go back to reference Kloppel G, Lingenthal G, von Bulow M et al (1985) Histological and fine structure features of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in relation to growth and prognosis: studies in xenografted tumours and clinicopathological correlation in a series of 75 case. Histopathology 9(8):841–856PubMedCrossRef Kloppel G, Lingenthal G, von Bulow M et al (1985) Histological and fine structure features of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in relation to growth and prognosis: studies in xenografted tumours and clinicopathological correlation in a series of 75 case. Histopathology 9(8):841–856PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Greene F, Page D, Fleming I et al (2003) AJCC cancer staging manual (6 edn). Ann Oncol 14(2):345–346CrossRef Greene F, Page D, Fleming I et al (2003) AJCC cancer staging manual (6 edn). Ann Oncol 14(2):345–346CrossRef
20.
go back to reference DeOliveira ML, Winter JM, Schafer M et al (2006) Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery: a novel grading system applied to 633 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 244(6):937–939CrossRef DeOliveira ML, Winter JM, Schafer M et al (2006) Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery: a novel grading system applied to 633 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 244(6):937–939CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Bassi C, Derevenis B, Fingerhut A et al (2009) Post-operative pancreatic fistula: An International Study Group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138(1):8–13CrossRef Bassi C, Derevenis B, Fingerhut A et al (2009) Post-operative pancreatic fistula: An International Study Group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138(1):8–13CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Robinson SM, Rahman A, Haugk B et al (2012) Metastatic lymph node ratio as an important prognostic factor in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. EJSO 38(4):333–339PubMedCrossRef Robinson SM, Rahman A, Haugk B et al (2012) Metastatic lymph node ratio as an important prognostic factor in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. EJSO 38(4):333–339PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Baker MS, Bentrem DJ, Ujiki MB, Stocker S, Talamonti MS et al (2009) A prospective single institution comparison of per-operative outcome for laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy. Surgery 146(4):635–643PubMedCrossRef Baker MS, Bentrem DJ, Ujiki MB, Stocker S, Talamonti MS et al (2009) A prospective single institution comparison of per-operative outcome for laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy. Surgery 146(4):635–643PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Menon K, Gomez D, Smith AM et al (2009) Impact of margin status on survival following pancreatoduodenectomy for cancer: the leeds pathology protocol (LEEP). HPB(Oxford) 11(1):18–24 Menon K, Gomez D, Smith AM et al (2009) Impact of margin status on survival following pancreatoduodenectomy for cancer: the leeds pathology protocol (LEEP). HPB(Oxford) 11(1):18–24
26.
go back to reference Balzano G, Zerbi A, Braga M, Rocchetti S, Beneduce AA, Dicarlo V (2008) Fast-track recovery programme after pancreatico-duodenectomy reduces delayed gastric emptying. BJS 95:1387–1393CrossRef Balzano G, Zerbi A, Braga M, Rocchetti S, Beneduce AA, Dicarlo V (2008) Fast-track recovery programme after pancreatico-duodenectomy reduces delayed gastric emptying. BJS 95:1387–1393CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Kim SC, Park KT, Hwang Ji H et al (2008) Comparative analysis of clinical outcomes for laparoscopic distal pancreatic resection and open distal pancreatic resection. Surg Endosc 22:2261–2268PubMedCrossRef Kim SC, Park KT, Hwang Ji H et al (2008) Comparative analysis of clinical outcomes for laparoscopic distal pancreatic resection and open distal pancreatic resection. Surg Endosc 22:2261–2268PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Marangose IP, Rosok BI, Kazaryan AM et al (2011) Effect of TachoSil patch in prevention of postoperative pancreatic fistula. J Gastrointest Surg 15:1625–1629CrossRef Marangose IP, Rosok BI, Kazaryan AM et al (2011) Effect of TachoSil patch in prevention of postoperative pancreatic fistula. J Gastrointest Surg 15:1625–1629CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Suzuki Y, Kuroda Y, Morita A et al (1995) Fibrin glue sealing for the prevention of pancreatic fistulas following distal pancreatectomy. Arc Surg 130:952–955CrossRef Suzuki Y, Kuroda Y, Morita A et al (1995) Fibrin glue sealing for the prevention of pancreatic fistulas following distal pancreatectomy. Arc Surg 130:952–955CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Velonvich V (2007) The use of tissue sealant to prevent fistula formation after laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. Surg Endosc 21:1222CrossRef Velonvich V (2007) The use of tissue sealant to prevent fistula formation after laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. Surg Endosc 21:1222CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Skattum J, Edwin B, Trondsen E et al (2004) Outpatient laparoscopic surgery: feasibility and consequences for education and health care costs. Surg Endosc 18:796–801PubMedCrossRef Skattum J, Edwin B, Trondsen E et al (2004) Outpatient laparoscopic surgery: feasibility and consequences for education and health care costs. Surg Endosc 18:796–801PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Schwarz RE, Smith DD (2006) Extent of lymph node retrieval and pancreatic cancer survival: information from a large U.S. population database. Ann Surg Oncol 13(9):1189–1200PubMedCrossRef Schwarz RE, Smith DD (2006) Extent of lymph node retrieval and pancreatic cancer survival: information from a large U.S. population database. Ann Surg Oncol 13(9):1189–1200PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Hellan M, Sun CL, Artinyan A et al (2008) The impact of lymph node number on survival in patients with lymph node-negative pancreatic cancer. Pancreas 37(1):19–24PubMedCrossRef Hellan M, Sun CL, Artinyan A et al (2008) The impact of lymph node number on survival in patients with lymph node-negative pancreatic cancer. Pancreas 37(1):19–24PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Oncological Feasibility of Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy for Adenocarcinoma: A Single-Institution Comparative Study
Authors
S. Rehman
S. K. P. John
R. Lochan
B. C. Jaques
D. M. Manas
R. M. Charnley
J. J. French
S. A. White
Publication date
01-02-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 2/2014
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2268-2

Other articles of this Issue 2/2014

World Journal of Surgery 2/2014 Go to the issue