Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 4/2012

01-04-2012

A Mathematical Model for Predicting Malignancy of Solitary Pulmonary Nodules

Authors: Yun Li, Jun Wang

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 4/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The goal of the present study was to differentiate between benign and malignant solitary pulmonary nodules (SPN) by developing a mathematical prediction model.

Methods

Records from 371 patients (197 male, 174 female) with SPN between January 2000 and September 2009 were reviewed (group A). Clinical data were collected to estimate the independent predictors of malignancy of SPN with multivariate logistic regression analysis. A clinical prediction model was subsequently developed. Between October 2009 and May 2011, data from an additional 145 patients with SPN were used to validate this new clinical prediction model (group B). The same data were also estimated with two previously published models for comparison with our new model.

Results

The median patient age was 57.1 years in group A; 54% of the nodules were malignant and 46% were benign. Logistic regression analysis identified six clinical characteristics (age, diameter, border, calcification, spiculation, and family history of tumor) as independent predictors of malignancy in patients with SPN. The area under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve for our model (0.874 ± 0.028) was higher than those generated using the other two reported models. In our model, sensitivity = 94.5%, specificity = 70.0%, positive predictive value = 87.8%, and negative predictive value = 84.8%).

Conclusions

Age, diameter, border, calcification, spiculation, and family history of tumor were independent predictors of malignancy in patients with SPN. Our prediction model was sufficient to estimate malignancy in patients with SPN and proved to be more accurate than the two existing models.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Soubani AO (2008) The evaluation and management of the solitary pulmonary nodule. Postgrad Med J 84:459–466PubMedCrossRef Soubani AO (2008) The evaluation and management of the solitary pulmonary nodule. Postgrad Med J 84:459–466PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Ost D, Fein AM, Feinsilver SH (2003) Clinical practice. The solitary pulmonary nodule. N Engl J Med 348:2535–2542PubMedCrossRef Ost D, Fein AM, Feinsilver SH (2003) Clinical practice. The solitary pulmonary nodule. N Engl J Med 348:2535–2542PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Erasmus JJ, Connolly JE, McAdams HP et al (2000) Solitary pulmonary nodules: part I. Morphologic evaluation for differentiation of benign and malignant lesions. Radiographics 20:43–58PubMed Erasmus JJ, Connolly JE, McAdams HP et al (2000) Solitary pulmonary nodules: part I. Morphologic evaluation for differentiation of benign and malignant lesions. Radiographics 20:43–58PubMed
4.
go back to reference Bateson EM (1965) An analysis of 155 solitary lung lesions illustrating the differential diagnosis of mixed tumours of the lung. Clin Radiol 16:51–65PubMedCrossRef Bateson EM (1965) An analysis of 155 solitary lung lesions illustrating the differential diagnosis of mixed tumours of the lung. Clin Radiol 16:51–65PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Zerhouni EA, Stitik FP, Siegelman SS et al (1986) CT of the pulmonary nodule: a cooperative study. Radiology 160:319–327PubMed Zerhouni EA, Stitik FP, Siegelman SS et al (1986) CT of the pulmonary nodule: a cooperative study. Radiology 160:319–327PubMed
6.
go back to reference Mahoney MC, Shipley RT, Corcoran HL et al (1990) CT demonstration of calcification in carcinoma of the lung. AJR Am J Roentgenol 154:255–258PubMed Mahoney MC, Shipley RT, Corcoran HL et al (1990) CT demonstration of calcification in carcinoma of the lung. AJR Am J Roentgenol 154:255–258PubMed
7.
go back to reference Khan A, Herman PG, Vorwerk P et al (1991) Solitary pulmonary nodules: comparison of classification with standard, thin-section, and reference phantom CT. Radiology 179:477–481PubMed Khan A, Herman PG, Vorwerk P et al (1991) Solitary pulmonary nodules: comparison of classification with standard, thin-section, and reference phantom CT. Radiology 179:477–481PubMed
8.
go back to reference Swensen SJ, Silverstein MD, Edell ES et al (1999) Solitary pulmonary nodules: clinical prediction model versus physicians. Mayo Clin Proc 74:319–329PubMedCrossRef Swensen SJ, Silverstein MD, Edell ES et al (1999) Solitary pulmonary nodules: clinical prediction model versus physicians. Mayo Clin Proc 74:319–329PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Swensen SJ, Silverstein MD, Llstrup DM et al (1997) The probability of malignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules. Application to small radiologically indeterminate nodules. Arch Intern Med 157:849–855PubMedCrossRef Swensen SJ, Silverstein MD, Llstrup DM et al (1997) The probability of malignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules. Application to small radiologically indeterminate nodules. Arch Intern Med 157:849–855PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Gould MK, Ananth L, Barnett PG et al (2007) A clinical model to estimate the pretest probability of lung cancer in patients with solitary pulmonary nodules. Chest 131:383–388PubMedCrossRef Gould MK, Ananth L, Barnett PG et al (2007) A clinical model to estimate the pretest probability of lung cancer in patients with solitary pulmonary nodules. Chest 131:383–388PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Nakamura K, Yoshida H, Engelmann R et al (2000) Computerized analysis of the likelihood of malignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules with use of artificial neural networks. Radiology 214:823–830PubMed Nakamura K, Yoshida H, Engelmann R et al (2000) Computerized analysis of the likelihood of malignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules with use of artificial neural networks. Radiology 214:823–830PubMed
12.
go back to reference Gurney JW (1993) Determining the likelihood of malignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules with Bayesian analysis. Part I. Theory. Radiology 186:405–413PubMed Gurney JW (1993) Determining the likelihood of malignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules with Bayesian analysis. Part I. Theory. Radiology 186:405–413PubMed
13.
go back to reference Mery CM, Pappas AN, Bueno R et al (2004) Relationship between a history of antecedent cancer and the probability of malignancy for a solitary pulmonary nodule. Chest 125:2175–2181PubMedCrossRef Mery CM, Pappas AN, Bueno R et al (2004) Relationship between a history of antecedent cancer and the probability of malignancy for a solitary pulmonary nodule. Chest 125:2175–2181PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Zhang Y, Ding J-A (2006) Benign and malignant solitary pulmonary nodule: analysis of risk factors. Chin J Clin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 13:162–165 Zhang Y, Ding J-A (2006) Benign and malignant solitary pulmonary nodule: analysis of risk factors. Chin J Clin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 13:162–165
15.
go back to reference MacMahon H, Austin JH, Gamsu G et al (2005) Guidelines for management of small pulmonary nodules detected on CT scans: a statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology 237:395–400PubMedCrossRef MacMahon H, Austin JH, Gamsu G et al (2005) Guidelines for management of small pulmonary nodules detected on CT scans: a statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology 237:395–400PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Seemann MD, Seemann O, Luboldt W et al (2000) Differentiation of malignant from benign solitary pulmonary lesions using chest radiography, spiral CT and HRCT. Lung Cancer 29:105–124PubMedCrossRef Seemann MD, Seemann O, Luboldt W et al (2000) Differentiation of malignant from benign solitary pulmonary lesions using chest radiography, spiral CT and HRCT. Lung Cancer 29:105–124PubMedCrossRef
19.
20.
go back to reference Perera FP (2000) Molecular epidemiology: on the path to prevention? J Natl Cancer Inst 92:602–612PubMedCrossRef Perera FP (2000) Molecular epidemiology: on the path to prevention? J Natl Cancer Inst 92:602–612PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Hemminki K, Mutanen P (2001) Genetic epidemiology of multistage carcinogenesis. Mutat Res 473:11–21PubMedCrossRef Hemminki K, Mutanen P (2001) Genetic epidemiology of multistage carcinogenesis. Mutat Res 473:11–21PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Vazquez M, Carter D, Brambilla E et al (2009) Solitary and multiple resected adenocarcinomas after CT screening for lung cancer: histopathologic features and their prognostic implications. Lung Cancer 64:148–154PubMedCrossRef Vazquez M, Carter D, Brambilla E et al (2009) Solitary and multiple resected adenocarcinomas after CT screening for lung cancer: histopathologic features and their prognostic implications. Lung Cancer 64:148–154PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Varoli F, Vergani C, Caminiti R et al (2008) Management of solitary pulmonary nodule. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 33:461–465PubMedCrossRef Varoli F, Vergani C, Caminiti R et al (2008) Management of solitary pulmonary nodule. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 33:461–465PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Wahidi MM, Govert JA, Goudar RK et al (2007) Evidence for the treatment of patients with pulmonary nodules: when is it lung cancer? ACCP Evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines, 2nd edn. Chest 132(3 Suppl):94S–107SPubMedCrossRef Wahidi MM, Govert JA, Goudar RK et al (2007) Evidence for the treatment of patients with pulmonary nodules: when is it lung cancer? ACCP Evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines, 2nd edn. Chest 132(3 Suppl):94S–107SPubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
A Mathematical Model for Predicting Malignancy of Solitary Pulmonary Nodules
Authors
Yun Li
Jun Wang
Publication date
01-04-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 4/2012
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-012-1449-8

Other articles of this Issue 4/2012

World Journal of Surgery 4/2012 Go to the issue