Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 1/2013

01-01-2013

18F-FDG Uptake at Initial Staging of the Adrenocortical Cancers: A Diagnostic Tool but Not of Prognostic Value

Authors: L. Tessonnier, C. Ansquer, C. Bournaud, F. Sebag, E. Mirallié, J. C. Lifante, F. F. Palazzo, I. Morange, D. Drui, C. de la Foucardère, J. Mancini, D. Taïeb

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 1/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare cancer for which little level evidence exists to guide management. 18F-FDG PET (18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography) is an increasingly used diagnostic tool in patients with suspicious or indeterminate adrenal tumors. In some other solid tumors, 18F-FDG PET may offer prognostic information that can guide optimal patient treatment. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether preoperative 18F-FDG PET based on SUVs assessments has a prognostic value in ACC patients.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed in patients who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT for the evaluation of ACC. Inclusion criteria were an unequivocal diagnosis of ACC; all data from primary diagnosis available; 18F-FDG PET/CT performed prior to surgery or other treatment of the primary tumor; a minimum of 6-months follow-up for surviving patients. All 18F-FDG PET/CT procedures were reinterpreted in a blind fashion.

Results

Thirty-seven patients (23 without metastasis [M0], 14 with metastasis [M1]) fulfilled the study criteria. Median uptake values were tumor standardized uptake values (SUV)max = 11 (range: 3–56) and a tumor/liver SUVmax ratio = 4.2 (range: 1.3–15). Median follow-up was 20 months. Although classic risk factors (tumoral stage, Weiss score) were associated with poor outcome, there was no correlation between primary tumor FDG uptake with overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) in M0 patients and with overall survival in M1 patients. 18F-FDG uptake correlated inconsistently with sinister histological features, such as atypical mitoses or necrosis.

Conclusions

At initial staging, primary tumor FDG uptake in ACC patients does not correlate with OS and DFS at 2 years. Patient prognosis and treatment strategy should not be based on uptake values.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Fassnacht M, Libe R, Kroiss M et al (2011) Adrenocortical carcinoma: a clinician’s update. Nat Rev Endocrinol 7:323–335PubMedCrossRef Fassnacht M, Libe R, Kroiss M et al (2011) Adrenocortical carcinoma: a clinician’s update. Nat Rev Endocrinol 7:323–335PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Kreissig R, Amthauer H, Krude H et al (2000) The use of FDG-PET and CT for the staging of adrenocortical carcinoma in children. Pediatr Radiol 30:306PubMedCrossRef Kreissig R, Amthauer H, Krude H et al (2000) The use of FDG-PET and CT for the staging of adrenocortical carcinoma in children. Pediatr Radiol 30:306PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Minn H, Salonen A, Friberg J et al (2004) Imaging of adrenal incidentalomas with PET using (11)C-metomidate and (18)F-FDG. J Nucl Med 45:972–979PubMed Minn H, Salonen A, Friberg J et al (2004) Imaging of adrenal incidentalomas with PET using (11)C-metomidate and (18)F-FDG. J Nucl Med 45:972–979PubMed
4.
go back to reference Zettinig G, Mitterhauser M, Wadsak W et al (2004) Positron emission tomography imaging of adrenal masses: (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose and the 11beta-hydroxylase tracer (11)C-metomidate. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 31:1224–1230PubMedCrossRef Zettinig G, Mitterhauser M, Wadsak W et al (2004) Positron emission tomography imaging of adrenal masses: (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose and the 11beta-hydroxylase tracer (11)C-metomidate. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 31:1224–1230PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Mackie GC, Shulkin BL, Ribeiro RC et al (2006) Use of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in evaluating locally recurrent and metastatic adrenocortical carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91:2665–2671PubMedCrossRef Mackie GC, Shulkin BL, Ribeiro RC et al (2006) Use of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in evaluating locally recurrent and metastatic adrenocortical carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91:2665–2671PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Tessonnier L, Sebag F, Palazzo FF et al (2008) Does 18F-FDG PET/CT add diagnostic accuracy in incidentally identified non-secreting adrenal tumours? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 35:2018–2025PubMedCrossRef Tessonnier L, Sebag F, Palazzo FF et al (2008) Does 18F-FDG PET/CT add diagnostic accuracy in incidentally identified non-secreting adrenal tumours? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 35:2018–2025PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Groussin L, Bonardel G, Silvera S et al (2009) 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for the diagnosis of adrenocortical tumors: a prospective study in 77 operated patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 94:1713–1722PubMedCrossRef Groussin L, Bonardel G, Silvera S et al (2009) 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for the diagnosis of adrenocortical tumors: a prospective study in 77 operated patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 94:1713–1722PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Nunes ML, Rault A, Teynie J et al (2010) 18F-FDG PET for the identification of adrenocortical carcinomas among indeterminate adrenal tumors at computed tomography scanning. World J Surg 34:1506–1510PubMedCrossRef Nunes ML, Rault A, Teynie J et al (2010) 18F-FDG PET for the identification of adrenocortical carcinomas among indeterminate adrenal tumors at computed tomography scanning. World J Surg 34:1506–1510PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Ansquer C, Scigliano S, Mirallie E et al (2010) 18F-FDG PET/CT in the characterization and surgical decision concerning adrenal masses: a prospective multicentre evaluation. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 37:1669–1678PubMedCrossRef Ansquer C, Scigliano S, Mirallie E et al (2010) 18F-FDG PET/CT in the characterization and surgical decision concerning adrenal masses: a prospective multicentre evaluation. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 37:1669–1678PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Boland GW, Dwamena BA, Sangwaiya MJ et al (2011) Characterization of adrenal masses by using FDG PET: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test performance. Radiology 259:117–126PubMedCrossRef Boland GW, Dwamena BA, Sangwaiya MJ et al (2011) Characterization of adrenal masses by using FDG PET: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test performance. Radiology 259:117–126PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Leboulleux S, Dromain C, Bonniaud G et al (2006) Diagnostic and prognostic value of 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in adrenocortical carcinoma: a prospective comparison with computed tomography. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91:920–925PubMedCrossRef Leboulleux S, Dromain C, Bonniaud G et al (2006) Diagnostic and prognostic value of 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in adrenocortical carcinoma: a prospective comparison with computed tomography. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91:920–925PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Fenske W, Volker HU, Adam P et al (2009) Glucose transporter GLUT1 expression is an stage-independent predictor of clinical outcome in adrenocortical carcinoma. Endocr Relat Cancer 16:919–928PubMedCrossRef Fenske W, Volker HU, Adam P et al (2009) Glucose transporter GLUT1 expression is an stage-independent predictor of clinical outcome in adrenocortical carcinoma. Endocr Relat Cancer 16:919–928PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Fassnacht M, Johanssen S, Quinkler M et al (2009) Limited prognostic value of the 2004 International Union Against Cancer staging classification for adrenocortical carcinoma: proposal for a revised TNM classification. Cancer 115:243–250PubMedCrossRef Fassnacht M, Johanssen S, Quinkler M et al (2009) Limited prognostic value of the 2004 International Union Against Cancer staging classification for adrenocortical carcinoma: proposal for a revised TNM classification. Cancer 115:243–250PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Deandreis D, Leboulleux S, Caramella C et al (2011) FDG PET in the management of patients with adrenal masses and adrenocortical carcinoma. Horm Cancer 2:354–362PubMedCrossRef Deandreis D, Leboulleux S, Caramella C et al (2011) FDG PET in the management of patients with adrenal masses and adrenocortical carcinoma. Horm Cancer 2:354–362PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Gallamini A, Hutchings M, Rigacci L et al (2007) Early interim 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography is prognostically superior to international prognostic score in advanced-stage Hodgkin’s lymphoma: a report from a joint Italian-Danish study. J Clin Oncol 25:3746–3752PubMedCrossRef Gallamini A, Hutchings M, Rigacci L et al (2007) Early interim 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography is prognostically superior to international prognostic score in advanced-stage Hodgkin’s lymphoma: a report from a joint Italian-Danish study. J Clin Oncol 25:3746–3752PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Haioun C, Itti E, Rahmouni A et al (2005) [18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in aggressive lymphoma: an early prognostic tool for predicting patient outcome. Blood 106:1376–1381PubMedCrossRef Haioun C, Itti E, Rahmouni A et al (2005) [18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in aggressive lymphoma: an early prognostic tool for predicting patient outcome. Blood 106:1376–1381PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Paesmans M, Berghmans T, Dusart M et al (2010) Primary tumor standardized uptake value measured on fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography is of prognostic value for survival in non-small cell lung cancer: update of a systematic review and meta-analysis by the European Lung Cancer Working Party for the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Staging Project. J Thorac Oncol 5:612–619PubMed Paesmans M, Berghmans T, Dusart M et al (2010) Primary tumor standardized uptake value measured on fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography is of prognostic value for survival in non-small cell lung cancer: update of a systematic review and meta-analysis by the European Lung Cancer Working Party for the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Staging Project. J Thorac Oncol 5:612–619PubMed
18.
go back to reference Torizuka T, Tanizaki Y, Kanno T et al (2009) Prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET in patients with head and neck squamous cell cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol Rad Ther Nucl Med 192:W156–W160CrossRef Torizuka T, Tanizaki Y, Kanno T et al (2009) Prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET in patients with head and neck squamous cell cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol Rad Ther Nucl Med 192:W156–W160CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Kidd EA, Siegel BA, Dehdashti F et al (2007) The standardized uptake value for F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose is a sensitive predictive biomarker for cervical cancer treatment response and survival. Cancer 110:1738–1744PubMedCrossRef Kidd EA, Siegel BA, Dehdashti F et al (2007) The standardized uptake value for F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose is a sensitive predictive biomarker for cervical cancer treatment response and survival. Cancer 110:1738–1744PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Kato H, Nakajima M, Sohda M et al (2009) The clinical application of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to predict survival in patients with operable esophageal cancer. Cancer 115:3196–3203PubMedCrossRef Kato H, Nakajima M, Sohda M et al (2009) The clinical application of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to predict survival in patients with operable esophageal cancer. Cancer 115:3196–3203PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Vander Heiden MG, Cantley LC, Thompson CB (2009) Understanding the Warburg effect: the metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Science 324:1029–1033PubMedCrossRef Vander Heiden MG, Cantley LC, Thompson CB (2009) Understanding the Warburg effect: the metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Science 324:1029–1033PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
18F-FDG Uptake at Initial Staging of the Adrenocortical Cancers: A Diagnostic Tool but Not of Prognostic Value
Authors
L. Tessonnier
C. Ansquer
C. Bournaud
F. Sebag
E. Mirallié
J. C. Lifante
F. F. Palazzo
I. Morange
D. Drui
C. de la Foucardère
J. Mancini
D. Taïeb
Publication date
01-01-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 1/2013
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-012-1802-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2013

World Journal of Surgery 1/2013 Go to the issue