Published in:
01-05-2012
Resection and Primary Anastomosis without Diverting Ileostomy for Left Colon Emergencies: Is it a Safe Procedure?
Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 5/2012
Login to get accessAbstract
Introduction
Large-bowel obstruction and perforation are still frequently occurring entities for the acute care surgeon. In these cases, Hartmann’s procedure is the most commonly used surgical technique. However, recent papers demonstrate that colon resection and primary anastomosis (RPA) in the emergency setting is a safe and feasible procedure. We present our series of left colon resection and primary anastomosis procedures from Torrevieja Hospital (Alicante, Spain), performed without bowel irrigation or a diverting ileostomy.
Materials and methods
Thirty-two RPA procedures were performed in emergency settings for perforation or obstruction, or both, during an 18-month period. The following data were prospectively collected: age, gender, nationality, diagnoses, ASA score, body mass index (BMI), POSSUM score (Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enumeration of Mortality and morbidity), and the score according to the Hinchey classification. Furthermore, duration of the operation, length of postoperative hospital stay, and mortality and morbidity data were recorded.
Results
Sixteen of these patients were diagnosed with acute diverticulitis, 14 patients with neoplasm (of which 9 cases had obstruction, 2 cases had perforation, and 3 cases had both), and foreign body perforation in the remaining 2 cases. The mean hospital stay was 7.8 (range, 4–10) days. The physiological POSSUM score was 24.4 (range, 15–39), and the surgical POSSUM score was 19.8 (range, 16–24). None of the patients died (0% mortality). Seven patients developed some kind of complication (21.9%), all of which were managed conservatively.
Conclusions
The results of this study suggest that RPA for left colon obstruction and perforation in emergency settings can be safely performed in certain surgical conditions.