Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 10/2011

Open Access 01-10-2011

Delayed Primary Closure of the Septic Open Abdomen with a Dynamic Closure System

Authors: Froukje J. Verdam, Dennis E. J. G. J. Dolmans, Maarten J. Loos, Menno H. Raber, Ralph J. de Wit, Jan A. Charbon, Jos P. A. M. Vroemen

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 10/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The major challenge in the management of patients with an infected open abdomen (OA) is to control septic peritonitis and intra-abdominal fluid secretion, and to facilitate repeated abdominal exploration, while preserving the fascia for delayed primary closure. We here present a novel method for closure of the infected OA, based on continuous dynamic tension, in order to achieve re-approximation of the fascial edges of the abdominal wall.

Methods

Eighteen cases with severe peritonitis of various origin (e.g., gastrointestinal perforations, anastomotic leakage) were primarily stabilized by laparostomy, sealed with either the vacuum-assisted closure abdominal dressing or the Bogotá bag. After hemodynamic stabilization and control of the sepsis, the Abdominal Re-approximation Anchor System (ABRA; Canica Design, Almonte, Ontario, Canada) was applied. This system approximates the wound margins through dynamic traction exerted by transfascial elastomers. Before ABRA application, 5/18 patients had a grade 2B, 2/18 a grade 3, and 11/18 a grade or 4 status according to the open abdomen classification of Björck.

Results

In this severely ill population the mean time before ABRA system application was 12 days (range: 2–39 days). Two of 18 patients died of non-ABRA-related causes within three weeks. In 14 of the remaining 16 patients (88%) primary abdominal closure of the midline was accomplished in 15 days (range: 7–30 days). The other two patients needed a component separation technique according to Ramirez to reach closure. However, secondary wound dehiscence occurred in both these patients. Two thirds of patients (12/18) developed pressure sores to the skin and/or dermis, but all healed without further complications. During outpatient clinic follow-up, 4/14 successfully closed patients still developed a midline hernia.

Conclusions

Delayed primary closure of OA in septic patients could be achieved in 88% with this new approximation system. However, the risk of hernia development remained. We consider this system a useful tool in the treatment of septic patients with an open abdomen.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Diaz JJ Jr, Cullinane DC, Dutton WD et al (2010) The management of the open abdomen in trauma and emergency general surgery: part 1-damage control. J Trauma: 68:1425–1438CrossRef Diaz JJ Jr, Cullinane DC, Dutton WD et al (2010) The management of the open abdomen in trauma and emergency general surgery: part 1-damage control. J Trauma: 68:1425–1438CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Kaplan M (2004) Managing the open abdomen. Ostomy Wound Manage 50:C2, 1–8, quiz 1p following 8 Kaplan M (2004) Managing the open abdomen. Ostomy Wound Manage 50:C2, 1–8, quiz 1p following 8
3.
go back to reference Balogh Z, McKinley BA, Holcomb JB et al (2003) Both primary and secondary abdominal compartment syndrome can be predicted early and are harbingers of multiple organ failure. J Trauma 54:848–859 discussion 859–861PubMedCrossRef Balogh Z, McKinley BA, Holcomb JB et al (2003) Both primary and secondary abdominal compartment syndrome can be predicted early and are harbingers of multiple organ failure. J Trauma 54:848–859 discussion 859–861PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Gaddnas F, Saarnio J, Ala-Kokko T et al (2007) Continuous retention suture for the management of open abdomen: a high rate of delayed fascial closure. Scand J Surg: 96:301–307 Gaddnas F, Saarnio J, Ala-Kokko T et al (2007) Continuous retention suture for the management of open abdomen: a high rate of delayed fascial closure. Scand J Surg: 96:301–307
5.
go back to reference Perez D, Wildi S, Demartines N et al (2007) Prospective evaluation of vacuum-assisted closure in abdominal compartment syndrome and severe abdominal sepsis. J Am Coll Surg: 205:192–586CrossRef Perez D, Wildi S, Demartines N et al (2007) Prospective evaluation of vacuum-assisted closure in abdominal compartment syndrome and severe abdominal sepsis. J Am Coll Surg: 205:192–586CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Nicholas JM, Rix EP, Easley KA et al (2003) Changing patterns in the management of penetrating abdominal trauma: the more things change, the more they stay the same. J Trauma 55:1095–1108 discussion 1108–1110PubMedCrossRef Nicholas JM, Rix EP, Easley KA et al (2003) Changing patterns in the management of penetrating abdominal trauma: the more things change, the more they stay the same. J Trauma 55:1095–1108 discussion 1108–1110PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Boele van Hensbroek P, Wind J, Dijkgraaf MG et al (2009) Temporary closure of the open abdomen: a systematic review on delayed primary fascial closure in patients with an open abdomen. World J Surg 33:199–207PubMedCrossRef Boele van Hensbroek P, Wind J, Dijkgraaf MG et al (2009) Temporary closure of the open abdomen: a systematic review on delayed primary fascial closure in patients with an open abdomen. World J Surg 33:199–207PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Tsuei BJ, Skinner JC, Bernard AC et al (2004) The open peritoneal cavity: etiology correlates with the likelihood of fascial closure. Am Surg 70:652–656PubMed Tsuei BJ, Skinner JC, Bernard AC et al (2004) The open peritoneal cavity: etiology correlates with the likelihood of fascial closure. Am Surg 70:652–656PubMed
9.
go back to reference Reimer MW, Yelle JD, Reitsma B et al (2008) Management of open abdominal wounds with a dynamic fascial closure system. Can J Surg 51:209–214PubMed Reimer MW, Yelle JD, Reitsma B et al (2008) Management of open abdominal wounds with a dynamic fascial closure system. Can J Surg 51:209–214PubMed
10.
go back to reference Urbaniak RM, Khuthaila DK, Khalil AJ et al (2006) Closure of massive abdominal wall defects: a case report using the abdominal reapproximation anchor (ABRA) system. Ann Plast Surg 57:573–577PubMedCrossRef Urbaniak RM, Khuthaila DK, Khalil AJ et al (2006) Closure of massive abdominal wall defects: a case report using the abdominal reapproximation anchor (ABRA) system. Ann Plast Surg 57:573–577PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Bosscha K, Reijnders K, Hulstaert PF et al (1997) Prognostic scoring systems to predict outcome in peritonitis and intra-abdominal sepsis. Br J Surg 84:1532–1534PubMedCrossRef Bosscha K, Reijnders K, Hulstaert PF et al (1997) Prognostic scoring systems to predict outcome in peritonitis and intra-abdominal sepsis. Br J Surg 84:1532–1534PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Björck M, Bruhin A, Cheatham M et al (2009) Classification—important step to improve management of patients with an open abdomen. World J Surg 33:1154–1157PubMedCrossRef Björck M, Bruhin A, Cheatham M et al (2009) Classification—important step to improve management of patients with an open abdomen. World J Surg 33:1154–1157PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Barczak CA, Barnett RI, Childs EJ et al (1997) Fourth national pressure ulcer prevalence survey. Adv Wound Care 10:18–26PubMed Barczak CA, Barnett RI, Childs EJ et al (1997) Fourth national pressure ulcer prevalence survey. Adv Wound Care 10:18–26PubMed
14.
go back to reference Ramirez OM, Ruas E, Dellon AL (1990) “Components separation” method for closure of abdominal-wall defects: an anatomic and clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg 86:519–526PubMedCrossRef Ramirez OM, Ruas E, Dellon AL (1990) “Components separation” method for closure of abdominal-wall defects: an anatomic and clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg 86:519–526PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Padalino P, Dionigi G, Minoja G et al (2010) Fascia-to-fascia closure with abdominal topical negative pressure for severe abdominal infections: preliminary results in a department of general surgery and intensive care unit. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 11:523–528CrossRef Padalino P, Dionigi G, Minoja G et al (2010) Fascia-to-fascia closure with abdominal topical negative pressure for severe abdominal infections: preliminary results in a department of general surgery and intensive care unit. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 11:523–528CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Wondberg D, Larusson HJ, Metzger U et al (2008) Treatment of the open abdomen with the commercially available vacuum-assisted closure system in patients with abdominal sepsis: low primary closure rate. World J Surg 32:2724–2729PubMedCrossRef Wondberg D, Larusson HJ, Metzger U et al (2008) Treatment of the open abdomen with the commercially available vacuum-assisted closure system in patients with abdominal sepsis: low primary closure rate. World J Surg 32:2724–2729PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Schecter WP, Ivatury RR, Rotondo MF et al (2006) Open abdomen after trauma and abdominal sepsis: a strategy for management. J Am Coll Surg 203:390–396PubMedCrossRef Schecter WP, Ivatury RR, Rotondo MF et al (2006) Open abdomen after trauma and abdominal sepsis: a strategy for management. J Am Coll Surg 203:390–396PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Cothren CC, Moore EE, Johnson JL et al (2006) One hundred percent fascial approximation with sequential abdominal closure of the open abdomen. Am J Surg 192:238–242PubMedCrossRef Cothren CC, Moore EE, Johnson JL et al (2006) One hundred percent fascial approximation with sequential abdominal closure of the open abdomen. Am J Surg 192:238–242PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Acosta S, Bjarnason T, Petersson U et al (2011) Multicentre prospective study of fascial closure rate after open abdomen with vacuum and mesh-mediated fascial traction. Br J Surg: 98:735–743CrossRef Acosta S, Bjarnason T, Petersson U et al (2011) Multicentre prospective study of fascial closure rate after open abdomen with vacuum and mesh-mediated fascial traction. Br J Surg: 98:735–743CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Campbell A, Chang M, Fabian T et al (2009) Management of the open abdomen: from initial operation to definitive closure. Am Surg: 75:S1–S22 Campbell A, Chang M, Fabian T et al (2009) Management of the open abdomen: from initial operation to definitive closure. Am Surg: 75:S1–S22
21.
go back to reference Koss W, Ho HC, Yu M et al (2009) Preventing loss of domain: a management strategy for closure of the “open abdomen” during the initial hospitalization. J Surg Educ 66:89–95PubMedCrossRef Koss W, Ho HC, Yu M et al (2009) Preventing loss of domain: a management strategy for closure of the “open abdomen” during the initial hospitalization. J Surg Educ 66:89–95PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Gracias VH, Braslow B, Johnson J et al (2002) Abdominal compartment syndrome in the open abdomen. Arch Surg 137:1298–1300PubMedCrossRef Gracias VH, Braslow B, Johnson J et al (2002) Abdominal compartment syndrome in the open abdomen. Arch Surg 137:1298–1300PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Howdieshell TR, Proctor CD, Sternberg E et al (2004) Temporary abdominal closure followed by definitive abdominal wall reconstruction of the open abdomen. Am J Surg 188:301–306PubMedCrossRef Howdieshell TR, Proctor CD, Sternberg E et al (2004) Temporary abdominal closure followed by definitive abdominal wall reconstruction of the open abdomen. Am J Surg 188:301–306PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Delayed Primary Closure of the Septic Open Abdomen with a Dynamic Closure System
Authors
Froukje J. Verdam
Dennis E. J. G. J. Dolmans
Maarten J. Loos
Menno H. Raber
Ralph J. de Wit
Jan A. Charbon
Jos P. A. M. Vroemen
Publication date
01-10-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 10/2011
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-011-1210-8

Other articles of this Issue 10/2011

World Journal of Surgery 10/2011 Go to the issue