Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 7/2011

01-07-2011

Male Gender is a Risk Factor for Recurrent Appendicitis Following Nonoperative Treatment

Authors: Wan-Ching Lien, Wen-Chung Lee, Hsiu-Po Wang, Yi-Chu Chen, Kao-Lang Liu, Chien-Jen Chen

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 7/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

This prospective study investigates recurrence rates and identifies predictive factors for recurrence following successful nonoperative treatment in adult patients with acute appendicitis.

Methods

Between January 2003 and December 2009, adult patients with acute appendicitis who received successful nonoperative management were enrolled. Cumulative recurrence rates were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Recurrence-free curves were compared using with the log-rank test. Cox regression models were employed to identify parameters that significantly and independently predict recurrence.

Results

During the study period, 128 patients were enrolled. The median follow-up period was 12 months (range = 1-90 months). Twenty (16%) patients developed recurrent appendicitis during follow-up. Twenty-one (16%) patients underwent interval appendectomy (IA). There was no significant difference between nonperforated (NPA) and perforated appendicitis (PA) groups with respect to recurrence rates (16% at the 9th month). Moreover, male gender was significantly associated with recurrence (HR 3.45; 95% CI, 1.15-10.39). Analytical results remained significant after excluding IA patients.

Conclusions

Since the recurrence rate is similar between NPA and PA, nonoperative treatment can be used for PA patients. Roughly 20% of the adult patients selected for nonoperative treatment experienced recurrence. Males were more susceptible than females to recurrent appendicitis.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Fitz R (1886) Perforating inflammation of the vermiform appendix. Am J Med Sci 92:321–346 Fitz R (1886) Perforating inflammation of the vermiform appendix. Am J Med Sci 92:321–346
2.
go back to reference McBurney C (1889) Experiences with early operative interference in cases of disease of the vermiform appendix. N Y Med J 50:676–684 McBurney C (1889) Experiences with early operative interference in cases of disease of the vermiform appendix. N Y Med J 50:676–684
3.
go back to reference Lasson A, Lundagards J, Loren I et al (2002) Appendiceal abscesses: primary percutaneous drainage and selective interval appendectomy. Eur J Surg 168:264–269PubMedCrossRef Lasson A, Lundagards J, Loren I et al (2002) Appendiceal abscesses: primary percutaneous drainage and selective interval appendectomy. Eur J Surg 168:264–269PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Styrud J, Eriksson S, Nilsson I et al (2006) Appendectomy versus antibiotic treatment in acute appendicitis. A prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial. World J Surg 30:1033–1037PubMedCrossRef Styrud J, Eriksson S, Nilsson I et al (2006) Appendectomy versus antibiotic treatment in acute appendicitis. A prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial. World J Surg 30:1033–1037PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Hansson J, Körner U, Khorram-Manesh A et al (2009) Randomized clinical trial of antibiotic therapy versus appendicectomy as primary treatment of acute appendicitis in unselected patients. Br J Surg 96:473–481PubMedCrossRef Hansson J, Körner U, Khorram-Manesh A et al (2009) Randomized clinical trial of antibiotic therapy versus appendicectomy as primary treatment of acute appendicitis in unselected patients. Br J Surg 96:473–481PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Campbell MR, Johnston SL, Marshburn T et al (2003) Nonoperative treatment of suspected appendicitis in remote medical care environments: implications for future spaceflight medical care. J Am Coll Surg 198:822–830CrossRef Campbell MR, Johnston SL, Marshburn T et al (2003) Nonoperative treatment of suspected appendicitis in remote medical care environments: implications for future spaceflight medical care. J Am Coll Surg 198:822–830CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ho C, Chen Y, Lai H et al (2004) Comparison of critical conservative treatment versus emergency operation in children with ruptured appendicitis with tumor formation. J Formos Med Assoc 103:359–363PubMed Ho C, Chen Y, Lai H et al (2004) Comparison of critical conservative treatment versus emergency operation in children with ruptured appendicitis with tumor formation. J Formos Med Assoc 103:359–363PubMed
9.
go back to reference Emil S, Duong S (2007) Antibiotic therapy and interval appendectomy for perforated appendicitis in children: a selective approach. Am Surg 73:917–922PubMed Emil S, Duong S (2007) Antibiotic therapy and interval appendectomy for perforated appendicitis in children: a selective approach. Am Surg 73:917–922PubMed
10.
go back to reference Varadhan KK, Humes Dj, Neal KR et al (2010) Antibiotic therapy versus appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a meta-analysis. World J Surg 34:199–209PubMedCrossRef Varadhan KK, Humes Dj, Neal KR et al (2010) Antibiotic therapy versus appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a meta-analysis. World J Surg 34:199–209PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Simillis C, Symeonides P, Shorthouse AJ et al (2010) A meta-analysis comparing conservative treatment versus acute appendectomy for complicated appendicitis (abscess or phlegmon). Surgery 147:818–829PubMedCrossRef Simillis C, Symeonides P, Shorthouse AJ et al (2010) A meta-analysis comparing conservative treatment versus acute appendectomy for complicated appendicitis (abscess or phlegmon). Surgery 147:818–829PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Mazziotti M, Marley E, Winthrop P et al (1997) Histopathologic analysis of interval appendectomy specimens: support for the role of interval appendectomy. J Pediatr Surg 32:806–809PubMedCrossRef Mazziotti M, Marley E, Winthrop P et al (1997) Histopathologic analysis of interval appendectomy specimens: support for the role of interval appendectomy. J Pediatr Surg 32:806–809PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Samuel M, Holmes K (2002) Prospective evaluation of nonsurgical versus surgical management of appendiceal mass. J Pediatr Surg 37:882–886PubMedCrossRef Samuel M, Holmes K (2002) Prospective evaluation of nonsurgical versus surgical management of appendiceal mass. J Pediatr Surg 37:882–886PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Price MR, Hasse GM, Sartorelli KH et al (1996) Recurrent appendicitis after initial conservative treatment of appendiceal abscess. J Pediatr Surg 31:291–294PubMedCrossRef Price MR, Hasse GM, Sartorelli KH et al (1996) Recurrent appendicitis after initial conservative treatment of appendiceal abscess. J Pediatr Surg 31:291–294PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Tsai H, Shan Y, Lin P et al (2006) Clinical analysis of the predictive factors for recurrent appendicitis after initial nonoperative treatment of perforated appendicitis. Am J Surg 192:311–316PubMedCrossRef Tsai H, Shan Y, Lin P et al (2006) Clinical analysis of the predictive factors for recurrent appendicitis after initial nonoperative treatment of perforated appendicitis. Am J Surg 192:311–316PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Friedell M, Perez-Izquierdo M (2000) Is there a role for interval appendectomy in the management of acute appendicitis? Am Surg 66:1158–1162PubMed Friedell M, Perez-Izquierdo M (2000) Is there a role for interval appendectomy in the management of acute appendicitis? Am Surg 66:1158–1162PubMed
17.
go back to reference Whyte C, Levin T, Harris B (2008) Early decisions in perforated appendicitis in children: lessons from a study of nonoperative management. J Pediatr Surg 43:1459–1463PubMedCrossRef Whyte C, Levin T, Harris B (2008) Early decisions in perforated appendicitis in children: lessons from a study of nonoperative management. J Pediatr Surg 43:1459–1463PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Oliak D, Sinow R, French S et al (1999) Computed tomography scanning for the diagnosis of perforated appendicitis. Am Surg 65:959–964PubMed Oliak D, Sinow R, French S et al (1999) Computed tomography scanning for the diagnosis of perforated appendicitis. Am Surg 65:959–964PubMed
19.
go back to reference Tsukada K, Miyazaki T, Katoh H et al (2004) CT is useful for identifying patients with complicated appendicitis. Dig Liver Dis 36:195–198PubMedCrossRef Tsukada K, Miyazaki T, Katoh H et al (2004) CT is useful for identifying patients with complicated appendicitis. Dig Liver Dis 36:195–198PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Bufo A, Shah R, Li M et al (1998) Interval appendectomy for perforated appendicitis in children. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 8:209–214PubMedCrossRef Bufo A, Shah R, Li M et al (1998) Interval appendectomy for perforated appendicitis in children. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 8:209–214PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Stelzmueller I, Bonatti H, Dunst K (2009) Recurrent appendicitis after conservative management of perityphlitic abscess: report of two cases. Int Surg 94:27–30PubMed Stelzmueller I, Bonatti H, Dunst K (2009) Recurrent appendicitis after conservative management of perityphlitic abscess: report of two cases. Int Surg 94:27–30PubMed
22.
go back to reference Livingston EH, Woodward WA, Sarosi GA et al (2007) Disconnect between incidence of nonperforated and perforated appendicitis: implications for pathophysiology and management. Ann Surg 245:886–892PubMedCrossRef Livingston EH, Woodward WA, Sarosi GA et al (2007) Disconnect between incidence of nonperforated and perforated appendicitis: implications for pathophysiology and management. Ann Surg 245:886–892PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Henry MC, Gollin G, Islam S et al (2007) Matched analysis of nonoperative management vs immediate appendectomy for perforated appendicitis. J Pediatr Surg 42:19–24PubMedCrossRef Henry MC, Gollin G, Islam S et al (2007) Matched analysis of nonoperative management vs immediate appendectomy for perforated appendicitis. J Pediatr Surg 42:19–24PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Aprahamian CJ, Barnhart DC, Bledsoe SE et al (2007) Failure in the nonoperative management of pediatric ruptured appendicitis: predictors and consequences. J Pediatr Surg 42:934–938PubMedCrossRef Aprahamian CJ, Barnhart DC, Bledsoe SE et al (2007) Failure in the nonoperative management of pediatric ruptured appendicitis: predictors and consequences. J Pediatr Surg 42:934–938PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Brown CV, Abrishami M, Muller M, Velmahos GC (2003) Appendiceal abscess: immediate operation or percutaneous drainage? Am Surg 69:829–832PubMed Brown CV, Abrishami M, Muller M, Velmahos GC (2003) Appendiceal abscess: immediate operation or percutaneous drainage? Am Surg 69:829–832PubMed
26.
go back to reference Andersson RE, Petzold MG (2007) Nonsurgical treatment of appendiceal abscess or phlegmon. Ann Surg 246:741–748PubMedCrossRef Andersson RE, Petzold MG (2007) Nonsurgical treatment of appendiceal abscess or phlegmon. Ann Surg 246:741–748PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Hoffmann J, Lindhard A, Jensen H (1984) Appendix mass: conservative management without interval appendectomy. Am J Surg 148:379–382PubMedCrossRef Hoffmann J, Lindhard A, Jensen H (1984) Appendix mass: conservative management without interval appendectomy. Am J Surg 148:379–382PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Migeon BR (2006) The role of X-inactivation and cellular mosaicism in women’s health and sex-specific diseases. JAMA 295:1428–1433PubMedCrossRef Migeon BR (2006) The role of X-inactivation and cellular mosaicism in women’s health and sex-specific diseases. JAMA 295:1428–1433PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Ross M, Grafham D, Coffey A et al (2005) The DNA sequence of the human X chromosome. Nature 434:325–337PubMedCrossRef Ross M, Grafham D, Coffey A et al (2005) The DNA sequence of the human X chromosome. Nature 434:325–337PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Sadr Azodi O, Andrén-Sandberg A, Larsson H (2009) Genetic and environmental influences on the risk of acute appendicitis in twins. Br J Surg 96:1336–1340PubMedCrossRef Sadr Azodi O, Andrén-Sandberg A, Larsson H (2009) Genetic and environmental influences on the risk of acute appendicitis in twins. Br J Surg 96:1336–1340PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Wong M, Jiang J, Griffiths S (2010) Factors associated with antihypertensive drug compliance in 83, 884 Chinese patients: a cohort study. J Epidemiol Community Health 64:895–901PubMedCrossRef Wong M, Jiang J, Griffiths S (2010) Factors associated with antihypertensive drug compliance in 83, 884 Chinese patients: a cohort study. J Epidemiol Community Health 64:895–901PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Kriegshauser K, Sajatovic M, Jenkins J et al (2010) Gender differences in subjective experience and treatment of bipolar disorder. J Nerv Ment Dis 198:370–372PubMedCrossRef Kriegshauser K, Sajatovic M, Jenkins J et al (2010) Gender differences in subjective experience and treatment of bipolar disorder. J Nerv Ment Dis 198:370–372PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Kaminski A, Liu IA, Applebaum H et al (2005) Routine interval appendectomy is not justified after initial nonoperative treatment of acute appendicitis. Arch Surg 140:897–901PubMedCrossRef Kaminski A, Liu IA, Applebaum H et al (2005) Routine interval appendectomy is not justified after initial nonoperative treatment of acute appendicitis. Arch Surg 140:897–901PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Tekin AKH, Can I, Oztan S (2007) Routine interval appendectomy is unnecessary after conservative treatment of appendiceal mass. Colorectal Dis 10:465–468 Tekin AKH, Can I, Oztan S (2007) Routine interval appendectomy is unnecessary after conservative treatment of appendiceal mass. Colorectal Dis 10:465–468
Metadata
Title
Male Gender is a Risk Factor for Recurrent Appendicitis Following Nonoperative Treatment
Authors
Wan-Ching Lien
Wen-Chung Lee
Hsiu-Po Wang
Yi-Chu Chen
Kao-Lang Liu
Chien-Jen Chen
Publication date
01-07-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 7/2011
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-011-1132-5

Other articles of this Issue 7/2011

World Journal of Surgery 7/2011 Go to the issue